The Impact of Ketamine for Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been used in anesthesia, pain management, and major depressive disorder. It has recently been studied in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ketamine on PTSD symptomatology and depression scores. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of Medline 1960 to May 20, 2023, and found 6 randomized controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria. We extracted data on the Clinician-Administered PTSD (CAPS), PTSD Checklist (PCL), or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) scales. RESULTS: The use of ketamine significantly reduced CAPS scores (n = 5, MD: -10.63 [95% CI -14.95 to -6.32]), PCL scores (n = 3, MD: -6.13 [95% CI -8.61 to -3.64]), and MADRS scores (n = 3, MD: -6.33 [95% CI -8.97 to -3.69]) at the maximal follow-up times versus control. Significant benefits were found at day 1 and weeks 1, 2, and 4 for CAPS and PCL scores as well as MADRS scores at day 1, week 1, and week 4 for ketamine versus control. The time to PTSD relapse was prolonged in the patients receiving ketamine versus control (n = 2, 15.74 days [95% CI 3.57 to 29.91 days]). More dry mouth (n = 2, OR 5.85 [95% CI 1.32 to 25.95]), dizziness (n = 2, OR 3.83 [95% CI 1.28 to 11.41]), and blurred vision (n = 2, OR 7.57 [1.00 to 57.10]) occurred with ketamine than control therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ketamine modestly reduced PTSD and depression scores as early as 1 day of therapy, but the longevity of effect needs to be determined. Given similar magnitude of benefit with SSRIs and venlafaxine, ketamine would not supplant these traditional options for chronic use.

Psychedelics for Patients With Cancer: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of psychedelics in the treatment of anxiety or depression among patients with cancer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search from inception to March 11, 2022, using the terms anxiety, depression, psychedelics, psilocybin, lysergic acid, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, or ayahuasca. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies assessing patients with cancer receiving psychedelics for the treatment of anxiety or depression. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five unique randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted. Significant reductions were found in 2 trials with 2 anxiety scales (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait) and in 1 trial with 2 additional anxiety scales (Hamilton Rating Scale-Anxiety, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety). Significant reductions were found in 2 trials in 2 depression scales (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, Beck Depression Inventory) and in 1 trial with an additional depression scale (Hamilton Rating Scale-Depression). Two studies assessed for clinically relevant reductions in anxiety and depression scores, and they occurred much more commonly in psychedelic-treated patients than those given placebo. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a new potential option for treating patients with anxiety and depression along with cancer, which is important given the generally lackluster benefits with traditional antidepressants. Only a few sessions may also provide benefits extending out for 6 to 12 months and possibly beyond that. However, the studies were small, had many methodological limitations, and there were increases in blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Psychedelics have a unique mechanism of action that might be well suited for treating anxiety and depression associated with cancer. This offers new promise for patients who are not being sufficiently treated with current antianxiety or antidepressant medications.

Mavacamten, a First-in-Class Cardiac Myosin Inhibitor for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess mavacamten's role in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treatment. DATA SOURCES: In addition to clinical guidelines, package inserts, and general reviews, we searched PubMed using the term mavacamten from inception to June 11, 2022. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English language studies describing mavacamten's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, clinical and economic outcomes, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mavacamten reduces left ventricular outflow obstruction and New York Heart Association functional class while improving Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Scores in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. With an acquisition cost of $245.20 per capsule, it would cost $1.2 million for every additional quality-adjusted life year. In those with unobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, there were improvements in N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin biochemical markers. Mavacamten is a substrate for CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, and a CYP enzyme inducer. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction ≥55% have a new option if they remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated ß-blocker or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker therapy. It is an alternative to disopyramide therapy, which has poor patient tolerance, or septal reduction therapies, which are invasive. However, mavacamten is not cost-effective and its role in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is not well established. CONCLUSIONS: Mavacamten is a new option for patients with refractory obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction ≥55% but its pricing makes therapy not cost-effective. Final health outcomes are not fully elucidated and additional studies are needed to determine long-term effects.