The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young Mexican women with triple-negative breast cancer.

Various guidelines recommend that women with triple-negative breast cancer should be tested for BRCA1 mutations, but the prevalence of mutations may vary with ethnic group and with geographic region, and the optimal cutoff age for testing has not been established. We estimated the frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations among 190 women with triple-negative breast cancer, unselected for family history, diagnosed at age 50 or less at a single hospital in Mexico City. Patients were screened for 115 recurrent BRCA mutations, which have been reported previously in women of Hispanic origin, including a common large rearrangement Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del). A BRCA mutation was detected in 44 of 190 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (23 %). Forty-three mutations were found in BRCA1 and one mutation was found in BRCA2. Seven different mutations accounted for 39 patients (89 % of the total mutations). The Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del) was found 18 times and accounted for 41 % of all mutations detected. There is a high prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young triple-negative breast cancer patients in Mexico. Women with triple-negative breast cancer in Mexico should be screened for mutations in BRCA1.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in unselected breast cancer patients from Peru.

The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among breast cancer patients in Peru has not yet been explored. We enrolled 266 women with breast cancer from a National cancer hospital in Lima, Peru, unselected for age or family history. DNA was screened with a panel of 114 recurrent Hispanic BRCA mutations (HISPANEL). Among the 266 cases, 13 deleterious mutations were identified (11 in BRCA1 and 2 in BRCA2), representing 5% of the total. The average age of breast cancer in the mutation-positive cases was 44 years. BRCA1 185delAG represented 7 of 11 mutations in BRCA1. Other mutations detected in BRCA1 included: two 2080delA, one 943ins10, and one 3878delTA. The BRCA2 3036del4 mutation was seen in two patients. Given the relatively low cost of the HISPANEL test, one should consider offering this test to all Peruvian women with breast or ovarian cancer.

Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Studies suggest that patients carrying a BRCA variant of uncertain significance (VUS) may have lingering confusion concerning results interpretation. Counseling for uninformative BRCA-negative (UN) results is thought to be more straightforward, despite the fact that both results lead to similar methods of empiric cancer risk counseling. This study compared surgical choices and perceptions between 71 patients with VUS results and 714 patients with UN results. All patients underwent genetic counseling because of a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer between 1997 and 2010, and completed a 2-year follow-up survey. Risk-reducing mastectomy rates in both groups were 7% (p = 1.00) and risk-reducing oophorectomy rates were 5% and 3%, respectively (p = 0.42). The VUS group reported less cancer distress reduction than the UN group (23.0% vs 35.8%, respectively, p = 0.043). Over 90% of both groups found the counseling process helpful. Overall, the study suggests that VUS results disclosed in genetic counseling did not cause excessive surgery or exaggerated cancer distress, though patients with a VUS found counseling somewhat less informative or reassuring. Future research on communication of VUS results, including pre-and post-test counseling, is essential for full realization of the potential for genomic medicine.

A KRAS variant is a biomarker of poor outcome, platinum chemotherapy resistance and a potential target for therapy in ovarian cancer.

Germline variants in the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of cancer genes disrupting microRNA (miRNA) regulation have recently been associated with cancer risk. A variant in the 3'UTR of the KRAS oncogene, referred to as the KRAS variant, is associated with both cancer risk and altered tumor biology. Here, we test the hypothesis that the KRAS variant can act as a biomarker of outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and investigate the cause of altered outcome in KRAS variant-positive EOC patients. As this variant seems to be associated with tumor biology, we additionally test the hypothesis that this variant can be directly targeted to impact cell survival. EOC patients with complete clinical data were genotyped for the KRAS variant and analyzed for outcome (n=536), response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=125) and platinum resistance (n=306). Outcome was separately analyzed for women with known BRCA mutations (n=79). Gene expression was analyzed on a subset of tumors with available tissue. Cell lines were used to confirm altered sensitivity to chemotherapy associated with the KRAS variant. Finally, the KRAS variant was directly targeted through small-interfering RNA/miRNA oligonucleotides in cell lines and survival was measured. Postmenopausal EOC patients with the KRAS variant were significantly more likely to die of ovarian cancer by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio=1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.57, P=0.019, n=279). Perhaps explaining this finding, EOC patients with the KRAS variant were significantly more likely to be platinum resistant (odds ratio=3.18, confidence interval: 1.31-7.72, P=0.0106, n=291). In addition, direct targeting of the KRAS variant led to a significant reduction in EOC cell growth and survival in vitro. These findings confirm the importance of the KRAS variant in EOC, and indicate that the KRAS variant is a biomarker of poor outcome in EOC likely due to platinum resistance. In addition, this study supports the hypothesis that these tumors have continued dependence on such 3'UTR lesions, and that direct targeting may be a viable future treatment approach.

