RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dietary management is considered a potential adjunctive treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Short-video sharing platforms have enabled patients to obtain dietary advice more conveniently. However, accessing useful resources while avoiding misinformation is not an easy task for most patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the information in IBD diet-related videos on Chinese short-video sharing platforms. METHODS: We collected and extracted information from a total of 125 video samples related to the IBD diet on the 3 Chinese short-video sharing platforms with the most users: TikTok, Bilibili, and Kwai. Two independent physicians evaluated each video in terms of content comprehensiveness, quality (rated by Global Quality Score), and reliability (rated by a modified DISCERN tool). Finally, comparative analyses of the videos from different sources were conducted. RESULTS: The videos were classified into 6 groups based on the identity of the uploaders, which included 3 kinds of medical professionals (ie, gastroenterologists, nongastroenterologists, and clinical nutritionists) and 3 types of non-medical professionals (ie, nonprofit organizations, individual science communicators, and IBD patients). The overall quality of the videos was poor. Further group comparisons demonstrated that videos from medical professionals were more instructive in terms of content comprehensiveness, quality, and reliability than those from non-medical professionals. Moreover, IBD diet-related recommendations from clinical nutritionists and gastroenterologists were of better quality than those from nongastroenterologists, while recommendations from nonprofit organizations did not seem to be superior to other groups of uploaders. CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of the information in IBD diet-related videos is unsatisfactory and varies significantly depending on the source. Videos from medical professionals, especially clinical nutritionists and gastroenterologists, may provide dietary guidance with higher quality for IBD patients.
Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Comunicação , Dieta , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Gravação em Vídeo , Disseminação de InformaçãoRESUMO
Materials require specific surface structures to achieve the best performance, but achieving an optimal structural design requires a systematic study of how structure affects performance. In this work, we comprehensively and systematically investigated the structure-activity relationship between the nanowire structure and the oil dewetting self-cleaning performance. It is easy for an oil droplet to enter this structure, but it is difficult for it to escape from the gaps between the structures even under the action of water. So, the oil dewetting ability is greatly reduced, showing that this "easy to enter and difficult to exit" mode is very disadvantageous for oil desorption. Moreover, if the structure is dissolved during the test, the oil dewetting ability will be restored. The desorption effect is affected by structural parameters and reaction conditions, which further verifies the negative effect of this structure. In contrast, copper(II) oxide nanowires completely lose their self-cleaning ability due to the enhancement of hydrophobicity and oleophilicity, and the larger-diameter copper(II) oxalate nanorods exhibit a "difficult to enter and difficult to exit" mode, leading to the partial recovery of the oil dewetting performance. This study helps us deeply understand the influence of the surface microstructure on the oil dewetting performance and lay a solid foundation for further appropriate structural design.
RESUMO
No fully validated risk-stratification strategies have been established in China where colonoscopies resources are limited. We aimed to develop and validate a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based risk-stratification model for colorectal neoplasia (CN); 10,164 individuals were recruited from 175 centers nationwide and were randomly allocated to the derivation (n = 6776) or validation cohort (n = 3388). Multivariate logistic analyses were performed to develop the National Colorectal Polyp Care (NCPC) score, which formed the risk-stratification model along with FIT. The NCPC score was developed from eight independent predicting factors and divided into three levels: low risk (LR 0-14), intermediate risk (IR 15-17), and high risk (HR 18-28). Individuals with IR or HR of NCPC score or FIT+ were classified as increased-risk individuals in the risk-stratification model and were recommended for colonoscopy. The IR/HR of NCPC score showed a higher prevalence of CNs (21.8%/32.8% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.001) and ACNs (4.3%/9.2% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.001) than LR, which was also confirmed in the validation cohort. Similar relative risks and predictive performances were demonstrated between non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (NSGS) and asymptomatic cohort. The risk-stratification model identified 73.5% CN, 82.6% ACN, and 93.6% CRC when guiding 52.7% individuals to receive colonoscopy and identified 55.8% early-onset ACNs and 72.7% early-onset CRCs with only 25.6% young individuals receiving colonoscopy. The risk-stratification model showed a good risk-stratification ability for CN and early-onset CRCs in Chinese population, including individuals with NSGS and young age.