Incontinence Is an Independent Risk Factor for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Urinary incontinence has been linked to worse postoperative pain, decreased physical function, and reduced quality of life in patients following total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether incontinence is associated with increased postoperative medical and joint complications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national insurance database. Thirty-two thousand eight hundred eleven patients with incontinence who underwent primary THA were identified and matched 1:4 with 129,073 patients without incontinence. Ninety-one thousand nine hundred thirty-five patients with incontinence who underwent primary TKA were matched 1:4 with 367,285 patients without incontinence. Medical and joint complication rates at 90 days and 2 years, respectively, were then compared for patient cohorts using multivariable logistic regressions. Results: Patients who underwent primary THA with incontinence had statistically higher rates of dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, aseptic revisions, and overall joint complications compared to controls. Patients who underwent primary TKA with incontinence had higher rates of mechanical failure, aseptic revision, and all-cause revision compared to controls. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an association between patients with incontinence and higher rates of dislocation, periprosthetic fractures, aseptic revisions, and overall joint complications following primary THA compared to controls. Patients with incontinence experience higher rates of mechanical failure, aseptic revision, and all-cause revision following TKA compared to controls. As such, perioperative management of urinary incontinence may help mitigate the risk of postoperative complications.

Association of Smokeless Tobacco and Complications Following Ankle and Hindfoot Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the rates of postoperative complications following ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis among current smokeless tobacco users and people who smoke compared to matched controls, and (2) compare rates of postoperative complications in current smokeless tobacco users vs people who smoke tobacco cigarettes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large national database. For patients who underwent ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users (n = 131) and people who smoke (n = 1948) were matched 1:4 with controls, and smokeless tobacco users (n = 131) were matched 1:4 with people who smoke tobacco cigarettes (n = 524). Orthopaedic complications within 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years were compared using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Within 90 days of ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] 5.01, 95% CI 1.65-15.20), wound disruption or dehiscence (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.21-7.44), and pooled complications (16.0% vs 5.9%, OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.50-5.38) compared with tobacco-naïve controls. The rates of hardware removal, wound disruption and dehiscence, and pooled complications remained significant in the smokeless tobacco cohort at 1 and 2 years. At 2 years following ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users additionally demonstrated significantly higher rates of infection (OR 6.08, 95% CI 1.15-32.05) and nonunion (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.31-4.20) compared with tobacco-naïve controls. Within 90 days of ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly lower rates of malunion or nonunion than patients who smoke tobacco cigarettes (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.97), whereas all other complications were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Smokeless tobacco use is associated with higher rates of complications following ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis compared with tobacco-naïve controls, and physicians should screen for smokeless tobacco use specifically and encourage cessation before operating electively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Adding Lateral Retinacular Release to Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Fails to Demonstrate Clinical Benefit Compared With Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Purpose: To compare functional outcomes and failure rates between medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstructions with and without lateral retinacular release (LRR) at minimum 1-year follow up. Methods: A retrospective review identified consecutive patients from 2013 to 2019 at a single center who met all of the following inclusion criteria: at least 1 confirmed patellar dislocation, patellar tilt (evidenced by tight retinaculum on operative examination or patellar tilt on radiographs), underwent either MPFL reconstruction alone or combined with LRR, had available preoperative documentation and imaging, and were at least 1 year out of surgery. Patients were excluded if they had previous surgery to the ipsilateral limb or had any concomitant procedure performed. Demographics and preoperative imaging were evaluated. Failure rates and functional outcome scores were obtained including Kujala, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, International Knee Documentation Committee, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. Clinical failure was defined as revision MPFL reconstruction on the affected knee or at least 1 instance of postoperative patellar dislocation. Results: A total of 18 patients underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction (mean follow-up = 29.3 ± 8.3 months, range = 15.1-42.8 months), and 31 underwent MPFL reconstruction combined with LRR (mean follow up = 36.0 ± 11.3 months, range = 14.0-51.9 months). At final follow-up, there were no statistical differences between the isolated MPFL and MPFL combined with LRR cohorts for any of the functional outcome scores (P > .05 for all). At the time of final follow-up, no patients who underwent isolated MPFL and 19.3% (n = 6) or patients undergoing MPFL combined with LRR experienced clinical failure (P = .073), as defined by subsequent patellar dislocation or revision MPFL reconstruction. Of these, 2 patients underwent revision MPFL reconstructions with distal tubercle transfer for borderline abnormal TT:TG (i.e., >15 mm). Conclusions: MPFL reconstruction surgery combined with LRR failed to demonstrate significantly different functional outcome scores and failure rates compared with isolated MPFL reconstruction at minimum 1-year follow up. In addition, there were no differences in rates of achieving MCID between both groups. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Smokeless Tobacco Use is Associated With Worse Medical and Surgical Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated increased complication risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who smoke cigarettes. It is unclear if smokeless tobacco use confers a similar impact. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate rates of postoperative complications after THA in smokeless tobacco users and people who smoke compared to matched controls, and (2) compare rates of postoperative complications in smokeless tobacco users versus patients who smoke. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large national database. For patients who underwent primary THA, smokeless tobacco users (n = 950) and people who smoke (n = 21,585) were matched 1:4 with controls (n = 3,800 and 86,340, respectively), and smokeless tobacco users (n = 922) were matched 1:4 with people who smoke (n = 3,688). Joint complication rates within 2 years and medical complications within 90 days postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Within 90 days of primary THA, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of wound disruption, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiac arrest, transfusion, readmission and longer length of stay compared to tobacco naïve controls. Within 2 years, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of prosthetic joint dislocations and overall joint-related complications compared to tobacco naïve controls. CONCLUSION: Smokeless tobacco use is associated with higher rates of medical- and joint-related complications following primary THA. Smokeless tobacco use may be under-diagnosed in patients undergoing elective THA. Surgeons may consider delineating between smoking and smokeless tobacco use during preoperative counseling.