Clinical and functional properties of novel VHL mutation (X214L) consistent with Type 2A phenotype and low risk of renal cell carcinoma.

This report describes clinical characteristics in families with a Type 2A phenotype and functional properties of a novel von Hippel Lindau variant (X214L). Pedigrees were analyzed. Analysis of von Hippel Lindau (VHL) coding exons and flanking intronic sequences in DNA from a proband with pheochromocytoma and islet cell tumor was performed. Western blot assays for VHL protein (pVHL), HIFα, and Jun B were conducted using VHL null renal clear carcinoma cell lines that were engineered to produce wild-type or X214L mutant pVHL. Pedigree analysis indicated that the variant tracked with disease and the same or similar VHL point mutations were identified in several Type 2A families. The predicted 14 amino acid extended pVHL variant, when reintroduced into VHL null cells, was stable and retained the ability to downregulate HIFα in a hydroxylationdependent manner. In contrast, the variant was defective with respect to downregulation of JunB. pVHL X214L, like other pVHL variants associated with a low risk of clear cell renal carcinoma, largely preserves the ability to downregulate HIF. In contrast, this variant, like other pVHL variants linked to Type 2A disease, fails to suppress JunB. This underscores that JunB may play a role in the pathogenesis of Type 2A VHL disease.

Genetic discrimination: the clinician perspective.

Clinicians attending continuing education sessions in California were surveyed about their beliefs and attitudes regarding genetic discrimination and their knowledge of protective legislation. Two hundred seventy-one surveys were collected from physicians (n = 191) and nurses (n = 80). Most respondents lacked information or were misinformed about the existence of protective legislation (58.3%) or published cases of insurance discrimination (85.2%); 52.4% believed that mutation carriers have difficulty obtaining health insurance; 13% would not encourage genetic testing, despite a family history of cancer. Clinician concerns about potential genetic discrimination, and lack of information regarding protective legislation, may influence access to care.

Effects of a cancer genetics education programme on clinician knowledge and practice.

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians lack adequate knowledge about emerging standards of care related to genetic cancer risk assessment and the features of hereditary cancer needed to identify patients at risk. OBJECTIVE: To determine how a clinical cancer genetics education programme for community based clinicians affected participant knowledge and changed clinical practice. METHODS: The effects of the programme on participant knowledge and changes in clinical practice were measured through pre and post session knowledge questionnaires completed by 710 participants and practice impact surveys completed after one year by 69 out of 114 eligible annual conference participants sampled. RESULTS: Respondents showed a 40% average increase in specific cancer genetics knowledge. Respondents to the post course survey reported that they used course information and materials to counsel and refer patients for hereditary cancer risk assessment (77%), shared course information with other clinicians (83%), and wanted additional cancer genetics education (80%). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant immediate gain in cancer genetics knowledge among participants in a targeted outreach programme, and subset analysis indicated a positive long term effect on clinical practice. Clinician education that incorporates evidence based content and case based learning should lead to better identification and care of individuals with increased cancer risk.

The founder mutation MSH2*1906G-->C is an important cause of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by mutations in the mismatch-repair genes. We report here the identification and characterization of a founder mutation in MSH2 in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. We identified a nucleotide substitution, MSH2*1906G-->C, which results in a substitution of proline for alanine at codon 636 in the MSH2 protein. This allele was identified in 15 unrelated Ashkenazi Jewish families with HNPCC, most of which meet the Amsterdam criteria. Genotype analysis of 18 polymorphic loci within and flanking MSH2 suggested a single origin for the mutation. All colorectal cancers tested showed microsatellite instability and absence of MSH2 protein, by immunohistochemical analysis. In an analysis of a population-based incident series of 686 Ashkenazi Jews from Israel who have colorectal cancer, we identified 3 (0.44%) mutation carriers. Persons with a family history of colorectal or endometrial cancer were more likely to carry the mutation than were those without such a family history (P=.042), and those with colorectal cancer who carried the mutation were, on average, younger than affected individuals who did not carry it (P=.033). The mutation was not detected in either 566 unaffected Ashkenazi Jews from Israel or 1,022 control individuals from New York. In hospital-based series, the 1906C allele was identified in 5/463 Ashkenazi Jews with colorectal cancer, in 2/197 with endometrial cancer, and in 0/83 with ovarian cancer. When families identified by family history and in case series are included, 25 apparently unrelated Ashkenazi Jewish families have been found to harbor this mutation. Although this pathogenic mutation is not frequent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population (accounting for 2%-3% of colorectal cancer in those whose age at diagnosis is <60 years), it is highly penetrant and accounts for approximately one-third of HNPCC in Ashkenazi Jewish families that fulfill the Amsterdam criteria.

