Aging rate, environmental risk and production efficiency of the low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films with contrasting thickness in irrigated region.

Physical thickness of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films might determine the release rate of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) & structural integrity and affect production efficiency. However, this critical issue is still unclear and little reported. Aging effects were evaluated in LDPE films with the thickness of 0.006, 0.008, 0.010 and 0.015 mm in a maize field of irrigation region. The Scanning electron microscope (SEM) results showed that the proportion of damaged area (Dam) to total area of LDPE films was massively lowered with increasing thickness after aging. The highest and lowest Dam was 32.2% and 3.5% in 0.006 and 0.015 mm films respectively. Also, the variations in peak intensity of asymmetric & symmetrical stretching vibrations (ASVI & SSVI) were detected using Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR), indicating that the declines in peak intensity tended to be slower with thickness. Interestingly, the declines in physical integrity were tightly associated with increasing exhalation rate of PAEs. Average releasing rate of PAEs was 38.2%, 31.4%, 31.5% and 19.7% in LDPE films from 0.006 to 0.015 mm respectively. Critically, thicker film mulching can lead to greater soil water storage at plough layer (SWS-PL) and better thermal status, accordingly harvesting higher economic benefit. Therefore, LDPE film thickening may be a solution to reduce environmental risk but improve production efficiency in arid region.

Thickness effects of polyethylene and biodegradable film residuals on soil properties and dryland maize productivity.

Plastic film residuals are increasingly remaining in cultivated lands. However, it is a critical issue how residual plastic type and thickness affect soil properties and crop yield. To address this issue, in situ landfill was conducted using thick polyethylene (PEt1), thin polyethylene (PEt2), thick biodegradable (BIOt1), thin biodegradable (BIOt2) residues, and CK (control) with no residues landfill in a semiarid maize field. The findings demonstrated that the impact of various treatments on soil characteristics and maize yield varied considerably. Soil water content decreased by 24.82% in PEt1 and 25.43% in PEt2, compared to BIOt1 and BIOt2, respectively. BIOt2 treatment increased soil bulk density by 1.31 g cm-3 and lowered soil porosity by 51.11%, respectively; it also elevated the silt/clay proportion by 49.42% relative to CK. In contrast, microaggregate composition in PEt2 was higher (43.02%). Moreover, BIOt2 lowered soil nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+) content. Compared with other treatments, BIOt2 resulted in significantly higher soil total nitrogen (STN) and lower SOC/STN. Finally, BIOt2 exhibited the lowest water use efficiency (WUE) (20.57 kg ha-1 mm-1) and yield (6896 kg ha-1) among all the treatments. Therefore, BIO film residues exhibited detrimental impacts on soil quality and maize productivity compared to PE film ones. Considering film thickness, thin residual films more evidently influenced soil quality and maize productivity than thick film ones.

Thickness-dependent release of microplastics and phthalic acid esters from polythene and biodegradable residual films in agricultural soils and its related productivity effects.

It is crucial to elucidate the release rate of microplastics (MPs) and phthalic acid esters (PAEs) in agricultural soil and their effects on crop productivity regarding film types and thicknesses. To address this issue, two-year landfill test was performed using 0.016 mm-thick polyethylene (PEt1) & biodegradable (BIOt1), and 0.01 mm-thin polyethylene (PEt2) & biodegradable (BIOt2) residual films as materials with no landfill as CK. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and infrared analyses revealed that two-year landfill caused considerable changes in physical forms and spectral peaks in BIO film, which was more pronounced in thin BIO (36.90 % weight loss). Yet, less changes were presented in the above analyzes in polyethylene (PE) films, and thick films damaged relatively less. MPs number was 86,829.11 n/kg in BIOt1 and 134,912.27 n/kg in BIOt2, equivalent to 2.55 and 3.72 times higher than in PEt1 and PEt2, respectively. This was closely associated with PAEs release, as soil PAEs concentration was substantially lower in PEt1 (17.60 g/kg) and PEt2 (21.43 g/kg) than in BIOt1 and BIOt2 (37.12 g/kg and 49.20 g/kg), respectively. Furthermore, maize productivity parameters were negatively correlated with the amount of MPs and PAEs. BIOt2 and PEt1 had the lowest and highest grain yield, respectively. BIO exhibited greater environmental risk and adverse effects on soil and crop productivity than PE film due to physical degradation and release of PAEs. Thickness-wise comparison exhibited that thin film residues had more adverse effect relative to thick film ones.

In situ degradation of low-density polyethylene film in irrigation maize field: Thickness-dependent effect.

Thickness of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film might determine its mechanical strength, clean production and soil health. Yet, this issue is little understood. In situ aging effects were evaluated in LDPE films with the thickness of 0.006 mm, 0.008 mm, 0.010 mm and 0.015 mm in maize field. The data showed that maximum tensile force (TFmax), maximum tensile strength (TSmax) and elongation at break (EAB) were massively lowered with increasing thickness after aging. The greatest and lowest reduction magnitude of EAB was 27.6 % and 11.2 % in 0.006 mm and 0.015 mm films respectively. Also, the melting point (Tm) and crystallinity (Xc) under Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) tended to decline with the increasing thickness. Moreover, the peak intensity of crystalline regions tended to transfer and concentrate on the amorphous regions, and such tendency became more pronounced in the thin films. Interestingly, there existed a pronounced distinct thickness-dependent effects on soil bulk density (SBD) and soil water-stable aggregate proportion. Thick plastic film mulching increased SBD but reduced the proportion of macroaggregates (mainly referred to 0.015 mm and 0.010 mm). In addition, thick film mulching slightly reduced the levels of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN), but significantly promoted the contents of soil labile C and N. Particularly, it significantly promoted above- & under-ground biomass of maize across two growing seasons (p < 0.05). To sum up, thickening LDPE film may act as a promising solution to improve LDPE film residue recycling, while benefiting for higher productivity. However, thick film mulching may cause a certain adverse impact on soil structure, and further investigations would be needed in the future.

Effects of increased plastic film residues on soil properties and crop productivity in agro-ecosystem.

Intensive use of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) plastic films in agro-ecosystems has raised considerable concerns due to the increasing film residues in soils. It is unclear how the increased film residues affect soil properties and crop productivity and whether biodegradable (Bio) film can substitute LDPE. To address the issue, we designed a landfill experiment with different addition levels of plastic residue into soils of maize (Zea mays L.) field from 2018 to 2019. Six treatments were arranged as PMT1-T3/BioT1-T3, representing the low, medium, and high-level application of LDPE / Bio film fragments, with no residual film, applied as CK. Results show that, soil bulk density was significantly increased from 1.19 to 1.31 g/cm3 regardless of residue types. In contrast, soil porosity was lowered from 58.03% in CK to 57.36% in Bio and 56.12% in LDPE significantly (P < 0.05). Increased residues improved soil nitrogen level and lowered the C/N ratio significantly. Also, it decreased microbial biomass C and N levels but with no change in C/N (P < 0.05). Maize yield and WUE decreased, while soil water storage increased significantly. LDPE residues affected soil properties and productivity partly lower than Bio ones did, but the negative effects of them were similar in the maize field.