COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Nursing Homes Financial Performance.

Nursing homes expressed concern about potential severe adverse financial outcomes of COVID-19, with worries extending to the possibility of some facilities facing closure. Maintaining a strong financial well-being is crucial, and there were concerns that the pandemic might have significantly impacted both expenses and income. This longitudinal study aimed to analyze the financial performance of nursing homes during COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we examined the impact of the pandemic on nursing home operating margins, operating revenue per resident day, and operating cost per resident day. The study utilized secondary data from various sources, including CMS Medicare cost reports, Brown University's Long Term Care Focus (LTCFocus), CMS Payroll-Based Journal, CMS Care Compare, Area Health Resource File, Provider Relief Fund distribution data, and CDC's NH COVID-19 public file. The sample consisted of 45 833 nursing home-year observations from 2018 to 2021. Fixed-effects regression analysis was employed to assess the impact of the pandemic on financial performance while controlling for various organizational and market characteristics. The study found that nursing homes' financial performance deteriorated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Operating margins decreased by approximately 4.3%, while operating costs per resident day increased by $26.51, outweighing the increase in operating revenue per resident day by about $17. Occupancy rates, payer mix, and staffing intensity were found to impact financial performance. The study highlights the significant financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing homes. While nursing homes faced substantial financial strains, the findings offered lessons for the future, underscoring the need for nursing homes to improve the accuracy of their cost reports and enhance financial transparency and accountability.

Beyond the Balance Sheet: Investigating the Association Between NHA Turnover and Nursing Home Financial Performance.

Introduction: Nursing homes (NHs) serve as a safety net for vulnerable populations such as older adults and people with disabilities. Nursing Home Administrators (NHAs) play a crucial role in managing the daily operations of NHs, including overseeing direct care staff and establishing the facility's strategic direction. Unfortunately, NHs have consistently faced high NHA turnover rates, which have been linked to poor organizational performance. This study aims to investigate the relationship between NHA turnover and financial performance in NHs. Methods: Using an integrated perspective based on the upper echelons theory and the resource-based view of the firm, we investigated the association between NHA turnover and financial peformance using multiple secondary data sources, such as the Care Compare: Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program and Brown University's Long Term Care Focus. We conducted a cross-sectional study using a multivariate linear regression model, measuring financial performance using operating margin while NHA turnover represents the number of administrators that left the organization. Results: Our findings indicate that NHs with higher NHA turnover rates have lower operating margins. Specifically, compared to facilities with no turnover, one NHA turnover is associated with a 1.14% decrease in operating margin, and two or more turnovers are associated with a 2.25% decrease. Discussion: This study contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating the financial impact of NHA turnover and provides further evidence of the need for targeted organizational and policy interventions to improve NHA retention.

Association of hospital and market characteristics with 30-day readmission rates from 2009 to 2015.

Objectives: The US government implemented the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program on 1 October 2012 to reduce readmission rates through financial penalties to hospitals with excessive readmissions. We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis of US hospitals from 2009 to 2015 to determine the association of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program with 30-day readmissions. Methods: We utilized multivariable linear regression with year and state fixed effects. The model was adjusted for hospital and market characteristics lagged by 1 year. Interaction effects of hospital and market characteristics with the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program indicator variable was also included to assess whether associations of Hospital Readmission Reduction Program with 30-day readmissions differed by these characteristics. Results: In multivariable adjusted analysis, the main effect of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program was a 3.80 percentage point (p < 0.001) decrease in readmission rates in 2013-2015 relative to 2009-2012. Hospitals with lower readmission rates overall included not-for-profit and government hospitals, medium and large hospitals, those in markets with a larger percentage of Hispanic residents, and population 65 years and older. Higher hospital readmission rates were observed among those with higher licensed practical nurse staffing ratio, larger Medicare and Medicaid share, and less competition. Statistically significant interaction effects between hospital/market characteristics and the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program on the outcome of 30-day readmission rates were present. Teaching hospitals, rural hospitals, and hospitals in markets with a higher percentage of residents who were Black experienced larger decreases in readmission rates. Hospitals with larger registered nurse staffing ratios and in markets with higher uninsured rate and percentage of residents with a high school education or greater experienced smaller decreases in readmission rates. Conclusion: Findings of the current study support the effectiveness of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program but also point to the need to consider the ability of hospitals to respond to penalties and incentives based on their characteristics during policy development.

Examining Knowledge Management and the Culture Change Movement in Long-Term Care: A Study of High-Medicaid-Census Nursing Homes.

High-quality nursing home (NH) care has long been a challenge within the United States. For decades, policymakers at the state and federal levels have adopted and implemented regulations to target critical components of NH care outcomes. Simultaneously, our delivery system continues to change the role of NHs in patient care. For example, more acute patients are cared for in NHs, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has implemented value payment programs targeting NH settings. As a part of these growing pressures from the broader healthcare delivery system, the culture-change movement has emerged among NHs over the past two decades, prompting NHs to embody more person-centered care as well as promote settings which resemble someone's home, as opposed to institutionalized healthcare settings. Researchers have linked culture change to high-quality outcomes and the ability to adapt and respond to the ever-changing pressures brought on by changes in our regulatory and delivery system. Making enduring culture change within organizations has long been a challenge and focus in NHs. Despite research suggesting that culture-change initiatives that promote greater resident-centered care are associated with several desirable patient outcomes, their adoption and implementation by NHs are resource intensive, and research has shown that NHs with high percentages of low-income residents are especially challenged to adopt these initiatives. This chapter takes a novel approach to examine factors that impact the adoption of culture-change initiatives by assessing knowledge management and the role of knowledge management activities in promoting the adoption of innovative care delivery models among under-resourced NHs throughout the United States. Using primary data from a survey of NH administrators, we conducted logistic regression models to assess the relationship between knowledge management and the adoption of a culture-change initiative as well as whether these relationships were moderated by leadership and staffing stability. Our study found that NHs were more likely to adopt a culture-change initiative when they had more robust knowledge management activities. Moreover, knowledge management activities were particularly effective at promoting adoption in NHs that struggle with leadership and nursing staff instability. Our findings support the notion that knowledge management activities can help NHs acquire and mobilize informational resources to support the adoption of care delivery innovations, thus highlighting opportunities to more effectively target efforts to stimulate the adoption and spread of these initiatives.

High Medicaid Nursing Homes: Contextual Factors Associated with the Availability of Specialized Resources Required to Care for Obese Residents.

Obesity is an increasingly important concern in the delivery of high-quality nursing home care. Obese nursing home residents require specialized equipment and resources. As high Medicaid nursing homes have limited financial ability, they may lack the necessary resources to address the needs of obese residents. Moreover, there are variations in the availability of obesity-related specialized resources across these facilities. This study aims to investigate the organizational and market factors associated with the availability of obesity-related specialized resources in high-Medicaid nursing homes. Survey and secondary data sources for the study period 2017-2018 were utilized. The survey data were merged with Brown University's Long Term Care Focus (LTCFocus), Nursing Home Compare, and Area Health Resource File datasets. The dependent variable was the composite score of obesity-related specialized resources, ranging from 0-19. An ordinary least square regression with propensity score weights (to adjust for potential survey non-response bias), along with appropriate organizational/market level control variables were used for our analysis. Our results suggest that payer-mix (>Medicare residents) and a higher proportion of obese residents were positively associated with the availability of obesity-related specialized resources. Policymakers should consider implementing incentives, such as increased Medicaid payments, to assist high Medicaid nursing homes in addressing the specific needs of obese residents.

Characteristics of nursing homes with high percentages of falls and falls with injuries among residents with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obesity among United States nursing home (NH) residents is increasing. These residents have special care needs, which increases their risk for falls and falls with injuries. NH are responsible for ensuring the health of their residents, including minimizing falls. However, given the special care needs of residents with obesity, different factors may be important for developing programs to minimize falls among this group. AIM: We aimed to identify NH characteristics associated with falls and falls with injuries among residents with obesity. METHOD: We used resident assessment data and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that rates of falls and falls with injuries among residents with obesity varied significantly based on for-profit status, size, acuity index, obesity rate among residents, and registered nurse hours per patient day. CONCLUSION: Recommendations are made as to how NH may be able to lower risk for falls and falls with injuries among their residents with obesity.

Resources availability and COVID-19 mortality among US counties.

The COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by WHO on 03/2020 has claimed millions of lives worldwide. The US leads all countries in COVID-19-related deaths. Individual level (preexisting conditions and demographics) and county-level (availability of resources) factors have been attributed to increased risk of COVID-19-related deaths. This study builds on previous studies to assess the relationship between county-level resources and COVID-19 mortality among 2,438 US counties. We merged 2019 data from AHA, AHRF, and USA FACTS. The dependent variable was the total number of COVID-19-related deaths. Independent variables included county-level resources: (1) hospital staffing levels (FTE RNs, hospitalists, and intensivists) per 10,000 population; (2) hospital capacity (occupancy rate, proportion of teaching hospitals, and number of airborne infection control rooms per 10,000 population); and (3) macroeconomic resources [per capita income and location (urban/rural)]. We controlled for population 65+, racial/ethnic minority, and COVID-19 deaths per 1,000 population. A negative binomial regression was used. Hospital staffing per 10,000 population {FTE RN [IRR = 0.997; CI (0.995-0.999)], FTE hospitalists [IRR = 0.936; CI (0.897-0.978)], and FTE intensivists [IRR = 0.606; CI (0.516-0.712)]} was associated with lower COVID-19-related deaths. Hospital occupancy rate, proportion of teaching hospitals, and total number of airborne infection control rooms per 10,000 population were positively associated with COVID-19-related deaths. Per capita income and being in an urban county were positively associated with COVID-19-related deaths. Finally, the proportion of 65+, racial/ethnic minorities, and the number of cases were positively associated with COVID-19-related deaths. Our findings suggest that focusing on maintaining adequate hospital staffing could improve COVID-19 mortality.

Are Hospice Google Ratings Correlated With Patient Experience Scores? Evidence from a National Hospice Study.

Background: Choosing hospice care for your loved ones is often challenging. Online ratings such as Google rating has become a go-to source for most consumers. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Survey for Hospice also provides quality information about hospice care to help patients and their families make decisions. Aim: To evaluate the perceived usefulness of publicly reported hospice quality indicators and compare hospice Google ratings with hospice CAHPS scores. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed to test the relationship between Google ratings and CAHPS measures in 2020. We conducted descriptive statistics for all variables. Multivariate regressions were used to assess the relationship between Google ratings and the CAHPS scores of the sample. Results: Among our sample of 1,956 hospices, the average Google rating was 4.2 out of 5 stars. CAHPS score means ranged from 75 (Help for pain and symptoms) to 90 (Treating patients with respect) out of 100. Hospice Google ratings were highly correlated with hospice CAHPS scores. For-profit and chain-affiliated hospices reported lower CAHPS scores. Hospice operational time was positively associated with CAHPS scores. The percentage of minority residents in the community and residents' educational level was negatively associated with CAHPS scores. Conclusions: Hospice Google ratings were highly correlated with patients' and families' experience scores as measured by the CAHPS survey. Consumers can use information from both resources in making decisions about hospice care.

Contextual factors and business strategy choice: The case of us hospitals.

US hospitals are struggling with how to compete and remain viable in an increasingly turbulent and competitive environment. Using Porter's generic strategies and resource dependence theory, this study examined the relationship between environmental factors and business strategy choice among U.S. hospitals. The study used longitudinal data from 2006 to 2016 of US urban, general acute care hospitals from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, Medicare cost reports, and Area Health Resource File. Multinomial regression was used to analyze the data. and Discussion: Our findings showed four types of hospital strategy: cost-leadership, differentiation, hybrid, and stuck-in-the-middle. A greater number of physicians (county-level) increases the likelihood of pursuing differentiation and hybrid strategy. On the other hand, a higher older adult population (65 years+) increases the likelihood of pursuing a cost-leadership strategy. Similarly, lower competition and higher Medicare Advantage penetration increases the likelihood of pursuing cost-leadership over hybrid strategy. An increase in the unemployment rate decreases the likelihood of pursuing differentiation and cost-leadership strategies versus the hybrid strategy. Finally, hospitals pursuing a differentiation strategy tended to be larger, teaching, and not-for-profit. The results showed the importance of environmental and organizational factors in predicting the strategy choice of hospitals.

Rural disparities in the quality of clinical care are notable and larger for males.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether rural-urban differences in quality of care for Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees vary between females and males. METHODS: Data for this study came from the 2019 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Linear regression was used to investigate urban-rural differences in individual MA enrollee scores on 34 clinical care measures grouped into 7 categories, and how those differences varied by sex (through evaluation of statistical interactions). FINDINGS: Across all 7 categories of measures, scores for rural residents were worse than scores for urban residents. For 4 categories-care for patients with (suspected) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, avoiding prescription misuse, behavioral health, and diabetes care-the average difference across measures in the category was greater than 3 percentage points. Across all 34 measures, there were 15 statistically significant rural-by-sex interactions that exceeded 1 percentage point. In 11 of those cases, the deficit associated with living in a rural area was greater for males than for females. In 3 cases, the deficit associated with living in a rural area was larger for females than for males. In 1 case involving Follow-up After Hospitalization for Mental Illness, rural residents had an advantage, and it was larger for males than for females. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions may help address patient- (eg, health literacy and patient activation), provider- (eg, workforce recruitment and retention), and structural-level issues contributing to these disparities, especially for rural males.

