Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 2024 May 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because of differences in chest wall anatomy, female patients may have higher rates of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) pocket-related complications. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate sex-based outcomes after S-ICD implantation. METHODS: Patients implanted with an S-ICD at Emory Healthcare between 2010 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Patients' clinical characteristics and post-S-ICD implantation complications were collected. RESULTS: There were 429 male patients (68%) and 199 female patients (32%) observed for a median duration of 2.3 years (0.6-4.4 years). Male and female patients had comparable rates of diabetes (28%), end-stage renal disease (29.5%), ejection fraction (30.2% ± 13.4%), and body mass index (29.1 ± 6.6 kg/m2). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of shocks between men and women (26.3% vs 20.1%; P = .09), including appropriate shocks (14.7% vs 12%; P = .98) and inappropriate shocks (11.7% vs 9.5%; P = .98). Pocket-related complications occurred in 21 patients; these included pocket infection (n = 12), wound dehiscence (n = 7), and hematoma requiring drainage (n = 2). Female patients had a significantly higher pocket-related complication rate compared with male patients (7.2% vs 2.5%; P = .016). In controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, and end-stage renal disease, female patients had higher odds of pocket-related complications compared with male patients (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-7.75). Pocket-related complications decreased after 2018 compared with before 2018 (6% vs 2.6%, P = .052), mainly driven by reduction in complications in women (12.3% vs 3.2%; P = .034) but not in men (2.8% vs 2.4%; P = 1). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of S-ICD patients, women had a higher rate of post-S-ICD pocket-related complications that could be explained by sex-based differences in anatomy.

2.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 86(12): 799-806, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31821137

RESUMO

Functional heartburn--persistent symptoms of esophageal reflux with no objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)--is the most common cause of failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, but it is often overlooked by internists and gastroenterologists.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Azia/diagnóstico , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/farmacologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA