Influence of Antihypertensive Treatment on RAAS Peptides in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients.

(1) Background: Recently, influences of antihypertensive treatment on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has gained attention, regarding a possible influence on inflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways. We aimed to study the effects of newly initiated antihypertensive drugs on angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang (1-7) as representers of two counter-regulatory axes. (2) Methods: In this randomized, open-label trial investigating RAAS peptides after the initiation of perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide, Ang II and Ang (1-7) equilibrium concentrations were measured at 8 a.m. and 12 a.m. at baseline and after four weeks of treatment. Eighty patients were randomized (1:1:1:1 fashion). (3) Results: Between the four substances, we found significant differences regarding the concentrations of Ang II (p < 0.0005 for 8 a.m., 12 a.m.) and Ang (1-7) (p = 0.019 for 8 a.m., <0.0005 for 12 a.m.) four weeks after treatment start. Ang II was decreased by perindopril (p = 0.002), and increased by olmesartan (p < 0.0005), amlodipine (p = 0.012), and hydrochlorothiazide (p = 0.001). Ang (1-7) was increased by perindopril and olmesartan (p = 0.008/0.002), but not measurably altered by amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide (p = 0.317/ 0.109). (4) Conclusion: The initiation of all first line antihypertensive treatments causes early and distinct alterations of equilibrium angiotensin levels. Given the additional AT1R blocking action of olmesartan, RAAS peptides shift upon initiation of perindopril and olmesartan appear to work in favor of the anti-inflammatory axis compared to amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide.

Hemodynamic profiles in treatment-naive arterial hypertension and their clinical implication for treatment choice: an exploratory post hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive thoracic bioimpedance by the HOTMAN System estimates hemodynamic modulators and expresses them as hemodynamic profiles. Aims of this analysis were to describe hemodynamic profiles among treatment-naive hypertensive patients compared with normotensive controls and to investigate whether a hemodynamic-guided choice of therapy improves blood pressure (BP) control within 4 weeks. METHOD: This exploratory post hoc analysis used data of a randomized parallel-group trial including 80 outpatients with newly diagnosed arterial hypertension (AHT), randomized to four antihypertensive first-line monotherapies, and 20 age-matched and sex-matched normotensive controls. Hemodynamic profiles were measured at baseline and after four weeks of treatment. On the basis of the hemodynamic profiles, the most appropriate pharmacological treatment was determined retrospectively and patients were categorised to have received concordant (ConTG) or discordant treatment (DisTG). RESULTS: In the hypertensive group, hypervolemia with vasoconstriction was the predominant hemodynamic profile in 48% of patients and hypervolemia without vasoconstriction in 45%, compared with 15 and 50%, respectively, in the control group. After 4 weeks of treatment, the mean (±SD) 24-h BP was 129.9 (±11.0)/81.5 (±8.0) mmHg in the DisTG vs. 133.9 (±12.3)/84.0 (±9.1) mmHg in the ConTG (P = 0.158/0.222). The mean 24-h BP reductions were -9.7 (±10.1)/-5.0 (±6.2) mmHg in the DisTG and -12.4 (±14.8)/-6.9(±6.9) mmHg in the ConTG (P = 0.353/0.223). After 4 weeks of treatment, the BP control rate was 53.7% (43/80) among all, 55.7% (29/52) in the DisTG and 48% (12/25) in the ConTG (P = 0.628). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the hypothesis that personalized treatment initiation based on hemodynamic profiles improves BP control in newly diagnosed hypertensive outpatients.