Ventilator Management in Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis: A Case Report.

The initiation of mechanical ventilation in the setting of profound metabolic acidosis can be a particular challenge in the transport environment. The classic teaching is that patients with severe acidemia should not be intubated, if possible, because they are often able to better maintain their own compensatory minute ventilation compared with clinician management with the mechanical ventilator. In this case, a patient had profound metformin-associated lactic acidosis with a pH of 6.51 and required intubation for deteriorating mental status with an inability to protect her airway. Maintaining adequate minute ventilation can be directly in conflict with the evidence-based approach of low tidal volume ventilation for all patients. When patients have profound metabolic acidosis without evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, increasing the tidal volume slightly to allow for more efficient respiration can be an effective strategy to maintain acid-base status.

Timing of Transport of Patients with COVID-19.

RATIONALE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of mortality or ECMO cannulation for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 transferred from sending hospitals to receiving tertiary care centers as a function of the duration of time at the sending hospital. OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who were transferred to tertiary or quarternary care medical centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of critical care transports of patients to one of seven consortium tertiary care centers from March 1, 2020, through September 4, 2020. Age 14 years and older with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 transported from a sending hospital to a receiving tertiary care center by the critical care transport organization. RESULTS: Patients transported with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 to tertiary care centers had a mortality rate of 38.0%. Neither the number of days admitted, nor the number of days intubated at the sending hospital correlated with mortality (correlation coefficient 0.051 and -0.007, respectively). Similarly, neither the number of days admitted, nor number of days intubated at the sending hospital correlated with ECMO cannulation (correlation coefficient 0.008 and -0.036, respectively). CONCLUSION: It may be reasonable to transfer a critically ill COVID-19 patient to a tertiary care center even if they have been admitted at the sending hospital for several days.

Interfacility Transport of Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess recent advances in interfacility critical care transport. DATA SOURCES: PubMed English language publications plus chapters and professional organization publications. STUDY SELECTION: Manuscripts including practice manuals and standard (1990-2021) focused on interfacility transport of critically ill patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Review of society guidelines, legislative requirements, objective measures of outcomes, and transport practice standards occurred in work groups assessing definitions and foundations of interfacility transport, transport team composition, and transport specific considerations. Qualitative analysis was performed to characterize current science regarding interfacility transport. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Task Force conducted an integrative review of 496 manuscripts combined with 120 from the authors' collections including nonpeer reviewed publications. After title and abstract screening, 40 underwent full-text review, of which 21 remained for qualitative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2004, there have been numerous advances in critical care interfacility transport. Clinical deterioration may be mitigated by appropriate patient selection, pretransport optimization, and transport by a well-resourced team and vehicle. There remains a dearth of high-quality controlled studies, but notable advances in monitoring, en route management, transport modality (air vs ground), as well as team composition and training serve as foundations for future inquiry. Guidance from professional organizations remains uncoupled from enforceable regulations, impeding standardization of transport program quality assessment and verification.

Postintubation Sedation After a Formulary Change From Succinylcholine to Rocuronium in a Critical Care Transport Organization.

OBJECTIVE: Rocuronium is increasingly used as a first-line neuromuscular blocker (NMB) in rapid sequence intubation by transport teams. Prior work has shown that rocuronium is associated with a delay in postintubation sedation compared with intubation with succinylcholine. METHODS: Boston MedFlight is a consortium-based transport organization. In 2017, the intubation protocol and formulary for Boston MedFlight was changed to replace succinylcholine with rocuronium. We performed a retrospective review of patients intubated by the critical care transport teams from January 2017 through December 2019. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 264 intubations, 92 with succinylcholine and 172 with rocuronium. Ketamine and etomidate were the most common induction agents. The mean time from NMB administration to the first dose of sedation was 9.2 minutes (95% confidence interval, 5.4-23.7) for the succinylcholine cohort and 14.8 minutes (95% confidence interval, 8.4-38.0; P < .001) for the rocuronium cohort. After neuromuscular blockade, the total hourly weight-adjusted fentanyl dose was significantly lower for patients intubated with rocuronium compared with succinylcholine. CONCLUSIONS: Intubation with rocuronium was associated with a longer time until the administration of sedation and decreased postneuromuscular blockade fentanyl administration compared with intubation with succinylcholine. These findings suggest opportunities for improvement in sedation and analgesia practices after rocuronium rapid sequence intubation.

