Exploration of how valued living relates to resilience among people with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: We lack critical information regarding promoting resilience in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Living according to one's values may increase resilience. The aims of this study were to: (a) determine whether the degree to which individuals with SCI are living according to their values is associated with resilience; (b) identify values endorsed as most important; and (c) examine whether the importance of these values differs significantly by high vs. low resilience. RESEARCH DESIGN: Individuals with SCI (N = 202, Mage = 47.32) completed an online survey. Two linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the extent to which domains of valued living (measured using the Valuing Questionnaire [VQ] and its subdomains, progress and obstruction, and the Valued Living Questionnaire [VLQ]) were associated with resilience. To explore whether resilience was associated with ratings of the perceived importance of specific types of values, we identified the top 10 most important values endorsed in the sample and performed independent sample t tests to analyze whether high (top quartile) versus low (bottom quartile) resilience groups differed on their importance ratings of specific types of values. RESULTS: Successful pursuit of values (VQ-progress) positively predicted resilience (B = 0.67, p < .001) while barriers in pursuit of values (VQ-obstruction) negatively predicted resilience (B = -0.16, p < .05). The VLQ score (living according to particular values) positively predicted resilience (B = 0.18, p < .001). Participants with high resilience levels rated the following values as significantly more important relative to those low in resilience: caring, respect, compassion, gratitude, responsibility, and contribution. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with SCI who are able to pursue their values with intention had higher levels of resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Training in Neurorehabilitation Psychology: Defining Competencies, Requisite Skill Sets, and a Proposed Developmental Pathway.

Psychologists have been applying neurorehabilitation models of care for many years. These practitioners come from different training backgrounds and use a variety of titles to refer to themselves despite considerable overlap in practice patterns, professional identification, and salary. Titles like 'neurorehabilitation psychologist' and 'rehabilitation neuropsychologist' are sometimes used by practitioners in the field to indicate their specialty area, but are not formally recognized by the American Psychological Association, the American Board of Professional Psychology, or by training councils in clinical neuropsychology (CN) or rehabilitation psychology (RP). Neither the CN or RP specialties alone fully address or define the competencies, skill sets, and clinical experiences required to provide high quality, comprehensive neurorehabilitation psychology services across settings. Therefore, irrespective of practice setting, we believe that both clinical neuropsychologists and rehabilitation psychologists should ideally have mastery of specific, overlapping competencies and a philosophical approach to care that we call neurorehabilitation psychology in this paper. Trainees and early career professionals who aspire to practice in this arena are often pressured to prioritize either CN or RP pathways over the other, with anxiety about perceived and real potential for falling short in their training goals. In the absence of an explicit training path or formal guidelines, these professionals emerge only after the opportunity, privilege, or frank luck of working with specific mentors or in exceptional patient care settings that lend themselves to obtaining integrated competencies in neurorehabilitation psychology. This paper reflects the efforts of 7 practitioners to preliminarily define the practice and philosophies of neurorehabilitation psychology, the skill sets and competencies deemed essential for best practice, and essential training pathway elements. We propose competencies designed to maximize the integrity of training and provide clear guideposts for professional development.

Cognitive enrichment and education quality moderate cognitive dysfunction in black and white adults with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which three sociobehavioral proxies of cognitive reserve-years of education, education quality, and cognitive enrichment-differ in their prediction of cognitive performance among Black and White people with MS (PwMS). METHODS: 82 PwMS (Black n = 41, White n = 41) underwent a neurological examination and a neuropsychological evaluation that included tests of word recognition (Wechsler Test of Adult Reading) as well as measures of verbal memory, visuospatial memory, and processing speed (the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS; BICAMS). Participants rated their lifetime engagement in various cognitively-enriching activities (Cognitive Reserve Scale). RESULTS: For the full sample, education quality and cognitive enrichment were more strongly associated with cognitive performance than were years of education. Cognitive enrichment was not associated with cognitive performance among participants with high education quality. In contrast, among participants with low education quality, cognitive enrichment was strongly associated with cognitive performance, suggesting that high engagement in cognitively-enriching activities provided similar protection to high education quality. Furthermore, among Black participants, cognitive enrichment and educational quality moderated the relationship between disability level and cognitive performance. In contrast, among White participants, cognitive enrichment did not provide additional protection beyond the buffering effect of education quality. CONCLUSIONS: PwMS can successfully build reserve through multiple routes, including formal education or informal cognitive enrichment. Treatment for MS should incorporate cognitively-enriching activities to build resilience against cognitive decline, particularly for members of marginalized racial/ethnic groups, who are at greatest risk for poor health outcomes, and for whom years of education may not best reflect education quality.

