Laparoscopic Excision of a Scar Pregnancy and Isthmocele Repair.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic excision of a scar pregnancy and isthmocele repair with a barbed suture. DESIGN: A step-by-step explanation of the laparoscopic excision technique of a scar pregnancy and isthmocele repair. SETTING: Cesarean scar pregnancy occurs as a result of attachment of the products of conception to the uterine scar [1-3]. In the present case, a 34-year-old, gravida 4, para 1 patient with a history of 1 miscarriage and 1 ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at 7 weeks of gestation. Dilation and curretage was performed at the 8th week of gestation to terminate the pregnancy. On ultrasonography performed 1 month later, placental material underlying the isthmocele was observed. Her beta human chorionic gonadotropin level was 13 836 mIU/mL. She was followed up for 1.5 months until the beta human chorionic gonadotropin levels were negative. However, the mass underneath the scar had grown larger, measuring up to 5 × 6 cm. Laparoscopy was performed because the patient reported vaginal spotting and pelvic pain. The incision was sutured with a synthetic absorbable unidirectional barbed suture (Stratafix Knotless Tissue Control Device; Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ). No residual scar defect was visible on follow-up ultrasonography 1 week and 1 month after surgery. CONCLUSION: Barbed sutures ease the repair of uterine scar defects and can provide ideal reapproximation of thick myometrial tissue. Laparoscopic treatment of a scar pregnancy and isthmocele repair are effective and safe modes of treatment.

Laparoscopic Blinded Endometrial Cavity Resection for Robert's Uterus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that laparoscopic excision of the endometrial tissue of a blind endometrial cavity in a patient with a Robert's uterus who did not consent to hysteroscopic surgery due to her virgin state and religious beliefs was an effective alternative treatment option for progressive dismenorrhea and pelvic pain. DESIGN: Presentation of a rare müllerian anomaly and a step-by-step demonstration of a laparoscopic excision technique in the endometrium of a blind uterine cavity (educative video) (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Robert's uterus is a rare müllerian anomaly characterized by the presence of a blind endometrial cavity and an asymmetric septum. Endometriosis may be encountered in 40% of patients with this anomaly. A 15-year-old virgin patient with progressive dysmenorrhea was diagnosed with a Robert's uterus anomaly on magnetic resonance imaging. Hysteroscopic surgery was suggested to form a communication between the blind endometrial cavity and the hemiuterus; however, the patient refused to undergo any vaginal surgery due to her virgin state and religous beliefs. A decision to excise the endometrial tissue of the blind cavity laparoscopically instead of performing a hemihysterectomy was made to prevent any adverse effects on the ovarian blood supply and damage to the myometrial wall of the unicornuate uterus. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic resection of the blind endometrial cavity in a patient with a Robert's uterus anomaly. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection of a blind endometrial cavity is a safe and effective surgical alternative in patients who refuse vaginal surgery.

Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 105 morbidly obese patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy due to benign gynecologic pathologies between January 2010 and April 2017 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether conventional suture ligation technique (n = 64) or electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (n = 41) were used during vaginal hysterectomy. The surgical procedure was performed with the same technique in both study groups. The primary outcomes were duration of surgery and estimated blood loss. The secondary outcomes were intra-operative complications and post-operative complications. RESULTS: The duration of surgery and estimated blood loss in the vessel sealing group was significantly less than in the conventional suture group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was present between the two groups in the rate of intra-operative and post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome of our study is that the EBVS system can be used equally and even more effectively in some aspects; and as safe an alternative approach to conventional suture ligation technique during vaginal hysterectomies performed specifically on morbidly obese patients with reduced operation times and blood loss, and without increasing the complication rates.