Evaluation of a COVID-19 emergency department observation protocol.

OBJECTIVES: Caring for patients with COVID-19 has resulted in a considerable strain on hospital capacity. One strategy to mitigate crowding is the use of ED-based observation units to care for patients who may have otherwise required hospitalization. We sought to create a COVID-19 Observation Protocol for our ED Observation Unit (EDOU) for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 to allow emergency physicians (EP) to gather more data for or against admission and intervene in a timely manner to prevent clinical deterioration. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study which included all patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of EDOU placement for the primary purpose of monitoring COVID-19 disease. Our institution updated the ED Observation protocol partway into the study period. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics. We assessed for differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between admitted and discharged patients. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess whether meeting criteria for the ED observation protocols predicted disposition. RESULTS: During the time period studied, 120 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were placed in the EDOU for the primary purpose of monitoring COVID-19 disease. The admission rate for patients in the EDOU during the study period was 35%. When limited to patients who met criteria for version 1 or version 2 of the protocol, this dropped to 21% and 25% respectively. Adherence to the observation protocol was 62% and 60% during the time of version 1 and version 2 implementation, respectively. Using a multivariate logistic regression, meeting criteria for either version 1 (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.34-7.53, p < 0.01) or version 2 (OR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.39-7.30, p < 0.01) of the protocol resulted in a higher likelihood of discharge. There was no difference in EDOU LOS between admitted and discharged patients. CONCLUSION: An ED observation protocol can be successfully created and implemented for COVID-19 which allows the EP to determine which patients warrant hospitalization. Meeting protocol criteria results in an acceptable admission rate.

A Case of Bleeding During Infection With COVID-19.

Dr. Patrick Lowe: Our case today is that of a 47-year-old woman who was referred to our emergency department (ED) due to bloody urine, dark tarry stools, red spots on her skin, and bruising throughout her body. Fourteen days prior to presentation, she began exhibiting intermittent fevers, headache, shortness of breath, and a dry cough, and she tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 pneumonia). Over the 3 days prior to her ED presentation, she experienced a headache that was more intense than the headaches she had been having in the preceding 2 weeks. She reported episodes of both dark urine as well as bright red blood in her urine. In addition, she had multiple dark stools described as tar-like when asked. On the day of her ED presentation, the patient noted a red rash throughout her body. In addition, earlier in the day, she had atraumatic self-limited epistaxis. She denied any falls or head strikes, vision changes, focal weakness or numbness, shortness of breath, chest pain, abdominal pain, or peripheral swelling.

Impact of Emergency Department Crowding on Discharged Patient Experience.

INTRODUCTION: While emergency department (ED) crowding has deleterious effects on patient care outcomes and operational efficiency, impacts on the experience for patients discharged from the ED are unknown. We aimed to study how patient-reported experience is affected by ED crowding to characterize which factors most impact discharged patient experience. METHODS: This institutional review board-exempt, retrospective, cohort study included all discharged adult ED patients July 1, 2020-June 30, 2021 with at least some response data to the the National Research Corporation Health survey, sent to most patients discharged from our large, academic medical center ED. Our query yielded 9,401 unique encounters for 9,221 patients. Based on responses to the summary question of whether the patient was likely to recommend our ED, patients were categorized as "detractors" (scores 0-6) or "non-detractors" (scores 7-10). We assessed the relationship between census and patient experience by 1) computing percentage of detractors within each care area and assessing for differences in census and boarder burden between detractors and non-detractors, and 2) multivariable logistic regression assessing the relationship between likelihood of being a detractor in terms of the ED census and the patient's last ED care area. A second logistic regression controlled for additional patient- and encounter-specific covariates. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 24.8%. Overall, 13.9% of responders were detractors. There was a significant difference in the average overall ED census for detractors (average 3.70 more patients physically present at the time of arrival, 95% CI 2.33-5.07). In unadjusted multivariable analyses, three lower acuity ED care areas showed statistically significant differences of detractor likelihood with changes in patient census. The overall area under the curve (AUC) for the unadjusted model was 0.594 (CI 0.577-0.610). The adjusted model had higher AUC (0.673, CI 0.657-.690]; P<0.001), with the same three care areas having significant differences in detractor likelihood based on patient census changes. Length of stay (OR 1.71, CI 1.50-1.95), leaving against medical advice/without being seen (OR 5.15, CI 3.84-6.89), and the number of ED care areas a patient visited (OR 1.16, CI 1.01-1.33) was associated with an increase in detractor likelihood. CONCLUSION: Patients arriving to a crowded ED and ultimately discharged are more likely to have negative patient experience. Future studies should characterize which variables most impact patient experience of discharged ED patients.

