[Accelerated musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging with deep learning-based image reconstruction at 0.55 T-3 T]. / Beschleunigte muskuloskeletale Magnetresonanztomographie mit Deep-Learning-gestützter Bildrekonstruktion bei 0,55 T­3 T.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a central component of musculoskeletal imaging. However, long image acquisition times can pose practical barriers in clinical practice. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: MRI is the established modality of choice in the diagnostic workup of injuries and diseases of the musculoskeletal system due to its high spatial resolution, excellent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and unparalleled soft tissue contrast. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Continuous advances in hardware and software technology over the last few decades have enabled four-fold acceleration of 2D turbo-spin-echo (TSE) without compromising image quality or diagnostic performance. The recent clinical introduction of deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction algorithms helps to minimize further the interdependency between SNR, spatial resolution and image acquisition time and allows the use of higher acceleration factors. PERFORMANCE: The combined use of advanced acceleration techniques and DL-based image reconstruction holds enormous potential to maximize efficiency, patient comfort, access, and value of musculoskeletal MRI while maintaining excellent diagnostic accuracy. ACHIEVEMENTS: Accelerated MRI with DL-based image reconstruction has rapidly found its way into clinical practice and proven to be of added value. Furthermore, recent investigations suggest that the potential of this technology does not yet appear to be fully harvested. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Deep learning-reconstructed fast musculoskeletal MRI examinations can be reliably used for diagnostic work-up and follow-up of musculoskeletal pathologies in clinical practice.

Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare deep learning reconstructed (DLR) 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality, identification, and grading of structural anomalies and reader confidence levels with conventional 3 T knee MRI in patients with knee pain following trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study of 26 symptomatic patients (5 women) includes 52 paired DLR 0.55 T and conventional 3 T MRI examinations obtained in 1 setting. A novel, commercially available DLR algorithm was employed for 0.55 T image reconstruction. Four board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality, noted structural anomalies and their respective reporting confidence levels for the presence or absence, as well as grading of bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared (P < 0.05, significant), and MRI findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI using Cohen kappa (κ). RESULTS: In reader's consensus, good image quality was found for DLR 0.55 T MRI and 3 T MRI (3.8 vs 4.1/5 points, P = 0.06). There was near-perfect agreement between 0.55 T DLR and 3 T MRI regarding the identification of structural anomalies for all readers (each κ ≥ 0.80). Substantial to near-perfection agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was reported for grading of cartilage (κ = 0.65-0.86) and meniscus lesions (κ = 0.71-1.0). High confidence levels were found for all readers for DLR 0.55 T and 3 T MRI, with 3 readers showing higher confidence levels for reporting cartilage lesions on 3 T MRI. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, new-generation 0.55 T DLR MRI provides good image quality, comparable to conventional 3 T MRI, and allows for reliable identification of internal derangement of the knee with high reader confidence.

Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T - Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction.

Objectives: To evaluate an optimized deep leaning-based image post-processing technique in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T in terms of image quality and image acquisition time. Materials and methods: Lumbar spine imaging was conducted on 18 patients using a 0.55 T MRI scanner, employing conventional (CDLR) and advanced (ADLR) deep learning-based post-processing techniques. Two musculoskeletal radiologists visually evaluated the images using a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality and resolution. Quantitative assessment in terms of signal intensities (SI) and contrast ratios was performed by region of interest measurements in different body-tissues (vertebral bone, intervertebral disc, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid and autochthonous back muscles) to investigate differences between CDLR and ADLR sequences. Results: The images processed with the advanced technique (ADLR) were rated superior to the conventional technique (CDLR) in terms of signal/contrast, resolution, and assessability of the spinal canal and neural foramen. The interrater agreement was moderate for signal/contrast (ICC = 0.68) and good for resolution (ICC = 0.77), but moderate for spinal canal and neuroforaminal assessability (ICC = 0.55). Quantitative assessment showed a higher contrast ratio for fluid-sensitive sequences in the ADLR images. The use of ADLR reduced image acquisition time by 44.4%, from 14:22 min to 07:59 min. Conclusions: Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms improve the visually perceived image quality in lumbar spine imaging at 0.55 T while simultaneously allowing to substantially decrease image acquisition times. Clinical relevance: Advanced deep learning-based image post-processing techniques (ADLR) in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T significantly improves image quality while reducing image acquisition time.

Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings Associated with Implementation of an Abbreviated Cardiac MRI Protocol.

Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the article by Lenkinski and Rofsky in this issue. See also the article by McKee et al in this issue.

Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.

Interventional Imaging Systems in Radiology, Cardiology, and Urology: Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions, and Electricity Costs.

BACKGROUND. The energy demand of interventional imaging systems has historically been estimated using manufacturer-provided specifications rather than directly measured. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the energy consumption of interventional imaging systems and estimate potential savings in the carbon emissions and electricity costs of such systems through hypothetical operational adjustments. METHODS. An interventional radiology suite, neurointerventional suite, radiology fluoroscopy unit, two cardiology laboratories, and two urology fluoroscopy units were equipped with power sensors. Power measurement logs were extracted for a single 4-week period for each radiology and cardiology system (all between June 1, 2022, and November 28, 2022) and for the 2-week period from July 31, 2023, to August 13, 2023, for each urology system. Power statuses, procedure time stamps, and fluoroscopy times were extracted from various sources. System activity was divided into off, idle (no patient in room), active (patient in room for procedure), and net-imaging (active fluoroscopic image acquisition) states. Projected annual energy consumption was calculated. Potential annual savings in carbon emissions and electricity costs through hypothetical operational adjustments were estimated using published values for Switzerland. RESULTS. Across the seven systems, the mean power draw was 0.3-1.1, 0.7-7.4, 0.9-7.6, and 1.9-12.5 kW in the off, idle, active, and net-imaging states, respectively. Across systems, the off state, in comparison with the idle state, showed a decrease in the mean power draw of 0.2-6.9 kW (relative decrease, 22.2-93.2%). The systems had a combined projected annual energy consumption of 115,684 kWh (range, 3646-26,576 kWh per system). The systems' combined projected energy consumption occurring outside the net-imaging state accounted for 93.3% (107,978/115,684 kWh) of projected total energy consumption (range, 89.2-99.4% per system). A hypothetical operational adjustment whereby all systems would be switched from the idle state to the off state overnight and on weekends (versus being operated in idle mode 24 hours a day, 7 days a week) would yield the following potential annual savings: for energy consumption, 144,640 kWh; for carbon emissions, 18.6 metric tons of CO2 equivalent; and for electricity costs, US$37,896. CONCLUSION. Interventional imaging systems are energy intensive, having high consumption outside of image acquisition periods. CLINICAL IMPACT. Strategic operational adjustments (e.g., powering down idle systems) can substantially decrease the carbon emissions and electricity costs of interventional imaging systems.

Environmental Sustainability and AI in Radiology: A Double-Edged Sword.

According to the World Health Organization, climate change is the single biggest health threat facing humanity. The global health care system, including medical imaging, must manage the health effects of climate change while at the same time addressing the large amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated in the delivery of care. Data centers and computational efforts are increasingly large contributors to GHG emissions in radiology. This is due to the explosive increase in big data and artificial intelligence (AI) applications that have resulted in large energy requirements for developing and deploying AI models. However, AI also has the potential to improve environmental sustainability in medical imaging. For example, use of AI can shorten MRI scan times with accelerated acquisition times, improve the scheduling efficiency of scanners, and optimize the use of decision-support tools to reduce low-value imaging. The purpose of this Radiology in Focus article is to discuss this duality at the intersection of environmental sustainability and AI in radiology. Further discussed are strategies and opportunities to decrease AI-related emissions and to leverage AI to improve sustainability in radiology, with a focus on health equity. Co-benefits of these strategies are explored, including lower cost and improved patient outcomes. Finally, knowledge gaps and areas for future research are highlighted.

