Cardiac evaluation in pregnant patients with dyspnea and palpitations.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of underlying cardiac disease in pregnancy can often be mistaken for common complaints because of normal physiological changes in pregnancy. Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with symptoms of palpitations and dyspnea can detect structural changes and identify high-risk features. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine transthoracic echocardiograms of perinatal individuals completed for palpitations or dyspnea to determine the frequency of identifying structural changes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all perinatal individuals with a transthoracic echocardiogram at a single academic center between October 1, 2017, and May 1, 2022. The indication for the echocardiogram, demographics, and clinical characteristics were recorded. Transthoracic echocardiograms with any abnormal findings noted in the transthoracic echocardiogram report were reviewed and categorized into findings of congenital heart disease, valvular disease, pericardial effusion, evidence of ischemia or wall motion abnormalities, abnormal diastolic or systolic function, and other. RESULTS: Of 539 transthoracic echocardiograms completed on 478 individuals who were pregnant or in the 12-week postpartum period, 96 (17.8%) had an indication of palpitations, and 32 (5.9%) had an indication of dyspnea. Abnormal findings were seen in 21.9% of patients with palpitations and in 34.4% of patients with dyspnea. In patients with palpitations who had abnormal findings, 33.3% had congenital heart disease; 33.3% had mild valvular disease, including mitral valve prolapse; 19.0% had a pericardial effusion; and 14.3% had evidence of ischemia or wall motion defects. Abnormal transthoracic echocardiogram findings in the dyspnea cohort included ischemia or wall motion defects (27.3%), mild valvular disease or mitral valve prolapse (36.4%), and abnormal systolic or diastolic function (36.4%). CONCLUSION: Many of the transthoracic echocardiograms completed for patients with dyspnea or palpitations identified no structural abnormality; however, in 1 of 3 to 1 of 4 patients, underlying structural heart disease was identified. Although some of these abnormalities were unlikely to change delivery plans, such as mild valvular disease or small effusions, other abnormalities, such as ischemia, congenital abnormalities, and abnormal systolic or diastolic function, were likely to have implications for pregnancy and postpartum management.

Development and validation of an electrocardiographic artificial intelligence model for detection of peripartum cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: This study used electrocardiogram data in conjunction with artificial intelligence methods as a noninvasive tool for detecting peripartum cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of an artificial intelligence-based heart failure detection model for peripartum cardiomyopathy detection. STUDY DESIGN: We first built a deep-learning model for heart failure detection using retrospective data at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. Cases were adult and nonpregnant female patients with a heart failure diagnosis; controls were adult nonpregnant female patients without heart failure. The model was then tested on an independent cohort of pregnant women at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center with or without peripartum cardiomyopathy. We also tested the model in an external cohort of pregnant women at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Key outcomes were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also repeated our analysis using only lead I electrocardiogram as an input to assess the feasibility of remote monitoring via wearables that can capture single-lead electrocardiogram data. RESULTS: The University of Tennessee Health Science Center heart failure cohort comprised 346,339 electrocardiograms from 142,601 patients. In this cohort, 60% of participants were Black and 37% were White, with an average age (standard deviation) of 53 (19) years. The heart failure detection model achieved an area under the curve of 0.92 on the holdout set. We then tested the ability of the heart failure model to detect peripartum cardiomyopathy in an independent University of Tennessee Health Science Center cohort of pregnant women and an external Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort of pregnant women. The independent University of Tennessee Health Science Center cohort included 158 electrocardiograms from 115 patients; our deep-learning model achieved an area under the curve of 0.83 (0.77-0.89) for this data set. The external Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort involved 80 electrocardiograms from 43 patients; our deep-learning model achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 (0.91-0.98) for this data set. For identifying peripartum cardiomyopathy diagnosed ≥10 days after delivery, the model achieved an area under the curve of 0.88 (0.81-0.94) for the University of Tennessee Health Science Center cohort and of 0.96 (0.93-0.99) for the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort. When we repeated our analysis by building a heart failure detection model using only lead-I electrocardiograms, we obtained similarly high detection accuracies, with areas under the curve of 0.73 and 0.93 for the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: Artificial intelligence can accurately detect peripartum cardiomyopathy from electrocardiograms alone. A simple electrocardiographic artificial intelligence-based peripartum screening could result in a timelier diagnosis. Given that results with 1-lead electrocardiogram data were similar to those obtained using all 12 leads, future studies will focus on remote screening for peripartum cardiomyopathy using smartwatches that can capture single-lead electrocardiogram data.

