Sequential Colocalization of ERa, PR, and AR Hormone Receptors Using Confocal Microscopy Enables New Insights into Normal Breast and Prostate Tissue and Cancers.

Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) use markers staining different cell populations applying widefield optical microscopy. Resolution is low not resolving subcellular co-localization. We sought to colocalize markers at subcellular level with antibodies validated for clinical diagnosis, including the single secondary antibody (combination of anti-rabbit/mouse-antibodies) used for diagnostic IHC with any primary antibody, and confocal microscopy. We explore colocalization in the nucleus (ColNu) of nuclear hormone receptors (ERa, PR, and AR) along with the baseline marker p63 in paired samples of breast and prostate tissues. We established ColNu mIHCF as a reliable technique easily implemented in a hospital setting. In ERa+ breast cancer, we identified different colocalization patterns (nuclear or cytoplasmatic) with PR and AR on the luminal epithelium. A triple-negative breast-cancer case expressed membrane-only ERa. A PR-only case was double positive PR/p63. In normal prostate, we identified an ERa+/p63+/AR-negative distinct population. All prostate cancer cases characteristically expressed ERa on the apical membrane of the AR+ epithelium. We confirmed this using ERa IHC and needle-core biopsies. ColNu mIHCF is feasible and already revealed a new marker for prostate cancer and identified sub-patterns in breast cancer. It could be useful for pathology as well as for functional studies in normal prostate and breast tissues.

Thyroid Papillary Microtumor: Validation of the (Updated) Porto Proposal Assessing Sex Hormone Receptor Expression and Mutational BRAF Gene Status.

Given the high incidence and excellent prognosis of many papillary thyroid microcarcinomas, the Porto proposal uses the designation papillary microtumor (PMT) for papillary microcarcinomas (PMCs) without risk factors to minimize overtreatment and patients' stress. To validate Porto proposal criteria, we examined a series of 190 PMC series, also studying sex hormone receptors and BRAF mutation. Our updated Porto proposal (uPp) reclassifies as PMT incidental PMCs found at thyroidectomy lacking the following criteria: (a) detected under the age of 19 years; (b) with multiple tumors measuring >1 cm adding up all diameters; and (c) with aggressive morphologic features (extrathyroidal extension, angioinvasion, tall, and/or hobnail cells). PMCs not fulfilling uPp criteria were considered "true" PMCs. A total of 102 PMCs were subclassified as PMT, 88 as PMC, with no age or sex differences between subgroups. Total thyroidectomy and iodine-131 therapy were significantly more common in PMC. After a median follow-up of 9.6 years, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and mortality were only found in the PMC subgroup. No subgroup differences were found in calcifications or desmoplasia. Expression of estrogen receptor-α and estrogen receptor-ß, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor was higher in PMC than in nontumorous thyroid tissue. BRAF mutations were detected in 44.7% of PMC, with no differences between subgroups. In surgical specimens, the uPp is a safe pathology tool to identify those PMC with extremely low malignant potential. This terminology could reduce psychological stress associated with cancer diagnosis, avoid overtreatment, and be incorporated into daily pathologic practice.

In search of an evidence-based strategy for quality assessment of human tissue samples: report of the tissue Biospecimen Research Working Group of the Spanish Biobank Network.

The purpose of the present work is to underline the importance of obtaining a standardized procedure to ensure and evaluate both clinical and research usability of human tissue samples. The study, which was carried out by the Biospecimen Science Working Group of the Spanish Biobank Network, is based on a general overview of the current situation about quality assurance in human tissue biospecimens. It was conducted an exhaustive review of the analytical techniques used to evaluate the quality of human tissue samples over the past 30 years, as well as their reference values if they were published, and classified them according to the biomolecules evaluated: (i) DNA, (ii) RNA, and (iii) soluble or/and fixed proteins for immunochemistry. More than 130 publications released between 1989 and 2019 were analysed, most of them reporting results focused on the analysis of tumour and biopsy samples. A quality assessment proposal with an algorithm has been developed for both frozen tissue samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, according to the expected quality of sample based on the available pre-analytical information and the experience of the participants in the Working Group. The high heterogeneity of human tissue samples and the wide number of pre-analytic factors associated to quality of samples makes it very difficult to harmonize the quality criteria. However, the proposed method to assess human tissue sample integrity and antigenicity will not only help to evaluate whether stored human tissue samples fit for the purpose of biomarker development, but will also allow to perform further studies, such as assessing the impact of different pre-analytical factors on very well characterized samples or evaluating the readjustment of tissue sample collection, processing and storing procedures. By ensuring the quality of the samples used on research, the reproducibility of scientific results will be guaranteed.