Last generation fluted modular titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty: a narrative review of mid- and long-term outcomes.

Background and Objective: Tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), were introduced to overcome proximal femur bone defects. They obtain stable fixation even in catastrophic proximal bone loss. Modular ones have the advantage to adjust length, rotation, off-set independently from the distal module. Short-term publications have been showing favorable outcomes burdened by an unacceptably high rate of stem failure. Still, there is a paucity of mid- and long-term reports. This narrative review aims at analyzing recent literature on modular TFTS with at least 5 years of minimum follow-up to gain a better understanding of implant survival, performance, and complications. Methods: A search of the PubMed database was performed with selected key terms. Results were screened after the application of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data were subsequently evaluated to obtain an up-to-date overview of the results and complications of TFTS. Key Content and Findings: Modular TFTS showed a consistent increase in patient reported outcomes that persists at 10 years and above. Femoral fractures were the most common intraoperative complication. Despite modularity, dislocation still occurs at a variable rate (1.2-12%). With revision for any cause as an endpoint, overall survival approaches 83% after 10 years of follow-up. If femoral revision only is evaluated, excellent survival rates (>95%) have been published. Stem subsidence over 5 mm was reported in less than 5% of patients, only 1 requiring femoral revision. The mean incidence of stem mechanical failure was 3.39%, although most breakages occurred in stems eventually retired from the market. Conclusions: Satisfactory survival rates were observed, with an acceptable rate of complications. Stem mechanical failure, excluding those stems eventually retired from the market, remains a marginal event. Therefore, the use of modular TFTS in revision surgery is safe and effective even in the long term.

What Is the Influence of Femoral Version on Size, Tear Location, and Tear Pattern of the Acetabular Labrum in Patients With FAI?

