Early Increases in Posttransplant Pancreatic Enzymes Are Associated With Surgical Complications But Not Graft Failure Among Pancreas Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to find the association between immediate postoperative increases in pancreatic enzymes and posttransplant complications among pancreas transplant recipients (PTRs). METHODS: We analyzed all PTRs transplanted at the University of Wisconsin between June 2009 and September 2018. Enzyme levels were presented as a ratio of absolute numbers to the upper limit of normal value, with value >1 considered as abnormal. We specifically evaluated bleeding, fluid collections, and thrombosis complications based on the amylase or lipase ratios on day 1 (Amylase1, Lipase1) and maximum ratios within 5 days of transplant (Amylasemax, Lipasemax). For early complications, we focused on technical complications that occurred within 90 days of transplant. For long-term outcomes, we assessed patient and graft survival, and rejections. RESULTS: There were a total of 443 PTRs, 287 were simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients, and 156 were solitary pancreas recipients. Higher Amylase1, Liplase1, Amylasemax, and Lipasemax were associated with an increase in early complications, mainly need for pancreatectomy, fluid collections, bleeding complications, or graft thrombosis, particularly in the solitary pancreas group. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that cases of early perioperative enzyme increase merit consideration for early imaging investigation to mitigate detrimental outcomes.

Association of human leukocyte antigen mismatches between donor-recipient and donor-donor in pancreas after kidney transplant recipients.

The effects of HLA mismatching on pancreas outcomes among pancreas after kidney (PAK) recipients are undefined. Outcomes might potentially differ depending on whether there is a mismatch between pancreas donor and recipient (PD-R) or pancreas donor and kidney donor(PD-KD). All primary PAK at our centre were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the degree of HLA mismatching: low (L-MM) as 0-4 and high (H-MM) as 5-6. We analysed all (N = 73) PAK for PD-R mismatch and the subset of PAK for PD-KD mismatch (N = 71). Comparing PD-R L-MM (n = 39) and H-MM (n = 34) PAKs, we observed no difference in the rate of pancreas graft failure. There was also no difference in the rate of rejection (L-MM 33% vs. H-MM 41%) or the severity of rejection. However, we observed a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter time to acute pancreas rejection in the H-MM group (6.8 ± 8.7 mo) versus the L-MM cohort (29.0 ± 36.2 mo) (P < 0.001). Similar to the PD-R mismatched cohort, we did not observe a detrimental effect of HLA mismatching on graft outcomes in the PD-KD cohort; time to rejection was again shorter in the H-MM subset. In this study, we found no impact of HLA mismatch on either pancreas graft survival or rejection rates, though rejection occurred earlier in high mismatched PAK transplants.

Defining postoperative transfusion thresholds in liver transplant recipients: A novel retrospective approach.

BACKGROUND: The optimal transfusion threshold for most patient populations has been defined as hematocrit (HCT) <21%. However, some specific patient populations are known to benefit from higher transfusion thresholds. To date, the optimal postoperative transfusion threshold for patients undergoing liver transplant has not been determined. To define the ideal transfusion threshold for liver transplant patients, we designed a retrospective study of 496 liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Using HCT prior to discharge as a surrogate marker for transfusion thresholds we grouped patients into three groups of transfusion thresholds (HCT <21%, <24%, and >30%). Transfusion rates (intra- and postoperative), graft and patient survival, and complications requiring readmission were compared between groups. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of patients were transfused during their hospital stay. Graft survival, patient survival, and rates of readmission within 30 days of discharge were no different between the three discharge HCT groups. Patients discharged with HCT >30% were less likely to be readmitted with infectious complications; however, this group also had the lowest model of end-stage liver (MELD) score at time of transplantation and were less likely to have received a transfusion during their hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Transfusion thresholds of HCT <24%, and potentially as low as 21% are acceptable in postoperative liver transplant recipients. The conduct of a randomized clinical trial, as supported by these data, will be necessary to support the use of lower thresholds.

Single center results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Studies have found similar outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with Type 2 (T2D) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, there are scarce data evaluating the association of recipient factors such as age, BMI, or pretransplant insulin requirements with outcomes, thus the criteria for the optimal recipient selection remains unclear. In this study, 284 T1D and 39 T2D patients, who underwent SPKT between 2006 and 2017 with 1 year of follow-up at minimum, were assessed for potential relationship of pretransplant BMI and insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes and pancreatic graft failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar rates of freedom from posttransplant diabetes (94.7% T2D vs. 92.3% T1D at 1 yr, and 88.1% T2D vs. 81.1% T1D at 5 yrs) and graft survival (89.7% T2D vs. 90.4% T1D at 1 yr, and 89.7% T2D vs. 81.2% T1D at 5 yrs). There was no significant association between BMI or pretransplant insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes occurrence in either T1D (p = .10, .43, respectively) or T2D (p = .12, .63) patients in the cohort; or with graft failure (T1D: p = .40, .09; T2D: p = .71, .28). These observations suggest a less restricted approach to selective use of SPKT in patients with T2D.