Characteristics of United States nursing homes with high percentages of stage 2-4 pressure injuries among high-risk nursing home residents with obesity.

Obesity rates in nursing homes (NHs) are increasing. Residents with obesity are at risk for poor outcomes such as pressure injuries (PIs) due to special care needs such as bariatric medical equipment and special protocols for skin care. PIs among resident populations is a sign of poor quality NH care. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to identify characteristics of NHs with high rates of stage 2-4 PIs among their high-risk residents with obesity. Resident assessment data were aggregated to the NH level. NH structure and process of care and antecedent conditions of the residents and environment measures were used in bivariate comparisons and multivariate logistic regression models to identify associations with NHs having high rates of stage 2-4 PIs among high-risk residents with obesity. We identified three characteristics for which the effect on the odds was at least 10% for clinical significance - for-profit status, large facilities, and the hours of certified nursing assistants (CNAs) per patient day (HRPPD). This study identified several NH characteristics that are associated with higher risk for PIs, which can be targeted with evidence-based interventions to reduce the risk of these adverse safety events occurring.

Poor self-rated mental health and Medicare beneficiaries' routine care-seeking.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between self-rated mental health (SRMH) and infrequent routine care among Medicare beneficiaries and to investigate the roles of managed care and having a personal doctor. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2018 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to predict infrequent routine care (having not made an appointment for routine care in the last 6 months) from SRMH, Medicare coverage type (fee-for-service [FFS] vs Medicare Advantage [MA], the managed care version of Medicare), and the interaction of these variables. Models that did and did not include having a personal doctor were compared. All models controlled for demographics and physical health. RESULTS: Overall, 14.9% of beneficiaries did not make a routine care appointment in the last 6 months, with rates adjusted for demographics and physical health ranging from 14.5% for those with "excellent" SRMH to 19.2% for those with "poor" SRMH. Beneficiaries with poor SRMH were less likely to make a routine care appointment in FFS than in MA (20.1% vs 16.4%, respectively, had not done so in the last 6 months; P < .05). Accounting for having a personal doctor reduced the association between SRMH and infrequent routine care by about a third. CONCLUSIONS: Extra efforts are needed to ensure receipt of routine care by beneficiaries with poor mental health-particularly in FFS, where more should be done to ensure that beneficiaries have a personal doctor.

Patient Experience for Hispanic Older Adults Varies by Language Preference.

BACKGROUND: Hispanic people with Medicare report worse patient experiences than non-Hispanic White counterparts. However, little research examines how these disparities may vary by language preference (English/Spanish). OBJECTIVES: Using Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey data, assess whether 2014-2018 disparities in patient experiences for Hispanic people with Medicare vary by language preference. RESEARCH DESIGN: We fit a series of linear, case-mix adjusted models predicting Medicare CAHPS measures by race/ethnicity/language preference (Hispanic Spanish-respondents; Hispanic Spanish-preferring English-respondents; Hispanic English-preferring respondents; and non-Hispanic White English-respondents). SUBJECTS: A total of 1,006,543 Hispanic and non-Hispanic White respondents to the Medicare 2014-2018 CAHPS surveys. RESULTS: There were disparities for all Hispanic groups relative to non-Hispanic White English-respondents. Hispanic Spanish-preferring English-respondents reported worse experience than Hispanic Spanish-respondents for getting care quickly (-8 points), getting needed care (-5 points), doctor communication (-2 points), and customer service (-1 point), but better experiences for flu immunization (+2 points). Similarly, Hispanic Spanish-preferring English-respondents reported worse experience than Hispanic English-preferring respondents for getting care quickly (-4 points) and getting needed care (-2 points). Hispanic English-preferring respondents reported worse experience than Hispanic Spanish-respondents for getting care quickly (-4 points), getting needed care (-3 points), doctor communication and customer service (-2 points each), but better experience for flu immunization (+2 points). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of language preference, Hispanic people with Medicare experience disparities in patient care relative to non-Hispanic White English-preferring counterparts. Hispanic Spanish-preferring English-respondents report the worse experiences, followed by Hispanic English-preferring respondents. Hispanic Spanish-respondents experienced the least disparities of the three Hispanic language subgroups.

Nursing home directors of nursing experiences regarding safety among residents with obesity.