The association between decision and incision time by race and ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: Identifying and reducing inequities in the delivery of care is crucial to improving health disparities in obstetric outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the effect of race and ethnicity on time from decision for cesarean delivery to incision following implementation of a case classification system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify women who had cesarean deliveries from October 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, at a single, tertiary care institution. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and cesarean delivery case classification. Case classification was divided into STAT cesarean delivery (within 10 minutes), level A (within 30 minutes), level B (within 60 minutes), or scheduled/unscheduled other. The "decision to incision time" was determined from the time the case surgical order was placed to the case start time. RESULTS: There were 565 eligible individuals who had a cesarean delivery during the study period, with 13.6% identifying as Black/African American, 29.0% as Hispanic/Latina, and 57.3% as White. Hispanic women were more likely to need interpreter services than other race/ethnicity groups. There was no statistically significant difference in "decision to incision time" by race/ethnicity. Within the total cohort, 51.8% of cesarean delivery cases went within the goal time according to case classification, which also did not differ by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity do not impact cesarean delivery "decision to incision time" or case classification. Only half of cesarean deliveries went within the goal time, so further evaluation to improve workflow and improve this metric for all patients is needed.

Prenatal aneuploidy screening and its impact on stillbirth etiology evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth impacts 1% of all pregnancies in the USA with the underlying cause often remaining unknown. The objective of this study was to identify if prenatal aneuploidy screening impacted patient agreement to stillbirth evaluation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with a singleton stillbirth after 20 weeks of gestation between October 2017 and December 2021. Demographics and stillbirth evaluation were collected for all patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed adjusting for variables that were significant in univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 81 persons experienced stillbirth during the study period. Approximately 59.3% of patients had prenatal aneuploidy screening: 39.5% integrated screening, 37.5% non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and 22.9% quad screen. Prenatal genetic screening did not significantly impact patient agreement to placental pathology, serum laboratory evaluation, or fetal autopsy. Patients with NIPT were less likely to have genetic testing sent at the time of stillbirth compared to those with another aneuploidy screening (aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal aneuploidy screening was not associated with patient acceptance of stillbirth evaluation. However, patients with NIPT were less likely to pursue further genetic testing during stillbirth evaluation, so further education regarding the benefit of karyotype and microarray should be included in patient counseling.

Intrapartum continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs intravenous insulin infusion among pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum glucose management is critical to reducing neonatal hypoglycemia shortly after birth. Although it is known that insulin is required for all pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus, the optimal mode of intrapartum glycemic control is not known. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of intrapartum use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with that of intravenous insulin infusion for glucose management among pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus on neonatal blood glucose levels. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial of pregnant participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus. After written informed consent, participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 intrapartum insulin administration strategies: continuation of their continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intravenous insulin infusion. The primary outcome was the first neonatal blood glucose level. RESULTS: Between March 2021 and April 2023, 76 participants were approached, and 70 participants were randomized (35 participants in the intravenous insulin infusion group and 35 participants in the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion group). The groups were similar in terms of age, race/ethnicity, pregravid body mass index, nulliparity, and gestational age at delivery. There was no statistically significant difference in the first neonatal glucose measurement between the 2 groups (50.1±23.4 vs 49.2±22.6; P=.86). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in any secondary neonatal outcomes. Approximately 57.1% of neonates in the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion group required either oral, intravenous, or both treatments for hypoglycemia, whereas 51.4% of neonates in the intravenous infusion group required treatment. In both groups, 28.6% of neonates required intravenous treatment for hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus using either intravenous insulin infusion or continuation of their continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for intrapartum insulin administration had no difference in the primary outcome of neonatal hypoglycemia. Patients should be given the option of both glycemic management strategies intrapartum.

Intra-operative tumor spillage in minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer and its impact on recurrence risk.

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic impact of intra-operative tumor spillage (ITS) during minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer (EC) is not well studied. The objective of this study was to determine if there is an association between ITS and EC recurrence. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of patients with a laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy with EC on final pathology between 2017 and 2022 and compared those with (case) and without (control) a subsequent EC recurrence. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic, intra-operative and pathologic details, and recurrence status. ITS was defined as uterine perforation with a manipulator, presence of extra-uterine tumor after colpotomy or specimen delivery, exposure of uncontained specimen into peritoneum, and/or pathology/operative reports noting specimen fragmentation. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios for the association of cancer recurrence with ITS. We adjusted for >50% myoinvasion, tumor size, and adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: 1057 patients underwent MIS for EC. Approximately 8% (n = 86) developed recurrent cancer and 172 patients were selected as controls. Twenty percent of recurrent cases (17/86) had ITS compared with 4% of nonrecurrent controls (7/172). When adjusted for tumor size, deep myoinvasion, and adjuvant treatment, patients with ITS had a 5.6 times increased odds (aOR 5.63, 95% CI 1.52-20.86) of recurrence compared to patients without ITS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EC, we found an association between ITS and cancer recurrence. These findings warrant further investigation to determine if adjuvant therapy or surgical technique should be altered to improve outcomes.

Mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes by modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular risk in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac disease is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States, and an increasing number of patients with known cardiac disease are reaching childbearing age. Although guidelines indicate that cesarean deliveries should be reserved for obstetrical indications, rates of cesarean delivery among obstetrical patients with cardiovascular disease are higher than those of the general population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes among patients with low-risk and moderate to high-risk cardiac disease as defined by the modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular risk. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of obstetrical patients with known cardiac disease, as defined by the modified World Health Organization cardiovascular classification categories in pregnancy, who underwent a perinatal transthoracic echocardiogram at a single academic medical center between October 1, 2017 and May 1, 2022. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and perinatal outcomes were collected. Comparisons were made between patients with low- (modified World Health Organization Class I) and moderate to high-risk (modified World Health Organization Class II-IV) cardiac disease using chi-square, Fisher exact, or Student t-tests. Cohen d tests were used to estimate the effect size between group means. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the odds of vaginal and cesarean delivery in low- and moderate to high-risk groups. RESULTS: A total of 108 participants were eligible for inclusion, with 41 participants in the low-risk cardiac group and 67 in the moderate to high-risk group. Participants had a mean age of 32.1 (±5.5) years at the time of delivery and a mean pregravid body mass index of 29.9 (±7.8) kg/m2. Chronic hypertension (13.9%) and a history of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (14.9%) were the most common comorbid medical conditions. In total, 17.1% of the sample had a history of a cardiac event (eg, arrhythmia, heart failure, myocardial infarction). Rates of vaginal and cesarean deliveries were similar between the low- and moderate to high-risk cardiac groups. Patients in the moderate to high-risk cardiac group were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit during pregnancy (odds ratio, 7.8; P<.05) and experience severe maternal morbidity compared with patients in the low-risk cardiac group (P<.01). Mode of delivery was not associated with severe maternal morbidity in the higher-risk cardiac group (odds ratio, 3.2; P=.12). In addition, infants of mothers with higher-risk disease were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (odds ratio, 3.6; P=.06) and have longer neonatal intensive care unit stays (P=.005). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in mode of delivery by modified World Health Organization cardiac classification, and mode of delivery was not associated with risk of severe maternal morbidity. Despite the overall increased risk of morbidity in the higher-risk group, vaginal delivery should be considered as an option for certain patients with well-compensated cardiac disease. However, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Continuous glucose monitor use in type 2 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether continuous glucose monitor use in type 2 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane library from inception through May 9, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies that compared continuous glucose monitor use with fingerstick glucose monitoring in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The initial search yielded 2463 unique citations that were screened in Covidence by 2 independent reviewers. Study types included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies. Our outcomes of interest were macrosomia or large-for-gestational-age infants, hemoglobin A1c, cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preeclampsia, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of estimates from 2 studies without risk of significant bias and reported summary adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis of 56 women with continuous glucose monitor use and 53 control women without continuous glucose monitor use showed that there was no difference in the incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants between continuous glucose monitor users and standard-of-care controls (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.78) with an I2 of 0%. In addition, there was no difference in the development of preeclampsia between continuous glucose monitor users and standard-of-care controls (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-7.22) with an I2 of 0%. CONCLUSION: Continuous glucose monitor use was not associated with improved perinatal outcomes as assessed by large-for-gestational-age infants and preeclampsia. This review is limited by the small amount of data available for this population, and further research is needed.

Clinical Factors Associated with Intrapartum Presentation Change after Mechanical Cervical Ripening.

