RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence, and infertility are all prevalent conditions associated with considerable reduction in quality of life. As a group, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women may be at higher risk of these conditions, but studies are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature pertaining to the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of these conditions in Indigenous Australian women. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched for articles published between 1980 and 2021 pertaining to these conditions in Indigenous Australian women. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies that did not directly address the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of these conditions were excluded. MAIN RESULTS: It was possible to identify only 11 papers dealing with these conditions in Indigenous Australian women. Only one dealt with POP and was a retrospective audit of a health outreach program in the Northern Territory concluding that there was significant underreporting of the condition. Five papers dealt with urinary incontinence and, again, described significant underreporting and poor referral pathways. Five papers reported small studies about infertility, one reporting poor engagement from clinical directors. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that despite the importance of these conditions, there is almost no body of research and this is an urgent national problem.
Assuntos
Infertilidade , Incontinência Urinária , Austrália/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Prolapso , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a disparity in the burden of gynaecological cancer for Indigenous women compared with non-Indigenous women in Australia. Understanding how Indigenous women currently experience gynaecological cancer care services and factors that impact on their engagement with care is critical. This study explored Indigenous Australian women's experience of gynaecological cancer care at a major metropolitan hospital in Queensland. METHODS: Indigenous women receiving care at a major metropolitan Queensland hospital for investigation or diagnosis of gynaecological cancer were invited to participate in a larger longitudinal study exploring women's experiences of gynaecological cancer care. This component was an in-depth, qualitative interview exploring the women's experiences of hospital care at approximately three-month post initial referral. A peer-approach was used to interview women. Hospital-based care providers involved in the care of Indigenous gynaecological cancer patients were invited to be interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed using an interpretative phenomenological approach enabling a multi-layered, contextualised understanding of the patients' experience and their interaction with tertiary cancer services. RESULTS: Eight Indigenous patients and 18 care providers were interviewed. Analysis of all interviews revealed four broad issues affecting Indigenous patients' early experiences of care: (1) navigating the system, impacted by timely diagnosis, access to support services and follow up; (2) communication and decision-making, patients' decision-making, efficacy of doctor-patient communication, and patients' knowledge about cancer; (3) coping with treatment demands, was impacted by emotional stress, access to services and support by hospital staff; and (4) feeling welcome and safe in the hospital, impacted by patients' relationship with care providers and their access to culturally-safe services. The combination of factors impacting these women's' experience of gynaecological care commonly left these women at breaking point, often with limited access to information, resources or support. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed that experiences of cancer care for Indigenous women are overlain by challenges associated with late referral, misdiagnosis, miscommunication, lack of information, logistics in accessing treatment and services and system cultural insensitivities. Our findings offer insights that can inform cancer care provision to more effectively support Indigenous women accessing gynaecological cancer services.