A prospective randomised phase-II trial with gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus sunitinib in advanced pancreatic cancer: a study of the CESAR Central European Society for Anticancer Drug Research-EWIV.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most common malignant tumours and is still associated with a poor prognosis in advanced disease. To improve the standard therapy with gemcitabine, we initiated a prospective randomised phase-II trial with gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus sunitinib (SUNGEM) based on data of in vitro trials and phase-I data for the combination treatment. The rational of adding sunitinib was its putative antiangiogenic mechanism of action. METHODS: A total of 106 eligible patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic PDAC without previous system therapy were randomised to receive GEM at a dosage of 1.000mg/m(2) d1, 8, 15 q28 versus a combination of SUNGEM at a dosage of GEM 1.000mg/m(2) d1+8 and sunitinib 50mg p.o. d1-14, q21d. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS), secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), toxicity and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The confirmatory analysis of PFS was based on the intend-to-treat (ITT) population (N=106). The median PFS was 13.3 weeks (95% confidence interval (95%-CI): 10.4-18.1 weeks) for GEM and 11.6 weeks for SUNGEM (95%-CI: 7.0-18.0 weeks; p=0.78 one-sided log-rank). The ORR was 6.1% (95%-CI: 0.7-20.2%) for GEM and for 7.1% (95%-CI: 0.9-23.5%) for SUNGEM (p=0.87). The median time to progression (TTP) was 14.0 weeks (95%-CI: 12.4-22.3 weeks) for GEM and 18.0 weeks (95%-CI: 11.3-19.3 weeks) for SUNGEM (p=0.60; two-sided log-rank). The median OS was 36.7 weeks (95%-CI: 20.6-49.0 weeks) for the GEM arm and 30.4 weeks (95%-CI: 18.1-37.6 weeks) for the SUNGEM (p=0.78, one-sided log-rank). In regard to toxicities, suspected SAEs were reported in 53.7% in the GEM arm and 71.2% in the SUNGEM arm. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was statistically significantly higher in the SUNGEM arm with 48.1% versus 27.8% in the GEM arm (p=0.045, two sided log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: The combination SUNGEM was not sufficient superior in locally advanced or metastatic PDAC compared to GEM alone in regard to efficacy but was associated with more toxicity.

Phase Ib safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of daily and twice daily oral enzastaurin in combination with pemetrexed in advanced/metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase Ib study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of enzastaurin either 500 mg once daily (QD) or 250 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) in combination with pemetrexed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) with folic acid and vitamin B(12) was given on day 1 every 21 days with enzastaurin 500 mg orally QD starting on day 5 of cycle 1 after a loading dose of 400 mg thrice daily on day 4. To evaluate whether a b.i.d. regimen results in higher enzastaurin exposures, the study was amended. After amendment, in cycle 1, patients received 500 mg enzastaurin QD on days 1-15 without initial loading dose and 250 mg b.i.d. on days 16-30; in subsequent cycles, patients received pemetrexed on day 1 every 21 days with enzastaurin b.i.d. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (42 preamendment and 26 postamendment) were assessed. Pemetrexed toxicity and pharmacokinetics did not appear to be altered by enzastaurin. Enzastaurin average steady-state plasma concentration (C(av,ss)) decreased by approximately 25% in the presence of pemetrexed. Enzastaurin C(av,ss) were approximately 40% higher in the b.i.d. versus QD regimen. Three patients (4.4%) with thyroid cancer of follicular/papillary type had partial response as defined by RECIST. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed plus enzastaurin is well tolerated with preliminary evidence of anticancer activity, particularly in thyroid cancer.

Second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: A standard second-line chemotherapy regimen has yet to be defined for patients with gemcitabine (Gem)-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase II trial, patients with unresectable or metastatic PC who had progressed on single-agent Gem or a Gem-containing regimen received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the 3-month survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 192 treatment cycles were given to 52 patients. The overall response rate was 3.8% (two partial responses); 10 patients (19.2%) experienced stable disease, nine of them for >12 weeks. At least one CA 19-9 reduction > or =50% occurred in 12 patients (23.1%). The 3-month survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval 63.2% to 86.8%), the median time to tumor progression was 7 weeks (range 1-62 weeks) and the median overall survival time was 20 weeks (range 1-84 weeks). Grade 3/4 hematological toxic effects included (percent of patients): neutropenia (17.3%), thrombocytopenia (5.8%) and anemia (3.8%). The most frequent non-hematological toxic effects were diarrhea, nausea and stomatitis/pharyngitis (23.1% each). CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed is a safe treatment option with moderate activity in patients with advanced PC after failure of Gem.

Phase II trial with S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with gastric cancer. A trial performed by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG).

S-1 is a new oral fluorinated pyrimidine derivate, in which the oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, tegafur, was combined with two 5-FU-modulating substances, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (gimeracil), and potassium oxonate (oteracil), at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. The final mechanism of action is exerted by 5-FU. The present study is the first European phase II trial of S-1 in gastric cancer. The primary study objectives were the safety, toxicity and activity of S-1 in non-pretreated patients with gastric cancer. The secondary objective was the duration of response. Patients had to have histologically- or cytologically-verified metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer; S-1 was administered orally twice daily at 40, then 35 mg/m(2) for 28 days every 5 weeks. The starting dose of 40 mg/m(2) was found to be intolerable due to significant non-haematological toxicity, and this dose was rapidly reduced to 35 mg/m(2) twice daily. Of the 7 patients enrolled at the 40 mg/m(2) level, only 3 were evaluable. At 35 mg/m(2), a response rate of 26.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.0-45.1%) in 23 enrolled patients, and 31.6% (C.I. 14.7-53.0%) in 19 evaluable patients according to an independent radiology review, was found. The median duration of response at 35 mg/m(2) (6 patients) was 223 days (range, 108-828 days), and of stable disease was 111 days (range 68-411 days). S-1 can be administered with an acceptable safety and toxicity in European patients at a dose of 35 mg/m(2) days 1 - 28 every 5 weeks and is associated with a moderate response rate similar to the results achieved with other fluoropyrimidines.

[Fatigue--when cancer patients are consistently without drive and energy. Determine the etiology!]. / Fatigue--wenn Krebspatienten ständig saft- und kraftlos sind. Gehen Sie der Ursache auf den Grund!

Fatigue in tumor patients is caused both by the tumor and/or its treatment, and is accompanied by loss of drive, lack of energy, depressive mood and loss of vitality; it is unresponsive to rest and sleep. A differentiation is made between mental fatigue, drive fatigue and psychological fatigue. In particular cytokines produced by the cancer cells, but also by the immune system, play a pathophysiological role. Such cytokines as interferon gamma and interleukin are also involved in the development of cachexia in tumor patients, and may also lead to changes in sleep pattern. An additional factor contributing to the loss of performance and exhaustion in cancer patients is the frequently deficient oxygen supply to the muscles, as also anemia, which is often seen in advanced tumor disease. Mental fatigue is also closely associated with depressive mood as well as the noxious influences of cytostatic agents, steroids and painkillers on the CNS. The causes of fatigue should always be investigated before appropriate causal treatment can be instituted.

EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group early phase II trial of S-1 in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Cancer of the colon and rectum is one of the most frequent malignancies both in the US and Europe. Standard palliative therapy is based on 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid combinations, with or without oxaliplatin or irinotecan, given intravenously. Oral medication has the advantage of greater patient convenience and acceptance and potential cost savings. S-1 is a new oral fluorinated pyrimidine derivative. In a nonrandomized phase II study, patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with S-1 at 40 mg m-2 b.i.d. for 28 consecutive days, repeated every 5 weeks, but by amendment the dose was reduced to 35 mg m-2 during the study because of a higher than expected number of severe adverse drug reactions. In total 47 patients with colorectal cancer were included. In the 37 evaluable patients there were nine partial responses (24%), 17 stable diseases (46%) and 11 patients had progressive disease (30%). Diarrhoea occurred frequently and was often severe: in the 40 and 35 mg m-2 group, respectively, 38 and 35% of the patients experienced grade 3-4 diarrhoea. The other toxicities were limited and manageable. S-1 is active in advanced colorectal cancer, but in order to establish a safer dose the drug should be subject to further investigations.

