Safety and clinical activity of BMS-986365 (CC-94676), a dual androgen receptor ligand-directed degrader and antagonist, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) may continue to be driven by AR signaling. BMS-986365 is an orally administered ligand-directed degrader targeting the AR via a first-in-class dual mechanism of AR degradation and antagonism. CC-94676-PCA-001 (NCT04428788) is a phase I multicenter study of BMS-986365 in patients with progressive mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who progressed on androgen deprivation therapy, one or more ARPIs, and taxane chemotherapy (unless declined/ineligible) were enrolled. The study included dose escalation (part A) and expansion (part B) of BMS-986365 up to 900 mg twice daily. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability, and to define maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase II dose. Key secondary endpoints included decline in prostate-specific antigen ≥50% (PSA50) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). RESULTS: Parts A and B enrolled 27 and 68 patients, respectively. In part B, the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-11). The most common treatment-related adverse events were asymptomatic prolonged corrected QT interval (47%) and bradycardia (34%). Part A maximum tolerated dose was not reached and recommended phase II dose selection is ongoing. Across part B three highest doses (400-900 mg twice daily, n = 60), PSA50 was 32% (n = 19), including 50% (n = 10/20) at 900 mg; median rPFS (95% confidence interval) was 6.3 months (5.3-12.6 months), including 8.3 months (3.8-16.6 months) at 900 mg; and rPFS was longer in patients without versus with prior chemotherapy: 16.5 months (5.5 months-not evaluable) versus 5.5 months (2.7-8.3 months), respectively. Efficacy was observed in patients with mCRPC with AR ligand binding domain (LBD) WT or with AR LBD mutations. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-986365 was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile, and demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC with potentially higher benefit in chemotherapy-naive patients. These data show the potential of BMS-986365 to overcome resistance to current ARPIs, regardless of AR LBD mutation status.

A Phase Ib/II Randomized Clinical Trial of Oleclumab with or without Durvalumab plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma upregulates CD73, potentially contributing to immune surveillance evasion. Combining oleclumab (CD73 inhibitor) and durvalumab with chemotherapy may identify an effective treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe a multicenter phase Ib/II randomized clinical trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, untreated (cohort A) or previously received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (cohort B; NCT03611556). During escalation, patients received oleclumab 1,500 or 3,000 mg, durvalumab 1,500 mg, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP; cohort A; n = 14) or modified FOLFOX (cohort B; n = 11). During expansion, cohort A patients (n = 170) were randomized to GnP (arm A1), oleclumab [recommended phase II dose (RP2D)] with GnP (arm A2), or oleclumab (RP2D) with durvalumab plus GnP (arm A3). Primary objectives were safety (escalation) and objective response rate (expansion). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: During escalation, 1/11 patients from cohort B (oleclumab 3,000 mg) experienced two dose-limiting toxicities. Oleclumab's RP2D was 3,000 mg. During expansion, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67.7% (42/62) of patients in A1, 73.7% (28/38) in A2, and 77.1% (54/70) in A3. The objective response rate was 29.0%, 21.1%, and 32.9% in A1, A2, and A3, respectively (A1 vs. A3; P = 0.650). PFS [HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47, 1.11] and OS (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.13) were similar for A3 versus A1. Patients with high CD73 expression had improved PFS and OS in A3 versus A1, although this should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Although the safety profile was acceptable, this study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 3.2024.

The determination of an optimal treatment plan for an individual patient with rectal cancer is a complex process. In addition to decisions relating to the intent of rectal cancer surgery (ie, curative or palliative), consideration must also be given to the likely functional results of treatment, including the probability of maintaining or restoring normal bowel function/anal continence and preserving genitourinary functions. Particularly for patients with distal rectal cancer, finding a balance between curative-intent therapy while having minimal impact on quality of life can be challenging. Furthermore, the risk of pelvic recurrence is higher in patients with rectal cancer compared with those with colon cancer, and locally recurrent rectal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Careful patient selection and the use of sequenced multimodality therapy following a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer, including the addition of endoscopic submucosal dissection as an option for early-stage rectal cancer, updates to the total neoadjuvant therapy approach based on the results of recent clinical trials, and the addition of a "watch-and-wait" nonoperative management approach for clinical complete responders to neoadjuvant therapy.