The prevalence of nursing home (NH) residents with obesity is rising. Perspectives of NH Directors of Nursing (DONs) who oversee care trajectories for residents with obesity is lacking. This study aimed to describe the experiences of NH DONs regarding care and safety for NH residents with obesity. An adapted version of Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model guided this qualitative descriptive study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 DONs. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis, and findings are presented under the model's constructs. We learned that admission decisions for NH referrals of patients with obesity are complex due to reimbursement issues, available space and resources, and resident characteristics. DONs described the need to coach and mentor Certified Nursing Assistants to provide safe quality care and that more staff education is needed. We identified novel findings regarding the challenges of short-term residents' experience transitioning out of care due to limited resources.

The Moderating Effect of the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) on the Relationship Between Hospital Strategy and Financial Performance.

Background: One of the major tenets of contingency theory is that the appropriate fit between strategy and environmental contingencies results in better financial performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) moderates the association between hospital strategy and financial performance. Methods: We used longitudinal data from 2011 to 2016 from US urban general acute care hospitals. Four secondary datasets were used: the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, Medicare cost reports (CMS), Area Health Resource File (AHRF), and the Robert Graham Center's SDI. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression model was used to analyze the data. An interaction term was used to test the moderating effect of the SDI on the strategy-financial performance relationship. Results and Discussion: Our results showed that compared to hybrids, the SDI moderates the relationship between strategy and financial performance for cost leaders and hybrids. Increasing market social deprivation increases the hospital operating margin of cost leaders by 0.06%. Similarly, increasing levels of market social deprivation increases the hospital operating margin of hybrids by 0.06% (p < 0.05). As such, our results suggest that social deprivation may affect the viability of hospital strategy.

Disparities In The Quality Of Clinical Care Delivered To American Indian/Alaska Native Medicare Advantage Enrollees.

This study used data from the 2019 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) to examine differences in the quality of care received by American Indian/Alaska Native beneficiaries versus care received by non-Hispanic White beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage (managed care) plans. American Indian/Alaska Native beneficiaries were more likely than White beneficiaries to receive care that meets clinical standards for eight of twenty-six HEDIS measures and were less likely than White beneficiaries to receive care that meets clinical standards for five of twenty-six measures. Measures for which American Indian/Alaska Native beneficiaries were less likely to receive care meeting clinical standards were mainly ones pertaining to appropriate treatment of diagnosed conditions. In all cases, differences in care for American Indian/Alaska Native and White beneficiaries were largely within-plan differences. These findings indicate the need for improved clinical care for all beneficiaries. For American Indian/Alaska Native beneficiaries, there is a particular need for improvement in the treatment of diagnosed conditions, including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol and other forms of substance abuse.

Hospital Cultural Competency Leadership and Training is Associated with Better Financial Performance.

GOAL: An organization's cultural competency reflects its ongoing capacity to provide high-quality, equitable, safe, and patient-centered care. Cultural competency leadership and training (CCLT) influences organizational cultural competency, which could affect organizational performance. Policies regarding health disparities point to the need for hospitals to become culturally competent. This study aimed to explore if CCLT practices are associated with better financial performance. METHODS: Using secondary data from three sources-the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, the Health Care Cost Information System, and the Area Health Resource File-a longitudinal panel study design reviewed 3,594 hospital-year observations for acute care hospitals across the United States from 2011 to 2012. CCLT, the independent variable, was measured as a summated scale of strategy, execution, implementation, and training in diversity practices. For financial performance, the operating and total margins of hospitals were measured as dependent variables. Two random-effects regression models with year- and state-fixed effects were used to examine the relationship, with hospital being the unit of analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The descriptive statistics showed that hospitals had an average CCLT score of approximately 2 (the range was 0-4). Regression analysis indicated that an increase in the CCLT score was associated with a 0.3% and 0.4% increase in total and operating margins, respectively (p < .05). Also, with each 10 additional staffed beds, hospitals on average experienced a 0.1% increase in both total and operating margins. Overall, for-profit hospitals experienced a 2.4% higher total margin and a 4.9% higher operating margin, as compared to not-for-profit hospitals. On the contrary, government hospitals showed 1% and 5.8% lower total and operating margins, respectively. APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: Results of our study support a business case for CCLT practices. Cultural competency makes good economic sense by helping to improve cost savings, increase market share, and enhance the efficiency of care. Therefore, healthcare leaders should consider investing in CCLT. With the growing emphasis on value-based purchasing related to patient outcomes and experience, hospitals that develop a high degree of cultural competency through CCLT can benefit from the changes in reimbursement. CCLT also affects financial performance through avoidance of costs related to employee absenteeism and turnover and improves team cohesiveness by reducing cultural conflicts. Other mechanisms by which CCLT assists in saving costs and affecting financial performance include avoidance of unnecessary readmissions and expensive hospitalizations through the proper screening of patients from diverse backgrounds. CCLT improves cultural competency and diversity management, thus creating a unique competitive advantage for hospitals.