New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-Initial Clinical Experience and Comparison With 3 T MRI.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the detection rate of and reader confidence in 0.55 T knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with 3 T knee MRI in patients with acute trauma and knee pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 0.55 T and 3 T knee MRI of 25 symptomatic patients (11 women; median age, 38 years) with suspected internal derangement of the knee was obtained in 1 setting. On the 0.55 T system, a commercially available deep learning image reconstruction algorithm was used (Deep Resolve Gain and Deep Resolve Sharp; Siemens Healthineers), which was not available on the 3 T system. Two board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality parameters, noted MRI findings and their respective reporting confidence level for the presence or absence, as well as graded the bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared ( P < 0.05 = significant), and clinical findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Image quality was rated higher at 3 T compared with 0.55 T studies (each P ≤ 0.017). Agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI for the detection and grading of bone marrow edema and fractures, ligament and tendon lesions, high-grade meniscus and cartilage lesions, Baker cysts, and joint effusions was perfect for both readers. Overall identification and grading of cartilage and meniscal lesions showed good agreement between high- and low-field MRI (each ICC > 0.76), with lower agreement for low-grade cartilage (ICC = 0.77) and meniscus lesions (ICC = 0.49). There was no difference in readers' confidence levels for reporting lesions of bone, ligaments, tendons, Baker cysts, and joint effusions between 0.55 T and 3 T (each P > 0.157). Reader reporting confidence was higher for cartilage and meniscal lesions at 3 T (each P < 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: New-generation 0.55 T knee MRI, with deep learning-aided image reconstruction, allows for reliable detection and grading of joint lesions in symptomatic patients, but it showed limited accuracy and reader confidence for low-grade cartilage and meniscal lesions in comparison with 3 T MRI.

Environmental Sustainability and MRI: Challenges, Opportunities, and a Call for Action.

The environmental impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently come into focus. This includes its enormous demand for electricity compared to other imaging modalities and contamination of water bodies with anthropogenic gadolinium related to contrast administration. Given the pressing threat of climate change, addressing these challenges to improve the environmental sustainability of MRI is imperative. The purpose of this review is to discuss the challenges, opportunities, and the need for action to reduce the environmental impact of MRI and prepare for the effects of climate change. The approaches outlined are categorized as strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from MRI during production and use phases, approaches to reduce the environmental impact of MRI including the preservation of finite resources, and development of adaption plans to prepare for the impact of climate change. Co-benefits of these strategies are emphasized including lower GHG emission and reduced cost along with improved heath and patient satisfaction. Although MRI is energy-intensive, there are many steps that can be taken now to improve the environmental sustainability of MRI and prepare for the effects of climate change. On-going research, technical development, and collaboration with industry partners are needed to achieve further reductions in MRI-related GHG emissions and to decrease the reliance on finite resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Radiology weather forecast: A retrospective analysis of predictability of median daily polytrauma-CT occurrence based on weather data.

OBJECTIVES: Resource planning is a crucial component in hospitals, particularly in radiology departments. Since weather conditions are often described to correlate with emergency room visits, we aimed to forecast the amount of polytrauma-CTs using weather information. DESIGN: All polytrauma-CTs between 01/01/2011 and 12/31/2022 (n = 6638) were retrieved from the radiology information system. Local weather data was downloaded from meteoblue.com. The data was normalized and smoothened. Daily polytrauma-CT occurrence was stratified into below median and above median number of daily polytrauma-CTs. Logistic regression and machine learning algorithms (neural network, random forest classifier, support vector machine, gradient boosting classifier) were employed as prediction models. Data from 2012 to 2020 was used for training, data from 2021 to 2022 for validation. RESULTS: More polytrauma-CTs were acquired in summer compared with winter months, demonstrating a seasonal change (median: 2.35; IQR 1.60-3.22 vs. 2.08; IQR 1.36-3.03; p <.001). Temperature (rs = 0.45), sunshine duration (rs = 0.38) and ultraviolet light amount (rs = 0.37) correlated positively, wind velocity (rs = -0.57) and cloudiness (rs = -0.28) correlated negatively with polytrauma-CT occurrence (all p <.001). The logistic regression model for identification of days with above median number of polytrauma-CTs achieved an accuracy of 87 % on training data from 2011 to 2020. When forecasting the years 2021-2022 an accuracy of 65 % was achieved. A neural network and a support vector machine both achieved a validation accuracy of 72 %, whereas all classifiers regarded wind velocity and ultraviolet light amount as the most important parameters. CONCLUSION: It is possible to forecast above or below median daily number of polytrauma-CTs using weather data. CLINCICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Prediction of polytrauma-CT examination volumes may be used to improve resource planning.

