What are the Most Important Objectives of Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? A Narrative Review.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate what objectives are most important to men undergoing radical prostatectomy to allow treating physicians to personalize perioperative counselling and improve patient quality of life outcomes. Materials and Methods: A predefined search protocol of the Medline and Embase databases was performed from database inception to May 2023. The search was limited to English language and full text. All articles with a specific consideration of patient objectives, preferences or reasons for decision to undergo radical prostatectomy were included for review. Results: Ten articles out of 375 screened met inclusion criteria for review. All 10 articles utilized a qualitative design and originated across 5 countries across the developed world. A common theme of men placing importance on having their tumor physically removed was found. Methodologies allowing free response beyond predefined categories identified a breadth of considerations including personal circumstance, personal belief and current function in the decision-making process. An investigation on radical prostatectomy performed robotically found some men placed preference on the quicker treatment time with surgery compared to radiation therapy, reflective of shorter recovery times with the robotic approach. Conclusion: Variability in results across studies highlights the heterogeneity in patient preferences. Directed investigation of patient objectives with an open-ended questioning approach would personalize the perioperative experience and may improve patient satisfaction and quality of life outcomes.

A Chance Finding of High Grade Prostate Cancer in a 35-Year-Old Male - A Case Report and Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Young Men with Prostate Cancer.

Background: Prostate cancer is often considered a disease of older men and this indeed fits with its peak incidence between 65-79 years of age. Reports of prostate cancer in men younger than 40 years of age and the outcomes of this age group following treatment are few in the literature. Here, we present the case of an unusual diagnosis of high grade prostate cancer in a very young man and outline early outcomes following treatment with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Case Presentation: A 35-year-old male, intermittently taking finasteride for hair loss, was found to have an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 12.5ng/mL leading to an incidental diagnosis of high grade prostate cancer. Targeted trans-perineal prostate biopsy found Gleason 4+5=9 acinar adenocarcinoma, without cribriform architecture but with features suspicious for extracapsular extension. Robotic radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed and found Gleason 4+5=9 adenocarcinoma with focal cribriform architecture, extra prostatic extension and clear margins, stage pT3a N0 M0. PSA was undetectable at 12 months, continence was immediate, and the patient reported strong erections soon after surgery. Family history of prostate cancer and genetic testing were both negative. Conclusion: This case highlights that not all clinically significant cancers will be identified by following PSA screening guidelines starting at 50 years of age (or 40 years of age for men with a family history of prostate cancer). While high grade prostate cancer in a man less than 40 years of age is uncommon, the literature suggests the incidence is increasing. Our case alongside series in the literature indicate that these men have better functional outcomes and equal oncological outcomes with early surgical intervention for localized disease when compared to the older population.

ASEPTIC: primary antibiotic prophylaxis using co-trimoxazole to prevent SpontanEous bacterial PeritoniTIs in Cirrhosis-study protocol for an interventional randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infection is a major cause of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious and common infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Secondary prophylactic antibiotic therapy has been shown to improve outcomes after an episode of SBP but primary prophylaxis to prevent the first episode of SBP remains contentious. The aim of this trial is to assess whether primary antibiotic prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole improves overall survival compared to placebo in adults with cirrhosis and ascites. METHODS: The ASEPTIC trial is a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in England, Scotland, and Wales. Patients aged 18 years and older with cirrhosis and ascites requiring diuretic treatment or paracentesis, and no current or previous episodes of SBP, are eligible, subject to exclusion criteria. The trial aims to recruit 432 patients from at least 30 sites. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral co-trimoxazole 960 mg or an identical placebo once daily for 18 months, with 6 monthly follow-up visits thereafter (with a maximum possible follow-up period of 48 months, and a minimum of 18 months). The primary outcome is overall survival. Secondary outcomes include the time to the first incidence of SBP, hospital admission rates, incidence of other infections (including Clostridium difficile) and antimicrobial resistance, patients' health-related quality of life, health and social care resource use, incidence of cirrhosis-related decompensation events, liver transplantation, and treatment-related serious adverse events. DISCUSSION: This trial will investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of co-trimoxazole for patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites to determine whether this strategy improves clinical outcomes. Given there are no treatments that improve survival in decompensated cirrhosis outside of liver transplant, if the trial has a positive outcome, we anticipate widespread adoption of primary antibiotic prophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT043955365 . Registered on 18 April 2020. Research ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethics Committee (South Central - Oxford B; REC 19/SC/0311) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

A challenging case of surgical management of a single ischemic testicle from severe epididymo-orchitis.

A 41 years-old male patient presented acutely with severe right testicular pain, and fever for 48 hours. Patient had a backround of previous left orchidectomy for epididymo-orchitis and sexually-transmitted disease. A clinical diagnosis of right epididymo-orchitis was made and patient was treated with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotic. However subsequent ultrasound revealed imminent testicular ischaemia. Given the challenging nature of the case, i.e. single testicle with testicular ischaemia, surgical exploration, fasciotomy and tunica vaginalis grafting was performed to the patient. The patient recovered fully post-operatively with ultrasound proving restoration of end-diastolic flow to the testicle.