Ambulatory sedation for children under 6 years with CHD in MRI and CT.

INTRODUCTION: In infants and young children, good image quality in MRI and CT requires sedation or general anesthesia to prevent motion artefacts. This study aims to determine the safety of ambulatory sedation for children with CHD in an outpatient setting as a feasible alternative to in-hospital management. METHODS: We recorded 91 consecutive MRI and CT examinations of patients with CHD younger than 6 years with ambulatory sedation. CHD diagnoses, vital signs, applied sedatives, and adverse events during or after ambulatory sedation were investigated. RESULTS: We analysed 91 patients under 72 months (6 years) of age (median 26.0, range 1-70 months; 36% female). Sixty-eight per cent were classified as ASA IV, 25% as ASA III, and 7% as ASA II (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification). Ambulatory sedation was performed by using midazolam, propofol, and/or S-ketamine. The median sedation time for MRI was 90 minutes (range 35-235 minutes) and 65 minutes for CT (range 40-280 minutes). Two male patients (age 1.5 months, ASA II, and age 17 months, ASA IV) were admitted for in-hospital observation due to unexpected severe airway obstruction. The patients were discharged without sequelae after 1 and 3 days, respectively. All other patients were sent home on the day of examination. CONCLUSION: In infants and young children with CHD, MRI or CT imaging can be performed under sedation in an outpatient setting by a well-experienced team. In-hospital backup should be available for unexpected events.

Early Outcome in Patients Requiring Conversion to General Anesthesia During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (tf-TAVI) has become an established therapy-option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Conscious sedation (CS) has proven to be an alternative to general anesthesia . So far, the outcome of patients undergoing unplanned periprocedural conversion from CS to general anesthesia has not been investigated. All patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in CS between 2014 and 2019 were included. The primary end point was early safety at 30 days according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. The reasons for conversion and length of ICU-/ hospital stay were further analyzed. Of 1,058 included patients 35 (3.3%) required a conversion. The end point was documented in 13 (37%) of the converted and 110 (11%) of nonconverted patients (p < 0.001). The causes were: unrest in 11/35 patients, procedural complications in 10/35 patients, respiratory distress in 8/35, and cardiovascular decompensation in 6 patients (17.1%). Compared with the group without conversion (Median (interquartile range ), 4 [4-5] days), length of hospital stay was longest in the group with procedural complications (6 [1-11] days) followed by cardiovascular decompensation (5 [4-7] days). In conclusion, the conversion rate to general anesthesia was low in a large cohort of unselected transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients. Additionally, hospital stay was longer dependent on the reason for conversion.

Assessing the level of radiation experienced by anesthesiologists during transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and protection by a lead cap.

OBJECTIVE: Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become a standard therapy for patients with aortic valve stenosis. Fluoroscopic imaging is essential for TAVI with the anesthesiologist's workplace close to patient's head side. While the use of lead-caps has been shown to be useful for interventional cardiologists, data are lacking for anesthesiologists. METHODS: A protective cap with a 0.35 lead-equivalent was worn on 15 working days by one anesthesiologist. Six detectors (three outside, three inside) were analyzed to determine the reduction of radiation. Literature search was conducted between April and October 2018. RESULTS: In the observational period, 32 TAVI procedures were conducted. A maximum radiation dose of 0.55 mSv was detected by the dosimeters at the outside of the cap. The dosimeters inside the cap, in contrast, displayed a constant radiation dose of 0.08 mSv. CONCLUSION: The anesthesiologist's head is exposed to significant radiation during TAVI and it can be protected by wearing a lead-cap.

Critical adverse events during transfemoral TAVR in conscious sedation. Is an anesthesiologic support mandatory?