Turning radiology reports into epidemiological data to track seasonal pulmonary infections and the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To automatically label chest radiographs and chest CTs regarding the detection of pulmonary infection in the report text, to calculate the number needed to image (NNI) and to investigate if these labels correlate with regional epidemiological infection data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All chest imaging reports performed in the emergency room between 01/2012 and 06/2022 were included (64,046 radiographs; 27,705 CTs). Using a regular expression-based text search algorithm, reports were labeled positive/negative for pulmonary infection if described. Data for regional weekly influenza-like illness (ILI) consultations (10/2013-3/2022), COVID-19 cases, and hospitalization (2/2020-6/2022) were matched with report labels based on calendar date. Positive rate for pulmonary infection detection, NNI, and the correlation with influenza/COVID-19 data were calculated. RESULTS: Between 1/2012 and 2/2020, a 10.8-16.8% per year positive rate for detecting pulmonary infections on chest radiographs was found (NNI 6.0-9.3). A clear and significant seasonal change in mean monthly detection counts (102.3 winter; 61.5 summer; p < .001) correlated moderately with regional ILI consultations (weekly data r = 0.45; p < .001). For 2020-2021, monthly pulmonary infection counts detected by chest CT increased to 64-234 (23.0-26.7% per year positive rate, NNI 3.7-4.3) compared with 14-94 (22.4-26.7% positive rate, NNI 3.7-4.4) for 2012-2019. Regional COVID-19 epidemic waves correlated moderately with the positive pulmonary infection CT curve for 2020-2022 (weekly new cases: r = 0.53; hospitalizations: r = 0.65; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Text mining of radiology reports allows to automatically extract diagnoses. It provides a metric to calculate the number needed to image and to track the trend of diagnoses in real time, i.e., seasonality and epidemic course of pulmonary infections. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Digitally labeling radiology reports represent previously neglected data and may assist in automated disease tracking, in the assessment of physicians' clinical reasoning for ordering radiology examinations and serve as actionable data for hospital workflow optimization. KEY POINTS: • Radiology reports, commonly not machine readable, can be automatically labeled with the contained diagnoses using a regular-expression based text search algorithm. • Chest radiograph reports positive for pulmonary infection moderately correlated with regional influenza-like illness consultations (weekly data; r = 0.45; p < .001) and chest CT reports with the course of the regional COVID-19 pandemic (new cases: r = 0.53; hospitalizations: r = 0.65; p < 0.001). • Rendering radiology reports into data labels provides a metric for automated disease tracking, the assessment of ordering physicians clinical reasoning and can serve as actionable data for workflow optimization.

The Impact of Modern Imaging Techniques on Carbon Footprints: Relevance and Outlook.

It is estimated that the health care sector accounts for 4.0-8.5% of total global CO2 emissions, with medical imaging representing an energy-intensive contributor. We outline the carbon footprint of the imaging modalities most relevant to urology and list practical recommendations that can have a positive impact on sustainability. PATIENT SUMMARY: Energy use for medical imaging scans is a significant contributor to carbon emissions by the health care sector. Steps to improve sustainability can include choosing the least energy-intensive option among the scan types suitable for each patient and condition, and switching off equipment when it is not in use.

