ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nuchal Translucency Evaluation at 11 to 14 Weeks of Gestation.

A fetus with an increased nuchal translucency at 11 to 14 weeks gestation is at risk for aneuploidy, genetic syndromes, structural anomalies, and intrauterine fetal demise in both single and twin gestations. In addition to referral to genetics for counseling and consideration of diagnostic genetic testing, a detailed anatomic survey and fetal echocardiogram are indicated in the second trimester to screen for congenital malformations and major heart defects. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Second and Third Trimester Vaginal Bleeding.

Vaginal bleeding can occur throughout pregnancy with varied etiologies. Although history and physical examination can identify many etiologies, imaging, in particular ultrasound (US), is the backbone of current medical practice. US pregnant uterus transabdominal, US pregnant uterus transvaginal, and US duplex Doppler velocimetry are usually appropriate for the evaluation of women with painless vaginal bleeding, those with painful vaginal bleeding, and also for those with second or third trimester vaginal bleeding with suspicion of or known placenta previa, low-lying placenta, or vasa previa. US cervix transperineal may be appropriate for those with painless or painful vaginal bleeding but is usually not appropriate for second or third trimester vaginal bleeding with suspicion of or known placenta previa, low-lying placenta, or vasa previa. Because the outcome of pregnancies is unequivocally related to the specific etiology of the vaginal bleeding, knowledge of imaging results directly informs patient management to optimize the outcome for mother and fetus. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder.

Placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PASD) is the current terminology recommended by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) and should replace terms such as abnormally adherent/invasive placenta or morbidly adherent placenta. PASD refers to a variety of potential clinical complications, which may result from abnormal placental implantation. More specifically, placenta accreta refers to a defect in the decidua basalis where the chorionic villi adhere directly to the myometrium with trophoblastic invasion. Accurate antenatal diagnosis is needed to plan for an appropriate delivery strategy at an experienced center in order to reduce maternal and potential fetal morbidity and mortality. Obtaining radiologic and clinical data when PASD is first suspected can play a significant role in formulating an appropriate delivery strategy. Depending on the clinical risk factors and initial imaging findings, transabdominal ultrasound of the pregnant uterus with duplex Doppler and transvaginal ultrasound as needed are the most appropriate imaging procedures. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Assessment of Gravid Cervix.

Preterm birth remains the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the greatest risk factor for preterm birth is a history of prior preterm birth, a short cervical length (≤25 mm) before 24 weeks' gestational age is also associated with increased risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. As such, cervical length assessment has become of particular interest in predicting those patients at risk for preterm birth. Other clinical scenarios (eg, preterm labor, induction of labor, and active labor) may arise, in which assessment of the cervix may be of interest. Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for assessing the gravid cervix, with transvaginal ultrasound recommended in patients at high risk for preterm birth or suspected preterm labor. Transperineal ultrasound is an alternate approach in those cases where transvaginal ultrasound in contraindicated. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Growth Disturbances-Risk of Fetal Growth Restriction.

Fetal growth restriction, or an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile, is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Optimizing management for obtaining the most favorable outcome for mother and fetus is largely based on detailed ultrasound findings. Identifying and performing those ultrasound procedures that are most associated with adverse outcome is necessary for proper patient management. Transabdominal ultrasound is the mainstay of initial management and assessment of fetal growth. For those fetuses that are identified as small for gestational age, assessment of fetal well-being with biophysical profile and Doppler velocimetry provide vital information for differentiating those fetuses that may be compromised and may require delivery and those that are well compensated. Delivery of the pregnancy is primarily based upon the gestational age of the pregnancy and the ultrasound findings. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Incidence of mesorectal node metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer: its therapeutic implications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for mesorectal node metastasis (MRNM) in locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS/MATERIALS: We performed an observational retrospective cohort study of 122 patients with cervical cancer who received definitive chemo-radiation treatment between December 2013 and June 2017 to evaluate the incidence of MRNM. Three diagnostic radiologists assessed all available pre-treatment images. In this study, the pelvic node metastasis was defined as ≥ 1.0 cm and MRNM as ≥ 0.5 cm for CT and MRI scans and as a maximum standardized uptake value of > 2.5 for PET/CT. The relationship of MRNM with FIGO stage, pelvic node metastasis, and mesorectal fascia involvement was evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of MRNM in all 122 patients was 8 (6.6%). However, in advanced stage (III- IV) patients, MRNM occurred in 4 of 39 (10.3%) compared with 4 of 83 (4.8%) in early stage (IB1-IIB) patients (p = 0.27). In patients with a positive pelvic node, MRNM occurred in 7 of 55 (12.7%) and 1 of 67 (1.5%) in those with negative pelvic node (p = 0.02). In addition, the incidence of MRNM was 3 of 9 (33.3%) in the presence of mesorectal fascia involvement and 5 of 113 (4.4%) among those without mesorectal fascia involvement (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that pelvic node metastasis and mesorectal fascia involvement are high-risk factors for MRNM. Therefore, vigilance of reviewing images in the mesorectum for MRNM is necessary for high-risk patients.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Postmenopausal Subacute or Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Pelvic pain is common in both reproductive age and postmenopausal women, and the major etiologies change throughout the life cycle. Chronic pain is defined as lasting for at least 6 months. There are many gastrointestinal and urinary disorders associated with chronic pain in this age group, which are not discussed in this guideline. Pain may be localized to the deep pelvis, with potential causes including pelvic congestion syndrome, intraperitoneal adhesions, hydrosalpinx, chronic inflammatory disease, or cervical stenosis. Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice, while CT and MRI may be appropriate for further characterization of sonographic findings. Alternatively, pain may be localized to the vagina, vulva, or perineum, with potential causes including vaginal atrophy, vaginismus, vaginal or vulvar cysts, vulvodynia, or pelvic myofascial pain. Imaging is primarily indicated in context of an abnormal physical exam and ultrasound is the initial modality of choice, while MRI may be appropriate for further characterization in select cases. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding.

