Informing evidence-based policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery period: learning from a national evidence centre.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the vital need for research to inform policy decision-making and save lives. The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established in March 2021 and funded for two years, to make evidence about the impact of the pandemic and ongoing research priorities for Wales available and actionable to policy decision-makers, service leads and the public. OBJECTIVES: We describe the approaches we developed and our experiences, challenges and future vision. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: The centre operated with a core team, including a public partnership group, and six experienced research groups as collaborating partners. Our rapid evidence delivery process had five stages: 1. Stakeholder engagement (continued throughout all stages); 2. Research question prioritisation; 3. Bespoke rapid evidence review methodology in a phased approach; 4. Rapid primary research; and 5. Knowledge Mobilisation to ensure the evidence was available for decision-makers. MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS: Between March 2021-23 we engaged with 44 stakeholder groups, completed 35 Rapid Evidence Reviews, six Rapid Evidence Maps and 10 Rapid Evidence Summaries. We completed four primary research studies, with three published in peer reviewed journals, and seven ongoing. Our evidence informed policy decision-making and was cited in 19 Welsh Government papers. These included pandemic infection control measures, the Action Plan to tackle gender inequalities, and Education Renew and Reform policy. We conducted 24 Welsh Government evidence briefings and three public facing symposia. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Strong engagement with stakeholder groups, a phased rapid evidence review approach, and primary research to address key gaps in current knowledge enabled high-quality efficient, evidence outputs to be delivered to help inform Welsh policy decision-making during the pandemic. We learn from these processes to continue to deliver evidence from March 2023 as the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, with a broader remit of health and social care, to help inform policy and practice decisions during the recovery phase and beyond.

Protocol for a feasibility study of a cancer symptom awareness campaign to support the rapid diagnostic centre referral pathway in a socioeconomically deprived area: Targeted Intensive Community-based campaign To Optimise Cancer awareness (TIC-TOC).

INTRODUCTION: Rapid diagnostic centres (RDCs) are being implemented across the UK to accelerate the assessment of vague suspected cancer symptoms. Targeted behavioural interventions are needed to augment RDCs that serve socioeconomically deprived populations who are disproportionately affected by cancer, have lower cancer symptom awareness and are less likely to seek help for cancer symptoms. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a community-based vague cancer symptom awareness intervention in an area of high socioeconomic deprivation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Intervention materials and messages were coproduced with local stakeholders in Cwm Taf Morgannwg, Wales. Cancer champions will be trained to deliver intervention messages and distribute intervention materials using broadcast media (eg, local radio), printed media (eg, branded pharmacy bags, posters, leaflets), social media (eg, Facebook) and attending local community events. A cross-sectional questionnaire will include self-reported patient interval (time between noticing symptoms to contacting the general practitioner), cancer symptom recognition, cancer beliefs and barriers to presentation, awareness of campaign messages, healthcare resource use, generic quality of life and individual and area-level deprivation indicators. Consent rates and proportion of missing data for patient questionnaires (n=189) attending RDCs will be measured. Qualitative interviews and focus groups will assess intervention acceptability and barriers/facilitators to delivery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was given by the London-West London & GTAC Research Ethics (21/LO/0402). This project will inform a potential future controlled study to assess intervention effectiveness in reducing the patient interval for vague cancer symptoms. The results will be critical to informing national policy and practice regarding behavioural interventions to support RDCs in highly deprived populations.

Amateur Boxing and Dementia: Cognitive Impairment Within the 35-Year Caerphilly Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term effects of amateur boxing in a representative population sample of men. DESIGN: The sample was examined every 5 years for 35 years. Cognition was assessed repeatedly from the third examination. Previous boxing experience and dementia were assessed at the fifth examination, and dementia assessed subsequently through medical records. SETTING AND ASSESSMENT OF RICK FACTORS: The Caerphilly Prospective Study investigates risk factors for a range of chronic diseases of diseases. These include life style and behavior, together with biological factors relevant to vascular disease. PARTICIPANTS: 1123 adult men aged 45 to 59 years at baseline, followed for 35 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive impairment. RESULTS: A report by a subject of having boxed "seriously" when younger was associated with a 2-fold increase in cognitive impairment [odds ratio (OR) = 2.27; 95% confidence intervals = 1.18-4.38]. For amnestic (Alzheimer-like) impairment, this rises to OR = 2.78 (95% confidence limits 1.37-5.65). Having boxed is associated with an "advancement" in the onset of the dementia (4.8 years; 95% confidence limits 0.9-8.8 years). CONCLUSIONS: Amateur boxing is associated with an increased risk and an earlier onset of cognitive impairment and dementia.