Investigating the impact of structured reporting on the linguistic standardization of radiology reports through natural language processing over a 10-year period.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how a transition from free text to structured reporting affects reporting language with regard to standardization and distinguishability. METHODS: A total of 747,393 radiology reports dictated between January 2011 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The body and cardiothoracic imaging divisions introduced a reporting concept using standardized language and structured reporting templates in January 2016. Reports were segmented by a natural language processing algorithm and converted into a 20-dimension document vector. For analysis, dimensionality was reduced to a 2D visualization with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding and matched with metadata. Linguistic standardization was assessed by comparing distinct report types' vector spreads (e.g., run-off MR angiography) between reporting standards. Changes in report type distinguishability (e.g., CT abdomen/pelvis vs. MR abdomen) were measured by comparing the distance between their centroids. RESULTS: Structured reports showed lower document vector spread (thus higher linguistic similarity) compared with free-text reports overall (21.9 [free-text] vs. 15.9 [structured]; - 27.4%; p < 0.001) and for most report types, e.g., run-off MR angiography (15.2 vs. 1.8; - 88.2%; p < 0.001) or double-rule-out CT (26.8 vs. 10.0; - 62.7%; p < 0.001). No changes were observed for reports continued to be written in free text, e.g., CT head reports (33.2 vs. 33.1; - 0.3%; p = 1). Distances between the report types' centroids increased with structured reporting (thus better linguistic distinguishability) overall (27.3 vs. 54.4; + 99.3 ± 98.4%) and for specific report types, e.g., CT abdomen/pelvis vs. MR abdomen (13.7 vs. 37.2; + 171.5%). CONCLUSION: Structured reporting and the use of factual language yield more homogenous and standardized radiology reports on a linguistic level, tailored to specific reporting scenarios and imaging studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Information transmission to referring physicians, as well as automated report assessment and content extraction in big data analyses, may benefit from standardized reporting, due to consistent report organization and terminology used for pathologies and normal findings. KEY POINTS: • Natural language processing and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding can transform radiology reports into numeric vectors, allowing the quantification of their linguistic standardization. • Structured reporting substantially increases reports' linguistic standardization (mean: - 27.4% in vector spread) and distinguishability (mean: + 99.3 ± 98.4% increase in vector distance) compared with free-text reports. • Higher standardization and homogeneity outline potential benefits of structured reporting for information transmission and big data analyses.

Assessment of hepatic function employing hepatocyte specific contrast agent concentrations to multifactorially evaluate fibrotic remodeling.

Background: Diffuse parenchymal liver diseases are contributing substantially to global morbidity and represent major causes of deaths worldwide. The aim of our study is to assess whether established hepatic fat and iron quantitation and relaxometry-based quantification of hepatocyte-specific contrast material as surrogate for liver function estimation allows to evaluate liver fibrosis. Methods: Retrospective consecutive study. Seventy-two healthy patients (mean age: 53 years) without known liver disease, 21 patients with temporary elevated liver enzymes (mean: 65 years) and 109 patients with biopsy proven liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (mean: 61 years), who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent [gadoxetate disodium, gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), 0.25 mmol/mL Primovist, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany] at 1.5 T (n=133) and at 3 T (n=69), were included. Fibrosis was classified using the histopathological meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis (METAVIR) and the clinical Child-Pugh scores. Gd-concentration were quantified using T1 map-based calculations. Gd-concentration mapping was performed by using a Look-Locker approach prior to and 912±159 s after intravenous administration of hepatocyte specific contrast agent. Additionally, parenchymal fat fraction, R2*, bilirubin, gender and age were defined as predicting factors. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated in a monoparametric (linear regression, predictor: Gd-concentration) and multiparametric model (predictors: age, bilirubin level, iron overload, liver fat fraction, Gd concentration in the left and right liver lobe). Results: Mean Gd-concentration in the liver parenchyma was significantly higher for healthy patients ([Gd] =0.51 µmol/L) than for those with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis ([Gd] =0.31 µmol/L; P<0.0001) and with acute liver disease ([Gd] =0.28 µmol/L), though there were no significant differences for the latter two groups. There was a significant moderate negative correlation for the mean Gd-concentration and the METAVIR score (ρ=-0.44, P<0.0001) as well as for the Child-Pugh stage (ρ=-0.35, P<0.0001). There was a significant strong correlation between the bilirubin concentration and the Gd-concentration (ρ=-0.61, P<0.0001). The diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of healthy patients and patients with known fibrosis or cirrhosis was 0.74 (0.71/0.60 sensitivity/specificity) in a monoparametric and 0.76 (0.85/0.61 sensitivity/specificity) in a machine learning based multiparametric model. Conclusions: T1 mapping-based quantification of hepatic Gd-EOB-DTPA concentrations performed in a multiparametric model shows promising diagnostic accuracy for the detection of fibrotic changes. Liver biopsy might be replaced by imaging examinations.