Incremental validity of brief and abbreviated neuropsychological tests toward predicting functional outcomes in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationships among functional outcomes and performance on standard-length and abbreviated cognitive screening measures for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHOD: 72 adults with MS underwent neurological examination and cognitive screening. They completed standard-length and abbreviated versions of tests from the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS), the abbreviated aMACFIMS, and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). Functional outcomes included neurological disability, physical and psychological dysfunction, and employment status. RESULTS: Concordance of impairment classifications was examined between standard-length and abbreviated tests using logistic regression and ROC curve analyses. Overall, the abbreviated test versions showed a broad range of concordance with impairment classifications made using the full-length tests. Processing speed was the strongest correlate of neurological disability and employment status; immediate recall was the strongest predictor of subjective physical dysfunction. Test performance provided unique value toward predicting neurological disability and employment status, but not physical and psychological dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings replicate some support for abbreviated tests in MS assessment, although caveats regarding loss of validity associated with abbreviation remain. The findings extend prior research showing that abbreviated tests of processing speed and immediate recall can provide unique predictive information regarding objective functional outcomes.

CVLT-3 response bias as an indicator of performance validity in a litigating population.

This study examined the efficacy of CVLT-3 response bias (i.e., parametric and nonparametric response bias) indices in differentiating between a clinical sample with traumatic brain injury and a litigating sample with poor performance validity.Participants included 106 individuals, divided into two groups: clinical group with TBI (n = 56) and a litigating group who demonstrated inadequate performance validity (n = 50), as measured by failure on at least two performance validity tests. Archival CVLT-II data was rescored utilizing the CVLT-3 scoring and normative data. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic discriminability of the two response bias indices.Both parametric and nonparametric bias indices showed acceptable levels of diagnostic discrimination: AUC = .791 for parametric response bias and AUC = .753 for nonparametric response bias.Parametric response bias' discrimination was statistically superior to the nonparametric responses bias' discrimination. The CVLT-3 response bias score demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity when differentiating between individuals in a clinical sample with TBI and individuals in litigation who demonstrated inadequate performance validity.

Influence of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Core Processes on Anxiety and Stress in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the core Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) processes (mindfulness, self as context, acceptance, defusion, values, and committed action) and anxiety and stress in a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Variance accounted for by ACT on anxiety and stress as outcome variables was examined using multiple linear regression. SETTING: Study measures were completed via online survey. PARTICIPANTS: 159 participants with a SCI completed self-report study measures relevant to the ACT core processes as well as measures of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life Anxiety subdomain and the Perceived Stress Scale. RESULTS: Higher reported engagement with acceptance (ß=0.238, P=.004), pursuit of values (ß=0.187, P<.008), and defusion (ß=0.351, P<.001) related to less anxious distress. Perceived stress was predicted by depression (ß = 0.230, P=.038) and the ACT core processes as a whole (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that considerable variance in anxiety and stress in individuals with SCI is accounted for by the core processes of ACT. Lower levels of anxiety and stress were predicted by the ACT components as a whole. Anxiety was uniquely predicted by pursuit of values, acceptance, and defusion, indicating these 3 components of ACT may be particularly beneficial in the treatment of anxiety in SCI. These results may provide targeted treatment opportunities via tailored ACT-based interventions.

