Risdiplam in Patients Previously Treated with Other Therapies for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: An Interim Analysis from the JEWELFISH Study.

INTRODUCTION: Risdiplam is a survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) splicing modifier for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The JEWELFISH study (NCT03032172) was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of risdiplam in previously treated pediatric and adult patients with types 1-3 SMA. Here, an analysis was performed after all patients had received at least 1 year of treatment with risdiplam. METHODS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA between the ages of 6 months and 60 years were eligible for enrollment. Patients were previously enrolled in the MOONFISH study (NCT02240355) with splicing modifier RG7800 or treated with olesoxime, nusinersen, or onasemnogene abeparvovec. The primary objectives of the JEWELFISH study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of risdiplam and investigate the PK after 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients enrolled: MOONFISH study (n = 13), olesoxime (n = 71 patients), nusinersen (n = 76), onasemnogene abeparvovec (n = 14). Most patients (78%) had three SMN2 copies. The median age and weight of patients at enrollment was 14.0 years (1-60 years) and 39.1 kg (9.2-108.9 kg), respectively. About 63% of patients aged 2-60 years had a baseline total score of less than 10 on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded and 83% had scoliosis. The most common adverse event (AE) was upper respiratory tract infection and pyrexia (30 patients each; 17%). Pneumonia (four patients; 2%) was the most frequently reported serious AE (SAE). The rates of AEs and SAEs per 100 patient-years were lower in the second 6-month period compared with the first. An increase in SMN protein was observed in blood after risdiplam treatment and was comparable across all ages and body weight quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and PD of risdiplam in patients who were previously treated were consistent with those of treatment-naïve patients.

Hair analysis to monitor adherence to prescribed chronic inhaler drug therapy in patients with asthma or COPD.

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to inhaled drug therapy in individuals with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be associated with suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. Measurement of drug residues in hair samples has been employed to assess oral medication use over time. Here, we test the feasibility of analyzing hair samples from patients with asthma and/or COPD for assessing adherence to prescribed inhaled medication. METHODS: In total, 200 male and female subjects, ≥ 18 years of age, with stable asthma and/or COPD who were receiving an acceptable standard of care daily inhaled product consistently, were recruited. Head hair samples were taken during a single visit to the clinical site and grouped by hair color according to the Fischer-Saller scale. Drug residues were extracted from milled hair samples using solid-phase extraction and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Inhaled drugs were detected in hair for 72% of subjects from whom it was possible to analyze hair samples (n = 157/200). Most hair samples obtained from subjects receiving formoterol or vilanterol had amounts of drug present that allowed determination of a quantifiable concentration, and demonstrated a dose response. Drugs were detected in all hair colors, with higher concentrations of formoterol observed in dark-haired versus light-haired individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that inhaled medication can be measured in hair samples from subjects with asthma and/or COPD. The results show that hair drug concentration data could potentially provide a record of historical adherence to inhaled therapeutics.

Effects of a novel sodium channel blocker, GSK2339345, in patients with refractory chronic cough
.

OBJECTIVE: Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) are important in the initiation and propagation of action potentials in afferent sensory nerve fibers responsible for evoking cough. This study investigated the efficacy of GSK2339345, a VGSC inhibitor, in the treatment of refractory chronic cough (RCC). METHODS: A three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was conducted in the UK. In part A, patients with RCC received two inhaled doses of either GSK2339345 or placebo, 4 hours apart during three study periods. Patients were monitored for cough for 8 hours post-first dose using the VitaloJAK, ambulatory cough monitor. In parts B and C, patients underwent full dose-response cough challenges with capsaicin and citric acid respectively following single doses of randomly assigned GSK2339345 or placebo (4 study days). Part A was analyzed using a mixed effects model and parts B and C using population non-linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Of 16 enrolled patients, 11 completed the study. 8-hour cough counts increased following GSK2339345 treatment compared with placebo (GSK2339345/placebo ratio of adjusted geometric means: 1.26 (90% credible interval 1.10, 1.44), associated with GSK2339345-evoked coughing, recorded during the 2 minutes post-dose. This was not observed with placebo. The effect of GSK2339345 on cough responses during cough challenges was inconclusive. GSK2339345 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: While these data could not determine if GSK2339345 reached the target VGSC, they strongly suggest that GSK2339345 has no anti-tussive effect despite reaching airway sensory nerves as evidenced by the evoked transient cough.
.

Systemic Exposures of Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Following Inhalation via Metered Dose Inhaler with the Mini Spacer Compared with the Aerochamber Plus Spacer.

BACKGROUND: The Mini Spacer has been developed for use with Ventolin(®) metered dose inhalers (MDIs) to improve accessibility to affordable spacers in developing countries. To ensure patient safety is not compromised if the Mini Spacer is used off-label with fluticasone propionate (FP) or salmeterol/FP combination (SFC) MDIs (currently not recommended), this study compared the systemic exposure of FP and salmeterol following delivery of FP and SFC MDIs with the Mini Spacer and the Aerochamber Plus(®) spacer (Aerochamber). METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, single dose, crossover study in healthy subjects that evaluated four treatments: i) FP 250 µg MDI with Mini Spacer; ii) FP 250 µg MDI with Aerochamber; iii) SFC 25/250 µg with Mini Spacer; iv) SFC 25/250 µg with Aerochamber. There was a minimum 7 day washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected over 24 hours post-dose. The co-primary endpoints were FP area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h [FP AUC(0-24)] and salmeterol maximum plasma concentration [Cmax]. RESULTS: FP systemic exposure in terms of AUC(0-24) was lower following inhalation with the Mini Spacer compared with the Aerochamber for both FP 250 µg (Mini Spacer/Aerochamber Ratio 0.76 [90% CI: 0.57-1.01]) and SFC 25/250 µg (Ratio 0.74 [90% CI: 0.56-0.99]). Salmeterol systemic exposure was also lower following SFC 25/250 µg with Mini Spacer compared with Aerochamber (Cmax Ratio 0.90 [90% CI 0.48-1.66]). The incidence of adverse events was low and similar with each treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the event of use of the Mini Spacer with FP and SFC MDIs, which is not recommended, FP and salmeterol systemic exposure is unlikely to be higher than if MDIs were to be used with the Aerochamber. However, these data do not indicate that the Mini Spacer and Aerochamber are interchangeable.