Visual and quantitative assessment of hip implant-related metal artifacts at low field MRI: a phantom study comparing a 0.55-T system with 1.5-T and 3-T systems.

BACKGROUND: To investigate hip implant-related metal artifacts on a 0.55-T system compared with 1.5-T and 3-T systems. METHODS: Total hip arthroplasty made of three different alloys were evaluated in a water phantom at 0.55, 1.5, and 3 T using routine protocols. Visually assessment (VA) was performed by three readers using a Likert scale from 0 (no artifacts) to 6 (extremely severe artifacts). Quantitative assessment (QA) was performed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) and the fraction of voxels within a threshold of the mean signal intensity compared to an automatically defined region of interest (FVwT). Agreement was evaluated using intra/inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interreader agreement of VA was strong-to-moderate (ICC 0.74-0.82). At all field strengths (0.55-T/1.5-T/3-T), artifacts were assigned a lower score for titanium (Ti) alloys (2.44/2.9/2.7) than for stainless steel (Fe-Cr) (4.1/3.9/5.1) and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys (4.1/4.1/5.2) (p < 0.001 for both). Artifacts were lower for 0.55-T and 1.5-T than for 3-T systems, for all implants (p ≤ 0.049). A strong VA-to-QA correlation was found (r = 0.81; p < 0.001); CoV was lower for Ti alloys than for Fe-Cr and Co-Cr alloys at all field strengths. The FVwT showed a negative correlation with VA (-0.68 < r < -0.84; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Artifact intensity was lowest for Ti alloys at 0.55 T. For other alloys, it was similar at 0.55 T and 1.5 T, higher at 3 T. Despite an inferior gradient system and a larger bore width, the 0.55-T system showed the same artifact intensity of the 1.5-T system.

Image Quality of Lumbar Spine Imaging at 0.55T Low-Field MRI is Comparable to Conventional 1.5T MRI - Initial Observations in Healthy Volunteers.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential of 0.55T low-field MRI system in lumbar spine imaging with and without the use of additional advanced postprocessing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lumbar spine of 14 volunteers (32.9 ± 3.6 years) was imaged both at 0.55T and 1.5T using sequences from clinical routine. On the 0.55T scanner system, additional sequences with simultaneous multi-slice acquisition and artificial intelligence-based postprocessing techniques were acquired. Image quality of all 28 examinations was assessed by three musculoskeletal radiologists with respect to signal/contrast, resolution, and assessability of the spinal canal and neuroforamina using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = perfect quality). Interrater agreement was evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test (significance level: p < 0.05). RESULTS: Image quality at 0.55T was rated lower on the 5-point Likert scale compared to 1.5T regarding signal/contrast (mean: 4.16 ± 0.29 vs. 4.54 ± 0.29; p < 0.001), resolution (4.07 ± 0.31 vs. 4.49 ± 0.30; p < 0.001), assessability of the spinal canal (4.28 ± 0.13 vs. 4.73 ± 0.26; p < 0.001) and the neuroforamina (4.14 ± 0.28 vs. 4.70 ± 0.27; p < 0.001). Image quality for the AI-processed sagittal T1 TSE and T2 TSE at 0.55T was also rated slightly lower, but still good to perfect with a concomitant reduction in measurement time. Interrater agreement was good to excellent (range: 0.60-0.91). CONCLUSION: While lumbar spine image quality at 0.55T is perceived inferior to imaging at 1.5T by musculoskeletal radiologists, good overall examination quality was observed with high interrater agreement. Advanced postprocessing techniques may accelerate intrinsically longer acquisition times at 0.55T.

