RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a common operation for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) when medical therapy alone is insufficient. No randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of ESS have been published. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ESS plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP. METHODS: We performed an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial in three tertiary care centres and 12 secondary care centres in 11 cities in the Netherlands (Almere, Amstelveen, Amsterdam, Blaricum, Den Haag, Deventer, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, Hoorn, Leiderdorp, and Rotterdam). Adults (aged ≥18 years) with CRSwNP and an indication for ESS were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (block sizes of six), stratified by study centre, to receive either ESS plus medical therapy or medical therapy. ESS was performed according to local practice, although anterior ethmoidectomy was mandatory. Medical therapy was prescribed at the patient's otorhinolaryngologist's discretion, and could be, but was not limited to, nasal corticosteroids, nasal rinsing, systemic corticosteroids, or systemic antibiotics. The primary outcome was disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 12 months of follow up, measured with the validated Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22; where each item is scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated no problems and 5 indicates problems as bad as can be, with a total score of 0-110 points), and the minimal clinically important difference of the SNOT-22 is 9·0 points. Primary and safety analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. The ITT population comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment according to their randomisation group and without any protocol violation. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR4978, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2015, and Aug 27, 2019, 371 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 238 were eligible, willing to participate, and randomly assigned to ESS plus medical therapy (n=121) or medical therapy (n=117) and 234 were included in the baseline ITT population (n=118 ESS plus medical therapy; n=116 medical therapy). 142 (61%) of 234 patients at baseline were men and 92 (39%) were women, and the mean age was 50·4 years (SD 12·7). 206 participants were analysed at 12 months for the primary outcome (n=103 in the ESS plus medical therapy group; n=103 in the medical therapy group). At 12 months follow-up, the mean SNOT-22 score in the ESS plus medical therapy group was 27·9 (SD 20·2; n=103) and in the medical therapy group was 31·1 (20·4; n=103), with an adjusted mean difference of -4·9 (95% CI -9·4 to -0·4), favouring ESS plus medical therapy. Adverse events were similar between the groups. The most common adverse events were minor epistaxis or gastrointestinal problems. No treatment-related deaths occurred, but one patient died due to congestive heart failure. INTERPRETATION: ESS plus medical therapy is more efficacious than medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP, although the minimal clinically important difference was not met. Long-term follow-up data are needed to determine whether the effect persists. The current results are a basis for further development of evidence-based guidelines. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).
Assuntos
Pólipos Nasais , Sinusite , Adolescente , Adulto , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A 66-year old women visited the ENT-department with a slowly growing, painless swelling under the tongue. An excision biopsy showed a lipoma. Although lipoma is a common tumour, oral lipomas are rare. After excision the oral lipoma rarely recurs.
Assuntos
Lipoma/patologia , Neoplasias da Língua/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Língua/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia , Feminino , Humanos , Língua/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is a chronic disease frequently seen in otorhinolaryngological practice. Along with its chronic disease burden it creates high societal costs. Therapy consists of long-term use of medication and, if insufficient, endoscopic sinus surgery. No consensus exists on the right timing and extent of disease that warrants surgery. Furthermore, there is lack of clinical knowledge about the benefit of surgery over medication only. The current trial evaluates the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery in addition to drug treatment versus medication exclusively in the adult patient group with nasal polyps. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled (PolypESS) trial in 238 patients aged 18 years or older selected for primary or revision endoscopic sinus surgery by the otorhinolaryngologist was designed. Patients will be randomised to either endoscopic sinus surgery in addition to medication or medical therapy only. Relevant data will be collected prior to randomisation, at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after start of treatment. Complete follow-up will be 24 months. Primary outcome is disease-specific Health-related Quality of Life quantified by the SNOT-22 after 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are generic Health-related Quality of Life, cost-effectiveness, objective signs of disease and adverse effects of treatment. Subgroup analyses will be performed to verify whether treatment effects differ among patient phenotypes. DISCUSSION: The PolypESS trial will investigate tailored care in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and will result in improved clinical pathways to help to determine in which circumstances to perform surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register, NTR4978 . Registered on 27 November 2014.
Assuntos
Endoscopia/métodos , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Rinite/cirurgia , Sinusite/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasais/economia , Países Baixos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Rinite/diagnóstico , Rinite/economia , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/economia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A 68-year-old man was referred to the Department of Otolaryngology because of a swelling of his neck and hoarseness. CT imaging of his neck revealed a cystic mass in the larynx as well as in the neck, with an air-fluid level. The diagnosis 'laryngopyocele' was made.