Vaginal bleeding is not uncommon in the first trimester of pregnancy. The majority of such patients will have a normal intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), a nonviable IUP, or an ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality in evaluation of these patients. US, along with clinical observations and serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels, can usually distinguish these causes. Although it is important to diagnose ectopic pregnancies and nonviable IUPs, one should also guard against injury to normal pregnancies due to inappropriate treatment with methotrexate or surgical intervention. Less common causes of first trimester vaginal bleeding include gestational trophoblastic disease and arteriovenous malformations. Pulsed methods of Doppler US should generally be avoided in the first trimester when there is a normal, or a potentially normal, IUP. Once a normal IUP has been excluded, Doppler US may be useful when other diagnoses such as retained products of conception or arteriovenous malformations are suspected. MRI may occasionally be helpful as a problem-solving tool. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Multiple Gestations.

Women with twin or higher-order pregnancies will typically have more ultrasound examinations than women with a singleton pregnancy. Most women will have at minimum a first trimester scan, a nuchal translucency evaluation scan, fetal anatomy scan at 18 to 22 weeks, and one or more scans in the third trimester to evaluate growth. Multiple gestations are at higher risk for preterm delivery, congenital anomalies, fetal growth restriction, placenta previa, vasa previa, and velamentous cord insertion. Chorionicity and amnionicity should be determined as early as possible when a twin pregnancy is identified to permit triage of the monochorionic group into a closer surveillance model. Screening for congenital heart disease is warranted in monochorionic twins because they have an increased rate of congenital cardiac anomalies. In addition, monochorionic twins have a higher risk of developing cardiac abnormalities in later gestation related to right ventricular outflow obstruction, in particular the subgroups with twin-twin transfusion syndrome or selective intrauterine growth restriction. Monochorionic twins have unique complications including twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, twin embolization syndrome, and acardius, or twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Differentiation of high lipid content from low lipid content adrenal lesions using single-source rapid kilovolt (peak)-switching dual-energy multidetector CT.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine if a single-source rapid kilovolt (peak)-switching dual-energy (RSDE) multidetector computed tomography (CT) can differentiate high lipid content (HLC) from low lipid content (LLC) incidental adrenal lesions. METHODS: A retrospective intrapatient study of 40 consecutive adults with known hepatic or pancreatic pathology who underwent multiphasic abdominal RSDE for nonadrenal-related clinical indications and had adrenal lesions was done. Arterial phase was acquired with RSDE, conventional unenhanced (CU) images with standard MDCT. RSDE measurements included lesion attenuation in Hounsfield units on simulated monochromatic 140-keV images and density (in milligrams per milliliter) on material decomposition images, using water-iodine and fat-iodine basis pairs. Each variable was correlated with CU Hounsfield units (Pearson coefficient). RSDE lesion values were compared with analysis of variance and Tukey HSD test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify RSDE thresholds comparable to 10 HU on unenhanced MDCT. RESULTS: Twenty-nine HLC and 18 LLC lesions were evaluated in 40 subjects (21 men; mean age, 66.5 years). RSDE variables correlated with CU Hounsfield units, r = 0.90-0.92, P < 0.001. Myelolipomas, HLC, and LLC lesions were different by analysis of variance, P < 0.001 for all dual-energy variables. Excluding myelolipomas from ROC curve analysis, ROC areas for Hounsfield unit 140-keV images, fat(-iodine), and water(-iodine) were 0.929 (0.039), 0.917 (0.046), and 0.912 (0.048), respectively (P < 0.001); using a specificity of 94.4%, 64% of adenomatous lesions had 140 keV values of less than 9.5 HU, 59% had fat(-iodine) values of less than 987 mg/mL, and 50% had water(-iodine) values of less than 994 mg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong correlation between RSDE measures and accepted MDCT attenuation values for HLC and LLC adrenal lesions. In some patients undergoing postcontrast RSDE who are found to have incidental adrenal nodules, further unenhanced CT or adrenal-protocol CT or magnetic resonance imaging may not be necessary.

Renal transplant complications.

Clinical monitoring and appropriate imaging have played an important role to ensure a successful outcome for renal transplant patients. A variety of imaging options now exist, and they are routinely used in these patients. Ultrasound is the most frequent first-line imaging method in the post-operative period and for long-term follow-up. For specific indications, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and nuclear medicine examinations are often helpful. This article will review the imaging findings of the most commonly encountered complications of renal transplantation.