Clinical Policies and Procedures for Critical Care Transport during a Respiratory Pandemic.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic of 2020-2021 created unprecedented challenges for clinicians in critical care transport (CCT). These CCT services had to rapidly adjust their clinical approaches to evolving patient demographics, a preponderance of respiratory failure, and transport utilization stratagem. Organizations had to develop and implement new protocols and guidelines in rapid succession, often without the education and training that would have been involved pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). These changes were complicated by the need to protect crew members as well as to optimize patient care. Clinical initiatives included developing an awake proning transport protocol and a protocol to transport intubated proned patients. One service developed a protocol for helmet ventilation to minimize aerosolization risks for patients on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). While these clinical protocols were developed specifically for COVID-19, the growth in practice will enhance the care of patients with other causes of respiratory failure. Additionally, these processes will apply to future respiratory epidemics and pandemics.

Intensive care unit admission for patients with pulmonary hypertension presenting to U.S. Emergency Departments.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients seeking emergency care, resulting in high acuity presentations and resource utilization. The objective was to characterize the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for PH among adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) along with other important clinical outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from the State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) and State Inpatient Databases (SID) from two geographically separated U.S. states (New York and Nebraska). The primary outcome measure was admission to an ICU. Other measures of interest included the hospital admission rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, and rate of critical care procedures performed. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2014, in a sample of 34 million ED visits, patients with a diagnosis of PH accounted for 0.71% of all ED visits. Of the PH visits, 20.2% were admitted to the ICU, compared to 2.6% of all other visits (P < 0.001), with an aOR of 1.74 (95% CI 1. 72-1.76). The vast majority (94.6%) of PH patients were admitted to the hospital, compared to 20.5% for all other ED visits (P < 0.001). Hospital LOS and hospital-based mortality were higher in the PH group than for other ED patients. With the exception of invasive mechanical ventilation, a significantly higher percentage of patients with PH admitted to the ICU than other patients underwent all critical care procedures evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with PH who sought emergency care in U.S. EDs from 2010 to 2014 were significantly more likely to require ICU admission than all other patients. They were also significantly more likely to be admitted to the hospital than all other patients, had longer hospital LOS, increased risk of inpatient mortality, and underwent more critical care procedures. These findings indicate the high acuity of PH patients seeking emergency care and demonstrate the need for additional research into this population.

Critical Care Transport of Patients With COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Critical care transport is associated with a high rate of adverse events, and the risks and outcomes of transporting critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been previously described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of transports of subjects with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 from sending hospitals to tertiary care hospitals in Boston. Follow-up data were obtained for patients transported between March 1st and April 20th, 2020. RESULTS: Of 254 charts identified, 250 patients were transported. Nine patients (3.5%) had cardiac arrest prior to transport. Twenty-nine (11.6%) had hypotension, 22 (8.8%) had a critical desaturation, and 4 (1.6%) had both en route. Hospital follow-up data were available for 189 patients. Of those intubated during their hospitalization, 44 (25.0%) had died, 59 (33.5%) had been extubated, and 13 (17.6%) had been discharged alive. For the subgroup with prior cardiac arrest, follow-up data available for 6. Of these 6, 2 died and 4 (66.7%) have been discharged alive. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients with COVID-19 had an adverse event in transport. The in-hospital mortality rate was 25%, with a 33.5% extubation rate. Patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest prior to transport had a 66.7% discharge rate among those transported to consortium hospitals.