Association between Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) processes and depressive symptoms and pain interference in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent to which Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) core processes are related to depressive symptoms and pain interference in a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: 159 individuals with an SCI completed self-report surveys of 6 core processes of ACT and of 2 quality-of-life indicators (Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life [SCI-QOL] Depressive Symptoms and Pain Interference). Hierarchical linear regressions were used to analyze the amount of variance in depressive symptom and pain interference accounted for by ACT as a comprehensive construct and each individual ACT component. Data were collected specifically to examine these research questions. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that ACT as a unified construct accounted for a significant amount of variance in both criterion variables (range ΔR² = .29-.56; all ps < .001). Pursuit of Values and Emotional Acceptance were significant independent predictors of depressive symptoms; Self-as-Context and Emotional Acceptance were significant independent predictors of pain interference. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Overall, these results demonstrate that ACT core processes account for moderate to large amounts of the variance in indicators of depressive symptoms and pain interference for individuals who have an SCI. Pursuit of values and acceptance had the greatest associations with depressive symptoms, whereas self as context and acceptance had the greatest associations with reported pain interference. These results highlight the potential for ACT core processes to be targeted in a treatment context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Interprofessional collaboration and communication to facilitate implementation of cognitive rehabilitation in persons with brain injury.

Cognitive rehabilitation encompasses therapeutic services directed at improving cognitive functioning and functional abilities in individuals with brain injury. The term cognitive rehabilitation, however, is often broadly defined, and interventions delivered by individual disciplines may vary in their conceptualizations. This paper, written by an interprofessional collaborative group of speech-language pathologists and rehabilitation psychologists/ neuropsychologists identifies challenges in interprofessional rehabilitation of cognitive problems as well as solutions for addressing those challenges. Specifically, the challenge of defining elements of cognitive rehabilitation is addressed with a recommendation for interprofessional training and development of a shared perspective; the problem of "siloed" care is addressed by recommendations for consistent and considerable efforts at interprofessional communication, use of shared language and emphasis on health literacy; and the challenge of access to collaborative care is addressed with the recommendation to increase utilization of telerehabilitation interventions. Our goal is to empower clinicians to not only turn to evidence-based practice to address patient needs, but to go further in implementing the evidence base by facilitating true collaborative interdisciplinary services via improved knowledge of best practice, and advocacy avenues within systems of care. Such an approach will maximize the ability of rehabilitation professionals to provide meaningful, person-centered interventions that will maximize patient outcomes.

Rehabilitation psychology: 2020 state of the field survey.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To date, there are no published formal surveys of the "state of the field" of Rehabilitation Psychology in terms of education, training, practice patterns, professional identity, and relative salary and income structures for those who identify as Rehabilitation Psychologists. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: In an effort to gather this information, the Practice Committee of APA Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) conducted a convenience-sample survey of its listserv subscribers to obtain a representation of Rehabilitation Psychologists across the United States, and a depiction of the fields in which they work. RESULTS: There were 282 respondents to the survey. Most respondents were female (69%) and worked in hospital/medical facilities (70%). Most worked in urban/suburban areas (96%), with adults (57%), and had a straight salary income structure (78%). Salary was found to be associated with age (p < .001), gender (p < .001), degree (p = .001), board certification status (p < .001), years licensed (p < .001), and Manager/Director position status (p < .001). Salary was not significantly different by region. CONCLUSIONS: Implications regarding the need for advocacy for the roles of Rehabilitation Psychology in health care, promotion of the specialty with consumers, and the development of future professionals are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Navigating the Pathway to Care in Adults With Cerebral Palsy.

As individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) age, they face unique challenges which complicate their ability to access and receive appropriate health care. These problems exist at the level of the health care system, the clinician, and the individual. At the system level, there is an inadequate number of professionals who are informed of and interested in the care of adults with CP. Pediatric clinicians prefer treating children, and adult caregivers are not knowledgeable about and may feel less competent about CP. Pediatric care does not translate well to the adult population, and information about best practices for adults is just starting to develop. Differences in the physiologic development of individuals with CP render well-established clinical protocols for risk screening of chronic diseases less effective. Moreover, lack of supportive resources decreases a caregiver's sense of self-efficacy in treating this population. The patient's ability to navigate these barriers is complicated by the high prevalence of comorbid cognitive impairment and mental health issues including anxiety, depression, and other psychiatric disorders; a bidirectional relationship between challenges in navigating care/needs and comorbid mental health conditions appears likely. Many patients have additional barriers related to social determinants of health, such as access to transportation, accessible health care facilities, and other personal and environmental factors that may impede health maintenance and wellness. Increasing and disseminating knowledge, harnessing the power of new technologies such as telemedicine, and addressing mental health issues are some of the methods that are available to help adults with CP navigate this road.

Therapeutic assessment and the art of feedback: A model for integrating evidence-based assessment and therapy techniques in neurological rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic assessment involves the integration of evidence-based approaches and humanistic principles, and there is empirical support for the use of this approach in the context of neuropsychological assessment broadly. OBJECTIVE: We propose that therapeutic assessment (TA) and collaborative therapeutic neuropsychological assessment (CTNA) principles are appropriate and effective for application within a neurological rehabilitation population specifically. METHODS: We review TA and CTNA principles and propose a model for their application to a neurological rehabilitation population, with an emphasis on describing the strengths of the collaborative approach, guidelines and principles for maximizing the efficacy of feedback, and transitioning the patient into psychotherapy services to further address their personal goals. A case example of a neurologically injured individual engaged in CTNA and subsequent intervention is shared to highlight the principles discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The proposed model and case study demonstrate the clinical utility of TA and CTNA principles with a neurological rehabilitation population.

Interprofessional Collaborative Management of Postconcussion Cognitive Symptoms.

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to illustrate an interprofessional cognitive rehabilitation approach. Invited experts representing physical medicine and rehabilitation, clinical neuropsychology/rehabilitation psychology, registered nurse care coordination, and speech-language pathology share viewpoints from their discipline to engage in collaborative interventions with the goal of enhancing treatment outcomes. Conclusions Treating the multifactorial symptoms of concussion requires expertise from an interdisciplinary team (IDT) of professionals, contributing unique perspectives and providing integrative services to optimize rehabilitation outcomes for patients. Speech-language pathologists serve an important role on IDTs to deliver personalized, targeted therapies for prolonged or persistent postconcussion cognitive impairment.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool: Influence of performance and symptom validity.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in a veteran traumatic brain injury (TBI) population, considering performance validity test (PVT) and symptom validity test (SVT) data, and explored associations of MoCA performance with neuropsychological test performance and self-reported distress. METHODS: Of 198 consecutively referred veterans to a Veterans Administration TBI/Polytrauma Clinic, 117 were included in the final sample. The MoCA was administered as part of the evaluation. Commonly used measures of neuropsychological functioning and performance and symptom validity were also administered to aid in diagnosis. RESULTS: Successively worse MoCA performances were associated with a greater number of PVT failures (ps < 0.05). Failure of both the SVT and at least 1 PVT yielded the lowest MoCA scores. Self-reported distress (both posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and neurobehavioral cognitive symptoms) was also related to MoCA performance. CONCLUSIONS: Performance on the MoCA is influenced by task engagement and symptom validity. Causal inferences about neurologic and neurocognitive impairment, particularly in the context of mild TBI, wherein the natural course of recovery is well known, should therefore be made cautiously when such inferences are based heavily on MoCA scores. Neuropsychologists are well versed in the assessment of performance and symptom validity and thus may be well suited to explore the influences of abnormal performances on cognitive screening.

