Midterm results of stemless impaction shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, multicenter study.

Background: Stemless shoulder arthroplasty using 4 open-fin press-fit anchors has been showing promising short-term clinical and radiographic results for patients' primary osteoarthritis. This prospective, multicenter study presents 5-year postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes of a stemless shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Methods: Between November 2012 and December 2015, 100 patients were treated for primary osteoarthritis with the Sidus stem-free shoulder system at 7 European centers. Clinical assessment included the Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Subjective Shoulder Value, and range of motion. True anteroposterior, axial and lateral radiographs were reviewed for osteolysis, glenoid and humerus loosening, heterotopic ossification, radiolucent lines, component migration and humeral bone resorption. In addition to a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, a comparative analysis between total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty was performed. Results: Seventy-one patients (36 females) with a mean age of 63.8 years (range: 47-79 years) were available for the 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up (range: 52-79 months). There was a significant increase (P < .0001) in all outcome scores compared to baseline values. Patients with total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 48) achieved significantly better functional outcome than patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty (n = 23) with regard to the absolute and relative Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, and Subjective Shoulder Value as well as greater abduction strength and range of motion in forward elevation and external rotation (P ≤ .004). There were no cases of osteolysis or humeral loosening. There were some cases of heterotopic ossification (1.4%), radiolucency around the humerus (1.4%) or glenoid (25%), glenoid migration (2.1%), inferior osteophytes (1.4%) or humerus bone resorption (9.9%). The 5-year survival was 94%. Conclusion: Patients treated with the Sidus stem-free shoulder system for primary osteoarthritis continue to achieve good clinical and radiographic results without any signs of aseptic humeral implant loosening at 5 years postsurgery.

Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System for primary osteoarthritis: short-term results of a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate clinical and radiologic results of a new metaphyseal anchored system. This system features a different anchor geometry that potentially leads to better bony integration and less loosening. METHODS: From November 2012 until December 2015, 148 patients (151 shoulders) were treated with the Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System at 9 centers in Europe. The main indication was primary osteoarthritis (80.1%). This analysis only includes patients diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis (n = 121). A clinical evaluation was performed using the Constant-Murley score, Subjective Shoulder Value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, and range of motion. Radiologic assessment was based on the occurrence of radiolucent lines and signs of implant migration, osteolysis, loosening, and heterotopic ossification. RESULTS: We evaluated 105 patients after a follow-up period of 2 years. There were 53 women and 52 men. The average age was 64 years. Total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 73 cases and hemiarthroplasty in 32. The Constant-Murley score improved from 26 points preoperatively to 70 points at 2 years' follow-up (P < .001). The Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 34% to 84% (P < .001), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form increased from 34 points to 86 points (P < .001). Radiologically, neither migration nor loosening was found. However, radiolucent lines of 2 mm or greater could be detected around the glenoid in 2 cases, but none of them have had clinical relevance yet. The overall complication rate was 6.7%, and the revision rate was 0%. CONCLUSION: Patients with the Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System achieve good clinical and radiologic short-term results that are comparable with the results of other stem-free shoulder implants.

