Medical and psychiatric comorbidities, somatic and cognitive symptoms, injuries and medical procedure history in patients with functional seizures from a public and a private hospital.

PURPOSE: Patients with functional seizures (FS), otherwise known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), from different socioeconomic backgrounds may differ, however, this remains a gap in current literature. Comorbidities can play both a precipitating and a perpetuating role in FS and are important in the planning of individual treatment for this condition. With this study, we aimed to describe and compare the reported medical and psychiatric comorbidities, injuries, somatic and cognitive symptoms, and medical procedures among patients with FS from a private and a public epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study. We collected data on the comorbidity and medical procedure histories, as well as symptoms and clinical signs reported by patients with video-electroencephalographically (video-EEG) confirmed FS without comorbid epilepsy. We used digital patient records starting with the earliest available digital record for each hospital until the year 2022. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were included in the study (N = 372). Public hospital patients had higher odds of reporting intellectual disability (aOR=15.58, 95% CI [1.80, 134.95]), circulatory system disease (aOR=2.63, 95% CI [1.02, 6.78]) and gait disturbance (aOR=8.52, 95% CI [1.96, 37.08]) compared to patients with FS attending the private hospital. They did, however, have fewer odds of reporting a history of an infectious or parasitic disease (aOR=0.31, 95% CI [0.11, 0.87]), respiratory system disease (aOR=0.23, 95% CI [0.06, 0.82]), or medical procedures in the past (aOR=0.32, 95% CI [0.16, 0.63]). CONCLUSION: The study presents prevalence and comparative data on the medical profiles of patients with FS from different socioeconomic backgrounds which may inform future considerations in FS diagnosis and treatment.

Medication use in patients with functional seizures from a public and a private hospital.

PURPOSE: Currently, we have limited knowledge of any potential differences among patients with functional seizures (FS), otherwise known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Investigating medication use among these patients may provide insight into the quality and intensity of medical care they receive. Thus, we aimed to assess and compare the frequency and quantity of antiseizure medications (ASMs), and psychiatric and other medications used among patients with FS from a private and public epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: Only video-electroencephalographically (video-EEG) confirmed patients with FS with no comorbid epilepsy were eligible for the study. For this retrospective case-control study we collected data on patients' medication-taking histories using digital patient records, starting with the earliest available digital patient record for each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were included in the study (N = 372). Patients with FS attending the public hospital had lower odds of taking any ASMs at presentation (aOR=0.39, 95% CI [0.20, 0.75]) and ever taking psychiatric medications (aOR=0.41, 95% CI [0.22, 0.78]) compared to FS patients from the private hospital. They did, however, have higher odds of being discharged with an ASM (aOR=6.60, 95% CI [3.27, 13.35]) and ever taking cardiovascular medication (aOR=2.69, 95% CI [1.22, 5.90]) when compared to the private hospital patients. With every additional presenting ASM (aOR=0.63, 95% CI [0.45, 0.89]) and psychiatric medication (aOR=0.58, 95% CI [0.40, 0.84]) the odds of being from the public hospital decreased. However, they increased with every additional discharge ASM (aOR=3.63, 95% CI [2.30, 5.72]) and cardiovascular medication (aOR=1.26, 95% CI [1.02, 1.55]). CONCLUSION: Standard approaches to pharmacological treatment for patients with FS differed between the public and private hospitals and may indicate a gap in quality of care.

Prevalence and comparison of psychological trauma and stressors in functional seizure patients from a public and private hospital.

PURPOSE: To date not much is known about the differences, if any, between patients with functional seizures (FS) from different socioeconomic backgrounds. We sought to compare the psychological stress and trauma profiles of patients with FS from a private and public hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: Only video-electroencephalography-confirmed patients with FS were eligible for the study. In this retrospective case-control study we collected data on self-reported demographic and psychological stressor/trauma variables using digital patient records starting with the earliest available digital patient record for each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients from a private hospital and 68 patients from a public hospital were included in the study. Most factors showed no significant differences. However, public hospital patients had higher odds of being older (p = 0.002), almost nine times the odds of reporting physical violence by an intimate partner (aOR = 8.65, 95% CI [1.70, 44.08]), more than eight times the odds of reporting psychological stress in the form of death and/or sickness in the family (aOR = 8.56, 95% CI [1.81, 40.41]) and almost three times the odds for other general psychosocial stressors (aOR = 2.82, 95% CI [1.08, 7.42]) compared to those attending the private hospital. They also had half the odds of being female compared to the private hospital patients (aOR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.23, 0.95]) and 93% fewer odds of reporting coming from an abusive home (aOR = 0.07, 95% CI [0.01, 0.52]). CONCLUSION: History and psychological trauma and stressor profiles showed many similarities between the public and private hospital groups; however, some differences were noted and could benefit further exploration and consideration in therapeutic and diagnostic contexts.

