A Minority of Patients on Mechanical Ventilation Consume Disproportionate Resources: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The Pareto principle states that the majority of any effect comes from a minority of the causes. This property is widely used in quality improvement science. RESEARCH QUESTION: Among patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), are there subgroups according to MV duration that may serve as potential nodes for high-value interventions aimed at reducing costs without compromising quality? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included approximately 780 hospitals in the Premier Research Database (2014-2018). Patients receiving MV were identified by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. They were then divided into quintiles according to MV duration; their hospital costs, post-MV onset length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and cumulative post-MV onset hospital days per quintile were compared. RESULTS: A total of 691,961 patients were included in the analysis. Median [interquartile range] duration of MV in days by quintile was as follows: quintile 1 (Q1), 1 [1, 1]; Q2, 2 [2, 2]; Q3, 3 [3, 3]; Q4, 6 [6, 7]; and Q5, 13 [10, 19]. Median [interquartile range] post-MV onset LOS (Q1, 2 [0, 5]; Q5, 17 [12, 26]) and hospital costs (Q1, $15,671 [$9,180, $27,901]; Q5, $70,133 [$47,136, $108,032]) rose from Q1 through Q5. Patients in Q5 consumed 47.7% of all post-MV initiation hospital days among all patients requiring MV, and the mean per-patient hospital costs in Q5 exceeded the sum of costs incurred by Q1 to Q3. Adjusted marginal mean (95% CI) hospital costs rose exponentially from Q1 through Q5: Q2 vs Q1, $3,976 ($3,354, $4,598); Q3 vs Q2, $5,532 ($5,103, $5,961); Q4 vs Q3, $11,705 ($11,071, $12,339); and Q5 vs Q4, $26,416 ($25,215, $27,616). INTERPRETATION: Patients undergoing MV in the highest quintiles according to duration of MV consume a disproportionate amount of resources, as evidenced by MV duration, hospital LOS, and costs, making them a potential target for streamlining MV care.

Characteristics, Hospital Course, and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Prolonged Acute Versus Short-Term Mechanical Ventilation in the United States, 2014-2018.

OBJECTIVES: Most patients requiring mechanical ventilation only require it for a short term (< 4 d of mechanical ventilation). Those undergoing prolonged acute mechanical ventilation (≥ 4 d mechanical ventilation) represent a select cohort who face significant morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. Using administrative codes, we identified prolonged acute mechanical ventilation and short-term mechanical ventilation patients and compared their baseline characteristics, hospital events, and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Seven-hundred eighty-seven acute care hospitals, United States, contributing data to Premier database, 2014-2018. PATIENTS: Patients on mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 691,961 patients meeting the enrollment criteria, 266,374 (38.5%) received prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. At baseline, patients on prolonged acute mechanical ventilation were similar to short-term mechanical ventilation in age (years: 62.0 ± 15.8 prolonged acute mechanical ventilation vs 61.7 ± 17.2 short-term mechanical ventilation), gender (males: 55.6% prolonged acute mechanical ventilation vs 53.9% short-term mechanical ventilation), and race (white: 69.1% prolonged acute mechanical ventilation vs 72.4% short-term mechanical ventilation). The prolonged acute mechanical ventilation group had a higher comorbidity burden than short-term mechanical ventilation (mean Charlson Score 3.5 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 2.7). The prevalence of vasopressors (50.3% vs 36.9%), dialysis (19.4% vs 10.3%), severe sepsis (20.3% vs 10.3%), and septic shock (33.5% vs 15.9%) was higher in prolonged acute mechanical ventilation than short-term mechanical ventilation. Hospital mortality (29.75% vs 21.1%), combined mortality, or discharge to hospice (37.2% vs 25.3%), extubation failure (12.3% vs 6.1%), tracheostomy (21.6% vs 4.5%), development of Clostridium difficile (4.5% vs 1.7%), and incidence density of ventilator-associated pneumonia (2.4/1,000 patient-days vs 0.6/1,000 patient-days) were all higher in the setting of prolonged acute mechanical ventilation than short-term mechanical ventilation. Median (interquartile range) post mechanical ventilation onset length of stay (13 [8-20] vs 4 d [1-8 d]) and hospital costs ($55,014 [$35,051-$88,007] vs $20,120 [$12,071-$34,915] were higher in prolonged acute mechanical ventilation than short-term mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-third of all hospitalized patients on mechanical ventilation require it for greater than or equal to 4 days. Prolonged acute mechanical ventilation patients exhibit a higher burden of both chronic and acute illness and experience higher rates than those on short-term mechanical ventilation of hospital-acquired complications and worse clinical and economic outcomes.