A multicenter study to evaluate subscapularis muscle function using 5:30 o'clock portal for antero-inferior shoulder stabilization.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome after arthroscopic antero-inferior shoulder stabilization with and without using a 5:30 o'clock portal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients [age (mean ± SD), 28.05 ± 8.25 years] with a mean follow-up of 15.23 ± 5.02 months were included in this study. Thirty-one patients underwent arthroscopic antero-inferior shoulder stabilization using the 5:30 o'clock portal in center A (group I) and were compared to 31 matched patients managed with the 3 o'clock portal in center B (group II). Physical examination, standard shoulder scores, ultrasound assessment and subscapularis strength measurement were used to evaluate postoperative shoulder function. RESULTS: Good to excellent results were seen in both groups. No significant differences were seen when comparing ASES, Constant and Rowe Score of both groups. Patients of group II achieved a significant higher score in the SST than patients of group I. (p < 0.05) Patients of group I had a significantly lesser loss of passive external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. (p = 0.04; p = 0.056) Ultrasound evaluation and strength measurement showed no significant differences in subscapularis muscle integrity or function neither between the involved and uninvolved shoulder nor between both groups. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic anterior-inferior shoulder stabilization results in excellent clinical results. When considering portal placement, the deep trans-subscapularis portal allows a more precise suture anchor placement at the inferior glenoid rim and capsular shift with a significant improved external rotation but does not negatively affect the subscapularis function in terms of internal rotation strength or structural integrity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Significant benefit for older patients after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from isolated subacromial impingement (SI) of their shoulder but who are resistant to other therapies benefit substantially from arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) if they are young (<60 years). Although physical demands rise notably in the older population, it still remains unclear if surgery leads to better results in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to focus on the impact of age on the functional outcome in elderly patients suffering from SI. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 307 patients (age range: 42-63 years) with isolated SI were enrolled. The 165 patients were allocated to physical therapy whereas 142 underwent ASD. The patient cohort was divided into two groups according to the median age (<57 years). Functional outcome was recorded using the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) allowing for qualitative self -assessment of the Constant, SPADI and Dark Scores. RESULTS: Median age was 57 (25%-75%: 48-63) years, follow-up was 55 (25%-75%: 25-87) months. In group I (age < 57 years, n = 165) no significant differences in outcome between physical therapy and ASD were detected. In contrast, in group II (age > 57 years; n = 142) the patients reported significantly better results after ASD in the overall MSQs. CONCLUSION: Despite their higher age, elderly patients with isolated SI actually benefit significantly from ASD in comparison to physical therapy.

The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment questionnaire which allows an easy follow-up of patients. The questionnaire also allows the calculation of 3 well established scoring systems, i.e. the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. The subjective and objective items of these three systems were condensed into a single 30-questions form and validated against the original questionnaires. METHODS: A representative collective of patients of our shoulder clinic was asked to fill in the newly designed self-assessment Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ). At the same time, the established questionnaires for self-assessment of CONSTANT, SPADI and DASH scores were handed out. The obtained results were compared by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty one patients completed all questionnaires. The correlation coefficients of the results were r = 0.91 for the SPADI, r = -0.93 for the DASH and r = 0.94 for the CMS scoring system, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an instrument which allows a quantitative self-assessment of shoulder function. It provides compatible data sets for the three most popular shoulder function scoring systems by one single, short 30-item. This instrument can be used by shoulder surgeons to effectively monitor the outcome, safety and quality of their treatment and also compare the results to published data in the literature.

The fulcrum axis: a new method for determining glenoid version.

Previously applied methods for the evaluation of glenoid version did not use body-surface landmarks; therefore, it is not possible to get information about glenoid version from the outside. The tip of the coracoid and the posterolateral corner of the acromion can easily be found on the body surface. These 2 landmarks were connected by a line called the fulcrum axis. After using an experimental x-ray technique in 143 human cadaver scapulae, 5 independent observers identified the fulcrum axis and the glenoid fossa twice. The resulting overall angle between the fulcrum axis and the glenoid fossa was 1.8 degrees (SD 4.5). The fulcrum axis may be used for the preoperative planning and the intraoperative evaluation of glenoid version while performing total shoulder arthroplasties. As the fulcrum axis and the plane of the glenoid fossa are approximately parallel, the fulcrum axis can be used to position patients for performing a true antero-posterior x-ray.

Functional malcentering of the humeral head and asymmetric long-term stress on the glenoid: potential reasons for glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty.

