Change in clinical parameters after subgingival instrumentation for the treatment of periodontitis and timing of periodontal re-evaluation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the changes in periodontal parameters (reduction in probing pocket depth [PPD], gain in clinical attachment level [CAL] and reduction in full-mouth bleeding on probing [BoP]) after subgingival instrumentation of periodontal pockets at different time points in systemically healthy patients suffering from periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four databases were searched for RCTs that carried out subgingival instrumentation in periodontal pockets and evaluated PPD at a minimum of two consecutive time points other than baseline. The analysis was conducted for both all pocket depths and stratified for initially shallow (4-5 mm) and deep (≥6 mm) pockets and data were extracted for various time points, 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 months. Weighted mean effects (WMEs) were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) and predictive intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs were identified, and all of them were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that for both shallow and deep pockets there was a small though clinically meaningful change between 1- to 2-month and 3- to 4-month time points and between these and 5-6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In systemically healthy patients, the greater part of reduction in PPD and gain in CAL occurs within the first 1-2 months after subgingival instrumentation. However, additional benefits in terms of pocket depth reduction occur beyond these early time points.

Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse alveolar ridge volume changes after immediate implant placement, with or without a regenerative technique. METHODS: Studies investigating the effect of immediate implant placement on ridge dimensional changes were identified through an electronic search conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE. Weighted mean changes (WMC) between baseline and follow-up time were calculated and subgroup analysis was performed according to study design, evaluation method and regenerative strategies. RESULTS: After immediate implant placement alone WMC of RCTs showed a loss in width and height of 1.1 mm. After flapless immediate implant placement with immediate provisionalization and a graft WMC showed a loss in width and height of 1.02 mm and 0.79 mm, while after flapped immediate implant placement and a graft WMC showed a gain of 1.79 mm. After immediate implant placement plus a non-resorbable membrane WMC showed a loss in height of 0.07 mm. After immediate implant placement plus a resorbable membrane and a graft WMC showed a gain in height of 1.09 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate implant placement does not seem to counteract alveolar ridge modelling after tooth extraction. Furthermore, the currently available evidence does not allow for any conclusive statements regarding the efficacy of a concomitant regenerative technique in preventing the amount of alveolar reduction.

Surgical treatment options for grafting areas of gingival recession association with cervical lesions: a review.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Gingival recession (GR) is a highly prevalent dental problem that may be associated with dentin hypersensitivity and aesthetic complaint. Furthermore, GR is often complicated by dental cervical wear of substance, such as erosion, abrasion, or abfraction lesions, as well as initial or more extensive carious involvement of the cervical area, which worsen the symptoms and make the treatment of this periodontal condition more challenging. THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To provide an overview of surgical treatment options presented in the literature for sites affected by GR with carious cervical lesions (CCLs) or non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). METHODS: The Medline database was searched for items dealing with GR and its treatment options, especially on GR associated with CCLs or NCCLs. RESULTS: Several periodontal surgical techniques have shown good potential for treating GR over the years. Specifically, considering GR associated with CCL or NCCL, an assessment of both hard (dental) and soft (gingival) tissue characteristics of the involved site is recommended in selecting the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: For GR associated with CCL or NCCL, hard and soft tissue characteristics of the involved site have to be carefully evaluated in order to choose the most appropriate surgical procedure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A structured decision-making process, considering both hard and soft tissue characteristics of the involved site, is recommended in choosing the most appropriate surgical procedures to treat GR associated with CCL or NCCL defects. The restitutio ad integrum of the dento-periodontal unit is an essential condition to restore the tooth to its original function and esthetics.

Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, through a systematic review of the literature, the efficacy of different surgical techniques in maintaining residual bone in the alveolar process following tooth extractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed was searched through January 2010 and papers were selected according to the CONSORT statement and an independent three-stage screening process. The selected outcome variables were clinical width and height changes of the socket, and means and standard deviations were calculated from the included studies. For those studies that were randomized controlled trials, six meta-analyses were performed by dividing studies into three groups with regard to the use of barriers and grafting (barriers alone, graft alone, or both). RESULTS: Thirteen papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analyses. Statistically significant ridge preservation was found for studies that used barriers alone; the pooled weighted mean was 0.909 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.497554 to 1.320732 mm) for bone height, while the mean for bone width was 2.966 mm (95% confidence interval, 2.334770 to 3.598300 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Socket preservation procedures are effective in limiting horizontal and vertical ridge alterations in postextraction sites. The meta-analysis indicates that the use of barrier membranes alone might improve normal wound healing in extraction sites.