Risk Without Reward: Differing Patterns of Chemotherapy Use Do Not Improve Outcomes in Stage II Early-Onset Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: Rising rates of early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) present challenges in deciding how to optimally treat patients. Although standard of care for stage II CC is surgical resection, adding chemotherapy for high-risk disease, evidence suggests treatment selection may differ by age. We investigated whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administration rates differ between patients with early- and later-onset stage II CC. METHODS: Data originated from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database spanning January 1, 2003, to August 1, 2021. Adults with stage II CC were grouped as age 18-49 years (EOCC) and those age 50 years or older (later-onset colon cancer [LOCC]). Demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor stage and site, and chemotherapy were included. Primary outcomes included rates of AC administration by age and ethnicity; secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and time to metastatic disease (TTMD). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated relationships between chemotherapy administration, age, and ethnicity, adjusting for significant covariates. RESULTS: One thousand sixty-five patients were included. Median age of patients with EOCC was 45.0 years versus 69.0 years for patients with LOCC. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed patients with EOCC received AC significantly more often than patients with LOCC. Non-Hispanic patients received AC at significantly lower rates than Hispanic patients in both cohorts. Subanalysis of stage IIA patients showed that patients with EOCC were more likely to receive AC than patients with LOCC. No significant differences in OS or TTMD were observed by age regardless of AC administration in stage II overall; however, patients with stage IIA EOCC receiving AC had significantly longer TTMD than those not receiving AC. CONCLUSION: AC was given preferentially in stage II EOCC, even in stage IIA, despite deviation from guidelines. This may expose low-risk patients to unnecessary toxicities and suggests bias toward treating younger patients more aggressively, despite unclear evidence for better outcomes.

Respect for the Patient-Oncologist Relationship May Limit Serious Illness Communication by Acute and Postacute Care Clinicians After Discharge to a Skilled Nursing Facility.

PURPOSE: There is a need to increase palliative care access for hospitalized older adults with cancer discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) at risk of poor outcomes. Assessing and Listening to Individual Goals and Needs (ALIGN) is a palliative care intervention developed to address this gap. This study gathered perspectives from clinicians across care settings to describe perceptions on serious illness communication and care coordination for patients with cancer after discharge to a SNF to guide ALIGN refinements. METHODS: We conducted 37 semistructured interviews with clinicians and leaders in hospital medicine (n = 12), oncology (n = 9), palliative care (n = 12), home health care (n = 6), and hospice (n = 4). Some participants had experience working in more than one specialty. The Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework was used to develop the interview guide that explored barriers to care, prognosis discussions, and hospice recommendations. Interviews were coded and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Analysis identified four themes: (1) discharge to a SNF is recognized as a time of worsening prognosis; (2) care silos create communication and information barriers during a period of increasing palliative care need; (3) family caregiver distress escalates following care transitions; and (4) lack of clarity of roles and respect for the patient-oncologist relationship limits prognostic communication and changes in focus of treatment. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that acute and postacute care clinicians defer serious illness conversations to the oncologist when patients are on a steep trajectory of decline, experiencing multiple care transitions, and may have limited contact with their oncologist. There is a need to clarify roles among nononcology and oncology clinicians in discussing prognosis and recommending hospice for older adults discharged to SNF.

A Phase II Study of Potentiation of Pembrolizumab with Binimetinib and Bevacizumab in Refractory Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: In this single-institution phase II investigator-initiated study, we assessed the ability of MAPK and VEGF pathway blockade to overcome resistance to immunotherapy in microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer (MSS mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MSS, BRAF wild-type mCRC who progressed on ≥2 prior lines of therapy received pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a safety run-in, patients were randomized to a 7-day run-in of binimetinib or simultaneous initiation of all study drugs, to explore whether MEK inhibition may increase tumor immunogenicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all patients combined (by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1). RESULTS: Fifty patients received study drug treatment; 54% were male with a median age of 55 years (range, 31-79). The primary endpoint, ORR, was 12.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5%-24.3%], which was not statistically different than the historical control data of 5% (P = 0.038, exceeding prespecified threshold of 0.025). The disease control rate was 70.0% (95% CI, 55.4%-82.1%), the median progression-free survival 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.7 months), and the median overall survival 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.7-12.2 months). No difference in efficacy was observed between the randomized cohorts. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed in 56% and 8% of patients, respectively; the most common were rash (12%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab failed to meet its primary endpoint of higher ORR compared with historical control data, demonstrated a high disease control rate, and demonstrated acceptable tolerability in refractory MSS mCRC.

Colon Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Management of disseminated metastatic CRC involves various active drugs, either in combination or as single agents. The choice of therapy is based on consideration of the goals of therapy, the type and timing of prior therapy, the mutational profile of the tumor, and the differing toxicity profiles of the constituent drugs. This manuscript summarizes the data supporting the systemic therapy options recommended for metastatic CRC in the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer.

Examination of Wnt signaling as a therapeutic target for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using a pancreatic tumor organoid library (PTOL).

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents at advanced stages and is refractory to most treatment modalities. Wnt signaling activation plays a critical role in proliferation and chemotherapeutic resistance. Minimal media conditions, growth factor dependency, and Wnt dependency were determined via Wnt inhibition for seven patient derived organoids (PDOs) derived from pancreatic tumor organoid libraries (PTOL). Organoids demonstrating response in vitro were assessed in vivo using patient-derived xenografts. Wnt (in)dependent gene signatures were identified for each organoid. Panc269 demonstrated a trend of reduced organoid growth when treated with ETC-159 in combination with paclitaxel or gemcitabine as compared with chemotherapy or ETC-159 alone. Panc320 demonstrated a more pronounced anti-proliferative effect in the combination of ETC-159 and paclitaxel but not with gemcitabine. Panc269 and Panc320 were implanted into nude mice and treated with ETC-159, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine as single agents and in combination. The combination of ETC-159 and paclitaxel demonstrated an anti-tumor effect greater than ETC-159 alone. Extent of combinatory treatment effect were observed to a lesser extent in the Panc320 xenograft. Wnt (in)dependent gene signatures of Panc269 and 320 were consistent with the phenotypes displayed. Gene expression of several key Wnt genes assessed via RT-PCR demonstrated notable fold change following treatment in vivo. Each pancreatic organoid demonstrated varied niche factor dependencies, providing an avenue for targeted therapy, supported through growth analysis following combinatory treatment of Wnt inhibitor and standard chemotherapy in vitro. The clinical utilization of this combinatory treatment modality in pancreatic cancer PDOs has thus far been supported in our patient-derived xenograft models treated with Wnt inhibitor plus paclitaxel or gemcitabine. Gene expression analysis suggests there are key Wnt genes that contribute to the Wnt (in)dependent phenotypes of pancreatic tumors, providing plausible mechanistic explanation for Wnt (in)dependency and susceptibility or resistance to treatment on the genotypic level.

The environmental impact of nitrous oxide inhalation sedation appointments and equipment used in dentistry.

PURPOSE: This paper reports a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to calculate the environmental footprint of a dental appointment using N2O, comparing single-use equipment with reusable equipment. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is used successfully in dentistry to provide sedation and pain relief to anxious patients, most commonly in children. However, N2O is a powerful climate pollutant 298 times more damaging than carbon dioxide over a 100-year estimate. METHODS: The functional unit chosen for this LCIA was 30 min delivery of N2O to oxygen in a 50:50 ratio at 6 L per minute flow rate as inhalation sedation to one patient. Two types of equipment were compared to deliver the anaesthetic gas: reusable and disposable items. RESULTS: The use of disposable equipment for N2O sedation produces a significantly larger environmental impact across nearly all of the environmental impact scores, but the overall global warming potential is comparable for both types of equipment due to the vast environmental pollution from N2O itself. CONCLUSION: N2O sedation is a reliable treatment adjunct but contributes to climate change. Single-use equipment has a further deleterious effect on the environment, though this is small compared to the overall impact of N2O. Dental priorities should be to deliver safe and effective care to patients that protects staff, minimises waste and mitigates impact on the environment alongside promoting research into alternatives.