Antecedents of geographical expansion: The case of federally qualified health centers.

BACKGROUND: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are pivotal safety net primary care providers for the medically underserved. FQHCs have complex organizational designs, with many FQHCs providing care at multiple physical locations ("sites"). The number of sites, however, varies considerably between FQHCs, which can have important implications for differential access that may perpetuate disparities in quality of care. PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to explore the organizational and environmental antecedents of the number of sites operated by each FQHC. The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of FQHCs' expansion that has vital implications for cost and access outcomes. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study is based on data between the years 2012 and 2018. Using multivariate growth curve modeling, we analyzed the final sample, consisting of 5,482 FQHC-years. RESULTS: The level of competition, measured as the number of FQHC sites in the Primary Care Service Area (PCSA) and the number of primary care physicians per 1,000 PCSA residents, was positively associated with the number of FQHC sites. The number of patients, the level of federal grant, and the year were also positively associated with the number of FQHC sites, whereas percentage of Medicaid patients; workforce supply, measured as primary care physician assistants per 1,000 PCSA residents; Medicaid expansion; and state/local funding available for FQHCs were not. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study indicate that competition, especially between peer FQHCs, is significantly associated with FQHC expansion. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This result suggests that FQHC managers and policymakers may closely monitor cost, access, and quality implications of competition and FQHC expansion.

The organizational and environmental characteristics associated with hospitals' use of intensivists.

BACKGROUND: As large numbers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in 2020 and 2021, the United States faced a shortage of critical care providers. Intensivists are physicians specializing in providing care in the ICU. Although studies have explored the clinical and financial benefits associated with the use of intensivists, little is known about the organizational and market factors associated with a hospital administrator's strategic decision to use intensivists. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use the resource dependence theory to better understand the organizational and market factors associated with a hospital administrator's decision to use intensivists. METHODOLOGY: The sample consisted of the national acute care hospitals (N = 4,986) for the period 2007-2017. The dependent variable was the number of full-time equivalent intensivists staffed in hospitals. The independent variables were organizational and market-level factors. A negative binomial regression model with state and year fixed effects, clustered at the hospital level, was used to examine the relationship between the use of intensivists and organizational and market factors. RESULTS: The results from the analyses show that administrators of larger, not-for-profit hospitals that operate in competitive urban markets with relatively high levels of munificence are more likely to utilize intensivists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: When significant strains are placed on ICUs like what was experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that hospital administrators understand how to best staff their ICUs. With a better understanding of the organizational and market factors associated with the use of intensivists, practitioners and policymakers alike can better understand how to strategically utilize intensivists in the ICU, especially in the face of a continuing pandemic.

Hospital Cultural Competency and Attributes of Patient Safety Culture: A Study of U.S. Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: Given the increasing racial and ethnic diversity in the United States, hospitals face challenges in providing safe and high-quality care to minority patients. Cultural competency fostered through engagement in diversity programs can be used as a resourceful strategy to provide safe care and improve the patient safety culture. This article examined the association of cultural competency and employee's perceived attributes of safety culture. METHODS: A longitudinal study design was used with 283 unique hospital observations from 2014 to 2016. The dependent variables were percent composite scores for 4 attributes of perceived safety culture: (1) management support for patient safety, (2) teamwork across units, (3) communication openness, and (4) nonpunitive response to an error. The independent variable was an engagement in diversity programs, considered in 3 categories: (1) high, (2) medium, and (3) low. Controls included hospital characteristics, market characteristics, and percent. Ordinal logistic regression was used for imputation, whereas multiple linear regression was used for analyses. RESULTS: Results indicate that hospitals with high engagement have 4.64% higher perceptions of management support for safety, 3.17% higher perceptions of teamwork across units, and 3.97% higher perceptions of nonpunitive response, as compared with hospitals that have a low engagement in diversity programs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Culturally competent hospitals have better safety culture than their counterparts. Cultural competency is an important resource to build a safety culture so that safe care for patients from minority and diverse backgrounds can be delivered.