The HRAS1 minisatellite locus and risk of ovarian cancer.

Approximately 10% of ovarian cancers are due to mutations in highly penetrant inherited cancer susceptibility genes. The highly polymorphic HRAS1 minisatellite locus, located just downstream from the proto-oncogene H-ras-1 on chromosome 11p, consists of four common progenitor alleles and several dozen rare alleles, which apparently derive from mutations of the progenitors. Mutant alleles of this locus represent a major risk factor for cancers of the breast, colorectum, and bladder, and it was found that BRCAI mutation carriers with at least one rare HRAS1 allele have a greater risk of ovarian cancer than BRCA1 carriers with only common HRAS1 alleles. There are no conclusive studies of HRAS1 alleles in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer. A case-control study of HRAS1 alleles was performed on DNA from 136 Caucasian patients with ovarian cancer and 108 cancer-free controls using conventional (Southern blot) and PCR-based methods to determine the frequency of rare HRAS1 alleles. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression methods. A single degree of freedom test was used to assess the significance of linear trend across categories of increasing exposure. A statistically significant association between rare HRAS1 alleles and risk of ovarian cancer was observed [OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-2.80; P = 0.04]. Having only one rare allele was associated with a relative risk of 1.66 (95% CI, 0.91-3.01), whereas having two rare alleles increased the relative risk to 2.86 (95% CI, 0.75-10.94; trend P = 0.03). Analysis of HRAS1 allele types by the age of the case at diagnosis revealed that younger cases (<45 years) had a borderline statistically significant increased association with rare HRAS1 alleles compared to older cases (> or = 0 years; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.90-3.98; P = 0.09). Rare HRAS1 alleles contribute to ovarian cancer predisposition in the general population. Thus, the HRAS1-variable number of tandem repeats locus may function as a modifier of ovarian cancer risk in both sporadic and hereditary ovarian cancer.

The current social, political, and medical role of genetic testing in familial breast and ovarian carcinomas.

Few advances in medical science have yielded as much publicity and controversy as discoveries in genetics. Moving quickly from the bench to the bedside, genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer has had a significant impact on our paradigms for decisions about the treatment and prevention of disease. Assessment of cancer risk is developing into a distinct discipline, with rapidly evolving genetic technologies and models for estimating an individual's risk of cancer. Exciting developments in chemoprevention of breast cancer demonstrate the potential to offer a broader range of options for decreasing cancer risk. This article will consider recent advances in the understanding of cancer genetics, and describe the state-of-the-art in terms of management of individuals with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Genetic cancer risk assessment. Putting it all together.

Dramatic advances in our understanding of the genetic basis for cancer have led to the development of new technologies and tools for genetic cancer risk assessment. Yet, cancer is a complex disorder, and risk assessment, counseling, and management strategies need to consider several important domains: state of cancer genetics knowledge, state of mind (previous cancer experience within the family), state of technology, and state of the art in terms of management. There are several barriers to the efficient identification and counseling of patients and families at high risk for cancer because of inherited susceptibility mutations. Chief among these concerns is the lack of access to competent counseling and education services that are equipped to handle the complex and rapidly evolving medical, technological, and ethical issues. Cancer risk assessment is developing into a distinct discipline in which established empiric risk models are recast along with rapidly evolving genetic technologies for estimation of individual cancer risk. Cancer genetics consultants are an important resource for primary care physicians, gynecologists, surgeons, and oncologists. However, no formal qualification criteria exist for either physicians or allied health care professionals who subspecialize in this new field. This article covers the unique domains of cancer genetics in health care and surveys models for delivery of cancer genetics services and tools for risk assessment. Coupled with innovative cancer diagnostic and preventive services and research, we have the potential to make great strides in cancer prevention and control.