BACKGROUND: Transfemoral TAVR (tf-TAVR) under conscious sedation (CS) has become popular. The need of anesthesiologic support during tf-TAVR has been questioned. Critical events during the procedure might require immediate action. We analyzed the frequency of periprocedural critical adverse events (CAE) during tf-TAVR with CS in our institution. METHODS: Tf-TAVR has been performed at our institution since 2007. We excluded patients from the first four years to minimize the influence of any learning curve. CAE were defined as occurrence of 1.) "CPR", 2.) "defibrillation", 3.) "emergency extracorporeal circulation (ECC)" and 4.) "conversion to general anesthesia (GA) not related to 1.)-3.)". Data was prospectively collected in our AVIATOR TAVR registry. RESULTS: 601 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Overall, CAE were recorded in 54 patients (9%). CPR was necessary in 12 patients (2%) and defibrillation in 10 patients (1.6%). ECC was rarely needed (n = 2, 0.3%). Conversion to GA was necessary in 34 patients (5.65%). Procedure-related conversion was necessary in 10 patients. With 24 patients, sedation-related conversion occurred more frequently. Unrest and pain were the most common reasons for conversion (n = 13, 2%) and respiratory distress in 11 patients (2%). Catecholaminergic support was needed in 269 (45%) patients. Vasopressors were more often applied (n = 249, 41%) than inotropes (n = 59, 10%). CONCLUSION: Even in a high-volume center, CAE may occur in nearly every tenth patient. Conversion to GA was the most common CAE. Catecholaminergic support (primary vasopressor support) was needed in nearly every second patient. These points underline the necessity of a cardiac anaesthesiologist to be in the room during the procedure. SUMMARY: Despite experience, critical adverse events (CAE) still occur in TAVR patients. We analyzed the occurrence of CAE and the need for catecholaminergic support in sedated TAVR patients.

Pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime in infants and neonates undergoing cardiac surgery.

AIMS: Very little data exist regarding the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on cefuroxime (CXM) pharmacokinetics in children less than one year of age. METHODS: 50 mg kg-1 CXM i.v. after induction were followed by 75 mg kg-1 into the CPB circuit. In 42 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 15-20 samples were obtained between 5 and 360 min after the first dose. Total CXM concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling was performed. RESULTS: Using a fixed protein binding of 15.6% for CXM, peak plasma concentrations of unbound CXM were 229 ± 52 µg ml-1 after the first bolus and 341 ± 86 µg ml-1 on CPB. Nadir concentrations before CPB were 69 ± 20 µg ml-1 and six hours later decreased to 41 ± 19 µg ml-1 with and 24 ± 14 µg ml-1 without CPB. A two-compartment model was fitted with the main covariates body weight, CPB and postmenstrual age (PMA). PK parameters were as follows: systemic clearance, 5.15 [95% CI 4.5-5.8] l h-1 ; central volume of distribution, 11.25 [9.41-13.09] l; intercompartmental clearance, 18.19 [14.79-21.58] l h-1 ; and peripheral volume, 17.07 [15.7-18.5] L. ƒT > MIC of 32 µg ml-1 for an 8-h time period was between 70 and 100% (2.5-10 kg BW). According to our simulation, 25 mg ml-1 CXM as a primary bolus and into the prime plus a 5 mg kg-1  h-1 infusion maintain CXM concentrations continuously above 32 µg ml-1 . CONCLUSIONS: The routine dosing regimen provided was sufficient for prophylaxis, but continuous dosing can provide a higher percentage of ƒT > MIC.

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol-opioid for sedation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients: a retrospective analysis of periprocedural gas exchange and hemodynamic support.

PURPOSE: Different sedation regimens have been described for use during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tf-TAVI) for treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The purpose of this study was to compare dexmedetomidine (DEX) with a combination of propofol-opioid (PO) with respect to periprocedural gas exchange and hemodynamic support. METHODS: Data from a cohort of patients sedated with either DEX or PO for tf-TAVI were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained TAVI registry. Operative risk was determined from comorbidities and risk scores. Periprocedural partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was chosen as the primary endpoint. Other differences in gas exchange, need for catecholamine therapy, the frequency of conversion to general anesthesia, and need for sedative "rescue therapy" (in DEX patients) were secondary endpoints. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used for analysis to minimize any selection bias. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients (140 PO, 157 DEX) included, the median [interquartile range] periprocedural PaCO2 values of DEX patients were significantly lower than in PO patients (40 [36-45] mmHg vs 44 [40-49] mmHg, respectively; median difference -4 mmHg; 95% confidence interval, -5 to -3 mmHg; P < 0.001). Hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 45 mmHg) was significantly less frequent in DEX patients compared with the PO group (25% vs 42%, respectively; P = 0.005). Vasopressor support was more frequent in the PO group compared with DEX (68% vs 25%, respectively; P < 0.001). Conversion to general anesthesia was not different between groups (9%, PO vs 3%, DEX; P = 0.051). Additional sedatives/opioids were required in 25 (16%) of the DEX patients. CONCLUSIONS: In sedated TAVI patients, DEX was associated with lower PaCO2 values and reduced requirements for vasopressor support, making it a promising alternative to PO for sedation during TAVI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01390675). Registered 11 July 2011.

