[Measurement of blood pressure in consultation and automated mesurement (BPTru(®)) to evaluate the white coat effect]. / Medida de la presión arterial en consulta y automatizada (BPTru®) para evaluar el efecto de bata blanca.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: White coat effect (WCE) is one of the main bias that can affect office blood pressure (BP) measurement. Therefore, it is a factor must be considered in hypertensives to avoid mistakes in diagnosis and/or treatment. Employment of automated office BP (AOBP) devices could diminish that effect. METHODS: Two studies were designed with the objective of evaluating differences between routinely office and AOBP measurements. WCE was also assessed. First, the TRUE-ESP study included normotensive and hypertensive patients attending specialized consultations at Cardiology, Nephrology, Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Family Practice. Second, the TRUE-HTA study included hypertensives attending a protocoled Hypertension Unit, with a trained staff. RESULTS: TRUE-ESP study included 300 patients, 76% being hypertensives. A significant difference between office BP and AOBP measurement (SBP/DBP 9.8±11.6/3.4±7.9 mmHg, P<.001) was observed. Percentage of patients gathering WCE criteria was 27.7%. TRUE-HTA study included 101 hypertensive patients. A significant difference between office BP and AOBP measurement (SBP/DBP 5.7±9.3/2.1±5.3 mmHg, P<.001) and activity period-ABPM (SBP/DBP 8.5±6.7/3.5±2.5 mmHg, P<.001) was observed. Percentage of WCE patients was 32.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AOBP devices can contribute to decrease WCE and to improve accuracy of office BP measurement.

[Self-audit and tutor accreditation]. / Self-audit y la acreditación de tutores.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of using self-audit (SA) as a means of accrediting family and community medicine tutors, to analyse the knowledge that the tutors have on this self-assessment methodology, and to record their opinions on this method. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study and analysis of an opinion questionnaire. SETTING: Family and community medicine teaching units (TU) in Catalonia. PARTICIPANTS: Tutors from family and community medicine TU in Catalonia (July 2001-July 2008). METHODS: Training of the tutors in SA methodology, creation of a reference group and a correction cycle. Correction by peers of the SAs performed by the tutors according to previously determined criteria and subsequent issue of a report-feedback. Self-administered questionnaire by a group of TU tutors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN OUTCOMES: A total of 673 SA were performed. The most frequent topic selected was diabetes mellitus in 27.9% of cases. The overall evaluation of the SA from a methodological point of view was correct in 44.5% of cases, improvable in 45.3%, and deficient in 10.2%. A total of 300 opinion questionnaires were issued. The response rate was 151/300 (50.03%). On the question about the usefulness of the SA in professional practice, 12% considered it very useful, 56% adequate, and 32% of little use or not useful. As regards whether it was a good means for the re-accreditation or accreditation of tutors, 66% considered that it was not. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of the SAs analysed are not carried out correctly, which indicates that tutors do not know this self-assessment method very well. They consider that SAs are a useful tool for improving clinical practice, but not a good means for accreditation and re-accreditation.

[Is the action taken by Catalonian primary care doctors adequate in view of the insufficient reduction in blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients? DISEHTAC-2001 study]. / Es adecuada la actitud que adoptan los médicos de atención primaria en Cataluña ante la insuficiente reducción de cifras de presión arterial en los pacientes hipertensos? Estudio DISEHTAC-2001.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the attitude to therapy of primary care staff in view of the lack of reduction in blood pressure. To describe the most commonly used antihypertensives. DESIGN: Descriptive, longitudinal, retrospective study during the year 2001. SETTING: Primary care, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: We analysed 990 hypertensive patients from 12 health centres picked from the 31 participants in the DISEHTAC-1996 study. METHODS: Age, sex, weight, and height were analysed, along with blood pressure values throughout the year 2001, therapeutic attitude (increase/replacement/combination) with poor control (more than 2 consecutive visits with blood pressure>139 and/or 89 mm Hg), screening and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), and drugs used. RESULTS: There were 58.9% females; mean age: 65.4 (13.01) years, and 43.8% received 2 or more antihypertensives. The most common antihypertensives prescribed were diuretics (47.6%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors plus diuretics was the most used combination (22.1%). When there was poor control, some change in treatment was made in 76.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.6-80) of cases. The most common was a combination of drugs (49.6%). The expected action was more frequent in those over 65 years and with a grade I of arterial hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] between 140-150 and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] between 90-99 mm Hg (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy is used in almost half of hypertensive patients, with the most common action being a drug combination.