The Snuffbox: The Effect of Smokeless Tobacco Use on Scaphoid Fracture Healing.

BACKGROUND: Smoking has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for nonunion of scaphoid fractures, but it is unclear if chewing tobacco confers similar risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of bone-related complications after nonsurgical management of scaphoid fractures in smokeless tobacco users compared with matched control subjects and compared with smokers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. For patients who underwent nonsurgical management of scaphoid fractures, 212 smokeless tobacco users and 6,048 smokers were matched 1:4 with control subjects (n = 848 and 24,192, respectively) and 212 smokeless tobacco users were matched 1:4 with 848 smokers. Rates of bone-related complications within 2 years of initial injury were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: From weeks 12 through 104 after initial injury, compared with control subjects who do not use tobacco, the smokeless tobacco cohort demonstrated markedly higher rates of nonunion (5.7% vs 2.7%, OR: 2.07). Compared with control subjects who do not use tobacco, the smoking cohort demonstrated markedly higher rates of nonunion (4.3% vs 2.6%, OR: 1.91), repair of nonunion (1.5% vs 0.9%, OR: 1.87), and four corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy (0.3% vs 0.1%, OR: 3.17). Smokeless tobacco use was markedly underdiagnosed in the adult male cohort of unilateral scaphoid fractures with 2 years of follow-up found in the database (372 of 25,704, 1.45%) relative to Centers for Disease Control estimates for adult male smokeless tobacco use (4.5%) ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given the higher rates of nonunion diagnoses after nonsurgical management in this cohort, surgeons should consider asking all patients with scaphoid fractures if they use smokeless tobacco or smoke and consider adding this to the patient's intake history to further identify patients at risk for nonunions. Tobacco cessation counseling is indicated for all tobacco users, including smokeless with scaphoid fractures.

Hormone Replacement Therapy Does Not Eliminate Risk Factors for Joint Complications following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.

Aging causes a reduction in testosterone and estrogen, which is linked to diminished bone mineral density. Hormone replacement therapy and its effect on the outcome of joint arthroplasties is unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on the medical and joint outcomes of total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who received TRT or ERT perioperatively were matched to controls. Rates of 90-day medical complications and 2-year joint complications were queried. Patients who received TRT had an increased risk of revision, periprosthetic joint infection, and pooled joint complications within 2 years following a THA and increased rates of septic and aseptic revisions, and aseptic loosening after TKA compared to the control cohort. Patients receiving ERT had increased rates of aseptic loosening and pooled joint complications within 2 years following THA and increased rates of all-cause revisions and pooled joint complications after TKA. Patients who received TRT demonstrated significantly higher rates of revision rates and PJI. Patients who received perioperative ERT were significantly more likely to have increased risks of revision rates and joint infections.