Periprocedural transfusion in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this investigation was to identify patient's characteristics and periprocedural variables related to periprocedural transfusion in transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (tf-TAVI). BACKGROUND: Transfusion of allogenic red-blood cells (RBC) in tf-TAVI and the number of transfused units has been linked to an increased 30-day mortality. In line with the trend of minimization and cost-effectiveness, transfusion should be avoided, wherever possible. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2015, 1,734 procedures were analyzed from our prospective registry for RBC-transfusion. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify the dependent variables. RESULTS: Transfusion was considered necessary in 14% (n = 243) of the patients. Female gender (OR [95% CI]) (1.680 [1.014-2.783]) and preprocedural moderate (7.594 [4.404-13.095]) and severe anemia (8.202 [0.900-74.752]) according to WHO were the most important preprocedural variables. Periprocedural, pericardial effusion (12.109 [3.753-39.063]), emergency extracorporeal circulation (54.5288 [6.178-481.259]) and major vascular injury (2.647 [1.412-4.962]) were related to transfusion. The same applies to moderate (4.255 [1.859-9.740]) and severe anemia (31.567 [8.560-116.416]) as well as periprocedural experience (0.072 [0.035-0.149] - 0.141[0.079-0.251], P < 0.001) CONCLUSION: Procedural experience, serious adverse events, low pre- and periprocedural Hb levels and female gender were the main variables relating to transfusion. Even in experienced high-volume centers, transfusion is still necessary in a considerable number of patients.

Pharmacokinetics of tranexamic acid in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery.

AIM: Tranexamic acid (TXA) continues to be one of the antifibrinolytics of choice during paediatric cardiac surgery. However, in infants less than 1 year of age, the optimal dosing based on pharmacokinetic (PK) considerations is still under discussion. METHODS: Forty-three children less than 1 year of age were enrolled, of whom 37 required the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and six were operated on without CPB. Administration of 50 mg kg-1 TXA intravenously at the induction of anaesthesia was followed by 50 mg kg-1 into the CPB prime in the CPB group. Plasma concentrations of TXA were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. PK data were investigated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: A two-compartment model was fitted, with the main covariates being allometrically scaled bodyweight, CPB, postmenstrual age (PMA). Intercompartmental clearance (Q), peripheral volume (V2), systemic clearance, (CL) and the central volume (V1) were calculated. Typical values of the PK parameter estimates were as follows: CL = 3.78 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.52, 5.05] l h-1 ; central volume of distribution = 13.6 (CI 11.7, 15.5) l; Q = 16.3 (CI 13.5, 19.2) l h-1 ; V2 = 18.0 (CI 16.1, 19.9) l. Independently of age, 10 mg kg-1 TXA as a bolus, a subsequent infusion of 10 mg kg-1 h-1 , then a 4 mg kg-1 bolus into the prime and a reduced infusion of 4 mg kg-1 h-1 after the start of CPB are required to maintain TXA concentrations continuously above 20 µg ml-1 , the threshold value for an effective inhibition of fibrinolysis and far lower than the usual peak concentrations (the '10-10-4-4 rule'). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a modified dosing regimen using a starting bolus followed by an infusion and a CPB prime bolus would prohibit the potential risk of seizures caused by high peak concentrations and also maintain therapeutic plasma concentration above 20 µg ml-1 .

