Outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury after stress ulcer prophylaxis: a retrospective multicenter study.

Background: Stress ulcers in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) present significant morbidity and mortality risks. Despite the low reported stress ulcer rates, stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is widely administered in neurocritical care. It was hypothesized that universal SUP administration may not be associated with reduced rates of complications across all neurocritical care patients. Methods: This retrospective study encompassed neurocritical care patients aged ≥18 with moderate or severe TBI or SCI, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between October 2020 and September 2021, across six level I trauma centers. Exclusions included patients with an ICU stay <2 days, prior SUP medication use, and pre-existing SUP diagnoses. The primary exposure was SUP, with the primary outcome being clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeds (CSGIBs). Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified by admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) groups. Results: Among 407 patients, 83% received SUP, primarily H2 receptor antagonists (88%) and proton pump inhibitors (12%). Patients on SUP were significantly younger, had lower admission GCS scores, higher Injury Severity Scores, longer ICU stays, and higher rates of mechanical ventilation than non-SUP patients. Overall, CSGIBs were rare (1%) and not significantly different between the SUP and non-SUP groups (p=0.06). However, CSGIBs exclusively occurred in patients with GCS scores of 3-8, and SUP was associated with a significantly lower rate of CSGIBs in this subgroup (p=0.03). SUP was also linked to significantly higher pneumonia rates in both GCS 3-8 and GCS 9-12 patients. Conclusions: This study highlights the low incidence of CSGIBs in neurocritical trauma patients and suggests potential benefits of SUP, particularly for those with severe neurological impairment. Nevertheless, the increased risk of pneumonia associated with SUP in these patients warrants caution. Further research is crucial to refine SUP guidelines for neurocritical care patients and inform optimal strategies. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective.

Hyperglycemia in nondiabetic adult trauma patients is associated with worse outcomes than diabetic patients: An analysis of 95,764 patients.

BACKGROUND: The adverse impact of acute hyperglycemia is well documented but its specific effects on nondiabetic trauma patients are unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differential impact of hyperglycemia on outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic trauma inpatients. METHODS: Adults admitted 2018 to 2019 to 46 Level I/II trauma centers with two or more blood glucose tests were analyzed. Diabetes status was determined from International Classification of Diseases-10th Rev.-Clinical Modification, trauma registry, and/or hemoglobin A1c greater than 6.5. Patients with and without one or more hyperglycemic result >180 mg/dL were compared. Logistic regression examined the effects of hyperglycemia and diabetes on outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, and body mass index. RESULTS: There were 95,764 patients: 54% male; mean age, 61 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 10; diabetic, 21%. Patients with hyperglycemia had higher mortality and worse outcomes compared with those without hyperglycemia. Nondiabetic hyperglycemic patients had the highest odds of mortality (diabetic: adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.5; nondiabetics: adjusted odds ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.8-8.4). Hyperglycemic nondiabetics experienced worse outcomes on every measure when compared with nonhyperglycemic nondiabetics, with higher rates of sepsis (1.1 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), more SSIs (1.0 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), longer mean hospital length of stay (11.4 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), longer mean intensive care unit length of stay (8.5 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001), higher rates of intensive care unit use (68.6% vs. 35.1), and more ventilator use (42.4% vs. 7.3%). CONCLUSION: Hyperglycemia is associated with increased odds of mortality in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Hyperglycemia during hospitalization in nondiabetics was associated with the worst outcomes and represents a potential opportunity for intervention in this high-risk group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management; Level III.

Midlevel providers in a Level I trauma service: experience at Wesley Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the health care system have led to reduced availability of surgical residents to function as house officers in teaching hospitals. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess the level of satisfaction of patients, physicians and nurses, and ancillary providers with the care provided by the midlevel providers (MLPs) who are utilized as house officers in a Level I trauma service. This type of care model is unusual because the trauma service no longer utilizes surgical residents to provide trauma coverage. METHODS: Trauma patients admitted to the hospital during a 3-month period in 2004 were surveyed, as were physicians and hospital employees who work most closely with MLPs. RESULTS: Patients are very satisfied (84%-86%) with the care they received from the MLPs (n = 109). There were no significant differences in satisfaction with MLPs when looking at the patient's age, gender, length of stay, or whether the patient was in the intensive care unit. Analysis of physician and hospital employee satisfaction is also strongly positive overall. Of the respondents, 84% (n = 281) agreed that MLPs have made a positive impact on the care of the trauma patient, 86% agreed that MLPs are available to address patient and staff concerns, and 80% think that MLPs have made trauma care more efficient. CONCLUSION: Trauma patients and healthcare team members of the trauma service at Wesley Medical Center, an accredited Level I trauma center, are generally satisfied with care provided by MLPs.

Blunt abdominal trauma with ruptured 16-week cornual ectopic pregnancy.

Trauma is the leading cause of nonobstetric morbidity and mortality in pregnancy. Care of the pregnant trauma patient is well documented in the medical literature; however, little has been written about the management of trauma patients with ectopic or cornual pregnancy. Herein, we report the previously undocumented occurrence of a traumatic rupture of a cornual ectopic pregnancy. The use of trauma ultrasound, computerized tomography, as well as obstetrical evaluation prevented an imminent life-threatening complication of this patient's pregnancy.