Effectiveness of Social Inclusion Interventions for Anxiety and Depression among Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents who are socially excluded are at increased risk of mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. Promoting social inclusion could be an effective strategy for preventing and treating adolescent depression and anxiety. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of intervention studies which aimed to prevent or treat adolescent depression and/or anxiety by promoting social inclusion. Throughout the review we engaged a youth advisory group of 13 young people (aged 21-24) from Uganda, Turkey, Syria, South Africa, and Egypt. RESULTS: We identified 12 studies relevant to our review. The interventions tested use a range of different strategies to increase social inclusion and reduce depression and anxiety, including social skills training, psychoeducation, teaching life skills training, and cash transfers. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) based on random-effects models showed medium-to-large benefits of interventions on improving depression and anxiety symptoms (n = 8; SMD = -0.62; 95% CI, -1.23 to -0.01, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although there are not many studies, those which have been done show promising results that strongly suggest that social inclusion could be an important component of programmes to promote adolescent mental health.

Stigma in functional seizures: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the extent, range and nature of knowledge on stigma in functional seizures (FS). METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis (JBIMES) guidelines and the five-step framework by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched for data sources written in English using MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Ovid, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, as well as grey literature sources, with no date limitations up to September 2021. The extracted data were analysed using basic frequency counts and thematic synthesis. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded a set of 988 potentially relevant data sources, of which 70 met the inclusion criteria. The retrieved sources reflected data from 85 countries and 5949 study participants. The thematic synthesis highlighted the prevalence of FS stigma, as well as its potential origins, context and impact on patients and families. The majority of studies were conducted in healthcare settings with healthcare providers, with fewer data sources reporting on family, patient, and broader society perspectives relating to FS stigma. CONCLUSION: Our scoping review suggests that FS stigma is prevalent but remains understudied. We need more research with a specific focus on stigma in FS, and factors that contribute to FS stigma (e.g. culture and context, naming of the condition), as well as accessible interventions and guidelines addressing FS stigma through education and training. Supportive attitudes and knowledge appear to be protective factors against FS stigma.

Personality traits, illness behaviors, and psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), epilepsy, and other nonepileptic seizures (oNES): Differentiating between the conditions.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate if South African individuals with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) differ from individuals with epileptic seizures (ES) and other nonepileptic seizures (oNES) in terms of demographic and seizure characteristics, personality traits, illness behaviors, and depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comorbidity in statistically significant ways; and if so, to test if these differences can be utilized in raising suspicion of PNES as the differential diagnosis to epilepsy and oNES in practice. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 29 adults with seizure complaints recruited using convenience sampling from a private and a government hospital with video-electroencephalography (vEEG) technology. A quantitative double-blind convenient sampling comparative design was used. A demographic and seizure questionnaire, the NEO Five Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), an abbreviated version of Illness Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ), and the Beck Anxiety Inventory - Primary Care (BAI-PC) were administered. Cronbach's alphas, analysis of variance (ANOVA), cross-tabulation, Fisher exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed on the dataset. RESULTS: The total sample consisted of 29 participants, of which 5 had PNES (17%), 21 ES (73%), and 3 oNES (10%). The final sample was comprised of 24 participants from the private hospital and 5 from the government hospital. The group with PNES was found to be significantly more male, to experience significantly more monthly seizures, and chronic pain when comparing the PNES with the ES group, and the PNES with the combined ES and oNES group in both private only sample, as well as the private and government hospital combined sample. Patients with PNES also had a higher level of education compared with the group with ES in the combined private and government hospital sample, something that was not evident in the private hospital only sample. No significant differences between groups were found in either sample in terms of age, population group, language, age at first seizure, and the NEO-FFI-3 subscales. All three groups scored above the cutoff point of 5 exhibiting depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms on the BAI-PC in both samples. However, the group with PNES tended to score significantly higher than the group with ES and the combined ES and oNES group in the private hospital sample. A cutoff point of 12 on the BAI-PC was found to predict PNES in this seizure population with 80% sensitivity and 89% specificity. However, once the analysis was repeated on the combined private and government hospital sample, significance in BAI-PC scores between groups was lost. All scales showed good reliability in our study, with the exception of the "Openness to Experience" subscale of the NEO-FFI-3 once reliability analysis was carried out on the combined private and government hospital group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an important stepping stone in the understanding of demographic and seizure factors, personality domains, abnormal illness behaviors, and psychiatric comorbidity in the South African population with PNES. The study also reported on a cutoff score of 12 on the BAI-PC predicting PNES with 80% sensitivity and 89% specificity in a private hospital sample.