A Phase Ib Expansion Cohort Evaluating Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib and Dual TORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: This study further evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of alisertib and sapanisertib in an expansion cohort of patients, including a subset of patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with further evaluation of the pharmacodynamic characteristics of combination therapy. METHODS: Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors and 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib and sapanisertib. Adverse events and disease response were assessed. Patients in the expansion cohort were treated with a 7-day lead-in of either alisertib or sapanisertib prior to combination therapy, with tumor tissue biopsy and serial functional imaging performed for correlative analysis. RESULTS: Toxicity across treatment groups was overall similar to prior studies. One partial response to treatment was observed in a patient with ER positive breast cancer, and a patient with pancreatic cancer experienced prolonged stable disease. In an additional cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment response was modest. Correlative analysis revealed variability in markers of apoptosis and immune cell infiltrate according to lead-in therapy and response. CONCLUSIONS: Dual targeting of Aurora A kinase and mTOR resulted in marginal clinical benefit in a population of patients with refractory solid tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, though individual patients experienced significant response to therapy. Correlatives indicate apoptotic response and tumor immune cell infiltrate may affect clinical outcomes.

HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Targeted treatment strategies are available for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (amplified and/or overexpressed) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and HER2 testing is indicated in patients with mCRC. At present, standard of care first-line treatment for those with HER2-positive mCRC remains chemotherapy in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors or bevacizumab, depending on RAS/BRAF mutational status and tumor sidedness. HER2-targeted agents should be considered for those with RAS/BRAF wild-type disease in subsequent-line treatment and in first-line treatment for patients not appropriate for intensive therapy. While the choice of anti-HER2 therapy is empiric given lack of head-to-head comparisons, the combination of trastuzumab plus tucatinib has received FDA accelerated approval for use in this setting and is generally the authors' preference. Trastuzumab plus lapatinib, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) also have evidence of efficacy in this setting. As T-DXd has demonstrated activity following treatment with other HER2-targeted regimens and carries an increased risk of high-grade toxicities, the authors favor reserving it for use after progression on prior anti-HER2 therapy. HER2-targeted therapies that inhibit signal transduction appear to have limited activity in those with RAS mutations, including trastuzumab-containing regimens. However, the antibody drug conjugate T-DXd has some data showing efficacy in this setting, and the authors would consider T-DXd in subsequent-line therapy for HER2-positive, RAS-mutated mCRC. Several areas of uncertainty remain regarding how to best utilize HER2-targeted therapies in mCRC. These include the optimal sequence of anti-HER2 therapies with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR therapies, the optimal combination partners for anti-HER2 therapies, and the incorporation of predictive biomarkers to guide use of anti-HER2 therapies. Results of ongoing studies may thus alter the treatment paradigm above in the coming years.

Population-level comparisons of gene regulatory networks modeled on high-throughput single-cell transcriptomics data.

Single-cell technologies enable high-resolution studies of phenotype-defining molecular mechanisms. However, data sparsity and cellular heterogeneity make modeling biological variability across single-cell samples difficult. Here we present SCORPION, a tool that uses a message-passing algorithm to reconstruct comparable gene regulatory networks from single-cell/nuclei RNA-sequencing data that are suitable for population-level comparisons by leveraging the same baseline priors. Using synthetic data, we found that SCORPION outperformed 12 existing gene regulatory network reconstruction techniques. Using supervised experiments, we show that SCORPION can accurately identify differences in regulatory networks between wild-type and transcription factor-perturbed cells. We demonstrate SCORPION's scalability to population-level analyses using a single-cell RNA-sequencing atlas containing 200,436 cells from colorectal cancer and adjacent healthy tissues. The differences between tumor regions detected by SCORPION are consistent across multiple cohorts as well as with our understanding of disease progression, and elucidate phenotypic regulators that may impact patient survival.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Regulate NLRP3 Activation to Generate a Tolerogenic Microenvironment.

