Validation of a HPLC method for flavonoid biomarkers in skullcap (Scutellaria) and its use to illustrate wide variability in the quality of commercial tinctures.

PURPOSE: To compare the flavonoid biomarker content (baicalin, baicalein and wogonin) of eleven commercial tinctures derived from Scutellaria lateriflora aerial parts (n=7) and Scutellaria baicalensis root (n=4). S. lateriflora tinctures are used in by western herbal practitioners to treat anxiety whereas S. baicalensis tinctures are used to treat inflammatory disease. METHODS: Baicalin and baicalein were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. and Wogonin was purchased from ChromaDex. The internal standard (4-hydroxybenzoic acid) was obtained from Acros Organics. The column used was a Luna C18, 5 m (150 x 4.6 mm, Phenomenex) maintained at ambient room temperature. A HP1050 HPLC system was used, comprising a gradient pump with degasser, a variable wavelength UV detector set to 270 nm, and an autosampler. Gradient elution was performed using 0.1% formic acid (eluent A) and methanol (eluent B). The gradient elution initial conditions were 45% B with linear gradient to 60% from 2 to 10 min, followed by linear gradient to 70% B at 30 min, and then linear gradient to 99% B at 31 min, this proportion being maintained for 1 min. The mobile phase was then returned to initial conditions at 33 min and maintained until the end of the run at 35 min. The flow rate was 1 mL/min. The assay was validated for sensitivity, accuracy and reproducibility. RESULTS: The concentration range of biomarkers (baicalin, baicalein and wogonin) in commercial tinctures is reported for S. lateriflora (baicalin: 0-12.66 mg/mL; baicalein: 0-0.63 mg/mL; wogonin: 0-0.16 mg/mL) and for S. baicalensis (baicalin: 0.12-10.61 mg/mL; baicalein: 0.52-5.88 mg/mL; wogonin: 0.08-1.61 mg/mL). CONCLUSION: The wide variability in biomarker concentrations between commercial tinctures has important implications for the manufacturers of commercial tinctures, for herbal practitioners in the choice of tinctures and not least for pharmacology and clinical researchers.

Nutritional supplements and conventional medicine; what should the physician know?

Almost anything that is swallowed in pill or potion form that is not a licensed medicine is, by default, legally classified as a dietary supplement. The present paper is an overview of supplement use and is intended to provide a logical framework for their discussion. Five major supplement categories are identified: essential micronutrients; other metabolites that have vitamin-like roles; natural oils; natural plant or animal extracts; antioxidants, which span the other categories. Supplement usage is also classified into broad categories. Examples of each supplement category and usage are briefly discussed. Some potential hazards of supplement use are also outlined; many substances in supplements are either not found in normal UK diets or consumed in much greater amounts than would be found in food. Many supplements are used for pharmaceutical purposes and sold as supplements to avoid the expense of acquiring a medicinal licence and to avoid the stricter quality-control regulations that apply to medicines. The use of supplements to ensure nutritional adequacy and as possible conditionally-essential nutrients is briefly discussed, as is their essentially pharmaceutical use for the prevention and alleviation of disease. There is critical discussion of whether the use of antioxidant supplements is justified or even if it is reasonable to promote a particular food on the basis of antioxidant content alone. Much of the research on supplements is reductionist, commercially sponsored or has other weaknesses; so, despite decades of use and research there is still uncertainty about their efficacy in many cases.