The effect of cyanosis on perioperative platelet function as measured by multiple electrode aggregometry and postoperative blood loss in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Platelet dysfunction is one of the major haematological disturbances of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In addition, cyanosis is known to cause further coagulation disturbances. METHODS: We prospectively studied 110 children under 1 year of age for the effects of cyanosis on baseline platelet aggregation, the time course of function on cardiopulmonary bypass, the effect on chest tube drainage (CTD) and the transfusion requirements. Using multiple electrode aggregometry (MULTIPLATE™) with the activators adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thrombin-related activation peptide (TRAP), platelet aggregation was assessed and examined for predictive value. RESULTS: Neonates under 30 days of age (n = 51) and infants (n = 59) were separated for analysis. Cyanosis had no significant effect on platelet function during the first 24 h after surgery. Similarly, there was no association to perioperative platelet function, CTD or exposures to blood products. ADP after protamine correlated significantly with the total number of exposures for neonates and infants and CTD at 6 h in the newborn group. Upon intensive care unit admission, ADP values correlated to the total number of exposures to blood products. No other platelet function value was able to clinically predict CTD or subsequent blood transfusion requirements. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, we observed no clinically significant effect of cyanosis on baseline and the perioperative course of platelet function, CTD and the number of exposures to blood products. Therefore, children under 1 year of age do not require a different approach with regard to platelet transfusions, independent of cyanosis. Clinically, platelet function was not a reliable predictor of CTD or blood transfusion requirements.

The perioperative course of factor XIII and associated chest tube drainage in newborn and infants undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative acquired factor XIII deficiency has been looked upon as a potential cause of postoperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-four infants were prospectively studied for the time course of factor XIII in plasma and the effect on chest tube drainage (CTD) and transfusion requirements in the first 24 h after surgery. A reconstituted blood prime (RBP) with fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and packed red blood cells (PRBC) was used. Samples were taken at baseline, after cardiopulmonary bypass and upon arrival in the ICU. Differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements based on a cutoff value of 70% factor XIII activity at the time of ICU admission were also calculated. RESULTS: Baseline factor XIII activity was 79%, decreased to 71% after CPB (P = 0.102) and increased back up to 77% at ICU arrival (P = 0.708). There was no significant correlation between factor XIII, CTD, age, cyanosis, platelet count, and transfusion requirements at any time point. Only preoperative fibrinogen levels correlated significantly with factor XIII activity. Perioperative blood transfusions (PRBC P = 0.712, FFP P = 0.909, platelets P = 0.807) and chest tube losses (P = 0.424 at 6 h and P = 0.215 at 24 h) were not significantly different above or below a 70% factor XIII activity at ICU arrival. CONCLUSION: Factor XIII activity in infants with congenital heart defects is within the lower range of normal adults, independent of patient's age and the presence of cyanosis. Reconstituted blood prime maintains factor XIII activity at sufficient levels during pediatric cardiac surgery. We could not detect a correlation between FXIII and CTD.

Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Although cephalosporins are recommended as primary agents, moxifloxacin may be a suitable second-line antibiotic in cardiac surgery, especially if additional Gram-negative coverage is warranted. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs in numerous ways. Since no such data exist, the aim of this study was to assess the serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Fourteen coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients received an intravenous infusion of 400 mg moxifloxacin as peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis. At 15 time points throughout a 24-h period, serum samples were obtained to measure moxifloxacin concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis, i.e. area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), volume of distribution at steady state (V(SS)), drug clearance (CL), elimination half-life (t(1/2)) and mean residence time (MRT), was performed in five patients. Apart from a slight transient decrease in moxifloxacin concentration at the onset, CPB did not affect the concentration-time curve. Mean ± standard deviation maximum drug concentration (C(max)) (5.12 ± 1.58 µg/mL), AUC (36.5 ± 5.40 µgh/mL), VSS (2.03 ± 0.30 L/kg), CL (11.2 ± 1.91 L/h), t(1/2) (9.47 ± 0.92 h) and MRT (12.9 ± 1.52 h) were comparable with historical data for healthy volunteers. We conclude that CPB does not alter the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin. No dose adjustments, especially with regard to the CPB circuit and its priming volume, are necessary in cardiac surgical patients.

