The Hippo pathway integrates PI3K-Akt signals with mechanical and polarity cues to control tissue growth.

The Hippo signalling pathway restricts cell proliferation in animal tissues by inhibiting Yes-associated protein (YAP or YAP1) and Transcriptional Activator with a PDZ domain (TAZ or WW-domain-containing transcriptional activator [WWTR1]), coactivators of the Scalloped (Sd or TEAD) DNA-binding transcription factor. Drosophila has a single YAP/TAZ homolog named Yorkie (Yki) that is regulated by Hippo pathway signalling in response to epithelial polarity and tissue mechanics during development. Here, we show that Yki translocates to the nucleus to drive Sd-mediated cell proliferation in the ovarian follicle cell epithelium in response to mechanical stretching caused by the growth of the germline. Importantly, mechanically induced Yki nuclear localisation also requires nutritionally induced insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signalling (IIS) via phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase (PI3K), phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1 or PDPK1), and protein kinase B (Akt or PKB) in the follicular epithelium. We find similar results in the developing Drosophila wing, where Yki becomes nuclear in the mechanically stretched cells of the wing pouch during larval feeding, which induces IIS, but translocates to the cytoplasm upon cessation of feeding in the third instar stage. Inactivating Akt prevents nuclear Yki localisation in the wing disc, while ectopic activation of the insulin receptor, PI3K, or Akt/PKB is sufficient to maintain nuclear Yki in mechanically stimulated cells of the wing pouch even after feeding ceases. Finally, IIS also promotes YAP nuclear localisation in response to mechanical cues in mammalian skin epithelia. Thus, the Hippo pathway has a physiological function as an integrator of epithelial cell polarity, tissue mechanics, and nutritional cues to control cell proliferation and tissue growth in both Drosophila and mammals.

YAP and TAZ in epithelial stem cells: A sensor for cell polarity, mechanical forces and tissue damage.

The YAP/TAZ family of transcriptional co-activators drives cell proliferation in epithelial tissues and cancers. Yet, how YAP and TAZ are physiologically regulated remains unclear. Here we review recent reports that YAP and TAZ act primarily as sensors of epithelial cell polarity, being inhibited when cells differentiate an apical membrane domain, and being activated when cells contact the extracellular matrix via their basal membrane domain. Apical signalling occurs via the canonical Crumbs/CRB-Hippo/MST-Warts/LATS kinase cascade to phosphorylate and inhibit YAP/TAZ. Basal signalling occurs via Integrins and Src family kinases to phosphorylate and activate YAP/TAZ. Thus, YAP/TAZ is localised to the nucleus in basal stem/progenitor cells and cytoplasm in differentiated squamous cells or columnar cells. In addition, other signals such as mechanical forces, tissue damage and possibly receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) can influence MST-LATS or Src family kinase activity to modulate YAP/TAZ activity.

Integrin signalling regulates YAP and TAZ to control skin homeostasis.

The skin is a squamous epithelium that is continuously renewed by a population of basal layer stem/progenitor cells and can heal wounds. Here, we show that the transcription regulators YAP and TAZ localise to the nucleus in the basal layer of skin and are elevated upon wound healing. Skin-specific deletion of both YAP and TAZ in adult mice slows proliferation of basal layer cells, leads to hair loss and impairs regeneration after wounding. Contact with the basal extracellular matrix and consequent integrin-Src signalling is a key determinant of the nuclear localisation of YAP/TAZ in basal layer cells and in skin tumours. Contact with the basement membrane is lost in differentiating daughter cells, where YAP and TAZ become mostly cytoplasmic. In other types of squamous epithelia and squamous cell carcinomas, a similar control mechanism is present. By contrast, columnar epithelia differentiate an apical domain that recruits CRB3, Merlin (also known as NF2), KIBRA (also known as WWC1) and SAV1 to induce Hippo signalling and retain YAP/TAZ in the cytoplasm despite contact with the basal layer extracellular matrix. When columnar epithelial tumours lose their apical domain and become invasive, YAP/TAZ becomes nuclear and tumour growth becomes sensitive to the Src inhibitor Dasatinib.

Adeno-associated virus Rep represses the human integration site promoter by two pathways that are similar to those required for the regulation of the viral p5 promoter.

UNLABELLED: Adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) can efficiently replicate in cells that have been infected with helper viruses, such as adenovirus or herpesvirus. However, in the absence of helper virus infection, AAV2 establishes latency by integrating its genome site specifically into PPP1R12C, a gene located on chromosome 19. This integration target site falls into one of the most gene-dense regions of the human genome, thus inviting the question as to whether the virus has evolved mechanisms to control this complex transcriptional environment in order to facilitate integration, maintain an apparently innocuous latency, and/or establish conditions that are conducive to the rescue of the integrated viral genome. The viral replication (Rep) proteins control and direct every known aspect of the viral life cycle and have been shown to tightly control all AAV2 promoters. In addition, a number of heterologous promoters are repressed by the AAV2 Rep proteins. Here, we demonstrate that Rep proteins efficiently repress expression from the target site PPP1R12C promoter. We find evidence that this repression employs mechanisms similar to those described for Rep-mediated AAV2 p5 promoter regulation. Furthermore, we show that the repression of the cellular target site promoter is based on two distinct mechanisms, one relying on the presence of a functional Rep binding motif within the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of PPP1R12C, whereas the second pathway requires only an intact nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) binding site within the Rep proteins, indicating the possible reliance of this pathway on interactions of the Rep proteins with cellular proteins that mediate or regulate cellular transcription. IMPORTANCE: The observation that repression of transcription from the adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) p5 and integration target site promoters is mediated by shared mechanisms highlights the possible coevolution of virus and host and could lead to the identification of host factors that the virus exploits to navigate its life cycle.