Put Down the Tin: Chewing Tobacco Use Is Associated With Worse Outcomes After Primary Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of chewing tobacco on both medical and spine-related complication rates after spinal lumbar fusions in comparison to both a control cohort and a smoking cohort. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Smoking is a prevalent modifiable risk factor that has been demonstrated to be associated with increased complications after lumbar fusion. Although smoking rates have decreased in the United States, chewing tobacco use has not similarly reduced. Despite chewing tobacco delivering up to 4 times the dose of smoking, the impact of chewing tobacco is incompletely understood. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion and used chewing tobacco were matched with a control cohort and a smoking cohort. Medical complications within 90 days after primary lumbar fusion were evaluated, including deep venous thrombosis, acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, transfusion, acute myocardial infarction, and inpatient readmission. Spine-related complications were evaluated at 2 years postoperatively, including pseudoarthrosis, incision and drainage (I&D), instrument failure, revision, and infection. RESULTS: After primary lumbar fusion, the chewing tobacco cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of pseudoarthrosis [odds ratio (OR): 1.41], revision (OR: 1.57), and any spine-related complication (OR: 1.32) compared with controls. The smoking cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of pseudoarthrosis (OR: 1.88), I&D (OR: 1.27), instrument failure (OR: 1.39), revision (OR: 1.54), infection (OR: 1.34), and any spine-related complication (OR: 1.77) compared with controls. The chewing tobacco cohort demonstrated significantly lower rates of pseudoarthrosis (OR: 0.84), I&D (OR: 0.49), infection (OR: 0.70), and any spine-related complication (OR: 0.81) compared with the smoking cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that chewing tobacco is associated with higher rates of both spine-related and medical complications after primary lumbar fusion. However, chewing tobacco use is associated with less risk of complications compared with smoking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Incidence and Trends of High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Over the Past Decade: A Lost Art.

Background: After failed nonoperative treatment, unicompartmental osteoarthritis can be treated surgically by either unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The purpose of this retrospective study is to analyze utilization and demographic trends of UKA and HTO relative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over the past decade. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients that received a UKA or HTO were identified. Trend analyses of surgical procedure utilization were performed with the Mann-Kendall trend test. Demographic data and the rates of various comorbidities were also queried. Results: A total of 103,465 UKAs, 2183 HTOs, and 1,413,425 TKAs, between 2010 and 2021 quarter 1, were analyzed. Trend analyses revealed that relative to TKA utilization, UKA utilization significantly increased (P < .001) while HTO utilization significantly decreased (P < .001). The compound annual growth rate of UKA utilization relative to TKA was +5.16% from 2010 to 2017 but was -10.61% from 2018 to 2021, while that of HTO relative to TKA was -9.69% from 2010 to 2021. Demographic analyses demonstrated the UKA cohort (63.1) was significantly older than the HTO cohort (46.5) (P < .001). Additionally, there were significantly more female patients who underwent UKA than HTO (P < .001). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that relative to TKA, UKA utilization increased from 2010 to 2017, with a subsequent decrease afterward, whereas HTO utilization decreased since 2010. Demographic differences exist between the 2 operations, with HTOs more commonly performed in younger male patients, and UKAs in older female patients. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Smokeless Tobacco Use is Associated With Worse Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated increased complication risk after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who smoke cigarettes, but it is unclear if smokeless tobacco use confers a similar impact. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate rates of postoperative complications after TKA in smokeless tobacco users and smokers as compared to matched controls, and (2) compare rates of postoperative complications in smokeless tobacco users versus smokers to determine if one is associated with significantly higher rates of postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database. For patients who underwent primary TKA, smokeless tobacco users (n = 1,535) and smokers (n = 28,953) were matched at a 1:4 with controls (n = 6,140 and 115,812, respectively), and smokeless tobacco users (n = 1,481) were matched at a 1:4 with smokers (n = 5,924). Rates of joint complications within 2 years and medical complications within 90 days postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: After primary TKA, compared to controls, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of aseptic loosening/mechanical failure within 2 years, longer lengths of stay, and higher rates of urinary tract infection, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, and acute kidney injury within 90 days. Compared to smokers, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly lower rates of aseptic revision and lower rates of wound disruption. CONCLUSION: Smokeless tobacco use is associated with higher rates of both medical and joint complications following primary TKA. However, smoking is associated with higher risk for complications than smokeless tobacco use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Is Fluoroquinolone Exposure after Primary Tendon Repair Associated with Higher Rates of Reoperations? A Matched Cohort Study.