Priority Needs for Conducting Pandemic-relevant Clinical Research With Children in Europe: A Consensus Study With Pediatric Clinician-researchers.

BACKGROUND: Infectious disease (ID) pandemics pose a considerable global threat and can disproportionately affect vulnerable populations including children. Pediatric clinical research in pandemics is essential to improve children's healthcare and minimize risks of harm by interventions that lack an adequate evidence base for this population. The unique features of ID pandemics require consideration of special processes to facilitate clinical research. We aimed to obtain consensus on pediatric clinician-researchers' perceptions of the priorities to feasibly conduct clinical pediatric pandemic research in Europe. METHODS: Mixed method study in 2 stages, recruiting pediatric clinician-researchers with experience of conducting pediatric ID research in clinical settings in Europe. Stage 1 was an expert stakeholder workshop and interviews. Discussions focused on participant's experience of conducting pediatric ID research and processes to facilitate pandemic research. Information informed stage 2, an online consensus survey to identify pediatric inician-researchers priorities to enable ID pandemic research. RESULTS: Twenty-three pediatric clinician-researchers attended the workshop and 39 completed the survey. Priorities were primarily focused on structural and operational requirements of research design and regulation: (1) clarity within the European Clinical Trials Directive for pediatric pandemic research; (2) simplified regulatory processes for research involving clinical samples and data; and (3) improved relationships between regulatory bodies and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that changes need to be made to the current regulatory environment to facilitate and improve pediatric research in the pandemic context. These findings can provide expert evidence to research policy decision-makers and regulators and to develop a strategy to lobby for change.

Cross-sectional survey study to examine underuse of twice daily inhaled maintenance therapy among patients with asthma.

Objective: Anecdotal evidence suggests that some patients with asthma intentionally use their twice-daily (BID) inhaled controller therapy once daily (QD), thus not achieving optimal dosing levels. This study identified the prevalence of and factors associated with intentional QD use of BID-indicated controllers among adult patients with asthma. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey study of adults using inhaled controllers intended for BID dosing for treatment of asthma and/or COPD. Survey responses were linked to administrative claims data for the prior 12 months (baseline). Results of patients indicating both an asthma diagnosis and current intentional QD or BID use of controllers are presented. Results: Of 1401 patients with asthma, 30.9% reported intentional QD use of their controller and 69.1% reported BID use. Intentional QD use was mostly a function of patients' lack of perceived need for BID treatment (44.1%) or physician orders to take their controller QD (34.0%). Patients reporting intentional QD use tended to be healthier (higher health status scores, and lower Charlson comorbidity scores, ambulatory and ER visits, and healthcare costs) with better asthma control (lower asthma-related ER and ambulatory visits and rescue medication use, and higher Asthma Control Test scores) compared with patients reporting BID use. Conclusions: Perceptions regarding health and the necessity of controller use to control or treat asthma were the main drivers of medication-taking behavior. Patients with less severe asthma were more likely to report once daily use of their inhaled controller, but still maintained asthma control.

Matching diagnostics development to clinical need: Target product profile development for a point of care test for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection.

BACKGROUND: Point of care tests (POCTs) are increasingly being promoted for guiding the primary medical care of community acquired lower respiratory tract infections (CA-LRTI). POCT development has seldom been guided by explicitly identified clinical need and requirements of the intended users. Approaches for identifying POCT priorities and developing target product profiles (TPPs) for POCTs in primary medical care are not well developed, and there is no published TPP for a CA-LRTI POCT aimed at developed countries. METHODS: We conducted workshops with expert stakeholders and a survey with primary care clinicians to produce a target product profile (TPP) to guide the development of a clinically relevant and technologically feasible POCT for CA-LRTI. RESULTS: Participants with clinical, academic, industrial, technological and basic scientific backgrounds contributed to four expert workshops, and 45 practicing primary care clinicians responded to an online survey and prioritised community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as the CA-LRTI where a new POCT was most urgently needed. Consensus was reached on a TPP document that included information on the intended niche in the clinical pathway in primary medical care; diagnostic product specification (intended use statement and test concept), and minimum and ideal user specifications. Clinicians minimum requirements of a CA-LRTI POCT included the use of minimally invasive samples, a result in less than 30 minutes, no more than a single preparation step, minimum operational requirements, and detection of common respiratory pathogens and their resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary, multistage partnership approach generated a clinically-driven TPP for guiding the development of a new POCT, and this approach as well as the TPP itself may be useful to others developing a new POCT.