Phase I and pharmacological studies of the cryptophycin analogue LY355703 administered on a single intermittent or weekly schedule.

LY355703 is a synthetic derivative of the marine cryptophycins, cytotoxic agents which induce mitotic arrest by binding at the microtubule vinca binding domain. Promising preclinical features of LY355703 were the 40-400 greater potency than paclitaxel or vinca alkaloids, the broad spectrum of antitumor activity in xenografts and the antitumour activity in multidrug resistant (MDR)-expressing murine tumours. Aims of this study were to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose recommended for Phase II, the pattern of toxicity, the pharmacokinetic profile and to document hints of antitumour activity of LY355703 given as 2-h infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks (Study 1) or, later on, on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Study 2). The latter weekly regimen was selected because of the acute dose-related toxicity reported in Study 1. The dose was escalated using a modified Continual Reassessment Method. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1 of cycle 1 in both studies; LY355703 plasma concentrations were assessed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 35 adult patients with solid tumours entered Study 1; the dose was escalated from 0.1 to 1.92 mg/m(2); at this dose 2 of 5 patients presented grade 3 neuropathy and myalgias; 1.48 mg/m(2) was then recommended for Phase II study. A total of 8 patients were treated in Study 2 at 1 mg/m(2); cumulative long-lasting neuroconstipation and neurosensory toxicity precluded the completion of the cycle in 9 out of 15 cycles; the clinical development of the weekly regimen was then discontinued. Other toxicities included cardiac dysrhythmia and mild alopecia. Pharmacokinetics of LY355703 appeared to be linear over the dose range studied. The administration of LY355703 on a 3-week schedule is associated with an acute dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy and myalgia of high interpatient variability for which possible risk factors and pharmacokinetic correlates could not be identified.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BIBX 1382 BS, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, given in a continuous daily oral administration.

The pyrimido-pyrimidine BIBX 1382 BS inhibits the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), thus specifically reverting the aberrant enzymatic activity from overexpressed and constitutively activated EGFR. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of this new specific molecule was carried out. After initially performing an accelerated titration design from the first toxicities onwards, a modified Fibonacci scheme was used to escalate the daily oral dose. The following dosages and cycles (defined as treatment during 28 days) were applied: 25 mg: 6; 50 mg: 3; 100 mg: 6; 200 mg: 7; 150 mg: 3. Over a 10 months accrual phase, 11 patients (pts) (7 females, 4 males) with a median age of 63 years (range 50-73 years), World Health Organization Performance Status (WHO PS) 0:5 pts, 1:6 pts and miscellaneous solid tumours were entered. The median number of cycles applied per pt was 2 (range 1-7). Reversible, dose-dependent increase of liver enzymes (maximal Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grades: gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT): 4, aspartate aminotransferase (GOT): 3, alanine aminotransferase (GPT): 3, alkaline phosphatase (AP): 3, bilirubin: 3) occurred. Oral medication yielded plasma levels far below those expected to be efficacious. In conclusion, target plasma levels could not be reached via the oral route at a reasonable dosage. Meanwhile, a preclinically unknown metabolite was identified from the urine of one patient. Subsequently, this metabolite was found to be abundant in patient plasma. The metabolite was demonstrated to be pharmacologically inactive. Due to a dose-limiting increase of liver enzymes, low bioavailability of BIBX 1382 BS and the detection of a pharmacologically inactive metabolite, this trial was discontinued.