Suspiciously slow: timed digit span as an embedded performance validity measure in a sample of veterans with mTBI.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the utility of Timed Digit Span (TDS) as an embedded performance validity test (PVT) in a sample of veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We hypothesize that TDS will predict PVT failure on an established stand-alone measure (Trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering; TOMM). METHODS: TDS was compared to Digit Span accuracy (DS), using TOMM as a criterion measure, in a sample of 99 veterans with mTBI. Correlation and regression were used to characterize associations between PVTs. Logistic regression was utilized to examine the relationship between embedded PVTs and the odds of TOMM failure. Classification accuracy of TDS was examined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictive power of TDS to estimate TOMM failure was calculated for the current sample and for hypothetical populations with common base rates (BRs). OUTCOMES: TDS significantly predicted failure on the TOMM and added greater incremental predictive value to the model compared to DS accuracy. Estimates of the predictive power of TDS were calculated using observed and hypothetical BRs. Sensitivity to stand-alone PVT, failure was 38% when specificity was set at 90%. CONCLUSION: TDS offers a promising embedded PVT method, given its strong convergence with an established stand-alone PVT.

Cognitive Log performance among individuals without brain injury in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread use of the Cognitive Log, information regarding normative performance is only available in individuals with known brain injury and in healthy college students. The purpose of the current research is to provide information about Cognitive Log performance in a regional group of rehabilitation patients without history of brain injury. Secondarily, non-neurological factors that may predict performance are considered. Research Method/Design: Participants included in this study were 121 consecutive patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital spinal cord and orthopedic floor. Based on history, only patients without insult to the brain were included. RESULTS: This study provides normative information for Cognitive Log performance in a nonbrain injured population, showing that these patients score in between those with acquired brain injury and healthy controls. Variables including age, estimated intelligence, and self-reported pain, fatigue, and affective distress accounted for 47.5% of the variance in Cognitive Log scores, although age and estimated intelligence, which accounted for 43.3% of the variance, were the only individually significant contributors to performance. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This study provides an estimate of normative Cognitive Log performance in a nonbrain injured population. This information is especially useful in that it signifies that both neurological and non-neurological factors contribute to Cognitive Log performance, and this information may shape how clinicians conceptualize scores in patients with and without brain injury. Age and longstanding intellectual abilities should be taken into consideration when interpreting Cognitive Log performances, developing rehabilitation strategies, and determining need for additional testing. (PsycINFO Database Record

MRI and Neuropsychological Correlates in African Americans With Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: African Americans (AAs) are at high risk for hypertension (HTN) and poor blood pressure (BP) control. Persistently elevated BP contributes to cardiovascular morbidity. White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a definable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) marker of cerebrovascular injury linked to impairments in higher level thinking (i.e., executive functions), memory formation, and speed of perceptual-motor processing. METHODS: This subinvestigation evaluated neuropsychological functioning in association with WMH on brain MRIs in 23 otherwise-healthy hypertensive AAs participating in an NIH-funded study of the effects of vitamin D on BP and cardiac remodeling in AA patients 30-74 years of age with HTN and left ventricular hypertrophy. Neuropsychological assessment included psychomotor processing speed [(Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) and Trail Making Test], executive functioning (Controlled Oral Word Association Test and Trail Making Test Part B), memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test), and fine motor functioning (Finger Tapping). RESULTS: Significant correlations (P < 0.05) were found between volume of periventricular lesions and trails A (r = 0.51) and dominant hand finger tapping speed (r = -0.69) and between subcortical lesion volume and trails A (r = 0.60), both dominant (r = -0.62) and nondominant hand finger tapping speed (r = -0.76) and oral SDMT (r = -0.60); higher lesion volumes correlated to worse neuropsychological performance. CONCLUSIONS: Psychomotor tests including the Trail Making Test and finger tapping speed are sensitive indicators of subclinical deficits in mental processing speed and could serve as early markers of deep subcortical cerebrovascular injury in otherwise-healthy individuals with uncontrolled chronic HTN.

Role of resilience in the rehabilitation of adults with acquired brain injury.

