Does catheter material affect functional performance of intravenous ports via the superior vena cava?

INTRODUCTION: The catheter is the only intravascular portion of an implanted port and plays a crucial role in catheter related complications. Both polyurethane and silicone are biocompatible materials which are utilized for catheter manufacturing, but their correlation to complications remains controversial. The aim of this study was to try to analyze the relationship between catheter materials and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3144 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan were recruited. Of these, 1226 patients received silicone catheter port implantation and 1679 received polyurethane catheter ports. Case matching was done prior to analysis and catheter related complications and cumulative complication incidence for each group were compared. RESULTS: Intergroup differences were identified in entry vessel (p = 0.0441), operation year (p < 0.0001), operation method (p = 0.0095), functional period (p < 0.0001), patient follow up status (p < 0.0001), operating time for vessel cutdown (p < 0.0001) and wire assisted approach (p = 0.0008). Stratified by specific entry vessel, no statistical difference was found in complication rate or incidence between the silicone and polyurethane groups. We further compared the cumulative complication incidence of the silicone and polyurethane groups, and also found no statistical difference (p = 0.4451). CONCLUSION: As long as external stress forces generated by surrounding structures and focused on potential weak points are avoided, both silicone and polyurethane materials provide sufficient structural stability to serve as reliable vascular access for patients.

Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Intravenous ports serve as vascular access and are indispensable in cancer treatment. Most studies are not based on a systematic and standardized approach. Hence, the aim of this study was to demonstrate long-term results of port implantation following a standard algorithm. A total of 2950 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 were included. Data of patients managed following a standard algorithm were analyzed for safety and long-term outcomes. The cephalic vein was the predominant choice of entry vessel. In female patients, wire assistance without use of puncture sheath was less likely and echo-guided puncture via internal jugular vein (IJV) with use of puncture sheath was more likely to be performed, compared to male patients (p < 0.0001). The procedure-related complication rate was 0.07%, and no pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, catheter fracture, or pocket erosion was reported. Catheter implantations by echo-guided puncture via IJV notably declined from 4.67% to 0.99% (p = 0.027). Mean operative time gradually declined from 37.88 min in 2012 to 23.20 min in 2018. The proposed standard algorithm for port implantation reduced the need for IJV echo-guided approach and eliminated procedure-related catastrophic complications. In addition, it shortened operative time and demonstrated good functional results.

Surgical result in non small cell lung cancer patients presenting with ground glass opacity predominant lesion less than 2 cm: Anatomic versus wedge resection.

BACKGROUND: Image characteristics of tumor, including tumor size and component are crucial for patients' survival. Patients who presented with ground glass opacity (GGO) was found less risk of intrapulmonary lymph node metastases and good survival. However, it is difficult to get tissue prove for small GGO lesion preoperatively because of its tiny size and the accuracy of intraoperation frozen section. Some patients received another operation for anatomic resection after malignancy has been confirmed and others refused reoperation and only received wedge resection. The aim of this study was tried to compare the treatment result between anatomic and wedge resection for non small cell lung cancer patients who present as small ground glass opacity (GGO) predominant lesion in pre-operation CT. METHODS: From January 2010 to May 2014, 500 non small cell lung cancer patients who underwent tumor resection were included. Patients who presented with small GGO predominant lesion in pre-operation CT were included and medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The survival status between anatomic and wedge resection was analyzed. RESULTS: 37 patients received anatomic resection (Group A) and 9 patients received wedge resection (Group B). Group B showed less staple usage (p = 0.01) and blood loss (p = 0.02). From view of pathology result, only less intrapulmonary lymph nodes was dissected was identified in group B. From view of survival, similar disease free and overall survival without statistical differences in both groups. CONCLUSION: Wedge resection may provide equivalent treatment result for patients who presented as peripheral GGO or GGO predominant lesions that less than 2 cm in size.