Neither moxifloxacin nor cefuroxime produces significant attenuation of inflammatory mediator release in patients exposed to cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: In vitro and experimental studies in animals have established the anti-inflammatory effects of moxifloxacin. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to an inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to assess whether the inflammatory cytokine response to CPB is reduced with a perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, either moxifloxacin or cefuroxime (the standard prophylaxis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with CPB were randomly assigned to receive either moxifloxacin or cefuroxime as the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Interleukin (IL)-6, -8, -10 and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) serum concentrations were determined at eight time points before and after CPB. RESULTS: In both groups, all cytokine concentrations significantly increased after the start of CPB. There were no statistically significant differences between the moxifloxacin and cefuroxime groups at any point; IL-6 concentrations [median (interquartile range)] 240 min after CPB, the primary endpoint, were 364 (192-598) and 465 (325-906) pg/mL (P = 0.323), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neither moxifloxacin nor cefuroxime produced significant attenuation of the inflammatory cytokine response to CPB. The reasons why moxifloxacin did not have significant anti-inflammatory effects in this unique clinical situation may be: (i) the inflammatory response to CPB may be different from that of infectious disease states that were used to establish the immunomodulatory effects of moxifloxacin; and (ii) a single intravenous dose, which was used in this investigation, may not lead to high enough plasma and intracellular concentrations.

Are the point-of-care diagnostics MULTIPLATE and ROTEM valid in the setting of high concentrations of heparin and its reversal with protamine?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro effects of high concentrations of heparin and its reversal with protamine on routine laboratory parameters as well as on modified thromboelastogram (ROTEM; TEM International, Munich, Germany) and impedance aggregometry (MULTIPLATE; Dynabyte, Munich, Germany). DESIGN: An observational, nonrandomized in vitro study. SETTING: A single-center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Heparinization of whole blood to levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 IU/mL of heparin and reversal with protamine. For MULTIPLATE measurements, heparin levels up to 20 IU/mL were tested. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The present results show that the prothrombin time (PT) and fibrinogen measurements are altered significantly by heparin concentrations above 2 IU/mL. Protamine reversal also affected coagulation tests except for the fibrinogen. The INTEM test using the ROTEM system was influenced significantly by heparin concentrations of 2 IU/mL or higher, whereas EXTEM measurements remained stable up to 4 IU/mL. The findings for the FIBTEM test were stable up to 6 IU/mL but then declined to values less than 50% of baseline at 8 IU/mL. HEPTEM results remained valid under all concentrations of heparin tested. The effect of protamine on ROTEM was seen mainly in the INTEM and HEPTEM measurements. Heparin concentrations up to a level of 20 U/mL had no effect on MULTIPLATE measurements. Effects of protamine on MULTIPLATE became significant at heparin-to-protamine ratios below 1:1 and were more pronounced for adenosine diphosphate than for thrombin receptor-activated protein testing. CONCLUSIONS: Neither fibrinogen (Clauss) nor derived fibrinogen or FIBTEM testing is valid in the setting of high concentrations of heparin unless antagonized by heparinase. Reversal of heparin with protamine worsens platelet function at all ratios as detected by aggregometry (MULTIPLATE) and thromboelastography (ROTEM), starting at a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, appropriate coagulation testing under cardiopulmonary bypass conditions should be selected carefully according to heparin levels. In particular, fibrinogen values are falsely low at heparin levels of 2 IU/mL and above. Therefore, newer algorithms promoting the correction of fibrinogen levels on cardiopulmonary bypass should be based on appropriate testing.

Seizures after open heart surgery: comparison of ε-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid.

