Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(1): e51675, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313883

RESUMO

The duration of several types of glaucoma surgery and reimbursement amounts per minute of surgery remain unknown. This study compared the surgical duration of glaucoma procedures (ab interno trabeculotomy, PreserFlo, ab externo trabeculotomy, bleb revision, EXPRESS, trabeculectomy, Ahmed, and the Baerveldt implant) and their reimbursement amounts in Japan. We retrospectively analyzed 30 consecutive surgeries of each type of glaucoma surgery. The reimbursement amount per surgical hour was calculated by subtracting the implant cost from the total medical fees. Amounts were converted to dollars based on an exchange rate of 1 USD = 133 JPY. The average surgical time was as follows: ab interno trabeculotomy, 7.8 ± 2.1; PreserFlo, 13.5 ± 4.0; ab externo trabeculotomy, 15.2 ± 4.1; bleb revision, 15.6 ± 2.3; EXPRESS, 16.9 ± 2.7; trabeculectomy, 18.5 ± 3.1; Ahmed, 35.8 ± 8.2; and Baerveldt, 39.2 ± 6.2. The reimbursement amounts after implant deduction were as follows: ab interno trabeculotomy, $1,089; PreserFlo, $1,538; ab externo trabeculotomy, $1,430; bleb revision, $259; EXPRESS, $1,600; trabeculectomy, $1,774; Ahmed, $1,600; and Baerveldt, $1,765. Reimbursement amounts per minute varied, with the highest and lowest for ab interno trabeculotomy and bleb revision at $140 per minute and $17 per minute, respectively. Reimbursement amounts per minute of surgery for eight types of glaucoma surgery vary by up to eightfold.

2.
Taiwan J Ophthalmol ; 12(2): 202-205, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35813793

RESUMO

In this article, we report two patients who experienced the first onset of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) 3 days after the administration of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. Case 1: A 50-year-old woman without any history of retinal disease developed vision loss in her right eye 3 days after receiving the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Case 2: A 56-year-old woman without any history of retinal disease developed vision loss in her right eye 3 days after receiving the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Case 1: Temporal superior BRVO and secondary macular edema (ME) were observed in the patient's right eye. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/25. Case 2: Temporal inferior BRVO and secondary ME were observed in the patient's right eye. Her BCVA was 13/20. Case 1: Three doses of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) were administered. Case 2: Three doses of IVR were administered. Case 1: ME resolved and BCVA improved to 20/20. Case 2: ME resolved and BCVA improved to 20/20. Both the cases showed a possible association between the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the first onset of BRVO.

3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(50): e28236, 2021 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34918688

RESUMO

RATIONALE: In this paper, we report on 2 patients who developed branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) exacerbation 1 day after administration of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1: A 71 year-old female developed vision loss in her left eye 1 day after receiving a second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. This patient was diagnosed with temporal inferior BRVO and secondary macular edema (ME) in her left eye. ME resolved after 3 doses of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA). After treatment, no recurrence of ME was observed.Case 2: A 72 year-old man developed vision loss in his right eye 1 day after receiving the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. This patient was diagnosed with temporal superior BRVO in the right eye without ME. The patient was followed up and did not undergo any additional treatment. DIAGNOSES: Case1: Temporal superior BRVO and secondary ME were observed in the left eye. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/30.Case2: Temporal superior BRVO recurrence and secondary ME were observed in the right eye. BCVA was 20/25. INTERVENTIONS: Case1: Additional dose of IVA was administered. Case2: Two times of Intravitreal ranibizumab was administered twice. OUTCOMES: Case1: Subsequently, ME resolved BCVA was 20/20. Case2: Subsequently, ME resolved BCVA was 20/25. LESSONS: Both cases showed a possible association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the exacerbation of BRVO.


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162/efeitos adversos , COVID-19 , Edema Macular , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Ranibizumab/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação , Acuidade Visual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA