The Roles of RAC1 and RAC1B in Colorectal Cancer and Their Potential Contribution to Cetuximab Resistance.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most diagnosed cancers and a leading contributor to cancer-related deaths in the United States. Clinically, standard treatment regimens include surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy; however, there has been increasing development and clinical use of targeted therapies for CRC. Unfortunately, many patients develop resistance to these treatments. Cetuximab, the first targeted therapy approved to treat advanced CRC, is a monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor and inhibits downstream pathway activation to restrict tumor cell growth and proliferation. CRC resistance to cetuximab has been well studied, and common resistance mechanisms include constitutive signal transduction through downstream protein mutations and promotion of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. While the most common resistance mechanisms are known, a proportion of patients develop resistance through unknown mechanisms. One protein predicted to contribute to therapy resistance is RAC1, a small GTPase that is involved in cytoskeleton rearrangement, cell migration, motility, and proliferation. RAC1 has also been shown to be overexpressed in CRC. Despite evidence that RAC1 and its alternative splice isoform RAC1B play important roles in CRC and the pathways known to contribute to cetuximab resistance, there is a need to directly study the relationship between RAC1 and RAC1B and cetuximab resistance. This review highlights the recent studies investigating RAC1 and RAC1B in the context of CRC and suggests that these proteins could play a role in resistance to cetuximab.

Inhibition of autocrine HGF maturation overcomes cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer.

Although amplifications and mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) act as bona fide oncogenes, in most cancers, RTKs maintain moderate expression and remain wild-type. Consequently, cognate ligands control many facets of tumorigenesis, including resistance to anti-RTK therapies. Herein, we show that the ligands for the RTKs MET and RON, HGF and HGFL, respectively, are synthesized as inactive precursors that are activated by cellular proteases. Our newly generated HGF/HGFL protease inhibitors could overcome both de novo and acquired cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer (CRC). Conversely, HGF overexpression was necessary and sufficient to induce cetuximab resistance and loss of polarity. Moreover, HGF-induced cetuximab resistance could be overcome by the downstream MET inhibitor, crizotinib, and upstream protease inhibitors. Additionally, HAI-1, an endogenous inhibitor of HGF proteases, (i) was downregulated in CRC, (ii) exhibited increased genomic methylation that correlated with poor prognosis, (iii) HAI-1 expression correlated with cetuximab response in a panel of cancer cell lines, and (iv) exogenous addition of recombinant HAI-1 overcame cetuximab resistance in CC-HGF cells. Thus, we describe a targetable, autocrine HAI-1/Protease/HGF/MET axis in cetuximab resistance in CRC.

HIV-1 Resistance to Islatravir/Tenofovir Combination Therapy in Wild-Type or NRTI-Resistant Strains of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and islatravir (ISL, 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyadensine, or MK-8591) are highly potent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Resistance to TDF and ISL is conferred by K65R and M184V, respectively. Furthermore, K65R and M184V increase sensitivity to ISL and TDF, respectively. Therefore, these two nucleoside analogs have opposing resistance profiles and could present a high genetic barrier to resistance. To explore resistance to TDF and ISL in combination, we performed passaging experiments with HIV-1 WT, K65R, or M184V in the presence of ISL and TDF. We identified K65R, M184V, and S68G/N mutations. The mutant most resistant to ISL was S68N/M184V, yet it remained susceptible to TDF. To further confirm our cellular findings, we implemented an endogenous reverse transcriptase assay to verify in vitro potency. To better understand the impact of these resistance mutations in the context of global infection, we determined potency of ISL and TDF against HIV subtypes A, B, C, D, and circulating recombinant forms (CRF) 01_AE and 02_AG with and without resistance mutations. In all isolates studied, we found K65R imparted hypersensitivity to ISL whereas M184V conferred resistance. We demonstrated that the S68G polymorphism can enhance fitness of drug-resistant mutants in some genetic backgrounds. Collectively, the data suggest that the opposing resistance profiles of ISL and TDF suggest that a combination of the two drugs could be a promising drug regimen for the treatment of patients infected with any HIV-1 subtype, including those who have failed 3TC/FTC-based therapies.