Defining feature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that participates in the high mortality rate and drug resistance is the immune-tolerant microenvironment which enables tumors to progress unabated by adaptive immunity. In this study, we report that PDAC cells release CSF-1 to induce nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) activation in myeloid cells. Increased NLRP3 expression was found in the pancreas of patients with PDAC when compared with normal pancreas which correlated with the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Using human primary cells and an orthotopic PDAC mouse model, we show that NLRP3 activation is responsible for the maturation and release of the inflammatory cytokine IL1ß which selectively drives Th2-type inflammation via COX2/PGE2 induction. As a result of this inflammation, primary tumors were characterized by reduced cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell activation and increased tumor expansion. Genetic deletion and pharmacologic inhibition of NLRP3 enabled the development of Th1 immunity, increased intratumoral levels of IL2, CD8+ T cell­mediated tumor suppression, and ultimately limited tumor growth. In addition, we observed that NLRP3 inhibition in combination with gemcitabine significantly increased the efficacy of the chemotherapy. In conclusion, this study provides a mechanism by which tumor-mediated NLRP3 activation exploits a distinct adaptive immunity response that facilitates tumor escape and progression. Considering the ability to block NLRP3 activity with safe and small orally active molecules, this protein represents a new promising target to improve the limited therapeutic options in PDAC. SIGNIFICANT: This study provides novel molecular insights on how PDAC cells exploit NLRP3 activation to suppress CD8 T-cell activation. From a translational perspective, we demonstrate that the combination of gemcitabine with the orally active NLRP3 inhibitor OLT1177 increases the efficacy of monotherapy.

The comparative performance of radial head prostheses in patients younger than and older than 50 years: a systematic review.

Background: Patient age may play a role in the surgeon's decision between radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and open reduction internal fixation in radial head fracture treatment. Though large sample reports have detailed outcomes of radial head replacement for a mean age younger than 50 years, the age ranges are widely distributed. Patient outcomes are not uniform across a broad age distribution. Therefore, treatment decisions should be evaluated within the confines of a narrower age bracket. An understanding of clinical outcomes for radial head replacement in younger adults will provide value for guiding treatment decisions. We performed a systematic review comparing the clinical outcomes for radial head replacement in patients younger and older than 50 years of age. Further analysis compared outcomes between RHA performed as a primary procedure and as a secondary procedure in patients younger and older than 50 years of age. Methods: PubMed was queried for articles which delineated individual patient data for age, surgical treatment, and appropriate outcome metrics. Articles were grouped based on patient age of under 50 and over 50 years and within those age groups, based on the arthroplasty being performed as a primary or as a secondary procedure. Results: There were no significant differences between the under 50 and the over 50 groups for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (P = .79) and for implant revision/removal (P = .32). In the under 50 group, RHA done as a primary procedure had significantly higher (P = .001) mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score than RHA done as a secondary procedure. In the over 50 group, relative risk was 2.39 (95% confidence interval, 2.12-2.69) for implant revision/removal (P = .11) when comparing primary and secondary procedures. Discussion: At a mean follow-up of 48 months, RHA in patients under the age of 50 years had satisfactory outcomes which were comparable to outcomes in patients over the age of 50 years. Across both age groups, arthroplasty performed as a primary procedure demonstrated superior outcomes compared to arthroplasty performed as a secondary procedure. Our findings provide guidance to surgeons who face a multifaceted decision when encountering younger adult patients with radial head fracture patterns that may not be amenable to fixation. Awareness of the age-specific performance of radial head implants is an important component of the decision for surgical treatment.

