Simulation Training in the Management of Adverse Contrast Reactions: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training has become increasingly prominent within medical education, but its utility within radiology remains underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To appraise the evidence for the effectiveness of simulation on the management of adverse reactions to contrast media. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Eligible studies recruited radiology residents, provided simulation-based training focused on contrast reaction management, and measured any effectiveness outcome compared with any nonsimulation training or no training. The quality of studies was appraised and outcomes were classified according to Kirkpatrick's hierarchy and the strength of evidence. RESULTS: Out of 146 screened results, 15 articles were included that described 17 studies-3 randomized trials and 14 pretest-posttest studies of hands-on or, less commonly, computer-based simulation. In all 16 studies that assessed knowledge before and after intervention, written test scores improved after simulation. Most studies noted improvements in comfort or confidence managing contrast reactions as well. In all three studies that assessed knowledge after simulation and after didactic lecture as a control, posttest scores were not statistically significantly better in the simulation groups than the lecture groups. Common study limitations included single-group designs, measuring only learning outcomes using unvalidated instruments, modest sample sizes, and limited assessment of long-term retention. CONCLUSION: Simulation produces subjective improvements and knowledge gain relevant to contrast reaction management. Further research is required to demonstrate superiority of simulation-based contrast reaction management training over traditional didactic lecture-based instruction.

Differential effects of stress and African ancestry on preterm birth and related traits among US born and immigrant Black mothers.

Preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks of gestation) is influenced by a wide range of environmental, genetic and psychosocial factors, and their interactions. However, the individual and joint effects of genetic factors and psychosocial stress on PTB have remained largely unexplored among U.S. born versus immigrant mothers.We studied 1121 African American women from the Boston Birth Cohort enrolled from 1998 to 2008. Regression-based analyses were performed to examine the individual and joint effects of genetic ancestry and stress (including lifetime stress [LS] and stress during pregnancy [PS]) on PTB and related traits among U.S. born and immigrant mothers.Significant associations between LS and PTB and related traits were found in the total study population and in immigrant mothers, including gestational age, birthweight, PTB, and spontaneous PTB; but no association was found in U.S. born mothers. Furthermore, significant joint associations of LS (or PS) and African ancestral proportion (AAP) on PTB were found in immigrant mothers, but not in U.S. born mothers.Although, overall, immigrant women had lower rates of PTB compared to U.S. born women, our study is one of the first to identify a subset of immigrant women could be at significantly increased risk of PTB and related outcomes if they have high AAP and are under high LS or PS. In light of the growing number of immigrant mothers in the U.S., our findings may have important clinical and public health implications.