Talking to the people that really matter about their participation in pandemic clinical research: A qualitative study in four European countries.

BACKGROUND: Pandemics of new and emerging infectious diseases are unpredictable, recurrent events that rapidly threaten global health and security. We aimed to identify public views regarding provision of information and consent to participate in primary and critical care clinical research during a future influenza-like illness pandemic. METHODS: Descriptive-interpretive qualitative study, using focus groups (n = 10) and semi-structured interviews (n = 16), with 80 members of the public (>18 years) in Belgium, Spain, Poland and the UK. Local qualitative researchers followed a scenario-based topic guide to collect data. Data were transcribed verbatim, translated into English and subject to framework analysis. RESULTS: Public understandings of pandemics were shaped by personal factors (illness during the previous H1N1 pandemic, experience of life-threatening illness) and social factors (historical references, media, public health information). Informants appreciated safeguards provided by ethically robust research procedures, but current enrolment procedures were seen as a barrier. They proposed simplified enrolment processes for higher risk research and consent waiver for certain types of low-risk research. Decision making about research participation was influenced by contextual, research and personal factors. Informants generally either carefully weighed up various approaches to research participation or responded instinctively. They supported the principle of using routinely collected, anonymized clinical biological samples for research without explicit consent, but regarded this as less acceptable if researchers were motivated primarily by commercial gain. CONCLUSIONS: This bottom-up approach to ascertaining public views on pandemic clinical research has identified support for more proportionate research protection procedures for publically funded, low-risk studies.

Frequency and costs of pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Information is limited regarding the cost of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) among patients with cystic fibrosis in the United States. METHODS: To examine PEx costs, medical chart data were linked to insurance claims for patients aged ≥6 years who had commercial coverage from a large US health insurer affiliated with Optum during 2008-2013. A PEx was categorized as an episode requiring newly started (1) oral antibiotics (PEx-O) or (2) intravenous (IV) antibiotics and/or inpatient stay (PEx-IV). RESULTS: Among 241 patients, 88.0% had ≥1 PEx (2.9/year) of any type, and 48.1% had ≥1 PEx-IV. Prior PEx-IV was the strongest risk factor for subsequent PEx-IV. The mean cost per episode was $12,784 for PEx of any type and $36,319 for PEx-IV. Patients with worse lung function were more likely to experience a PEx and incurred higher annual PEx-related costs. LIMITATIONS: This was an observational study using a convenience sample of patients with commercial coverage from a large US health insurer whose medical charts were available for abstraction. Results of the study may not be generalizable to individuals with Medicaid coverage and other types of insurance, or to the uninsured. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients experience ≥1 PEx annually, and nearly half require IV antibiotics and/or inpatient stay at considerable cost.

Impact of a National Cancer Prevention and Treatment Program on the Prevalence of Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnoses in Oklahoma.

In 2000, Congress passed the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act (BCCPTA) to provide coverage through Medicaid to women who screened positive for breast and cervical cancer. We aimed to determine if late-stage breast cancer prevalence decreased among Oklahoma women after passage of BCCPTA. Data were obtained from the Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry during 2000-2011. We estimated prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) using modified Poisson regression between the proportion of women with late-stage breast cancer and timing of diagnosis related to BCCPTA. Among uninsured women, the probability of being diagnosed with late-stage cancer after enactment of the BCCPTA was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.96) times the probability before enactment. This was significant among uninsured women living in metro counties (PPR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.90) but not in non-metro counties (PPR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.56). These findings may be similar to other rural states with large uninsured populations.

Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.

BACKGROUND: A rigorous research response is required to inform clinical and public health decision-making during an epi/pandemic. However, the ethical conduct of such research, which often involves critically ill patients, may be complicated by the diminished capacity to consent and an imperative to initiate trial therapies within short time frames. Alternative approaches to taking prospective informed consent may therefore be used. We aimed to rapidly review evidence on key stakeholder (patients, their proxy decision-makers, clinicians and regulators) views concerning the acceptability of various approaches for obtaining consent relevant to pandemic-related acute illness research. METHODS: We conducted a rapid evidence review, using the Internet, database and hand-searching for English language empirical publications from 1996 to 2014 on stakeholder opinions of consent models (prospective informed, third-party, deferred, or waived) used in acute illness research. We excluded research on consent to treatment, screening, or other such procedures, non-emergency research and secondary studies. Papers were categorised, and data summarised using narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We screened 689 citations, reviewed 104 full-text articles and included 52. Just one paper related specifically to pandemic research. In other emergency research contexts potential research participants, clinicians and research staff found third-party, deferred, and waived consent to be acceptable as a means to feasibly conduct such research. Acceptability to potential participants was motivated by altruism, trust in the medical community, and perceived value in medical research and decreased as the perceived risks associated with participation increased. Discrepancies were observed in the acceptability of the concept and application or experience of alternative consent models. Patients accepted clinicians acting as proxy-decision makers, with preference for two decision makers as invasiveness of interventions increased. Research regulators were more cautious when approving studies conducted with alternative consent models; however, their views were generally under-represented. CONCLUSIONS: Third-party, deferred, and waived consent models are broadly acceptable to potential participants, clinicians and/or researchers for emergency research. Further consultation with key stakeholders, particularly with regulators, and studies focused specifically on epi/pandemic research, are required. We highlight gaps and recommendations to inform set-up and protocol development for pandemic research and institutional review board processes. PROSPERO PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014014000.

Depression monitoring and patient behavior in the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-Based Treatment (COMET) trial.

OBJECTIVE: In this secondary analysis of results of the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-Based Treatment (COMET) trial, patient behaviors that might account for the differences observed in clinical outcomes were examined. METHODS: Patients (N=914) diagnosed as having major depressive disorder participated in telephone interviews either monthly for six months (intervention) or at three and six months (usual care) asking about antidepressant medication-taking, use of psychotherapy or counseling, and participation in depression support groups. Physicians (N=83) in the intervention arm received monthly feedback regarding their patients' depression severity. RESULTS: A total of 664 (73%) patients completed the month 6 interview. The adjusted odds of current antidepressant use at six months were 85% greater (p=.01) for patients in the intervention (N=380) versus usual care (N=284) arms, according to multivariate regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: More frequent measurement of depression symptoms was associated with greater medication persistence, which in turn may have mediated clinical improvements.

Discrete choice experiment to estimate breast cancer patients' preferences and willingness to pay for prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.

OBJECTIVES: Rising out-of-pocket costs for cancer patients have increased shared decision making. Clinical guidelines recommend prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients receiving chemotherapy with a 20% or greater risk of febrile neutropenia. A discrete choice experiment was conducted to explore breast cancer patients' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for prophylactic G-CSF to decrease the risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. METHODS: An online discrete choice experiment questionnaire survey of a national US convenience sample of self-reported breast cancer patients with prior chemotherapy treatment was conducted. Sixteen paired G-CSF treatment scenarios, each with four attributes (risk of disruption to chemotherapy schedule due to low white blood cell counts, risk of developing an infection requiring hospitalization, frequency of administration, and total out-of-pocket cost) were presented with a follow-up "no treatment" option. Participant preferences and WTP out of pocket were estimated by logistic regression. RESULTS: Participants (n = 296) preferred G-CSF regimens with lower out-of-pocket costs, lower risk of chemotherapy disruption, lower risk of infection, and greater convenience (one G-CSF injection per chemotherapy cycle). Participants' WTP was $1076 out of pocket per cycle to reduce the risk (high to low) of disrupting their chemotherapy schedule, $884 per cycle to reduce the risk (24% [high] to 7% [low]) of infection, and $851 per cycle to decrease the number of G-CSF injections (11 to 1) per cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Participants highly valued specific features of prophylactic G-CSF treatment including maintaining their chemotherapy schedule, lowering their risk of infection, and reducing the number of injections. Physicians should consider patient preferences to inform the best treatment choices for individual patients.

