RESUMO
A clinical practice guideline on telerehabilitation was developed by an American Physical Therapy Association volunteer guideline development group consisting of international physical therapists and physiotherapists, a physician, and a consumer. The guideline was based on systematic reviews of current scientific literature, clinical information, and accepted approaches to telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice. Seven recommendations address the impact of, preparation for, and implementation of telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice. Research recommendations identify current gaps in knowledge. Overall, with shared decision-making between clinicians and patients to inform patients of service delivery options, direct and indirect costs, barriers, and facilitators of telerehabilitation, the evidence supports the use of telerehabilitation by physical therapists for both examination and intervention. The Spanish and Chinese versions of this clinical practice guideline, as well as the French version of the recommendations, are available as supplementary material (Suppl. Materials).
Assuntos
Telerreabilitação , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Especialidade de Fisioterapia/normas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas , FisioterapeutasRESUMO
AIMS: School-based physical therapists (SBPTs) rapidly transitioned to telehealth during the pandemic. This study explored the perceptions of, and strategies utilized by, SBPTs delivering therapy via telehealth. METHODS: Using a grounded theory qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were completed with 13 SBPTs. Interviews were transcribed and theme coded until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: The following themes emerged: supports and education, challenges, strategies promoting success, and the outcomes of telehealth. SBPTs overcame challenges including those associated with technology, communication, space, equipment, and examination. Coaching techniques, incorporation into the daily routine, and the sharing of demonstrations promoted success. Telehealth service delivery was perceived to improve communication with educational teams and families, improve efficiency and productivity, increase access to students, promote an appreciation of the family and home context, and enhance family engagement. SBPTs believe incorporating elements of telehealth in conjunction with in-person delivery is ideal. CONCLUSIONS: While the COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid transition to telehealth for SBPTs, lessons learned could have a long-lasting positive impact on school-based services. The benefits of telehealth should be considered in the delivery of school-based physical therapy services.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fisioterapeutas , Telemedicina , Humanos , Pandemias , Telemedicina/métodos , Modalidades de FisioterapiaAssuntos
Fisioterapeutas , Telemedicina , Criança , Humanos , Pandemias , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
AimsThe aim of this study was to examine regional differences in school-based physical therapy practice focusing on the attributes of the school-based physical therapists and students; service delivery approaches, activities, and interventions; and student outcomes. Recognition of regional practices may decrease unnecessary variations, and assist with therapist clinical decision making and efforts to implement evidence-informed practice.MethodsA secondary data analysis of the PT COUNTS data was performed to compare physical therapist and student attributes; service delivery, activities, and interventions; and student outcomes across the Northeast, Southeast, Central, and Northwest regions of the United States.ResultsDifferences in the physical therapist and student characteristics, service delivery, activities, and interventions existed across the regions. There were no regional differences in outcomes when controlling for student functional level.ConclusionRegional differences in school-based practices may be expected and indicative of the influence of contextual factors including state and local policies and procedures that shape school-based service delivery and the characteristics of the therapists and students. Regional differences in practices may not have been of sufficient clinical magnitude to alter outcomes. Physical therapists can use the findings to reflect upon their individual decision making and practices.