Anal Carcinoma, Version 2.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

This discussion summarizes the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for managing squamous cell anal carcinoma, which represents the most common histologic form of the disease. A multidisciplinary approach including physicians from gastroenterology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and radiology is necessary. Primary treatment of perianal cancer and anal canal cancer are similar and include chemoradiation in most cases. Follow-up clinical evaluations are recommended for all patients with anal carcinoma because additional curative-intent treatment is possible. Biopsy-proven evidence of locally recurrent or persistent disease after primary treatment may require surgical treatment. Systemic therapy is generally recommended for extrapelvic metastatic disease. Recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Anal Carcinoma include staging classification updates based on the 9th edition of the AJCC Staging System and updates to the systemic therapy recommendations based on new data that better define optimal treatment of patients with metastatic anal carcinoma.

Advances in the management of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer remains among the malignancies with the worst outcomes. Survival has been improving, but at a slower rate than other cancers. Multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy, has been under investigation for many years. Because of the anatomical characteristics of the pancreas, more emphasis on treatment selection has been placed on local extension into major vessels. Recently, the development of more effective treatment regimens has opened up new treatment strategies, but urgent research questions have also become apparent. This review outlines the current management of pancreatic cancer, and the recent advances in its treatment. The review discusses future treatment pathways aimed at integrating novel findings of translational and clinical research.

Cabozantinib sensitizes microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to immune checkpoint blockade by immune modulation in human immune system mouse models.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been found to be effective in metastatic MSI-high colorectal cancers (CRC), however, have no efficacy in microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers, which comprise the majority of mCRC cases. Cabozantinib is a small molecule multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is FDA approved in advanced renal cell, medullary thyroid, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Using Human Immune System (HIS) mice, we tested the ability of cabozantinib to prime MSS-CRC tumors to enhance the potency of immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. In four independent experiments, we implanted distinct MSS-CRC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) into the flanks of humanized BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSirpαNOD (BRGS) mice that had been engrafted with human hematopoietic stem cells at birth. For each PDX, HIS-mice cohorts were treated with vehicle, nivolumab, cabozantinib, or the combination. In three out of the four models, the combination had a lower tumor growth rate compared to vehicle or nivolumab-treated groups. Furthermore, interrogation of the HIS in immune organs and tumors by flow cytometry revealed increased Granzyme B+, TNFα+ and IFNγ+ CD4+ T cells among the human tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) that correlated with reduced tumor growth in the combination-treated HIS-mice. Notably, slower growth correlated with increased expression of the CD4+ T cell ligand, HLA-DR, on the tumor cells themselves. Finally, the cabozantinib/nivolumab combination was tested in comparison to cobimetinib/atezolizumab. Although both combinations showed tumor growth inhibition, cabozantinib/nivolumab had enhanced cytotoxic IFNγ and TNFα+ T cells. This pre-clinical in vivo data warrants testing the combination in clinical trials for patients with MSS-CRC.

ATM kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in preclinical models of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response (DDR) associated with double-strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan is used clinically to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), often in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU). AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU was evaluated in preclinical models of CRC to determine whether low doses of AZD0156 enhance the cytotoxicity of irinotecan in chemotherapy regimens used in the clinic. METHODS: Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156, the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN38), and combination therapy were evaluated in 12 CRC cell lines. Additional assessment with clonogenic assay, cell cycle analysis, and immunoblotting were performed in 4 selected cell lines. Four colorectal cancer patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, or 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI). Immunofluorescence was performed on tumor tissues. The DDR mutation profile was compared across in vitro and in vivo models. RESULTS: Enhanced effects on cellular proliferation and regrowth were observed with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 in select models. In cell cycle analysis of these models, increased G2/M arrest was observed with combination treatment over either single agent. Immunoblotting results suggest an increase in DDR associated with irinotecan therapy, with a reduced effect noted when combined with AZD0156, which is more pronounced in some models. Increased TGI was observed with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in some PDX models. The DDR mutation profile was variable across models. CONCLUSIONS: AZD0156 and irinotecan provide a rational and active combination in preclinical colorectal cancer models. Variability across in vivo and in vitro results may be related to the variable DDR mutation profiles of the models evaluated. Further understanding of the implications of individual DDR mutation profiles may help better identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan in the clinical setting.