The impact of age on risk assessment, therapeutic practice and outcome in candidemia.

BACKGROUND: In Norway, the epidemiological situation of candidemia is followed closely. We have previously demonstrated the highest incidence of candidemia in elderly >65 years of age. However, knowledge of other aspects of this infection is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this nationwide, retrospective study was to examine risk factors, therapeutic practice and outcome in adult candidemia patients according to age. METHODS: We retrieved data from medical records from patients who developed candidemia in Norway between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012. Data were analyzed according to age, younger patients being between 18 and 65 years, elderly being ≥65 years of age. RESULTS: From 771 eligible patients, 738 patients (95.7%) were included (58% men, mean age 65.2 years, 58.1% being ≥65 years). Exposure to health-care related risk factors for candidemia were significantly more common in the younger patients (neutropenia, central venous catheter, mechanical ventilation and chemotherapy) who received empirical treatment more often than the elderly (29.8% vs. 21.7%, p = .01). More elderly did not received any antifungal therapy (27.3% vs 16.8%, p < 0001) and had higher mortality compared to younger patients (45.5% vs 23.9%, p < .0001). In the study population, mortality was higher with age (per 10-years increase, OR 1.43;1.28-1.59, p < 0.0001), in patients not receiving targeted therapy (OR 2.5; CI 1.82-3.36, p < .0001) or any therapy at all (OR 4.64; 3.23-6.68, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for candidemia, treatment and outcome differed significantly according to age. Given the increasing numbers of elderly, scrutiny on our clinical practice is warranted.

Tularaemia in Norwegian dogs.

We describe tularaemia in a Norwegian dog caused by Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica. A Hamilton Hound and his owner developed tulaeremia after hunting an infected mountain hare (Lepus timidus). The dog showed signs of lethargy, anorexia and fever during a period two to four days after hunting and thereafter fully recovered. Its antibody titers increased 32-fold from one to three weeks post exposure. Thereafter, the titer declined and leveled off at moderate positive values up to one year after exposure (end of study). This is believed to be the first case report of clinical F. tularensis subspecies holarctica infection in a European dog. In 2011, enormous numbers of Norway lemmings (Lemmus lemmus) occurred in Finnmark, the northernmost county of Norway and many dogs caught and swallowed lemmings. Some of these dogs developed non-specific signs of disease and the owners consulted a veterinary surgeon, who suspected tularaemia. In order to investigate this hypothesis, serum samples from 33 dogs were examined for antibodies to F. tularensis. The dogs were allocated into three groups: Dogs from Finnmark that became sick (Group 1) or remained healthy following contact with lemmings (Group 2), and healthy control dogs from Oslo without known contact with lemmings (Group 3). All the serum samples were analyzed with a tube agglutination assay. Among dogs exposed to lemmings, 10/11 and 3/12 were antibody positive in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, whereas none of the control dogs (n=10) were positive for antibodies against F. tularensis. These results strongly indicate that the non-specific disease seen in the dogs in Finnmark was linked to F. tularensis infection acquired through contact with lemmings.