OBJECTIVE: Although the lysine analogs tranexamic acid (TXA) and aminocaproic acid (EACA) are used widely for antifibrinolytic therapy in cardiac surgery, relatively little research has been performed on their safety profiles, especially in the setting of cardiac surgery. Two antifibrinolytic protocols using either TXA or aminocaproic acid were compared according to postoperative outcome. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred four patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: One cohort of 275 consecutive patients received TXA; a second cohort of 329 consecutive patients was treated with EACA. Except for antifibrinolytic therapy, the anesthetic and surgical teams and their protocols remained unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Besides major outcome criteria, namely postoperative bleeding, the need for allogeneic transfusions, operative revision because of bleeding, postoperative renal dysfunction, neurologic events, heart failure, and in-hospital mortality, the authors specifically sought differences between the groups concerning seizures. The 2 cohorts were comparable over a range of perioperative factors. Postoperative seizures occurred significantly more frequently in TXA patients (7.6% v 3.3%, p = 0.019), whereas EACA patients had a higher incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction (20.0% v 30.1%, p = 0.005). There were no differences in all other measured major outcome factors. CONCLUSION: Both lysine analogs are associated with significant side effects, which must be taken into account when performing risk-benefit analyses of their use. Their use should be restricted to patients at high risk for bleeding; routine use on low-risk patients undergoing standard surgeries should face renewed critical reappraisal.

Tranexamic acid versus ɛ-aminocaproic acid: efficacy and safety in paediatric cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Tranexamic acid (TXA) and ɛ-aminocaproic acid (EACA) are used for antifibrinolytic therapy in cardiac surgery, although data directly comparing their blood sparing effect and their side effects, especially in paediatric cardiac surgical patients, are still missing. METHODS: We analysed perioperative data of 234 paediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg undergoing cardiac surgery. In a 5-month period, all patients (n=114) received TXA (group TXA). During a second 5-month period, all patients (n=120) were treated with EACA (group EACA). Primary outcome was blood loss at 24h postoperatively; secondary outcome criteria were transfusion requirement, rate of revision for bleeding, postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: All descriptive and intra-operative parameters were well comparable. There was no evidence for a difference in blood loss at 24h postoperatively (TXA 21 ml kg(-1) (14-38) (median (interquartile range)) vs EACA 29 ml kg(-1) (14-40), p=0.242), rate of re-operation for bleeding (TXA 9.6% vs EACA 8.3%, p=0.725) and transfusion of blood products. The incidence of postoperative complications such as seizures (TXA 3.5% vs EACA 0.8%, p=0.203) and other neurological complications (TXA 2.6% vs EACA 1.7%, p=0.677), renal injury (TXA 9.6% vs EACA 13.3%, p=0.378), renal failure (TXA 1.8% vs EACA 4.2%, p=0.447), low cardiac output syndrome (TXA 12.3% vs EACA 10.8%, p=0.729), and vascular thrombosis (TXA 4.4% vs EACA 5.0%, p=0.824), as well as the in-hospital mortality (TXA 2.6% vs EACA 3.3%, p>0.999) did not show any statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: TXA and EACA are well comparable in their effect on perioperative blood loss as well as in major clinical outcome criteria. Although the fourfold risk for seizures using TXA was not significant, we currently use EACA in paediatric cardiac surgery.

Efficiency and safety of preoperative autologous blood donation in cardiac surgery: a matched-pair analysis in 432 patients.

OBJECTIVE: A shortage of blood products is predicted for the near future in many countries all over the world. Preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) in cardiac surgery is considered an option to reduce the need of allogeneic blood products. We analysed a 1-year period of our institutional database according to the safety and efficiency of our autologous blood donation programme. METHODS: All patients who donated autologous blood prior to cardiac surgery were matched to a non-donor according to age, body weight, body mass index, sex, haemoglobin concentration, EuroSCORE, antifibrinolytic therapy and risk for bleeding. We analysed the occurrence of adverse effects during donation in all donors as well as the main perioperative data, haemoglobin levels and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in all patients. RESULTS: There were no major cardiac events such as myocardial infarction, worsened cardiac insufficiency or death in the donor group during the PABD process. A total of 216 patients could be matched. Exposure to allogeneic blood products was significantly reduced in the donor group (packed red cells 70 patients (pts) vs 118 pts (p<0.001), fresh frozen plasma 26 pts vs 54 pts (p=0.001), platelets 10 pts vs 22 pts (p=ns)). There were no reports of transfusion-related side effects. Further, there was no difference in haemoglobin concentrations at postoperative day 1 and at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this large matched-pair analysis without the need for risk stratification, PABD reduces the need for allogeneic blood products in adult cardiac surgery. In a carefully selected cohort, PABD is a safe and efficient alternative to allogeneic transfusion.