Challenges in Heart Failure Disease Management in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Qualitative Study.

Clinical guidelines recommend clinicians in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) monitor body weight and signs and symptoms related to heart failure (HF) and encourage a sodium restricted diet to improve HF outcomes; however, SNFs face considerable challenges in HF disease management (HF-DM). In the current study, we characterized the challenges of HF-DM with data from semi-structured, in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers, staff, and physicians from nine SNFs. Patients receiving skilled nursing care were interviewed together as a dyad with their caregiver. A data-driven, qualitative descriptive approach was used to understand the process and challenges of HF-DM. Coded text was categorized into descriptive themes. Interviews with five dyads (n = 10 individuals), SNF nurses and certified nursing assistants (n = 13), and physicians (n = 2) revealed that, among the sample, HF care was not prioritized above other competing health concerns. Staff operated in the challenging SNF environment largely without protocols or educational materials to prompt HF-DM. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(5), 13-17.].

Patient Characteristics Are Not Associated With Documentation of Weight and Heart Failure Related Sign and Symptom Assessment in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring body weight and signs and symptoms related to heart failure (HF) can alert clinicians to a patient's worsening condition but the degree to which these practices are performed in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is unknown. This study analyzed the frequency of these monitoring practices in SNFs and explored associated factors at both the patient and SNF level. DESIGN: An observational study of data from the usual care arm of the SNF Connect Trial, a randomized cluster trial of a HF disease management intervention. The data extracted from charts were combined with publicly available facility data. A linear regression model was estimated to evaluate the frequency of HF disease management conditional on patient and facility covariates. SETTING: Data from 28 SNFs in Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Patients discharged from hospital to SNFs with a primary or secondary diagnosis of HF. MEASUREMENTS: Patient-level covariates included demographics, New York Heart Association class, type of HF, and Charlson comorbidity index. Facility-level covariates were from Nursing Home Compare. RESULTS: The sample (n = 320) was majority female (66%), white (93%), with mean age 80 ± 10 years and a Charlson comorbidity index of 3.2 ± 1.5. Seventy percent had HF with preserved ejection fraction, mean ejection fraction of 50 ± 16% and 40% with a New York Heart Association class III-IV. On average, patients were weighed 40% of their days in the SNF and had documentation of at least 1 HF-related sign or symptom 70% of their days in the SNF. Patient-level factors were not associated with frequency of documenting weight and assessments of HF-related signs/symptoms. Health Inspection Star Rating was positively associated with weight monitoring (P < .05) but not associated with symptom assessment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Patient-level factors are not meaningfully associated with the documentation of weight tracking or sign/symptom assessment. Monitoring weight was instead associated with the Health Inspection Star Rating.

Information Needs of Skilled Nursing Facility Staff to Support Heart Failure Disease Management.

OBJECTIVES: Characterize key tasks and information needs for heart failure disease management (HF-DM) in the distinct care setting of skilled nursing facility (SNF) staff in partnership with community-based clinical stakeholders. Develop design recommendations contextualized to the SNF setting for informatics interventions for improved HF-DM in the SNF setting. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with fifteen participants (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nursing aides and physicians) from 8 Denver-metro SNFs. Data coded using a data-driven, inductive approach. RESULTS: Key tasks of HF-DM: symptom assessment, communicating change in condition, using equipment, documentation of daily weights, and monitoring patients. Themes: 1) HF-DM is challenged by a culture of verbal communication; 2) staff face knowledge barriers in HF-DM that are partially attributed to unmet information needs. HF-DM information needs: identification of HF patients, HF signs and symptoms, purpose of daily weights, indicators of worsening HF, purpose of sodium restricted diet, and materials to improve patients' understanding of HF. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: HF-DM information needs are not fully supported by current SNF information systems.

Age-Related Differences in Hospitalization Rates, Clinical Presentation, and Outcomes Among Older Adults Hospitalized With Influenza-U.S. Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET).

