RESUMO
There have been shifts over time in the value placed on long-term psychotherapeutic modalities even though they can be life-saving. For example, the province of Ontario in Canada has been dealing with a government proposal put forward in 2019 to limit the length of psychotherapy treatment. In response, stakeholders from numerous groups came together to advocate for the importance of continuing unrestricted access to long-term psychotherapy. Approaches to this advocacy then had to unexpectedly adapt to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that came to the forefront in 2020 and will continue to develop in response to this changing landscape.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Defesa do Consumidor , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Psicoterapia/legislação & jurisprudência , Psicoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Ontário , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
In the Canadian province of Ontario, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care is proposing to impose arbitrary limits on access to psychotherapy provided by physicians. This column presents and debunks 3 myths associated with this ill-conceived proposal: (1) that long-term psychotherapy costs the health care system too much money, making it necessary for the government to curb this spending; (2) that long-term psychotherapy is a non-evidence-based treatment being needlessly spent on the worried well; and (3) that we need to focus on quick treatments, not long ones.