Circulating Tumor Cells as a Tool of Minimal Residual Disease Can Predict Lung Cancer Recurrence: A longitudinal, Prospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for predicting the recurrence of cancer in lung cancer patients after surgery remains unclear. METHODS: A negatively selected protocol of CTC identification was applied. For all the enrolled patients, CTC testing was performed before and after surgery on the operation day (day 0), postoperative day 1, and day 3. The daily decline and trend of CTCs were analyzed to correlate with cancer relapse. The mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusted by cancer characteristics was applied for statistical significance. RESULTS: Fifty patients with lung mass undergoing surgery were enrolled. Among 41 primary lung cancers, 26 (63.4%) were pathological stage Tis and I. A total of 200 CTC tests were performed. MMRM analysis indicated that surgery could contribute to a CTC decline after surgery in all patients with statistical significance (p = 0.0005). The daily decrease of CTCs was statistically different between patients with and without recurrence (p = 0.0068). An early rebound of CTC counts on postoperative days 1 and 3 was associated with recurrence months later. CONCLUSION: CTC testing can potentially serve as a tool for minimal residual disease detection in early-staged lung cancer after curative surgery.

Superior Vena Cava Port Catheter Tip Confirmation: Quantified Formula for Intravascular Catheter Length versus Anatomic Landmark Reference.

BACKGROUND: Adequate tip location is crucial for intravenous port implantation because it can minimize catheter-related complications. Adequate tip location cannot be observed directly and needs to be confirmed by imaging tools. A quantified intravascular catheter length formula has been proposed and we attempt to compare its clinical effectiveness with anatomic landmark references. METHODS: During the period from March 2012 to February 2013, 503 patients who received port implantation where implanted catheter length depended on carina level as confirmed by intraoperative fluoroscopy were assigned to Group A. From March 2013 to February 2014, 521 patients who received port implantation based on quantified intravascular catheter length formula were assigned to Group B. Clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Catheter tip location of Group A, as revealed by intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative chest film, was 1.18 ± 0.51 and 1.1 ± 1.3 cm below carina, respectively. Catheter tip location of Group B, as revealed by intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative chest film, was 1.25 ± 1.05 and 1.05 ± 1.32 cm below carina, respectively. Similar catheter tip location was identified in both groups. The functional period of implanted ports, complication rate (3.58% and 2.53%), and incidence (0.049 and 0.0506 episodes/1,000 catheter days) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The quantified intravascular catheter length formula can predict an adequate catheter length just as well as carina do and results in good catheter tip location. The formula could replace the clinical use of anatomic landmarks and serve as an easy tool for practitioners.

Survival impact of locoregional metachronous malignancy in survival of lung cancer patients who received curative treatment.

BACKGROUND: Metachronous malignancy is also found in the lung cancer population and may be identified before or after diagnosis of lung cancer. No prior studies have documented lung cancer patients with metachronous malignancy and its survival impact in this population. The aim of this study was to try to clarify the survival impact of locoregional metachronous malignancy in the lung cancer population with resectable disease from a pathology point of view. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2009, 199 lung cancer patients received curative treatment in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, of which 34 were identified as having lung cancer and metachronous malignancy and 165 patients as having lung cancer only. Clinico-pathologic factors were collected from the medical records. Differences in clinical presentations between the two groups and survival impact were further analyzed. RESULTS: Of these patients, 165 patients (82.9%) had lung cancer only (lung cancer group), and the remaining 34 patients (17.1%) had lung cancer and metachronous malignancy (metachronous malignancy group). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups. The disease free survival (P=0.3199) and overall survival (P=0.71) between these two groups showed no statistically significant difference. Metachronous malignancy only showed survival impact in lung cancer patients with pathologic stage IIIA (P=0.0389). CONCLUSIONS: Metachronous malignancy is also seen in the lung cancer population and may be identified before or after diagnosis of lung cancer. Locoregional metachronous malignancy has no survival impact on lung cancer patients who receive curative treatment. Anatomic resection with regional lymph node (LN) dissection is recommended if different tumor cell type and resectable disease are confirmed.