Antibiotic prescribing behavior among physicians in Asia: a multinational survey.

Objective: To evaluate antibiotic prescribing behavior (APB) among physicians with various specialties in five Asian countries. Design: Survey of antibiotics prescribing behavior in three stages (initial, on-treatment, and de-escalation stages). Methods: Participants included internists, infectious diseases (ID) specialists, hematologists, intensivists, and surgeons. Participants' characteristics, patterns of APB, and perceptions of antimicrobial stewardship were collected. A multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate factors associated with appropriate APB. Results: There were 367 participants. The survey response rate was 82.5% (367/445). For the initial stage, different specialties had different choices for empiric treatment. For the on-treatment stage, if the patient does not respond to empiric treatment, most respondents will step up to broader-spectrum antibiotics (273/367: 74.39%). For the de-escalation stage, the rate of de-escalation was 10%-60% depending on the specialty. Most respondents would de-escalate antibiotics based on guidelines (250/367: 68.12%). De-escalation was mostly reported by ID specialists (66/106: 62.26%). Respondents who reported that they performed laboratory investigations prior to empirical antibiotic prescriptions (aOR = 2.83) were associated with appropriate use, while respondents who reported ID consultation were associated with appropriate antibiotic management for infections not responding to empiric treatment (aOR = 40.87); adherence with national guidelines (aOR = 2.57) was associated with reported successful carbapenem de-escalation. Conclusion: This study highlights the variation in practices and gaps in appropriate APB on three stages of antibiotic prescription among different specialties. Education on appropriate investigation, partnership with ID specialist, and availability and adherence with national guidelines are critical to help guide appropriate APB among different specialties.

Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Retinal Vessel Occlusion and Its Association: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Recent studies have shown that atrial fibrillation (AF) is more prevalent in patients with retinal vessel occlusion and may be associated with both central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). However, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis to confirm this finding.Methods: We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to January 2019. Included studies were published cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies, and randomized control trials reporting the prevalence of AF in patients with CRAO or CRVO. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model.Results: Eleven studies were included in our meta-analysis, involving a total population of 12,305 subjects with retinal vessel occlusion. The prevalence of AF ranged from 4.1% to 21.4% (pooled prevalence = 11.5%, 95% CI: 7.0-16.1, I2 = 96.3%). Five studies reported a control group of patients without retinal vessel occlusion. We found that AF is significantly associated with retinal vessel occlusion (pooled OR = 2.24, 95% CI:2.07-2.43, I2 = 0.0%).Conclusion: Our study showed that AF is significantly associated with retinal vessel occlusion. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the exact mechanism linking AF with CRAO and CRVO.