BACKGROUND: Rates of influenza hospitalizations differ by age, but few data are available regarding differences in laboratory-confirmed rates among adults aged ≥65 years. METHODS: We evaluated age-related differences in influenza-associated hospitalization rates, clinical presentation, and outcomes among 19 760 older adults with laboratory-confirmed influenza at 14 FluSurv-NET sites during the 2011-2012 through 2014-2015 influenza seasons using 10-year age groups. RESULTS: There were large stepwise increases in the population rates of influenza hospitalization with each 10-year increase in age. Rates ranged from 101-417, 209-1264, and 562-2651 per 100 000 persons over 4 influenza seasons in patients aged 65-74 years, 75-84 years, and ≥85 years, respectively. Hospitalization rates among adults aged 75-84 years and ≥85 years were 1.4-3.0 and 2.2-6.4 times greater, respectively, than rates for adults aged 65-74 years. Among patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza, there were age-related differences in demographics, medical histories, and symptoms and signs at presentation. Compared to hospitalized patients aged 65-74 years, patients aged ≥85 years had higher odds of pneumonia (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; P = .01) and in-hospital death or transfer to hospice (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7-2.6; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Age-related differences in the incidence and severity of influenza hospitalizations among adults aged ≥65 years can inform prevention and treatment efforts, and data should be analyzed and reported using additional age strata.

Use of an expert panel to identify domains and indicators of delirium severity.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to create a content domain framework for delirium severity to inform item development for a new instrument to measure delirium severity. METHODS: We used an established, multi-stage instrument development process during which expert panelists discussed best approaches to measure delirium severity and identified related content domains. We conducted this work as part of the Better ASsessment of ILlness (BASIL) study, a prospective, observational study aimed at developing and testing measures of delirium severity. Our interdisciplinary expert panel consisted of twelve national delirium experts and four expert members of the core research group. Over a one-month period, experts participated in two rounds of review. RESULTS: Experts recommended that the construct of delirium severity should reflect both the phenomena and the impact of delirium to create an accurate, patient-centered instrument useful to interdisciplinary clinicians and family caregivers. Final content domains were Cognitive, Level of consciousness, Inattention, Psychiatric-Behavioral, Emotional dysregulation, Psychomotor features, and Functional. Themes debated by experts included reconciling clinical geriatrics and psychiatric content, mapping symptoms to one specific domain, and accurate capture of unclear clinical presentations. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this work represents the first application of instrument development science to delirium. The identified content domains are inclusive of various, wide-ranging domains of delirium severity and are reflective of a consistent framework that relates delirium severity to potential clinical outcomes. Our content domain framework provides a foundation for development of delirium severity instruments that can help improve care and quality of life for patients with delirium.

Usability Testing of a Mobile Clinical Decision Support App for Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis in Nursing Homes.

The aim of the current study was to conduct usability testing of a mobile clinical decision support (CDS) prototype designed for urinary tract infection (UTI) assessment by nurses in nursing homes (NHs). Usability of the UTIDecide smartphone application (app) was evaluated using cognitive walk-through and think-aloud protocol sessions with nurses (n = 6) at two NH sites. This evaluation was followed by unsupervised field tests lasting ≥1 week with nurses at one site (n = 4) and posttest interviews and administration of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Cognitive walk-through/think-aloud sessions yielded interface design recommendations that were implemented prior to field tests. All test sessions resulted in highly positive perceived usability and usefulness from participants. Average SUS score was 92.5 (n = 3), which equates to an "A" grade for usability. Design recommendations identified for future app versions are: (a) integration of the mobile CDS app with organizational information systems; and (b) expanded features to support assessment of other conditions. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(7), 11-17.].

Research Priorities in Post-acute and Long-term Care: Results of a Stakeholder Needs Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Conduct a needs assessment among post-acute and long-term care (PA-LTC) stakeholder groups to identify (1) research topics of highest priority and (2) perspectives on research, including concerns/barriers to conducting research in the PA-LTC setting. DESIGN: Mixed methods multistakeholder engagement process. Needs assessment conducted with tailored strategies per stakeholder group: interview, survey, and focus group. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four stakeholder groups-medical directors/providers (n = 89), administrative leadership (n = 5), frontline staff (n = 17), and family members of residents and residents themselves (n = 11)-were recruited from the Colorado PA-LTC community through an academic-community partnership between the University of Colorado and Colorado Medical Directors Association. MAIN OUTCOME(S): Stakeholder perspectives on research and high priority PA-LTC research topics. RESULTS: Research priorities common across stakeholder groups included polypharmacy (overuse of medication generally and overuse of antibiotics specifically), care transitions, mental health (including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, behaviors), chronic pain, urinary tract infection, and quality of life issues. Providers specifically prioritized heart failure, Parkinson's, and other chronic illnesses. Administrators and directors of nurses emphasized hospitalizations. Staff prioritized medication/therapy compliance. Families/residents prioritized neurologic disease. Concerns included staff burden, consenting process, privacy, and family involvement. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: PA-LTC patients have a lot to offer as participants and decision makers in research, frontline staff are enthusiastic about participation, family members want to be involved, and providers value research findings in their practice but need a more supportive environment to produce and participate in research.

Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are localised skin injuries that cause significant mortality and are costly. Nursing best practices prevent pressure injuries, including time-consuming, complex tasks that lack payment incentives. The Braden Scale is an evidence-based stratification tool nurses use daily to assess pressure-injury risk. Our objective was to analyse the cost-utility of performing repeated risk-assessment for pressure-injury prevention in all patients or high-risk groups. DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis using Markov modelling from US societal and healthcare sector perspectives within a 1-year time horizon. SETTING: Patient-level longitudinal data on 34 787 encounters from an academic hospital electronic health record (EHR) between 2011 and 2014, including daily Braden scores. Supervised machine learning simulated age-adjusted transition probabilities between risk levels and pressure injuries. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalised adults with Braden scores classified into five risk levels: very high risk (6-9), high risk (10-11), moderate risk (12-14), at-risk (15-18), minimal risk (19-23). INTERVENTIONS: Standard care, repeated risk assessment in all risk levels or only repeated risk assessment in high-risk strata based on machine-learning simulations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs (2016 $US) of pressure-injury treatment and prevention, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) related to pressure injuries were weighted by transition probabilities to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at $100 000/QALY willingness-to-pay. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested model uncertainty. RESULTS: Simulating prevention for all patients yielded greater QALYs at higher cost from societal and healthcare sector perspectives, equating to ICERs of $2000/QALY and $2142/QALY, respectively. Risk-stratified follow-up in patients with Braden scores <15 dominated standard care. Prevention for all patients was cost-effective in >99% of probabilistic simulations. CONCLUSION: Our analysis using EHR data maintains that pressure-injury prevention for all inpatients is cost-effective. Hospitals should invest in nursing compliance with international prevention guidelines.

The Case for Mobility Assessment in Hospitalized Older Adults: American Geriatrics Society White Paper Executive Summary.

Mobility can be defined as the ability to move or be moved freely and easily. In older adults, mobility impairments are common and associated with risk for additional loss of function. Mobility loss is particularly common in these individuals during acute illness and hospitalization, and it is associated with poor outcomes, including loss of muscle mass and strength, long hospital stays, falls, declines in activities of daily living, decline in community mobility and social participation, and nursing home placement. Thus, mobility loss can have a large effect on an older adult's health, independence, and quality of life. Nevertheless, despite its importance, loss of mobility is not a widely recognized outcome of hospital care, and few hospitals routinely assess mobility and intervene to improve mobility during hospital stays. The Quality and Performance Measurement Committee of the American Geriatrics Society has developed a white paper supporting greater focus on mobility as an outcome for hospitalized older adults. The executive summary presented here focuses on assessing and preventing mobility loss in older adults in the hospital and summarizes the recommendations from that white paper. The full version of the white paper is available as Text S1. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:11-16, 2019.

A Statewide Antibiotic Stewardship Collaborative to Improve the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Background: Colorado hospitals participated in a statewide collaborative to improve the management of inpatient urinary tract infections (UTIs) and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). We evaluated the effects of the intervention on diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic use. Methods: The main collaborative outcomes were proportion of UTI diagnoses that met criteria for symptomatic UTI; exposure to fluoroquinolones (UTI only); duration of therapy (UTIs and SSTIs); and exposure to antibiotics with broad gram-negative activity (SSTIs only). Outcomes were compared between pre-intervention and intervention periods overall and by hospital. Secondary analyses were changes in outcome trends by time series analysis. Results: Twenty-six hospitals, including 9 critical access hospitals, participated in the collaborative. Data were reported for 4060 UTIs and 1759 SSTIs. Between the pre-intervention and intervention periods, the proportion of diagnosed UTIs that met criteria for symptomatic UTI was similar (51% vs 54%, respectively; P = .10), exposure to fluoroquinolones declined (49% vs 41%; P < .001), and the median duration of therapy was unchanged (7 vs 7 days; P = .99). Among SSTIs, exposure to antibiotics with broad gram-negative activity declined (61% vs 53%; P = .001) and the median duration of therapy declined (11 vs 10 days; P = .03). There was substantial variation in performance among hospitals. By time series analysis, only the declining trend of fluoroquinolone use was significant (P = .03). Conclusions: The collaborative model is a feasible approach to engage hospitals in a common antibiotic stewardship intervention. Performance improvement was observed for several outcomes but varied substantially by hospital.