PURPOSE: The goals of this review paper are to present an overview of the literature on resilience in adults with ABI, to describe approaches to measuring resilience in clinical practice and to discuss practical suggestions for promoting resilience in rehabilitation of adults with ABI. METHOD: We employed systematic review of journal articles, books, and websites related to resilience in adults with acquired brain injury (ABI). RESULTS: Resilience was associated with adaptation and adjustment for individuals faced with serious injury such as ABI. However, research examining the construct of resilience is limited. CONCLUSION: While rehabilitation typically focuses on the identification and reduction of impairments for improving functioning, a focus on resilience may allow for recovery in a broader sense that exceeds expected outcomes.

Neuropsychological test validity in Veterans presenting with subjective complaints of 'very severe' cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the utility of combining data from measures of performance validity and symptom validity among Veterans undergoing neuropsychological evaluation for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive impairments following mTBI are often reported by returning combat veterans. However, objectively-measured cognitive deficits are not common among individuals with mTBI, raising the question of whether negative impression management influences self-ratings. METHODS: Self-report ratings were obtained for memory, concentration, decision-making, and processing speed/organization using a 5-point scale ranging from 'none' to 'very severe'. Veterans also completed brief neuropsychological testing which included measures of performance validity. RESULTS: Study 1 examined data from 122 participants and demonstrated that veterans reporting a 'very severe' cognitive deficit were over three times as likely to demonstrate poor effort on a validity test than those without a very severe rating. Study 2 replicated these findings in an independent sample of 127 veterans and also demonstrated that both severity of self-report ratings and performance on an embedded measure of effort were predictive of poor effort on a stand-alone performance validity test. CONCLUSION: Veterans with suspected mTBI who report 'very severe' cognitive impairment have a greater likelihood of putting forth sub-optimal effort on objective testing.

Correlates of resilience in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To examine resilience in the context of adjustment to traumatic brain injury (TBI), including the relative roles of demographic and theoretically related constructs such as coping, social support, and positive affectivity on resilience within the first 5 years postinjury. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional, observational study of 67 persons with medically documented mild complicated to severe TBI. Participants completed a battery of measures including cognitive tests; questionnaires assessing self-report of emotional symptoms, perceived social support, and coping style; and a measure of resilience. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of the sample endorsed moderate to high levels of resilience during the first 5 years postinjury. Brain injury severity, premorbid intelligence, and cognitive flexibility did not predict resilience, as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. By contrast, task-oriented coping and perceived social support were strong and unique covariates of resilience. Positive and negative affectivity were related to resilience but were not unique covariates of it in the presence of task-oriented coping and perceived social support. Discriminant validity of resilience as a concept and the means of assessing it was supported by findings that emotion-oriented and avoidance coping were not meaningfully related to resilience. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Overall, the findings indicate that the majority of individuals in this sample reported high levels of resilience after brain injury and that correlates of resilience in adults with TBI is similar to that observed in adults without the history of cognitive impairment. (PsycINFO Database Record

Informational literature influences symptom expression following mild head injury: An analog study.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Many Veterans involved in recent OEF/OIF conflicts return with reports of having experienced an mTBI. The Veteran's Affairs (VA) and Department of Defense (DoD) have gone to great lengths to provide information to Veterans regarding possible effects of TBI. Although well intended, this information may possibly have an iatrogenic effect. Conversely, setting positive expectations for recovery from mTBI has been shown to result in decreased symptomatology. RESEARCH DESIGN: One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc analyses were used to determine whether there were significant differences on reported severity and number of PCS symptoms (NSI) among the three experimental groups (recovery focused information; expectation for persistent symptoms; and no information given). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Undergraduate students, who were told to imagine they had experienced a military-related TBI, reported varying levels of expected symptoms when given either positive or negative information about symptom expectation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The results indicate that presenting recovery-oriented literature resulted in the lowest report of expected symptoms, whereas presenting no information resulted in the highest report of expected symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Providing Veterans with information regarding a likely positive trajectory of recovery may result in less symptom persistence during rehabilitation.