Subinternship in Diagnostic Radiology: Bringing the Shadowers Out of the Shadows.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic radiology subinternships are uncommon. We started a diagnostic radiology subinternship at our institution in 2020 and present 3 years of data assessing the impact of the course on students' perceptions of and interest in diagnostic radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The initial course design consisted of daily shadowing shifts, small group lectures with attending radiologists, asynchronous self-paced learning assignments, an ultrasound skills session, multidisciplinary tumor board attendance, and completion of 2 formal case presentations. "Junior resident" shifts, where students dictated studies under attending supervision, an emergency radiology call shift, and an ultrasound procedures shift were subsequently added in response to student feedback. Students were asked to complete surveys before and after completing the course. RESULTS: Forty-seven fourth-year medical students completed the course over 3 years. The first 2 groups were predominantly male, whereas the third group showed near even gender representation (54% male). 21 (45%) chose to apply to diagnostic radiology for residency. Student reported interest in diagnostic radiology as a career, valuation of diagnostic radiology as a specialty, comfort with imaging interpretation, and perceptions of the availability of patient interaction and procedures in diagnostic radiology all significantly increased after participation in the course. Students ranked the junior resident shifts and small group attending lectures as the most valuable course components. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a diagnostic radiology subinternship significantly improved students' interest in and perceptions of the field. We encourage the creation of similar courses in other radiology departments and stress the importance of active learning experiences.

Dermatology through the lens of social media: A qualitative study among adolescents.

Social media (SM) use has accelerated at an unprecedented pace and dermatology literature evaluating SM use is primarily centered on the quality and quantity of dermatologic content, with minimal research on how adolescent patients experience such content. We recruited 15 patients between the ages of 13-18 years from the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Department of Dermatology to interview regarding their experience with dermatologic content on SM. Despite most participants' insightful comments on SM use and the relative lack of dermatologic content validation on SM, many participants adopted skin care advice from SM. Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to social influence and it is important dermatologists understand how pervasive skin-related content is on these platforms.

The Effect of State-Level Prescription Opioid Legislation on Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, a statewide legislation titled the Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention (STOP) Act was enacted in 2017 to limit prescription opioid use and reduce dependence. The impact of state legislation curbing opioid prescription on outcomes after spine surgery is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients undergoing lumbar tubular microdecompression for symptomatic lumbar spine stenosis from June 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Cases between June 2016 and December 2017 represent the group before the STOP act (pre-STOP), while cases between January 2018 and June 2019 represent the group after legislation enactment (post-STOP). Preoperative and postoperative patient functional scores including the EuroQol-Five Dimensions Index, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were compared between both groups. The meaningful clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated for each score and was compared between both groups as well. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients met inclusion criteria, with 86 in the pre-STOP group and 61 in the post-STOP group. Analysis of postoperative scores demonstrated statistically lower VAS leg pain score averages in the post-STOP group (P < 0.05). Higher trends in achieving MCID among the post-STOP group were observed; however, the differences between both groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05 for all). Additionally, there were no statistical differences in rates of unplanned pain-related clinic visits and emergency department (ED) visits, as well as no differences in the number of pain-related calls within 90 days after surgery between both groups. CONCLUSION: The enactment of state legislation to curb the prescribing of opioids for postoperative pain did not negatively affect the rate of achieving clinically meaningful outcomes among patients undergoing lumbar tubular microdecompression for spinal stenosis. Additionally, decreasing the amount of opioids prescribed for postoperative pain does not increase the number of unplanned clinic or ED visits due to pain within 90 days after surgery.

The effect of smoking on achieving meaningful clinical outcomes one year after lumbar tubular microdecompression: a matched-pair cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There has been a shift in the spine literature in reporting meaningful outcomes, including meaningful clinically important difference (MCID), after surgery. The evidence on the effect of tobacco smoking at the time of lumbar tubular microdecompression (LTMD) on meaningful outcomes is limited. PURPOSE: To compare differences in 1-year functional outcomes and rates of achieving MCID between current smokers and non-smokers who underwent LTMD for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). STUDY DESIGN: A nested case control study to compare the difference in patient reported outcomes (PROs) between smokers and non-smokers 1-year after undergoing LTMD. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included patients that underwent single level LTMD by a single surgeon between January 2014 through August 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative PROs were recorded using the questionnaires EQ-5D, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain. The MCID was also used. METHODS: Current tobacco smokers at the time of surgery were matched 1:2 to non-smokers by age (+/- 1year). Preoperative and postoperative functional scores were compared between the two groups using independent t-tests. Additionally, thresholds for achieving MCID were calculated for each individual functional score, and were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients with 1-year follow-up who met inclusion criteria, 35 patients were identified as smokers and were matched to 70 non-smokers. No statistical differences were identified between age, BMI, or gender. Comparison of preoperative PROs showed no statistically significant differences between smokers and non-smokers (p>0.05 for all), while smokers had statistically lower EQ-5D (p<0.001) and higher ODI (p=0.05), VAS back (p=0.033), and VAS leg (p=0.03) score averages at a minimum of one year follow-up. Evaluation of meaningful outcomes demonstrated non-smokers had higher rates of achieving MCID on at least 1 threshold score as compared to smokers (98.5% vs. 91.1%; p=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Current smokers at the time of surgery have inferior postoperative EQ-5D scores, increased pain and disability, and lower odds of achieving the MCID at 1-year after undergoing LTMD when compared to patients without any smoking history.