Do Safety Culture Scores in Nursing Homes Depend on Job Role and Ownership? Results from a National Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To identify facility- and individual-level predictors of nursing home safety culture. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of individuals within facilities. SETTING: Nursing homes participating in the national Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Long-Term Care: Healthcare-Associated Infections/Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Project. PARTICIPANTS: Responding nursing home staff (N = 14,177) from 170 (81%) of 210 participating facilities. MEASUREMENTS: Staff responses to the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture (NHSOPS), focused on five domains (teamwork, training and skills, communication openness, supervisor expectations, organizational learning) and individual respondent characteristics (occupation, tenure, hours worked), were merged with data on facility characteristics (from the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting): ownership, chain membership, percentage residents on Medicare, bed size. Data were analyzed using multivariate hierarchical models. RESULTS: Nursing assistants rated all domains worse than administrators did (P < .001), with the largest differences for communication openness (24.3 points), teamwork (17.4 points), and supervisor expectations (16.1 points). Clinical staff rated all domains worse than administrators. Nonprofit ownership was associated with worse training and skills (by 6.0 points, P =.04) and communication openness (7.3 points, P =.004), and nonprofit and chain ownership were associated with worse supervisor expectations (5.2 points, P =.001 and 3.2 points, P =.03, respectively) and organizational learning (5.6 points, P =.009 and 4.2 points, P = .03). The percentage of variation in safety culture attributable to facility characteristics was less than 22%, with ownership having the strongest effect. CONCLUSION: Perceptions of safety culture vary widely among nursing home staff, with administrators consistently perceiving better safety culture than clinical staff who spend more time with residents. Reporting safety culture scores according to occupation may be more important than facility-level scores alone to describe and assess barriers, facilitators, and changes in safety culture.

"Connecting the Dots": A Qualitative Study of Home Health Nurse Perspectives on Coordinating Care for Recently Discharged Patients.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, nearly one-third of adults 65 years or older with Medicare discharged to home after hospitalization were referred for home health care (HHC) services. Care coordination between the hospital and HHC is frequently inadequate and may contribute to medication errors and readmissions. Insights from HHC nurses could inform improvements to care coordination. OBJECTIVE: To describe HHC nurse perspectives about challenges and solutions to coordinating care for recently discharged patients. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study with six focus groups of HHC nurses and staff (n = 56) recruited from six agencies in Colorado. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a mixed deductive/inductive approach to theme analysis with a team-based iterative method. KEY RESULTS: HHC nurses described challenges and solutions within domains of Accountability, Communication, Assessing Needs & Goals, and Medication Management. One additional domain of Safety, for both patients and HHC nurses, emerged from the analysis. Within each domain, solutions for improving care coordination included the following: 1) Accountability-hospital physicians willing to manage HHC orders until primary care follow-up, potential legislation allowing physician assistants and nurse practitioners to write HHC orders; 2) Communication-enhanced access to hospital records and direct telephone lines for HHC; 3) Assessing Needs & Goals-liaisons from HHC agencies meeting with patients in hospital; 4) Medication Management-HHC coordinating directly with clinician or pharmacist to resolve discrepancies; and 5) Safety-HHC nurses contributing non-reimbursable services for patients, and ensuring that cognitive and behavioral health information is shared with HHC. CONCLUSIONS: In an era of shared accountability for patient outcomes across settings, solutions for improving care coordination with HHC are needed. Efforts to improve care coordination with HHC should focus on clearly defining accountability for orders, enhanced communication, improved alignment of expectations for HHC between clinicians and patients, a focus on reducing medication discrepancies, and prioritizing safety for both patients and HHC nurses.

Can Braden Score Predict Outcomes for Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients?

BACKGROUND: Braden score is a routine assessment of pressure ulcer risk hypothesized to identify the frail phenotype. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive utility of the Braden score on outcomes of inpatients with heart failure (HF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An academic medical center between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. PARTICIPANTS: 642 inpatients with a primary diagnosis of HF (ICD-9 428). MEASUREMENTS: The primary predictor was Braden score. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Additional outcomes included 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and discharge destination. Multivariable methods were used to determine the association between the primary predictor and each outcome adjusted for patient demographics and clinical variables. RESULTS: Mean admission and discharge Braden scores were 19.5 ± 2.3 (SD) (range = 9-23) and 20.0 ± 1.9 (range = 11-23), respectively (P < .0001). Mean age was 61.8 ± 16.2 years (range = 19-101). The 30-day mortality rate was 4.4%, 30-day readmission rate was 16.2%, mean LOS was 7.0 ± 8.7 days, and 78.2% were discharged home. After adjustment, higher (better) Braden score was significantly associated with decreased 30-day mortality (discharge Braden AOR 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.996)), and decreased average LOS (admission Braden ß -0.52 days (P = .0002)). Higher discharge Braden score was significantly associated with discharge to home (AOR 1.66 (95% CI 1.42-1.95)). Braden score was not significantly associated with 30-day readmission. CONCLUSION: Braden score is an independent predictor of mortality, LOS, and discharge destination among inpatients with HF. Further exploration of the use of Braden scores to identify inpatients who might benefit from specialized intervention is warranted.

A randomized trial of heart failure disease management in skilled nursing facilities (SNF Connect): Lessons learned.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Conducting clinical trials in skilled nursing facilities is particularly challenging. This manuscript describes facility and patient recruitment challenges and solutions for clinical research in skilled nursing facilities. METHODS: Lessons learned from the SNF Connect Trial, a randomized trial of a heart failure disease management versus usual care for patients with heart failure receiving post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities, are discussed. Description of the trial design and barriers to facility and patient recruitment along with regulatory issues are presented. RESULTS: The recruitment of Denver-metro skilled nursing facilities was facilitated by key stakeholders of the skilled nursing facilities community. However, there were still a number of barriers to facility recruitment including leadership turnover, varying policies regarding research, fear of litigation and of an increased workload. Engagement of facilities was facilitated by their strong interest in reducing hospital readmissions, marketing potential to hospitals, and heart failure management education for their staff. Recruitment of patients proved difficult and there were few facilitators. Identified patient recruitment challenges included patients being unaware of their heart failure diagnosis, patients overwhelmed with their illness and care, and frequently there was no available proxy for cognitively impaired patients. Flexibility in changing the recruitment approach and targeting skilled nursing facilities with higher rates of admissions helped to overcome some barriers. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of skilled nursing facilities and patients in skilled nursing facilities for clinical trials is challenging. Strategies to attract both facilities and patients are warranted. These include aligning study goals with facility incentives and flexible recruitment protocols to work with patients in "transition crisis."

Characteristics Associated with Home Health Care Referrals at Hospital Discharge: Results from the 2012 National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient- and hospital-level factors associated with home health care (HHC) referrals following nonelective U.S. patient hospitalizations in 2012. DATA SOURCE: The 2012 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression modeling to assess patient- and hospital-level variables in patient discharges with versus without HHC referrals. DATA COLLECTION: Analysis included 1,109,905 discharges in patients ≥65 years with Medicare. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: About 29.2 percent of discharges were referred to HHC, which were more likely with older age, female sex, urban location, low income, longer length of stay, higher severity of illness scores, diagnoses of heart failure or sepsis, and hospital location in New England (referent: Pacific). CONCLUSIONS: As health policy changes influence postacute HHC, defining specific diagnoses and regional patterns associated with HHC is a first step to optimize postacute HHC services.

Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) have a mortality rate of 11.6%, are costly to treat, and result in Medicare reimbursement penalties. Medicare codes HAPUs according to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient-Safety Indicator 3 (PSI-03), but they are sometimes inappropriately coded. The objective is to use electronic health records to predict pressure ulcers and to identify coding issues leading to penalties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated all hospitalized patient electronic medical records at an academic medical center data repository between 2011 and 2014. These data contained patient encounter level demographic variables, diagnoses, prescription drugs, and provider orders. HAPUs were defined by PSI-03: stages III, IV, or unstageable pressure ulcers not present on admission as a secondary diagnosis, excluding cases of paralysis. Random forests reduced data dimensionality. Multilevel logistic regression of patient encounters evaluated associations between covariates and HAPU incidence. RESULTS: The approach produced a sample population of 21 153 patients with 1549 PSI-03 cases. The greatest odds ratio (OR) of HAPU incidence was among patients diagnosed with spinal cord injury (ICD-9 907.2: OR = 14.3; P < .001), and 71% of spinal cord injuries were not properly coded for paralysis, leading to a PSI-03 flag. Other high ORs included bed confinement (ICD-9 V49.84: OR = 3.1, P < .001) and provider-ordered pre-albumin lab (OR = 2.5, P < .001). DISCUSSION: This analysis identifies spinal cord injuries as high risk for HAPUs and as being often inappropriately coded without paralysis, leading to PSI-03 flags. The resulting statistical model can be tested to predict HAPUs during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate coding of conditions leads to poor hospital performance measures and Medicare reimbursement penalties.

Comparing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Programs Between Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes and Non-Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVE The impact of healthcare system integration on infection prevention programs is unknown. Using catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention as an example, we hypothesize that US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes have a more robust infection prevention infrastructure due to integration and centralization compared with non-VA nursing homes. SETTING VA and non-VA nursing homes participating in the AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care collaborative. METHODS Nursing homes provided baseline information about their infection prevention programs to assess strengths and gaps related to CAUTI prevention via a needs assessment questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 353 of 494 nursing homes from 41 states (71%; 47 VA and 306 non-VA facilities) responded. VA nursing homes reported more hours per week devoted to infection prevention-related activities (31 vs 12 hours; P<.001) and were more likely to have committees that reviewed healthcare-associated infections. Compared with non-VA facilities, a higher percentage of VA nursing homes reported tracking CAUTI rates (94% vs 66%; P<.001), sharing CAUTI data with leadership (94% vs 70%; P=.014) and with nursing personnel (85% vs 56%, P=.003). However, fewer VA nursing homes reported having policies for appropriate catheter use (64% vs 81%; P=.004) and catheter insertion (83% vs 94%; P=.004). CONCLUSIONS Among nursing homes participating in an AHRQ-funded collaborative, VA and non-VA nursing homes differed in their approach to CAUTI prevention. Best practices from both settings should be applied universally to create an optimal infection prevention program within emerging integrated healthcare systems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:287-293.

Hospital to Post-Acute Care Facility Transfers: Identifying Targets for Information Exchange Quality Improvement.

INTRODUCTION: Information exchange is critical to high-quality care transitions from hospitals to post-acute care (PAC) facilities. We conducted a survey to evaluate the completeness and timeliness of information transfer and communication between a tertiary-care academic hospital and its related PAC facilities. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional Web-based 36-question survey of 110 PAC clinicians and staff representing 31 PAC facilities conducted between October and December 2013. RESULTS: We received responses from 71 of 110 individuals representing 29 of 31 facilities (65% and 94% response rates). We collapsed 4-point Likert responses into dichotomous variables to reflect completeness (sufficient vs insufficient) and timeliness (timely vs not timely) for information transfer and communication. Among respondents, 32% reported insufficient information about discharge medical conditions and management plan, and 83% reported at least occasionally encountering problems directly related to inadequate information from the hospital. Hospital clinician contact information was the most common insufficient domain. With respect to timeliness, 86% of respondents desired receipt of a discharge summary on or before the day of discharge, but only 58% reported receiving the summary within this time frame. Through free-text responses, several participants expressed the need for paper prescriptions for controlled pain medications to be sent with patients at the time of transfer. DISCUSSION: Staff and clinicians at PAC facilities perceive substantial deficits in content and timeliness of information exchange between the hospital and facilities. Such deficits are particularly relevant in the context of the increasing prevalence of bundled payments for care across settings as well as forthcoming readmissions penalties for PAC facilities. Targets identified for quality improvement include structuring discharge summary information to include information identified as deficient by respondents, completion of discharge summaries before discharge to PAC facilities, and provision of hard-copy opioid prescriptions at discharge.