Emergency Department Management of Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Adults With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: While emergency physicians are familiar with the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure, management of mechanical ventilation and advanced therapies for oxygenation in the emergency department have become essential during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We review the current evidence on hypoxemia in COVID-19 and place it in the context of known evidence-based management of hypoxemic respiratory failure in the emergency department. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 causes mortality primarily through the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with hypoxemia arising from shunt, a mismatch of ventilation and perfusion. Management of patients developing ARDS should focus on mitigating derecruitment and avoiding volutrauma or barotrauma. CONCLUSIONS: High flow nasal cannula and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation have a more limited role in COVID-19 because of the risk of aerosolization and minimal benefit in severe cases, but can be considered. Stable patients who can tolerate repositioning should be placed in a prone position while awake. Once intubated, patients should be managed with ventilation strategies appropriate for ARDS, including targeting lung-protective volumes and low pressures. Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure can be beneficial. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators do not decrease mortality but may be given to improve refractory hypoxemia. Prone positioning of intubated patients is associated with a mortality reduction in ARDS and can be considered for patients with persistent hypoxemia. Neuromuscular blockade should also be administered in patients who remain dyssynchronous with the ventilator despite adequate sedation. Finally, patients with refractory severe hypoxemic respiratory failure in COVID-19 should be considered for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

ECMO and Right Ventricular Failure: Review of the Literature.

Right ventricular (RV) failure is the inability of the RV to maintain sufficient cardiac output in the setting of adequate preload, due to either intrinsic injury to the RV or increased afterload. Medical treatment of RV failure should include optimizing preload, augmenting contractility with vasopressors and inotropes, and considering inhaled pulmonary vasodilators. However, when medical therapies are insufficient, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is needed to maintain systemic and RV perfusion. The data on MCS for isolated RV failure are limited, but extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) appears to be the most efficient and effective modality. For patients with isolated RV failure from acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, veno-venous (VV) ECMO is an appropriate initial configuration, even if the patient is in shock. With primary RV injury or RV failure with concomitant left ventricle (LV) failure, however, venoarterial (VA) ECMO is indicated. Both modalities provide indirect support to the RV by reducing preload, reducing RV wall tension, and delivering oxygenated blood to the coronary circulation. Peripheral cannulation is required in VV-ECMO and is most commonly used in VA-ECMO, allowing for rapid cannulation even in emergencies. Changes in pulsatility on an arterial catheter waveform can indicate changes in clinical status including changes in myocardial function, inadequate preload, worsening RV failure, and excessive VA-ECMO support leading to an elevated LV afterload. Myocardial function may be improved by titration of inotropes or vasodilators, utilization of an Impella or an intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation support devices, or by changes in VA-ECMO support.

Changes in Oxygen Saturation and Mean Arterial Pressure With Inhaled Epoprostenol in Transport.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure have traditionally been considered one of the riskiest patient populations to transport, given the potential for desaturation with movement. We performed a retrospective cohort study to analyze our experience using inhaled epoprostenol in transport, with a primary objective of assessing change in the oxygen saturation throughout the transport. METHODS: The transport records of patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure or right heart failure, transported on inhaled epoprostenol, were reviewed. The primary outcome was the change in SpO2 from the start of the inhaled epoprostenol transport to the time of handover of care at the receiving institution. The secondary outcome was the change in the mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS: Comparing the initial SpO2 to the final, there was no significant difference in oxygenation between time 0 and the transfer of care at the receiving hospital at 91% versus 93% (interquartile range [IQR] 86.0-93.5 vs 87.5-96.0, P = .49). Comparing the SpO2 for those who had inhaled epoprostenol started by the transport team showed a larger change at 86% compared to 93% (IQR: 83.0-91.0 vs 86.5-94.5, P = .04). There was no change in the median MAP from time 0 to the end of the transport (77 vs 75 mm Hg, IQR, 67.5-84.8 vs 68.5-85.8, P = .70). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with severe cardiopulmonary compromise transported on inhaled epoprostenol had no significant change in their median oxygen saturations, with the overall population increasing from 91% to 93%. When inhaled epoprostenol was initiated by the transport team, the improvement was clinically and statistically significant with an increase in SpO2 from 86% to 93%, with a final oxygen saturation comparable to those who were on the medication at the time of the team's arrival.

Transport of a Nonintubated Prone Patient with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19.

With the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems have been facing an unprecedented, large-scale respiratory disaster. Prone positioning improves mortality in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure, including COVID-19. While this is effective for intubated patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, it has also been shown to be beneficial for non-intubated patients. Critical care transport (CCT) has become an essential component of combating COVID-19, frequently transporting patients to receive advanced respiratory therapies and distribute patients in concert with available resources. With increasing awake proning, CCT teams may encounter patients supported in the prone position. Historically, transporting in the prone position has not been embraced due to substantial risks of desaturation during transport. In this case report, we describe the first known report of transporting a non-intubated, critically ill COVID-19 patient in the prone position.