Pediatric basilar skull fractures from multi-level falls: A systematic review and retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Multi-level fall (MLF) accounts for 26.5%-37.7% of traumatic pediatric basilar skull fractures (BSFs). There is a dearth of information concerning recommendations for work-up, diagnosis, treatment, and otolaryngological follow-up of pediatric basilar skull fractures secondary to MLFs. Through a systematic literature review and retrospective review of an institution's trauma experience, we sought to identify clinical findings among pediatric MLF patients that indicate the need for otolaryngological follow-up. METHODS: A two-researcher team following the PRISMA guidelines performed a systematic literature review. PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were searched August 16th, 2020 and again on November 20th, 2021 for English language articles published after 1980 using search terms Pediatric AND (fall OR "multi level fall" OR "fall from height") AND ("basilar fracture" OR "basilar skull fracture" OR "skull base fracture" OR "skull fracture"). Simultaneously, an institutional trauma database and retrospective chart review was performed for all patients under age 18 who presented with a MLF to a pediatric tertiary care center between 2007 and 2018. RESULTS: 168 publications were identified and 13 articles reporting pediatric basilar skull fracture data and MLF as a mechanism of injury were selected for review. MLF is the most common etiology of BSF, accounting for 26.5-37.7% of pediatric BSFs. In the retrospective review, there were 180 cases of BSF from MLF in the study period (4.2%). BSF and fall height were significantly associated (p < 0.001), as well as presence of a CSF leak and fall height (p = 0.02), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (p = 0.047), and BSF fracture type (p < 0.001). However, when stratified by age, these associations were only present in the younger group. Of those with non-temporal bone BSFs (n = 71), children with hemotympanum (n = 7) were approximately 18 times more likely (RR 18.3, 95% CI 1.89 to 177.02) than children without hemotympanum (n = 64) to have hearing loss at presentation (28.6% vs. 1.6% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: MLF is the most common cause of pediatric basilar skull fractures. However, there is limited information on the appropriate work-up or otolaryngologic follow-up for this mechanism of injury. Our retrospective review suggests fall height is predictive for BSF, ICH, and CSF leak in younger children. Also, children with non-temporal bone BSFs and hemotympanum may represent a significant population requiring otolaryngology follow-up.

Costs and Complications Associated with Infected Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair.

Background: Mesh hernia repair is widely accepted because of the associated reduction in hernia recurrence compared with suture-based repair. Despite initiatives to reduce risk, mesh infection and mesh removal are a significant challenge. In an era of healthcare value, it is essential to understand the global cost of care, including the incidence and cost of complications. The purpose of this study was to identify the outcomes and costs of care of patients who required the removal of infected hernia mesh. Methods: A review of databases from 2006 through June 2018 identified patients who underwent both ventral hernia repair (VHR) and re-operation for infected mesh removal. Patient demographic and operative details for both procedures, including age, Body Mass Index, mesh type, amount of time between procedures, and information regarding interval procedures were obtained. Clinical outcome measures were the length of the hospital stay, hospital re-admission, incision/non-incision complications, and re-operation. Hospital cost data were obtained from the cost accounting system and were combined with the clinical data for a cost and clinical representation of the cases. Results: Thirty-four patients underwent both VHR and removal of infected mesh material over the 12-year time frame and were included in the analyses; the average age at VHR was 48 years, and 16 patients (47%) were female. Following VHR, 21 patients (62%) experienced incision complications within 90 days post-operatively, the complications ranging from superficial surgical site infection (SSI) to evisceration. A mean of 22.65 months passed between procedures. After mesh removal, 16 patients (47%) experienced further incisional complications; and 22 (65%) patients had at least one re-admission. Eighteen patients (53%) required a minimum of one additional related operative procedure after mesh removal. Median hospital costs nearly doubled (p < 0.001) for the mesh removal ($23,841 [interquartile range {IQR} $13,596-$42,148]) compared with the VHR admission ($13,394 [IQR $8,424-$22,161]) not accounting for re-admission costs. A majority experienced hernia recurrence subsequent to mesh removal. Conclusions: Mesh infection after hernia repair is associated with significant morbidity and costs. Hospital re-admission, re-operations, and recurrences are common among these patients, resulting in greater healthcare resource utilization. Development of strategies to prevent mesh infection, identify patients most likely to experience infectious complications, and define best practices for the care of patients with mesh infection are needed.

The contribution of specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol elements to reduced length of hospital stay after ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is a commonly performed procedure that may be associated with prolonged hospitalization. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are intended to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS) and improve outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of compliance with individual VHR ERAS elements on LOS. METHODS: With IRB approval, a medical record review (perioperative characteristics, clinical outcomes, compliance with ERAS elements) was conducted of open VHR consecutive cases performed in August 2013-July 2017. The ERAS protocol was implemented in August 2015; elements in place prior to implementation were accounted for in compliance review. Clinical predictors of LOS were determined through forward regression of log-transformed LOS. The effects of specific ERAS elements on LOS were assessed by adding them to the model in the presence of the clinical predictors. RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirty-four patients underwent VHR (109 ERAS, 125 pre-ERAS). Across all patients, the mean LOS was 5.4 days (SD = 3.3). Independent perioperative predictors (P's < 0.05) of increased LOS were CDC Wound Class III/IV (38% increase above the mean), COPD (35%), prior infected mesh (21%), concomitant procedure (14%), mesh size (3% per 100 cm2), and age (8% increase per 10 years from mean age). Formal ERAS implementation was associated with a 15% or about 0.7 days (95% CI 6%-24%) reduction in mean LOS after adjustment. Compliance with acceleration of intestinal recovery was low (25.6%) as many patients were not eligible for alvimopan use due to preoperative opioids, yet when achieved, provided the greatest reduction in LOS (- 36%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for VHR results in decreased hospital LOS. Evaluation of the impact of specific ERAS element compliance to LOS is unique to this study. Compliance with acceleration of intestinal recovery, early postoperative mobilization, and multimodal pain management standards provided the greatest LOS reduction.