Folate depletion impairs DNA excision repair in the colon of the rat.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diminished folate status appears to promote colonic carcinogenesis by, as of yet, undefined mechanisms. Impaired DNA repair plays a significant role in the evolution of many colon cancers. Since folate is essential for the de novo synthesis of nucleotides and since folate depletion has previously been associated with excessive DNA strand breaks, it was hypothesised that folate depletion may impair DNA repair. Studies were therefore performed to examine whether folate depletion affects the two major categories of DNA repair. METHODS: Study 1: eight weanling male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed on diets containing either 0 or 8 mg folate/kg diet with 1% succinylsulphathiazole for four weeks. After viable colonocytes had been harvested, DNA excision repair was evaluated by a single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Study 2: eighteen animals were fed on similar diets for five weeks. Also in study 2, 18 additional rats were fed on the same defined diet without succinylsulphathiazole for 15 weeks. Weekly injections with the procarcinogen, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (20 mg base/kg), were administered to the latter group of animals. Five microsatellite loci from different chromosomes were investigated for instability in hepatic and colonic DNA. RESULTS: In study 1, a significantly retarded rate of DNA excision repair was observed in the folate deficient colonocytes compared with controls (p < 0.05). In study 2, there was no evidence of instability at the five microsatellite loci associated with either short or long term folate depletion. CONCLUSIONS: Folate deficiency impairs DNA excision repair in rat colonic mucosa; a similar degree of deficiency, even when administered in conjunction with a colonic carcinogen, did not produce evidence of a widespread defect in mismatch repair.

A novel 4-cM minimally deleted region on chromosome 11p15.1 associated with high grade nonmucinous epithelial ovarian carcinomas.

Prior cytogenetic and restriction fragment length polymorphism studies have demonstrated that allelic deletion of chromosome 11p is common in human invasive epithelial ovarian tumors. To construct a highly detailed deletion map of chromosome 11p, we used 13 polymorphic microsatellite CA repeat primers to identify regions harboring potential tumor suppressor genes. Twenty-three of 48 samples (48%) of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer showed LOH involving at least one locus, consistent with prior studies. None of the five mucinous tumors showed allelic deletion at any of the 13 primers, suggesting that loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 11p may not be involved in the pathogenesis of mucinous ovarian cancer. Two separate minimally deleted regions were identified in nonmucinous ovarian cancer. The first is an 11-cM region on chromosome 11pl5.5-15.3 that extends from D11S2071 to D11S988 and includes the HRAS locus. The second is a novel 4-cM region on 11p15.1, defined by marker D11S1310. Deletion of both regions at 11p15.5-15.3 and 11p15.1 is strongly associated with high grade nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Genetic counseling for familial cancer risk.

Public interest in genetic screening is greater than ever. Guided by clues in the pedigree, clinicians can refer selected patients for an intensive genetic workup. Despite the limited number of DNA-based tests and the dearth of effective preventive strategies, patients can benefit from existing risk assessment, surveillance, prevention, and counseling.

Allelic loss at 7q31.1 in human primary ovarian carcinomas suggests the existence of a tumor suppressor gene.

We studied loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in chromosome 7q in order to determine the location of a putative tumor suppressor gene (TSG) in human epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Samples were obtained from 26 primary ovarian carcinomas at the time of staging laparotomy. Paired normal and tumoral DNAs were used as templates for polymerase chain reaction amplification of a set of 14 (C-A)n microsatellite repeats on 7q21-qter. All the cases studied presented LOH at one or more loci on 7q. Seventy-three percent LOH (in 14 of 19 informative cases) were detected in D7S522 at 7q31.1. The percentages of LOH were normally distributed around microsatellite D7S522 determining a smallest common deleted region of 1 cM. The high incidence of LOH in primary ovarian carcinomas suggests that a TSG relevant to the development of ovarian cancers is present at 7q31.1, confirming our previous functional evidence for a TSG in this region.

Molecular genetic changes associated with ovarian cancer.

Multiple specific chromosomal deletions can be found in human epithelial ovarian cancer by cytogenetic analysis or molecular techniques. Somatic allelic deletion or loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a tumor is considered circumstantial evidence for the location of tumor suppressor genes. We have examined 27 primary epithelial ovarian tumors for the presence of LOH at 19 polymorphic markers on chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, and 17. Markers near the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene at 5q21 showed LOH in 50% (10/20) of informative cases. LOH was seen in 53% (8/15) at the IFNA locus on 9p, another region implicated in other tumors, but not previously associated with ovarian cancer. We observed LOH for markers on 11p15 in 50% (12/24) of ovarian cancer DNAs from informative cases, while only 25% (4/16) at 11q13 and 29% (5/17) at 11q24 showed LOH. Only a portion of distal 11p was deleted in six cases. The incidence of LOH (50%) at HGH (17q22-q24) was greater than that at D17S579 (39%; 17q21), a locus tightly linked to BRCA1. Sixty-four percent (7/11) showed allelic loss at 17p11. LOH was infrequently observed at markers on chromosomes 1, 6, and 13q. Most cases showing LOH were stage III or IV, and most showed LOH at more than one locus. These studies support the concept that multiple genetic loci are involved in ovarian tumorigenesis. Two additional regions thought to harbor genes important in other cancers, 5q21 and 9p21, can now be added to the growing spectrum of molecular alterations seen in ovarian cancer.