Treatment patterns and healthcare system burden of managed care patients with suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment patterns and healthcare burden among individuals with suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), as identified through a practice guideline-based healthcare claims algorithm. METHODS: Adults with evidence of PAH from 1 January 2004 (commercial and Medicaid) or 1 July 2006 (Medicare Advantage) through 30 June 2008 were identified. Given the lack of an ICD-9 code for PAH, an algorithm was developed requiring: (1) ≥ 1 claim for PAH medication (index date); (2) ≥ 1 claim with a pulmonary hypertension diagnosis code in the 6-month pre-index period (baseline) or within 90 days post-index; (3) a right heart catheterization or pulmonary hypertension-related inpatient stay during baseline or within 90 days post-index; and (4) continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months pre-index and ≥ 6 months post-index. Patients with PAH-specific medications during baseline were excluded. Treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and costs were assessed during the period ending with the earlier of health plan disenrollment or 31 December 2008. RESULTS: Among the 521 included patients, 69% were female. Most patients (94%) initiated treatment with monotherapy (most commonly sildenafil or bosentan), and 12.7% of all patients augmented their therapy by the end of the observation period. The medication possession ratio was 0.96 each for ambrisentan (SD=0.04), bosentan (SD=0.04), and sildenafil (SD=0.05). Overall, 72.6% of patients discontinued therapy with a mean of 149 (SD=170) days until discontinuation. A mean (SD) of 2.14 (1.82) all-cause office and 1.64 (1.98) outpatient visits occurred per patient per month. Mean PAH-related healthcare costs were $6617 per patient per month, comprising 71% of all-cause costs. The guideline-based algorithm may not have perfectly captured patients with PAH. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with suspected PAH were likely to initiate treatment with oral monotherapy, had high compliance rates, and received close ambulatory follow-up. PAH-related costs constituted the majority of all-cause healthcare costs.

Effect of communicating depression severity on physician prescribing patterns: findings from the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-based Treatment (COMET) trial.

OBJECTIVE: In this secondary analysis from the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-based Treatment trial (COMET), we evaluated whether providing primary care physicians with patient-reported feedback regarding depression severity affected pharmacological treatment patterns. METHOD: Intervention-arm physicians received their patients' 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores monthly. Odds of having no change in antidepressant treatment during the 6-month study period were calculated. Relationships between depression symptom status (partial or nonresponse) at month 3 and treatment changes in months 3 through 6 were assessed. RESULTS: Among 503 intervention and 412 usual care (UC) patients with major depressive disorder, most received antidepressant monotherapy at baseline (79.4% UC vs. 88.4% intervention; P=.047). Few switched their baseline antidepressant (17.4%), increased their dose (12.4%) or augmented with a second medication (2%). Odds of having no change in antidepressant therapy did not differ significantly between study arms (odds ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.88; P=.392). Few month 3 partial or nonresponders had a regimen change over the following 3 months; the study arms did not differ significantly (partial responders: 4.1% UC vs. 7.7% intervention; P=.429; nonresponders: 14.6% UC vs. 15.9% intervention; P=.888). CONCLUSIONS: Among depressed patients treated in primary care, little active management was observed. The lack of treatment modification for the majority of partial and nonresponders was notable.

Epidemiology and course of disease in childhood uveitis.

PURPOSE: To describe the disease characteristics and visual outcome of pediatric uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal observation. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-seven pediatric uveitis patients from the National Eye Institute, University of Illinois, Chicago, and Oregon Health Sciences University. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, uveitis disease characteristics, complications, treatments, and visual outcomes were determined at baseline and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year time points. RESULTS: The patient population was 54% female; 62.4% white, 12.5% black, 2.7% Asian, 2.1% multiracial, and 14.61% Hispanic. Median age at diagnosis was 9.4 years. The leading diagnoses were idiopathic uveitis (28.8%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (20.9%), and pars planitis (17.1%). Insidious onset (58%) and persistent duration (75.3%) were most common. Anterior uveitis was predominant (44.6%). Complications were frequent, and cystoid macular edema (odds ratio [OR] 2.94; P = 0.006) and hypotony (OR, 4.54; P = 0.026) had the most significant visual impact. Ocular surgery was performed in 18.9% of patients. The prevalence of legal blindness was 9.23% at baseline, 6.52% at 1 year, 3.17% at 3 years, 15.15% at 5 years, and 7.69% at 10 years. Posterior uveitis and panuveitis had more severe vision loss. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a higher prevalence of infectious uveitis and vision loss at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The rate and spectrum of vision threatening complications of pediatric uveitis are significant. Prospective studies using standard outcome measures and including diverse populations are needed to identify children most at risk.

Ocular disease in patients with ANCA-positive vasculitis.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive vasculitis-the term recently applied to Wegener's granulomatosis-is a rare multi-system inflammation characterized by necrotizing granulomas and vasculitis. We investigated the ocular manifestations of this disease in a group of patients drawn from five inflammatory eye disease clinics across the United States. Of 8,562 persons with ocular inflammation, 59 individuals were diagnosed with ANCA-positive vasculitis; 35 males and 21 females, aged 16 to 96 years, were included in this study. Ocular diagnoses were scleritis (75.0%), uveitis (17.9%), and other ocular inflammatory conditions (33.9%) including peripheral ulcerative keratitis and orbital pseudotumor. Mean duration of ocular disease was 4.6 years. Oral corticosteroids and other systemic immunosuppressive agents were used by 85.7% and 78.5% of patients, respectively. Over time, patients with ANCA-positive vasculitis experienced 2.75-fold higher mortality than other patients with inflammatory eye disease.

What women want from their physicians: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased efforts to improve the education of trainees in women's health, little information exists about what women want from their healthcare providers. Existing information from studies focuses on patient care and medical knowledge rather than on all six competencies mandated by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). OBJECTIVES: To identify what adult female patients want their physicians to know and be able to do in all ACGME competency areas in order to guide development of graduate women's health curricula. METHODS: We conducted two focus groups with 18 volunteer adult female patients and one focus group with 5 community advocates. Questions addressed all six competency areas. The same female researcher moderated all three sessions. Two researchers analyzed session transcriptions for themes. RESULTS: Female patients and community advocates consistently stressed the need for their physicians to be able to navigate the healthcare system and to be their advocates. They also noted the need for physicians skilled in working with patients from a variety of cultures and for developing and maintaining respectful doctor-patient relationships, including good interpersonal communication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' expectations of physicians extend beyond medical knowledge and patient care into the areas of communication, systems-based practice, and professionalism. Curricular changes in women's health at the postgraduate level should emphasize skills in these competencies, and needs assessment processes would do well to include patient viewpoints in the future.

Non-invasive detection of multinucleated giant cells in the conjunctiva of patients with sarcoidosis by in-vivo confocal microscopy.

AIM: To explore the use of in-vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) as a potential non-invasive adjunctive tool for diagnosing sarcoidosis. METHODS: Conjunctivae were imaged using confocal microscopy in 10 patients with sarcoidosis and 27 control subjects. We utilized the ASL-1000 Scanning Confocal Microscope (Advanced Scanning Ltd., New Orleans, LA) and the Confoscan 3 (Nidek Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan). Two masked observers reviewed the in-vivo confocal images of the conjunctivae in these subjects. One masked observer was experienced in reviewing confocal images. The most striking and obvious feature seen in granulomatous inflammation on confocal microscopy is the presence of multinucleated giant cells (MGCs). RESULTS: Unmasked observation of the scans revealed MGCs in six of the 10 sarcoid patients and no MGCs in the controls. One experienced masked observer found MGCs in five of the 10 patients with sarcoidosis and had no false-positive results (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.001; specificity = 1; sensitivity = 50% for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and 83% compared to the unmasked observer). The second less-experienced masked observer detected MGCs in three of the 10 patients and three of the 27 controls (11.1% of the controls) (p = 0.186; specificity = 0.89; sensitivity = 30% of all patients with sarcoidosis and 50% compared to the unmasked observer). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of IVCM to visualize the basic histology and pathology in sarcoidosis of the conjunctiva is novel. Initial results indicate that trained observers can detect MGCs in granulomatous inflammation. The ASL-1000 microscope tends to have better resolution and deeper penetration of the conjunctiva compared with the Confoscan 3.

An evaluation of the care provided to patients prescribed controlled substances for chronic nonmalignant pain at an academic family medicine center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prescribing medications for chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) can be challenging for physicians for many reasons. In 1999, the state of Oregon implemented new guidelines governing the prescription of medications for CNMP. This study assessed the quality of care provided to CNMP patients, including the extent of compliance with the new state requirements 2 years after they were implemented. METHODS: We used telephone records to identify patients who had called for prescription refills between mid 2001 and mid 2002. We then reviewed medical records of those patients to identify those who received refills for opioids or benzodiazepines for treatment of chronic pain. Medical records were evaluated to measure the percentage of records exhibiting documentation of compliance with state prescribing laws and other features indicative of a high standard of care. RESULTS: Ninety seven percent of records included documentation of the diagnosis for which chronic therapy was indicated. Required Material Risk Notification Forms were absent from 100% of charts. Seventy-five percent of records document consultation with a pain specialist or other physician with specialty pertinent to the patient's source of pain. Medication contracts were only present in 39% of records, and documentation of a pain evaluation and functional evaluation was present in 67% and 54% of records, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Review of medical records in our clinic documented less-than-optimal compliance with state laws regulating prescribing for CNMP and the need for improvement in assessment and care of these patients.