Background: The association between tendon damage and fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics has been well documented. However, there is limited data evaluating the impact of postoperative FQ use on outcomes of primary tendon repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of reoperation for patients with FQ exposure after primary tendon repair versus controls. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. All patients who underwent primary repair of distal biceps ruptures, Achilles tendon ruptures, and rotator cuff tears were identified. For each tendon, patients who were prescribed FQs within 90 days postoperatively were propensity score matched at a 1:3 ratio with controls without postoperative FQ prescriptions across age, sex, and several comorbidities. Rates of reoperation were compared at two years postoperatively with multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 124,322 patients who underwent primary tendon procedures were identified, including 3,982 (3.2%) patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days postoperatively: 448 with distal biceps repair, 2,538 with rotator cuff repair, and 996 with Achilles tendon repair. These cohorts were matched with 1,344, 7,614, and 2,988 controls, respectively. Patients with postoperative FQ prescriptions exhibited significantly higher rates of revision surgery after primary repair of distal biceps ruptures (3.6% vs. 1.7%; OR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.04), rotator cuff tears (7.1% vs. 4.1%; OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.48-2.15), and Achilles tendon ruptures (3.8% vs. 1.8%; OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.40-3.27). Conclusion: Patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days after primary tendon repair demonstrated significantly higher rates of reoperations for distal biceps, rotator cuff, and Achilles tendon repair at two years postoperatively. To achieve optimal outcomes and avoid complications in patients following primary tendon repair procedures, physicians should consider prescribing alternative non-FQ antibiotics and counsel patients on the risk of reoperation associated with postoperative FQ use.

How do the top 10 known offending drug classes associated with decreased bone mineral density affect total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Many regularly prescribed classes of drugs are known to negatively impact bone health. However, it is unclear if perioperative use of these drugs impacts total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of perioperative use of 10 drug classes with known negative effects on bone health on prosthesis-related outcomes of TSA. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary TSA were retrospectively identified in the PearlDiver database. Within this population, patients prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), thiazolidinediones (TZDs), loop diuretics, glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) within 6 months before or 6 months after primary TSA were identified (n = 23,748). These patients were propensity score matched 1:1 with controls (n = 23,748) on age, sex, and several comorbidities. After matching, patients with perioperative drug exposure were divided into 10 subgroups (ie, 1 for each drug class). Rates of prosthesis-related complications among patients taking each medication class vs. controls were compared with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Relative to controls, SGA exposure was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause revision (odds ratio [OR] 1.68) and aseptic revision (OR 1.57). Loop diuretic exposure was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause revision (OR 1.44) and aseptic revision (OR 1.43). Glucocorticoid exposure was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause revision (OR 1.32) and aseptic revision (OR 1.30). SSRI exposure was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause revision (OR 1.27) and aseptic revision (OR 1.24). Periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, and septic revision was comparable for all drug cohorts compared to matched controls (all P > .05). Patients with perioperative exposure to PPIs, TZDs, FGAs, AEDs, aromatase inhibitors, and calcineurin inhibitors displayed comparable rates of all queried complications compared with controls (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Compared with matched controls, patients with perioperative exposure to SGAs, loop diuretics, glucocorticoids and SSRIs exhibited significantly higher rates of all-cause and aseptic revisions following primary TSA. Several other medications that are risk factors for osteoporosis and fragility fractures did not demonstrate significant associations with any complications, including periprosthetic fracture. These results highlight the need for a thorough review of patients' medical history and current medication usage prior to preoperative risk counseling for patients seeking TSA.

The Impact of Epilepsy on Complication Rates After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how epilepsy may affect total joint arthroplasty outcomes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of epilepsy on prosthesis-related complications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database. Patients who have epilepsy underwent a primary THA (n = 6,981) and TKA (n = 4,987) and were matched 1:4 (THA, n = 27,924; TKA, n = 19,948). Rates of low-energy falls and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared for patients who did and did not have epilepsy with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: After primary TKA, patients who have epilepsy exhibited significantly higher rates of aseptic revision (4.3% versus 3.5%, odds ratio [OR] 1.21, P = .017) and revision for prosthetic joint infection (1.8% versus 1.3%, OR 1.29, P = .041). THA patients who have epilepsy exhibited significantly higher rates of prosthetic dislocation (3.2% versus 1.9%, OR 1.54, P < .001), periprosthetic fracture (2.2% versus 0.8%, OR 2.39, P < .001), and aseptic loosening (1.7% versus 1.1%, OR 1.40, P = .002). Rates of low-energy falls within 2 years after TKA (14.1% versus 6.4%, OR 2.19, P < .001) and THA (33.6% versus 7.5%, OR 5.95, P < .001) were also significantly higher for patients who have epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy was associated with significantly higher rates of falls (P < .001) and prosthesis-related complications after primary THA (P < .05) and TKA (P < .05). Precautions should be implemented in this population during intraoperative and perioperative decision-making to reduce complication risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Biceps Tenodesis Has Greater Expected Value Than Repair for Isolated Type II SLAP Tears: A Meta-analysis and Expected-Value Decision Analysis.

PURPOSE: To use an expected-value decision analysis to determine the optimal treatment decision between repair and biceps tenodesis (BT) for an isolated type II SLAP injury. METHODS: An expected-value decision analysis with sensitivity analysis was performed to systematically quantify the clinical decision. To determine outcome probabilities, a decision tree was constructed (repair vs BT) and a meta-analysis was conducted. To determine outcome utilities, we evaluated 70 patients with a chief complaint of shoulder pain regarding age, sex, Shoulder Activity Level, and visual analog scale score in terms of potential outcome preferences. Statistical fold-back analysis was performed to determine the optimal treatment. One-way sensitivity analysis determined the effect of changing the reinjury rate on the expected value of BT. RESULTS: The overall expected value was 8.66 for BT versus 7.19 for SLAP repair. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that BT was the superior choice if reinjury rates were expected to be lower than 28%. Meta-analysis of 23 studies and 908 patients revealed that the probability of a "well" outcome was significantly greater for BT (87.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74.9%-94.6%; I2 = 0.0%) than for SLAP repair (62.9%; 95% CI, 55.9%-69.3%; I2 = 65.9%; P = .0023). The rate of reinjury was 1.5% for BT (95% CI, 0.05%-33.8%; I2 = 0.0%) and 6.4% for repair (95% CI, 4.2%-9.6%; I2 = 24%), which was not statistically significantly different (P = .411). A total of 50 participants (mean age, 25.4 years [standard deviation, 8.9 years]; 76% male patients; 50% overhead athletes) met the inclusion criteria. Forty-six percent of participants had a high Shoulder Activity Level score. CONCLUSIONS: Decision analysis showed that BT is preferred over repair for an isolated type II SLAP tear based on greater expected value of BT versus repair. Meta-analysis showed more frequent favorable outcomes with BT. Surgeons can use this information to tailor discussions with patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, meta-analysis of Level I-IV studies.

Osteoporosis management and secondary fragility fracture rates in patients with multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study.

This study highlights the persistent osteoporosis treatment gap following fragility fractures. Patients with multiple sclerosis sustained more primary hip fractures than controls and exhibited significantly higher rates of falls within three years post-fracture. However, multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with medications. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of osteoporosis management, falls, and secondary fractures following primary fragility fractures among patients with MS versus matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients aged ≥ 50 years with primary fragility fractures were identified (n = 120,368). Within this population, patients with MS were matched 1:10 with controls across age, sex, and US region. Rates of osteoporosis diagnoses and pharmacologic treatment, low-energy falls, and secondary fragility fractures were compared at three years post-fracture via logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,232 patients with MS (mean age, 65.7 years) with primary fragility fractures were matched with 12,320 controls (mean age, 65.8 years). Primary hip fractures were significantly more common in the MS cohort (47.4% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001). After the initial fracture, patients with MS were significantly more likely to receive a formal osteoporosis diagnosis (12.9% vs. 9.7%; OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.61) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (14.4% vs. 11.9%; OR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.46). The MS cohort also exhibited significantly higher rates of falls (27.8% vs 22.7%; OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32). Rates of secondary fractures were comparable (6.3% vs. 5.0%; OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.40). CONCLUSION: Primary hip fragility fractures were significantly more common in patients with MS compared to matched controls. Following an initial fracture, patients with MS exhibited a significantly higher rate of falls but were more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with medications.

Effect of Sickle Cell Trait on Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Matched Cohort.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if sickle cell trait (SCT) carrier status conveys an increased risk for poor outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to compare short-term clinical outcomes of THA for patients with SCT vs matched controls. METHODS: Patient records were queried from the PearlDiver database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients with SCT who underwent THA were matched 1:1 with controls across age, gender, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, obesity, and US region. Thirty-day and 90-day rates of systemic complications and 1-year and 2-year rates of joint complications were compared with logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 1646 patients were assigned to each cohort. In the 30-day and 90-day postoperative periods, SCT carriers had a higher likelihood of cerebrovascular accident, anemia, acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory failure (all P < .05). SCT carriers exhibited significantly higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection at both 1 (3.5% vs 2.1%; odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.99) and 2 years (3.7% vs 2.6%; OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.49) postoperatively. Prosthetic loosening was also significantly more likely for SCT carriers within 1 year (1.3% vs 0.3%; OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.75-13.86). CONCLUSION: Patients with SCT exhibited significantly higher risk for systemic complications, periprosthetic joint infection, and prosthetic loosening after THA. Increased perioperative efforts should be made to prevent hypoxia, acidosis, and dehydration, as these states increase red blood cell sickling, which may reduce complication rates and improve outcomes in patients with SCT.