Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(8S1): S353-S357, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anatomic referencing in total knee arthroplasty places the femoral component flush to the anterior cortex while maintaining posterior condylar offset (PCO). The intent of this study was to evaluate how component position influences the femoral component size. METHODS: Digital surface models were created using 446 femora from an established computed tomography database. Virtual bone resections, component sizing, and component placement were performed assuming neutral (0°) flexion and neutral (3°) rotation relative to the posterior condyles. The appropriately sized femoral component, which had 2 mm of incremental size, was placed flush with the anterior cortex for optimal restoration of the PCO. Sizing and placement were repeated using 3 and 6° flexion and 0, 5, and 7° external rotation (ER). RESULTS: At 0° flexion, decreasing ER from 3 to 0° resulted in an average decreased anterior-posterior height (APH) of 1.9 mm, corresponding to a component size decrease of 1 for 88% of patients. At 7° ER, component size increased by an average of 2.5 mm, corresponding to a size increase for 80% of patients. Flexing the femoral component to 3° with ER at 3° resulted in a decrease in APH of 2.2 mm (1 size decrease in 93% of patients). At 3° flexion and 3° ER, 86% had the same component size as at 0° flexion and 0° ER. Increasing ER at 3° flexion increased APH by 1.2 mm at 5° and 3.1 mm at 7° on average, relative to 3° ER. Increasing flexion from 3 to 6° extended this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Flexion decreases the APH when the ER is held constant. The ER of the femoral component increases the APH across all tested flexion angles, causing an increase in the ideal femoral component size to maintain PCO. With anatomic referencing, alterations in femoral component positioning and subsequent changes in component size can be accounted for.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Fêmur , Articulação do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Fêmur/anatomia & histologia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/anatomia & histologia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/fisiologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Rotação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
J Knee Surg ; 37(9): 638-641, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191007

RESUMO

One of the critical steps in total knee arthroplasty is femoral component positioning and sizing. Historically, there was wider variability between femoral component sizes, necessitating the concepts of anterior referencing (AR) and posterior referencing (PR). With the introduction of smaller increments between sizes, the concept of anatomic referencing has been introduced to replace AR and PR. The intent of this study was to validate the concept of anatomic referencing and show that with 2 mm increments in femoral sizes, the femoral component can be placed flush to the anterior cortex while maintaining posterior condylar offset (PCO). Digital surface models were created using 515 femurs from an established computed tomography database. Virtual bone resections, component sizing and placement were performed assuming neutral mechanical axis and a cartilage thickness of 2 mm. The appropriately sized femoral component, which had 2 mm incremental sizes, was placed flush with the anterior cortex with restoration of the PCO. The anterior-posterior distance from the posterior surface of the component to the medial and lateral surfaces of the posterior condylar cartilage were measured. The medial condyle was the limiting condyle in the majority of cases (73%). The average medial gap after appropriate femoral component matching was 0.6 mm (0.39-1.41 mm) across all sizes. The overall average condylar gap was 1.02 mm. The most common femoral component was a size 7 (57.2 mm) and the average femoral AP width was 55.9 mm. Anatomic referencing with an implant system that has 2-mm increments in femoral component sizing provides an alternative to AR and PR without compromise. Anatomic referencing allows for perfect alignment of the anterior flange of the femoral component to the anterior cortex of the femur while restoring the native PCO to within 1 mm. This avoids having to choose between AR or PR when in between femoral sizes.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Fêmur , Prótese do Joelho , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur/anatomia & histologia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/anatomia & histologia , Simulação por Computador , Desenho de Prótese , Masculino , Feminino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA