Diagnostic Performance of Stool-based Testing for Colorectal Lesions Among Average-risk Individuals: A Real-world Evidence Study.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the real-world performance of stool-based tests (SBTs) for colorectal cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of average-risk individuals with positive SBT for advanced neoplasia (adenocarcinoma, advanced adenoma, and/or advanced serrated lesions) detection at follow-up colonoscopy. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the detection of advanced neoplasia (P= 0.16) between SBTs [30.7% for multitargeted stool DNA (mt-sDNA) vs 22.8% for fecal immunochemical test]. However, there was a significant difference in the detection of advanced serrated lesions (11.3% for mt-sDNA vs 1.8% for fecal immunochemical test, P< 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between SBTs for advanced neoplasia detection, though mt-sDNA detected significantly more advanced serrated lesions.

Colorectal cancer screening uptake and adherence by modality at a large tertiary care center in the United States: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Real-world data is crucial to inform existing opportunistic colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention programs. This study aimed to assess CRC screening adherence and utilization of various screening modalities within a Primary Care network over a three-year period (2017-2019). METHODS: A retrospective review of individuals aged 50-75 years at average CRC risk, with at least one clinic visit in the previous 24 months. The primary outcome, CRC screening adherence (overall and by modality) was examined among the entire eligible population and newly adherent individuals each calendar year. The final sample included 107,366 patients and 218,878 records. RESULTS: Overall CRC screening adherence increased from 71% in 2017 to 78% in 2019. For "up-to-date" individuals, colonoscopy was the predominant modality (accounting for approximately 74%, versus 4% of adherence for non-invasive options). However, modality utilization trends changed over time in these individuals: mt-sDNA increased 10.2-fold, followed by FIT (1.6-fold) and colonoscopy (1.1-fold). Among newly adherent individuals, the proportion screened by colonoscopy and FOBT decreased over time (89% to 80% and 2.4% to 1.2%, respectively), while uptake of FIT and mt-sDNA increased (7.7% to 11.5% and 0.9% to 6.8%, respectively). Notably, FIT and mt-sDNA increases were most evident in age and race-ethnicity groups with the lowest screening rates. CONCLUSIONS: In an opportunistic CRC screening program, adherence increased but remained below the national 80% goal. While colonoscopy remained the most utilized modality, new colonoscopy uptake declined, compared with rising mt-sDNA and FIT utilization. Among minority populations, new uptake increased most with mt-sDNA and FIT.

The effect of the APPRISE mandate on use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and transfusion rates in patients with ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) support chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In response to research demonstrating that ESAs increase tumor growth and shorten survival, the Food and Drug Administration mandated the new APPRISE (Assisting Providers and Cancer Patients with Risk Information for the Safe use of ESAs) guidelines for consenting patients before ESAs administration. We sought to quantify the change in ESA and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion use after the APPRISE mandate was instituted. METHODS/MATERIALS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review compared patients with EOC undergoing chemotherapy before and after the APPRISE mandate. Abstracted data included patient demographics, chemotherapy treatment status and regimen, and number of patients requiring ESAs or RBCs. A cost savings analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients who underwent 367 cycles of chemotherapy after the APPRISE guidelines were compared with a matched set of 88 patients receiving 613 cycles of chemotherapy before the APPRISE guidelines. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Most patients had advanced stage disease and received primary taxane-/platinum-based chemotherapy. Of 88 patients, 45 (51%) in the pre-APPRISE group received a total of 196 ESA injections compared with 0 patients in the post-APPRISE group. Red blood cell transfusion in the post-APPRISE group was similar to that in the pre-APPRISE group (8.3% vs 14.8%, P = 0.28). Omission of ESAs in the post-APPRISE group resulted in a roughly $700,000 savings in billable charges. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, the APPRISE guidelines have resulted in complete cessation of the use of ESAs in patients with primary or recurrent EOC, resulting in considerable cost savings. Importantly, RBC transfusion rates did not significantly increase after the guidelines were imposed.

The utilization of palliative care in gynecologic oncology patients near the end of life.

BACKGROUND: Palliative and supportive care services provide excellent care to patients near the end of life. It is estimated that enrollment in such services can reduce end-of-life costs; however, there is limited data available regarding the impact of palliative services in end-of-life care in gynecologic oncology patients. We examined the use of palliative services in gynecologic oncology patients during the last six months of life. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of patients with a diagnosis of a gynecologic malignancy who died between June 2007 and June 2010 was performed. Abstracted data included demographics, admission and procedural history, use of anti-cancer therapy, and palliative care utilization during the last six months of life. RESULTS: 268 patients were identified. Most patients were white (76.9%) and had ovarian cancer (56.7%). During the last six months of life, 155 (57.8%) patients underwent anti-cancer therapy with chemotherapy, 19 (7.1%) patients were treated with radiation therapy, and 17 patients (6.3%) underwent treatment with both. 218 patients (81.3%) had at least one admission during this time (range 0-14). The most common reason for admission was gastrointestinal complaints (37.1%), followed by admissions for procedures (18.3%). The median time between the last admission and death was 32 days. 157 patients (58.6%) underwent at least one procedure during the last six months of life (range 0-11). The most common procedure performed was paracentesis (22.6%). 198 (73.9%) patients died at home or in a palliative care unit. 189 (70.5%) patients were referred to hospice or palliative care. 3.2% underwent a procedure or treatment with chemotherapy or radiation after hospice enrollment. The median time between hospice enrollment and death was 22 days. 55% of patients were enrolled in hospice less than 30 days before death. Of the 79 patients not referred to hospice, only 16.5% had documentation of refusing hospice services. CONCLUSIONS: During the last six months of life, the majority of gynecologic oncology patients receive anticancer therapy and many have repeated hospital admissions. While the majority of patients are referred for palliative care, it appears that most patients spend less than 30 days on hospice. Earlier referral could decrease the number of hospital admissions and procedures while providing invaluable support during this end of life transition.