Quantifying the Effects of Structured Reporting on Report Turnaround Times and Proofreading Workload in Neuroradiology.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of a change from free text reporting to structured reporting on resident reports, the proofreading workload and report turnaround times in the neuroradiology daily routine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our neuroradiology section introduced structured reporting templates in July 2019. Reports dictated by residents during dayshifts from January 2019 to March 2020 were retrospectively assessed using quantitative parameters from report comparison. Through automatic analysis of text-string differences between report states (i.e. draft, preliminary and final report), Jaccard similarities and edit distances of reports following read-out sessions as well as after report sign-off were calculated. Furthermore, turnaround times until preliminary and final report availability to clinicians were investigated. Parameters were visualized as trending line graphs and statistically compared between reporting standards. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred thirty-eight reports were included into analysis. Mean Jaccard similarity of resident drafts and staff-reviewed final reports increased from 0.53 ± 0.37 to 0.79 ± 0.22 after the introduction of structured reporting (p < .001). Both mean overall edits on draft reports by residents following read-out sessions (0.30 ± 0.45 vs. 0.09 ± 0.29; p < .001) and by staff radiologists during report sign-off (0.17 ± 0.28 vs. 0.12 ± 0.23, p < .001) decreased. With structured reporting, mean turnaround time until preliminary report availability to clinicians decreased by 20.7 minutes (246.9 ± 207.0 vs. 226.2 ± 224.9; p < .001). Similarly, final reports were available 35.0 minutes faster on average (558.05 ± 15.1 vs. 523.0 ± 497.3; p = .002). CONCLUSION: Structured reporting is beneficial in the neuroradiology daily routine, as resident drafts require fewer edits in the report review process. This reduction in proofreading workload is likely responsible for lower report turnaround times.

More Space, Less Noise-New-generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems Can Improve Patient Comfort: A Prospective 0.55T-1.5T-Scanner Comparison.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess patient comfort when imaged on a newly introduced 0.55T low-field magnetic resonance (MR) scanner system with a wider bore opening compared to a conventional 1.5T MR scanner system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, fifty patients (mean age: 66.2 ± 17.0 years, 22 females, 28 males) underwent subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with matched imaging protocols at 0.55T (MAGNETOM FreeMax, Siemens Healthineers; Erlangen, Germany) and 1.5T (MAGNETOM Avanto Fit, Siemens Healthineers; Erlangen, Germany) on the same day. MRI performed between 05/2021 and 07/2021 was included for analysis. The 0.55T MRI system had a bore opening of 80 cm, while the bore diameter of the 1.5T scanner system was 60 cm. Four patient groups were defined by imaged body regions: (1) cranial or cervical spine MRI using a head/neck coil (n = 27), (2) lumbar or thoracic spine MRI using only the in-table spine coils (n = 10), (3) hip MRI using a large flex coil (n = 8) and (4) upper- or lower-extremity MRI using small flex coils (n = 5). Following the MRI examinations, patients evaluated (1) sense of space, (2) noise level, (3) comfort, (4) coil comfort and (5) overall examination impression on a 5-point Likert-scale (range: 1= "much worse" to 5 = "much better") using a questionnaire. Maximum noise levels of all performed imaging studies were measured in decibels (dB) by a sound level meter placed in the bore center. RESULTS: Sense of space was perceived to be "better" or "much better" by 84% of patients for imaging examinations performed on the 0.55T MRI scanner system (mean score: 4.34 ± 0.75). Additionally, 84% of patients rated noise levels as "better" or "much better" when imaged on the low-field scanner system (mean score: 3.90 ± 0.61). Overall sensation during the imaging examination at 0.55T was rated as "better" or "much better" by 78% of patients (mean score: 3.96 ± 0.70). Quantitative assessment showed significantly reduced maximum noise levels for all 0.55T MRI studies, regardless of body region compared to 1.5T, i.e., brain MRI (83.8 ± 3.6 dB vs. 89.3 ± 5.4 dB; p = 0.04), spine MRI (83.7 ± 3.7 dB vs. 89.4 ± 2.6 dB; p = 0.004) and hip MRI (86.3 ± 5.0 dB vs. 89.1 ± 1.4 dB; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived 0.55T new-generation low-field MRI to be more comfortable than conventional 1.5T MRI, given its larger bore opening and reduced noise levels during image acquisition. Therefore, new concepts regarding bore design and noise level reduction of MR scanner systems may help to reduce patient anxiety and improve well-being when undergoing MR imaging.