Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 26(2): 217-220, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38192180

RESUMO

Hypertension guidelines recommend team-based care for the treatment of high blood pressure (BP). Clinical pharmacists can help patients get to goal BP with rapid medication titration in conjunction with telehealth visits. We conducted a pharmacist-led home BP monitoring pilot program from June 2020 to September 2021. Forty-two patients with a SBP ≥140 despite using ≤2 antihypertensive medications were referred for pharmacist telehealth with expedited medication titration to achieve a BP goal <130/80. The mean enrollment SBP/DBP was 155.2 (SD, 15.8)/89.7 (SD, 11.5) mm Hg, and the mean completion SBP/DBP was 132.1 (SD, 10.9)/77.6 (SD, 10). The number of hypertension medications prescribed increased from 1.3 to 1.6 with no instances of falls or hypotension. At completion, 31% of patients had an automated office blood pressure (AOBP) with SBP <130 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg. A pharmacist-led, home BP monitoring telehealth pilot program helped patients safely achieve BP goals.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Telemedicina , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacêuticos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacologia , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia
2.
Am J Hypertens ; 37(5): 342-348, 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring is increasingly used for remote hypertension management, but the real-world performance of home blood pressure (BP) devices is unknown. We examined BP measurements from patients' home devices using the American Medical Association's (AMA) SMBP Device Accuracy Test tool. METHODS: Patients at a single internal medicine clinic underwent up to five seated, same-arm BP readings using a home device and an automated BP device (Omron HEM-907XL). Following the AMA's three-step protocol, we used the patient's home device for the first, second, and fourth measurements and the office device for the third and fifth (if needed) measurements. Device agreement failure was defined as an absolute difference in systolic BP >10 mm Hg between the home and office devices in either of two confirmatory steps. Performance was examined by brand (Omron vs. non-Omron). Moreover, we examined patient factors associated with agreement failure via logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics. RESULTS: We evaluated 152 patients (mean age 60 ±â€…15 years, 58% women, 31% Black) seen between October 2020 and November 2021. Device agreement failure occurred in 22.4% (95% CI: 16.4%, 29.7%) of devices tested, including 19.1% among Omron devices and 27.6% among non-Omron devices (P = 0.23). No patient characteristics were associated with agreement failure. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-fifth of home devices did not agree based on the AMA SMBP device accuracy protocol. These findings confirm the importance of office-based device comparisons to ensure the accuracy of home BP monitoring.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Esfigmomanômetros , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/métodos
3.
Am J Med Qual ; 36(3): 139-144, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941721

RESUMO

The coronavirus pandemic catalyzed a digital health transformation, placing renewed focus on using remote monitoring technologies to care for patients outside of hospitals. At NewYork-Presbyterian, the authors expanded remote monitoring infrastructure and developed a COVID-19 Hypoxia Monitoring program-a critical means through which discharged COVID-19 patients were followed and assessed, enabling the organization to maximize inpatient capacity at a time of acute bed shortage. The pandemic tested existing remote monitoring efforts, revealing numerous operating challenges including device management, centralized escalation protocols, and health equity concerns. The continuation of these programs required addressing these concerns while expanding monitoring efforts in ambulatory and transitions of care settings. Building on these experiences, this article offers insights and strategies for implementing remote monitoring programs at scale and improving the sustainability of these efforts. As virtual care becomes a patient expectation, the authors hope hospitals recognize the promise that remote monitoring holds in reenvisioning health care delivery.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Monitorização Fisiológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Humanos , Monitorização Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
4.
J Telemed Telecare ; 27(8): 531-534, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888405

RESUMO

During a mass casualty disaster drill at NewYork-Presbyterian's Lower Manhattan Hospital in April 2019, the Emergency Department (ED) used telemedicine to see low-acuity 'walking wounded' patients. This telemedicine service is provided every day as ED Express Care Service and staffed by off-site, board-certified Emergency Medicine attending physicians. This novel use of the ED Express Care Service allowed the ED to provide timely, safe, quality care while expanding resources and ED capacity through rapid assessment, treatment and discharge of the low-acuity patients.


Assuntos
Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Telemedicina , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitais , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA