Noninvasive Soft Tissue Expansion Strips and Wound Complications After Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total ankle arthroplasty through the anterior approach (TAR-AA) is an increasingly popular treatment for ankle arthritis, but it carries a known risk for wound complications. Several products have been investigated to mitigate this risk; however, most are either costly or invasive. Noninvasive skin expansion strips (NSESs) were designed to transfer tension away from the incision and induce new skin growth at the edges of the strips. We hypothesize that postoperative application of NSESs will decrease unplanned clinic visits and wound complications after TAR-AA. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 41 patients at a single institution (3 surgeons) treated with NSESs after undergoing TAR-AA. An additional 41 consecutive historical patients treated without NSESs were retrospectively included as a control group. Patients received application of NSESs in the operating room after routine wound closure and again 2 weeks postoperatively. No other changes were made to the surgeons' wound closure technique, immobilization, follow-up timing, or rehabilitation protocols. Primary outcomes included (1) additional clinic visit required for wound assessment or suture removal, (2) superficial wound complication, and (3) deep infection. RESULTS: Baseline demographics did not differ significantly from our 41 consecutively treated historical controls. Additional clinic visits for suture removal or wound evaluation were significantly lower for patients treated with NSESs (15%, 6 of 41) compared to the control group (49%, 20 of 41) (P = .001). There was also a significant difference in the superficial wound complication rate in the treatment group vs control group, 2% and 12%, respectively (P = .04). There were no deep infections in either group. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive skin expansion strips placed after TAR-AA with an anterior approach have the potential to decrease wound complications and unplanned clinic visits. Further high-volume or randomized studies are needed to clarify their cost effectiveness and effect on long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Head Fractures Associated with Traumatic Hip Dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Femoral head fractures are an uncommon but severe injury. These high-energy injuries typically occur in association with traumatic hip dislocations. Initial treatment includes urgent concentric reduction; however, controversy exists regarding specific fracture management. The well-known complications of avascular necrosis (AVN), posttraumatic arthritis (PTA), and heterotrophic ossification can leave patients with a significant functional loss of their affected hip. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at our institution assessing all patients who presented from 2007 to 2015 with a femoral head fracture associated with a hip dislocation and at least 6 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Twenty-two patients met our inclusion criteria. There were 15 males and 7 females with an average age of 36 years (range: 17-55). The average follow-up time was 18 months (range: 6-102). Fractures were classified according to the Pipkin classification. The Thompson and Epstein score was used to determine functional outcomes. RESULTS: There were five, Pipkin I, 3 Pipkin II, 0 Pipkin III, and 14 Pipkin IV, femoral head fractures. Sixteen patients were successfully closed reduced in the emergency department (ED) and six patients required open reduction after failed reduction in the ED. Four patients (18%) were successfully treated with closed reduction alone and 18 patients (82%) required operative intervention. Of those undergoing operative intervention, one patient underwent excision of the femoral head fragment, seven underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the femoral head, nine underwent ORIF of the acetabulum, and one underwent ORIF of the femoral head and the acetabulum. Nine patients (41%) had an uneventful postoperative course. Two patients (9%) developed AVN, both requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA). Five patients (23%) developed PTA, two eventually requiring a THA. Two patients (9%) had sciatic nerve palsy. One patient (5%) developed a postoperative infection and four patients (18%) developed heterotrophic ossification (HO), none requiring operative treatment. Two patients (9%) had persistent anterolateral (AL) thigh numbness. Overall functional results were excellent in six patients (27%), good in six (27%), fair in seven (32%), and poor in three patients (14%). Four patients (18%) required a THA. CONCLUSION: Femoral head fractures are a rare injury with well-known complications. Early diagnosis and concentric reduction are the prerequisites for successful treatment. This study adds to the growing literature on femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocations in efforts to define treatment plans and to guide patient expectations. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Del Core MA, Gross B, Ahn J, et al. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Head Fractures Associated with Traumatic Hip Dislocations. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):6-10.