We tested the hypothesis that functional malcentering of the humeral head during arm elevation exists in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and influences long-term glenoid loading. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers and 10 patients with primary osteoarthritis, 10 with cuff-arthropathy, and 1 with dysplastic glenoid were examined. Open magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional (3D) digital postprocessing techniques were applied in various arm positions. Osteoabsorptiometry was used to determine 3D subchondral mineralization patterns of the glenoid as an indicator of integral long-term stress distribution. At 30 degrees of abduction, 5 patients demonstrated malcentering of the humeral head posteriorly; all patients with cuff arthropathy had malcentering superiorly. At 90 degrees, most patients displayed significant (P < .001) malcentering in the superior and posterior direction. The shoulders showed maximal subchondral mineralization patterns in the direction of malcentering. Most patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis displayed functional malcentering, which might be responsible for postoperative glenoid loosening in shoulder arthroplasty if not corrected intraoperatively.

Hemiarthroplasty for Humeral Head Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Replacement of the fractured humeral head with a modular prosthesis. The procedure aims at an adequate reconstruction of shape and function of the shoulder. INDICATIONS: Displaced three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus that cannot be reduced and internally fixed. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Fracture can be reduced and adequately internally fixated. Noncompliant patient. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: In beach-chair position, the fractured humeral head is removed via a deltopectoral approach. The Aequalis modular fracture prosthesis can be positioned by two methods: (i) a fracture jig optimizing height and retroversion of the prosthesis, (ii) under additional intraoperative fluoroscopy. Healing of the tuberosities can be promoted by cancellous grafts taken from the fractured head. These are fixed by four heavy sutures running horizontally and two sutures running vertically. RESULTS: 13 out of 22 patients treated by primary hemiarthroplasty (within 10 days after the fracture) and 34 out of 50 patients treated by secondary arthroplasty could be assessed after a mean follow-up of 40 (15-70) and 44 (8-98) months, respectively. The absolute Constant score amounted to 45 and 50 points, respectively, and the relative score to 56% in both groups. The majority of patients was free of pain or suffered less pain than before the operation (secondary arthroplasty; p < 0.001). In contrast to these, only satisfactory, objective results, self-assessment was good or better than before (secondary prostheses; p < 0.001). In both groups, prognostic factors were the size and position of the tuberosities (p < 0.001).

Serum S-100B and interleukin-8 as predictive markers for comparative neurologic outcome analysis of patients after cardiac arrest and severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To compare S-100B and interleukin-8 serum values on scene/at admission and 12 hrs later with respect to neurologic long-term outcome 12 months after cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation, as well as after severe traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Prospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: On scene; intensive care units of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Twenty patients with severe traumatic brain injury. INTERVENTIONS: Therapy was adjusted to the standards of modern prehospital and intensive care management by physicians who were not involved in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: First median S-100B values of the cardiac arrest group (4.42 ng/mL) mounted as high as those of the traumatic brain injury group (4.11 ng/mL). Within 12 hrs, S-100B levels significantly decreased to 0.75 ng/mL in cardiac arrest patients and to 0.68 ng/mL in traumatic brain injury patients but remained significantly elevated compared with the controls (0.04 ng/mL). Interleukin-8 levels of the cardiac arrest patients on scene (30.33 pg/mL) were clearly elevated above normal (12.60 pg/mL) and increased significantly to 101.40 pg/mL after 12 hrs. They showed no significant difference compared with those of the traumatic brain injury patients (78.75 pg/mL and 96.00 pg/mL, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis in cardiac arrest patients identified only the S-100B level measured 12 hrs after study entry as an independent predictor for unfavorable neurologic outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale score. In contrast, S-100B as well as interleukin-8 levels quantified 12 hrs after admission significantly predicted an unfavorable neurologic course in the traumatic brain injury group. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly elevated S-100B and interleukin-8 serum levels 12 hrs after cardiac arrest suggest that primary brain damage and systemic inflammatory response are comparably serious with that of traumatic brain injury. In both collectives, increased S-100B values measured 12 hrs after insult correlated well with an unfavorable neurologic outcome after 12 months.