BACKGROUND: Femoral version deformities have recently been identified as a major contributor to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). An in-depth understanding of the specific labral damage patterns caused by femoral version deformities may help to understand the underlying pathomorphologies in symptomatic patients and select the appropriate surgical treatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Is there a correlation between femoral version and the mean cross-sectional area of the acetabular labrum? (2) Is there a difference in the location of lesions of the acetabular labrum between hips with increased femoral version and hips with decreased femoral version? (3) Is there a difference in the pattern of lesions of the acetabular labrum between hips with increased femoral version and hips with decreased femoral version? METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative study. Between November 2009 and September 2016, we evaluated 640 hips with FAI. We considered patients with complete diagnostic imaging including magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the affected hip with radial slices of the proximal femur and axial imaging of the distal femoral condyles (allowing for calculation of femoral version) as eligible. Based on that, 97% (620 of 640 hips) were eligible; a further 77% (491 of 640 hips) were excluded because they had either normal femoral version (384 hips), incomplete imaging (20 hips), a lateral center-edge angle < 22° (43 hips) or > 39° (16 hips), age > 50 years (8 hips), or a history of pediatric hip disease (20 hips), leaving 20% (129 of 640 hips) of patients with a mean age of 27 ± 9 years for analysis, and 61% (79 of 129 hips) were female. Patients were assigned to either the increased (> 30°) or decreased (< 5°) femoral version group. The labral cross-sectional area was measured on radial MR images in all patients. The location-dependent labral cross-sectional area, presence of labral tears, and labral tear patterns were assessed using the acetabular clockface system and compared among groups. RESULTS: In hips with increased femoral version, the labrum was normal in size (21 ± 6 mm2 [95% confidence interval 20 to 23 mm2]), whereas hips with decreased femoral version showed labral hypotrophy (14 ± 4 mm2 [95% CI 13 to 15 mm2]; p < 0.01). In hips with increased femoral version, labral tears were located more anteriorly (median 1:30 versus 12:00; p < 0.01). Hips with increased femoral version exhibited damage of the anterior labrum with more intrasubstance tears anterosuperiorly (17% [222 of 1322] versus 9% [93 of 1084]; p < 0.01) and partial tears anteroinferiorly (22% [36 of 165] versus 6% [8 of 126]; p < 0.01). Hips with decreased femoral version showed superior labral damage consisting primarily of partial labral tears. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of patients with FAI, the term "labral tear" is not accurate enough to describe labral pathology. Based on high-quality radial MR images, surgeons should always evaluate the combination of labral tear location and labral tear pattern, because these may provide insight into associated femoral version abnormalities, which can inform appropriate surgical treatment. Future studies should examine symptomatic patients with normal femoral version, as well as an asymptomatic control group, to describe the effect of femoral version on labral morphology across the entire spectrum of pathomorphologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Femoral neck fractures: Key points to consider for fixation or replacement a narrative review of recent literature.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are frequent injuries and not rarely complicated by non-union, implant failure, and avascular necrosis. Some of these fractures represent a dilemma for trauma surgeons. Which fracture should be fixed? Which replaced with a prosthesis? How? The aim of this narrative review is to investigate the literature in order to provide the most updated and evidence-based knowledge about FNF' treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature research has been performed to find the essential key points to consider when dealing with FNF and their treatment. The most representative papers and the new meta-analysis were matched with authors' experience to give a concise but comprehensive view of the problem. Timing, age, comorbidities, vascularization of the femoral head, displacement, instability, comminution of the fracture, bone quality, and surgeon experience seem to be the major topics to consider in the decision making. We then focus on the optimal fixation or replacement as suggested by the literature. RESULTS: Age is the main independent factor to consider. Timing seems essential in the elderly population to reduce mortality and important in the younger patients to reduce complications. Vascular supply should be always considered. Displacement, instability, and comminution of the fracture are negative prognostic factors for fixation as well as, theoretically, bone quality. In the elderly hip replacement is mostly indicated. A stable and solid fixation is mandatory to allow early mobilization. Sliding Hip Screws (SHS) seem preferable to cannulated screws for displaced/unstable (Pauwels II-III, posterior comminution) and basicervical fracture patterns or in smokers. There is a tendency toward Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) also in the elderly if the patient is an indipendent ambulator without severe comorbidities. Dual mobility cups are gaining popularity in THA for FNF. CONCLUSIONS: FNF are frequent injuries and represent, in some cases, a dilemma for the trauma surgeon. Age, timing, comorbidities, bone quality, femoral head vascularization, fracture displacement, intrinsic instability, and comminution as surgeon experience should be carefully evaluated before surgery. A case-to-case analysis of the patient-related factors helps the surgeon to make the right choice and reduce the well-known complications.

Staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of surgical site infection in children undergoing clean elective surgery: A cohort study.

Staphylococcus aureus persistently colonizes the skin and nasopharynx of approximately 20% to 30% of individuals, with the highest rates in younger children. To avoid clinical problems for carriers and the spread of S aureus to other hospitalized patients, screening and decolonization of carriers undergoing surgery has been recommended. However, the best approach to patients undergoing clean surgery is not precisely defined. To evaluate whether children carrying S aureus admitted to the hospital for clean elective surgery have an increased risk of postoperative surgical infections, 393 infants and children (77.1% males; mean age ±â€Šstandard deviation, 7.6 ±â€Š4.5 years) who were scheduled for clean elective surgery procedures were evaluated for S aureus carriage on the day of intervention and 5 days after it. Both anterior nares and pharyngeal swabs were collected. S aureus was identified using the RIDAGENE methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) system (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. At admission, 138 (35.1%) children screened positive for S aureus. MRSA was identified in 40 (29.0% of S aureus positive subjects) cases. The carriage rates of S aureus and MRSA varied considerably with age, and in children <2 years old the rate was significantly lower than in any other age group (P < .05). Surgical site infection was demonstrated in 4 out of 109 (3.7%) children who were initially colonized by S aureus and in 5 out of 201 (2.5%) children with a negative screening, without any statistically significant difference between groups (P = .72). None of these children had MRSA. These results seem to suggest that children undergoing clean elective surgery do not need to be screened for S aureus colonization because, although positive, they have no increased risk of surgical site infection. Following this statement, preoperative procedures should be simplified with relevant advantages from a clinical, social, and economic point of view.