Impact of Postoperative COVID-19 Infection Status on Outcomes in Elective Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection causes major morbidity and mortality, it is unclear what the impact of postoperative COVID-19 infection is on 30-day outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: There were 2,340 patients who underwent TJA in 2021, identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, with 925 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients (39.5%) and 1,415 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients (60.5%), overall. Propensity score matching was implemented using patient demographics and preoperative medical conditions to compare outcomes for postoperative COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients who underwent TKA or THA. RESULTS: Postoperative COVID-19-positive THA patients were found to have a significantly increased risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 42.57), sepsis (OR 12.77), readmission (OR 12.06), non-home discharge (OR 3.78), and longer length of stay (hazard ratio 1.62). Postoperative COVID-19-positive TKA patients had an increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 14.17), superficial infection (OR 3.17), pneumonia (OR 34.68), unplanned intubation (OR 18.31), ventilator use for more than 48 hours (OR 18.31), pulmonary embolism (OR 11.98), urinary tract infection (OR 5.16), myocardial infarction (OR 16.02), deep vein thrombosis (OR 4.69), non-home discharge (OR 1.79), reoperation (OR 3.17), readmission (OR 9.61), and longer length of stay (hazard ratio 1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who contracted COVID-19 within 30 days after TJA were at increased risk of mortalities, medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and non-home discharges. It is important for orthopedic surgeons to understand these adverse outcomes to better counsel patients and mitigate these risks, particularly in higher risk populations.

Preoperative COVID-19 infection status negatively impacts postoperative outcomes of geriatric hip fracture surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Compare outcomes for patients with recently diagnosed COVID-19 infection to those without COVID-19 infection undergoing operative treatment of hip fractures using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. DESIGN: Retrospective propensity score matched cohort. METHODS: Patients who received surgery for an acute hip fracture (intramedullary nail (IMN), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or hemiarthroplasty) in 2021 were identified from the NSQIP database. Propensity score matching was implemented using patient demographics and preoperative medical conditions to compare outcomes for COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative cohorts. RESULTS: After matching, COVID-19-positive patients exhibited a higher risk of 30-day mortality (Odds ratio (OR) 1.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01 - 2.04), pneumonia (OR 2.90, 95 % CI: 1.91 - 4.33), unplanned intubation (OR 2.53, 95 % CI: 1.39 - 4.39), and septic shock (OR 2.51, 95 % CI: 1.10 - 4.67). COVID-19-positive patients were also more likely to have a longer length of hospital stay (Hazard Ratio 1.3, 95 % CI: 1.20 - 1.41) and were more likely to be discharged to an acute care hospital (OR 1.90, 95 % CI: 1.03 - 3.06). CONCLUSIONS: Active COVID-19 infection is an independent risk factor for complications as well as increased resource utilization in patients undergoing surgical treatment of acute hip fracture. Using the results of this multicenter study, quantification of these risks can help inform practice and treatment protocols for this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Ultracongruent Designs Compared to Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts - What Does the Evidence Tell Us? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) have been the most common tibial designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Ultra-congruent (UC) inserts are becoming popular because they preserve bone without relying on the posterior cruciate ligament balance and integrity. Despite increasing use, there is no consensus on how UC inserts perform versus PS and CR designs. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of 5 online databases was performed for articles from January 2000 to July 2022 comparing the kinematic and clinical outcomes of PS or CR tibial inserts to UC inserts. There were nineteen studies included. There were 5 studies comparing UC to CR and 14 comparing UC to PS. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) was rated "good quality". RESULTS: For CR studies, pooled analyses showed no difference in knee flexion (n = 3, P = .33) or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (n = 2, P = .58). For PS studies, meta-analyses showed better anteroposterior stability (n = 4, P < .001) and more femoral rollback (n = 2, P < .001) for PS but no difference in knee flexion (n = 9, P = .55) or medio-lateral stability (n = 2, P = .50). There was no difference with WOMAC (n = 5, P = .26), Knee Society Score (n = 3, P = .58), Knee Society Knee Score (n = 4, P = .76), or Knee Society Function Score (n = 5, P = .51). CONCLUSION: Available data demonstrates there are no clinical differences between CR or PS and UC inserts in small short-term studies ending around 2 years after surgery. More importantly, high-quality research comparing all inserts is lacking, demonstrating a need for more uniform and longer-term studies beyond 5 years after surgery to justify increased UC usage.

Intraosseous Tibial Resuscitation After a Total Knee Arthroplasty Leading to Osteonecrosis and Loosening of the Tibial Component.

A 51-year-old woman suffered cardiac arrest requiring emergent intraosseous access that abutted the tibial component of her total knee arthroplasty. She developed a wound at the site and knee pain which was concerning for deep infection. Subsequent imaging was consistent with osteonecrosis developing around the tibial component. The component eventually loosened, requiring a revision surgery. Her deep cultures remained negative throughout. Her findings are most consistent with osteonecrosis and aseptic loosening of her prosthesis. While intraosseous access may be beneficial during resuscitation, it has complications. This is the first reported case of osteonecrosis secondary to intraosseous access leading to prosthetic loosening necessitating a revision surgery.

Fortuitous Eradication of an Aggressive Basal Cell Carcinoma Via Foreign Body Reaction to a Polyurethane Vacuum-Assisted Closure Sponge.

ABSTRACT: The foreign body reaction (FBR) is a well-documented immune reaction. Much of the literature on FBRs has focused on minimizing this immune response to mitigate the impact on medical implants. Here, we present a case that illustrates a serendipitous oncologic outcome from an FBR. A 54-year-old man presented with an aggressive basal cell carcinoma (BCC). At the first resection, he had broadly positive surgical margins. The surgical wound was temporized with a polyurethane wound vacuum assisted closure (VAC) device. He was lost to follow-up having retained a VAC sponge for a total of 12 weeks. A wide re-resection was performed 7 months after the initial resection. Exhaustive examination of the resected specimen was performed. There was an absence of any BCC, replaced by a widespread chronic FBR to polyurethane VAC sponge particles. This suggests that the foreign body immune response was sufficiently intense to eradicate any remaining BCC. This case illustrates the concept of an FBR as a novel method of local immunotherapy.