Upper extremity venous Doppler ultrasound.

Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice when evaluating the upper extremity venous system. When sonographic findings are equivocal or nondiagnostic, particularly in evaluating the central deep veins, MR venography or catheter venography correlation may be helpful. Ultrasound provides an accurate, rapid, low-cost, portable, noninvasive method for screening, mapping, and surveillance of the upper extremity venous system.

Sonography of benign renal cystic disease.

When evaluating renal cystic mass lesions, ultrasound plays an important part in distinguishing cysts from solid lesions and in demonstrating the complex internal architecture of cystic lesions. Ultrasound is usually the initial imaging modality for patients who have medical renal disease. When renal cystic disease is identified, it is extremely important to accurately communicate the findings and attempt to distinguish benign from surgical lesions.

Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: U.S. multicenter phase III study.

PURPOSE: To assess prospectively the efficacy and safety of postcontrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) compared with that of precontrast MR imaging in patients who are known to have or are suspected of having liver lesions and who are scheduled for hepatic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigational review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. HIPAA went into effect after data collection. A total of 172 patients were enrolled. After precontrast MR imaging, 169 patients (94 men, 75 women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 19-84 years) received an intravenous bolus of 25 micromol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA and underwent dynamic gradient-recalled-echo and delayed MR imaging 20 minutes after injection. Arterial and portal phase computed tomography (CT) were performed within 6 weeks of MR imaging. The standard of reference was surgery with intraoperative ultrasonography (US) and biopsy and/or pathologic evaluation of resected liver segments and/or 3-month follow-up of nonresected segments if intraoperative US was not available. Three blinded reviewers and unblinded site investigators identified liver lesions on segment maps. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare differences in per-patient sensitivity of precontrast and postcontrast MR images. Adverse events were recorded, and patient monitoring and laboratory assay were performed at time of injection and up to 24 hours after contrast material administration. RESULTS: At MR imaging, 316 lesions were identified in 131 patients. In 77% (P = .012), 72% (P = .15), and 71% (P = .027) of patients for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively, more lesions were seen at precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging combined than at precontrast MR imaging alone. Sensitivity values for blinded readings were significantly greater at postcontrast MR imaging than at precontrast MR imaging for two of three blinded readers. For all blinded readers, combined precontrast and postcontrast MR images showed no difference in sensitivity compared with helical CT scans. The use of MR imaging, however, yielded fewer patients with at least one false-positive lesion (37%, 31%, and 34% of patients for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively) than did helical CT (45%, 36%, and 43% of patients for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with precontrast MR imaging, postcontrast MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA demonstrated improved sensitivity for lesion detection in the majority of blinded readers, with no substantial adverse events.

Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: multicenter study of safety and effectiveness of direct injection protocol.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of an undiluted direct injection of ferumoxides with those of a diluted slow infusion of ferumoxides during 30 minutes in patients with known liver lesions or in those suspected of having them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three patients at 16 institutions were randomized to receive either an undiluted direct injection of 0.56 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight of ferumoxides administered during 2 minutes (2 mL/min) or a diluted slow infusion administered during 30 minutes. Safety was assessed with monitoring for adverse events and laboratory tests. For sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy analysis, two independent blinded observers identified and classified lesions as benign or malignant with precontrast images and with pre- and postcontrast images combined. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events in the group with direct injection compared with those in the group with infusion (21 [18%] of 114 patients vs 19 [17%] of 112 patients, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed. The most common adverse events in the group with direct injection versus the group with infusion were headache (five [4%] of 114 vs three [3%] of 112, respectively) and back pain (five [4%] of 114 vs three [3%] of 112, respectively). Overall, in 68 (62%) of 109 patients with direct injection and 71 (66%) of 108 patients with infusion, additional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging information was obtained after ferumoxides administration (P =.67). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy were significantly improved by adding images obtained after ferumoxides administration to the images obtained before contrast agent administration (P <.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Direct injection of ferumoxides has safety and effectiveness profiles similar to those of slow infusion of the agent. Further findings indicate that the addition of ferumoxides increases the sensitivity and specificity of hepatic MR evaluation when compared with unenhanced MR imaging.

Noninvasive assessment of portomesenteric venous thrombosis: current concepts and imaging strategies.

Rapid, noninvasive imaging strategies, especially multidetector spiral CT and CT angiography (CTA) as well as gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (MRA), have facilitated early diagnosis of splanchnic venous thrombosis, a potentially lethal cause of intestinal ischemia. Single breath-hold volumetric acquisitions permit superior temporal and contrast resolution while eliminating motion artifact and suppressing respiratory misregistration. Increased spatial resolution is aided by thinner slice collimation. These cross-sectional imaging techniques are becoming a preferred noninvasive alternative to conventional selective mesenteric angiography with delayed imaging for venous evaluation and should be considered the primary diagnostic modalities for evaluating patients with high clinical suspicion of nonsurgical mesenteric ischemia.