OBJECTIVE: The use of mechanical cervical ripening with balloon devices is common during induction of labor; however, there is risk for displacement of the fetal presenting part during its insertion. This study sought to investigate the clinical risk factors associated with an intrapartum presentation change from cephalic to noncephalic presentation after mechanical cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a multicenter retrospective study that abstracted detailed labor and delivery information from electronic medical records in 19 hospitals across the United States. All women with fetal cephalic confirmed position on admission undergoing induction of labor with mechanical cervical ripening were included. Women who had a cesarean delivery for noncephalic presentation were compared with women who had a vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery for other indications. Models were adjusted for nulliparity, multiple gestation, and gestational age. RESULTS: A total of 3,462 women met inclusion criteria, with 1.3% (n = 46) having an intrapartum presentation change from cephalic to noncephalic presentation after mechanical cervical ripening. Those who had a cesarean delivery for an intrapartum presentation change were more likely to be nulliparous (82.6 vs. 65.4%, p = 0.01), less than 34 weeks' gestation (6.5 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.02), and have twins (6.5 vs. 1.2%, p = 0.02). In adjusted analysis, twins were associated with an increased odds of cesarean delivery for intrapartum presentation change (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-15.77), whereas multiparity reduced the odds (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.82). CONCLUSION: Nulliparity and multifetal gestation are associated with a cesarean delivery for an intrapartum presentation change after mechanical cervical ripening. KEY POINTS: · Intrapartum presentation change after mechanical cervical ripening is low at 1.3%.. · Nulliparity and multifetal gestation are associated with a cesarean delivery for presentation change.. · There were no significant differences in neonatal morbidity by delivery status to delivery type..

Procalcitonin levels in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: The utility of procalcitonin to identify obstetric sepsis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the mean (range) procalcitonin in pregnancy among healthy women not in labor (group 1), healthy women in labor (group 2), and women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) without clinical chorioamnionitis (group 3). SEARCH STRATEGY: NLM PubMed, Elsevier Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 21, 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Ten or more pregnant women with procalcitonin reported at more than 20 weeks of pregnancy, with information on labor, PPROM, and infection. Exclusions were major medical comorbidities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each abstract and full-text review was independently reviewed by the same two authors. Quality was reviewed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: The systematic review included 25 studies: 10 (40%) of good quality and 15 (60%) of poor quality. The meta-analysis included 21 studies. Mean procalcitonin in group 1 was 0.092 ng/mL (range 0.036-0.049 ng/mL), in group 2 it was 0.130 ng/mL (range 0.049-0.259 ng/mL), and in group 3 it was 0.345 ng/mL (range 0.005-1.292 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Among healthy pregnant women not in labor, procalcitonin levels are comparable to those in non-pregnant adults and may be useful in identifying infection. Procalcitonin levels in other groups overlap abnormal values of procalcitonin in non-pregnant adults, and may not discriminate infection among women in labor or with obstetric comorbidities. PROSPERO: CRD42020157376, registered 4/28/2020.

Trends in Screening for Diabetes in Early Pregnancy in the United States.

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize current diabetes screening practices in the first trimester of pregnancy in the United States, evaluate patient characteristics and risk factors associated with early diabetes screening, and compare perinatal outcomes by early diabetes screening. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of US medical claims data of persons diagnosed with a viable intrauterine pregnancy and who presented for care with private insurance before 14 weeks of gestation, without pre-existing pregestational diabetes, from the IBM MarketScan® database for the period January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate perinatal outcomes. Results: A total of 400,588 pregnancies were identified as eligible for inclusion, with 18.0% of persons receiving early screening for diabetes. Of those with laboratory order claims, 53.1% underwent hemoglobin A1c testing, 30.0% underwent fasting glucose testing, and 16.9% underwent oral glucose tolerance testing. Compared with those who did not undergo early diabetes screening, those who did were more likely to be older; obese; having a history of gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, polycystic ovarian syndrome, or hyperlipidemia; and having a family history of diabetes. In adjusted logistic regression, history of gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio 3.99; 95% confidence interval 3.73-4.26) had the strongest association with early diabetes screening. Adverse perinatal outcomes, including a higher rate of cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes, occurred more frequently among women who underwent early diabetes screening. Conclusions: First-trimester early diabetes screening was mostly commonly performed by hemoglobin A1c evaluation, and persons who underwent early diabetes screening were more likely to experience adverse perinatal outcomes.

Clinical characteristics and subsequent need for anti-hypertensive agents in the postpartum period for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify clinical characteristics of patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy associated with requiring multiple anti-hypertensive medications to optimize blood pressure in the postpartum setting. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all women who had a diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy who delivered at a single institution between October 1, 2017 and May 1, 2021. Demographics and clinical characteristics including category of anti-hypertensive medication and number of medications were collected. Models were adjusted for race. RESULTS: A total of 1,708 women were identified for inclusion. Of this cohort, 64.9 % did not require any anti-hypertensive medications, while 24.8 % used one medication and 10.2 % required two or more medications. When comparing women by the number of medications that were required, their demographics were similar except for race (p < 0.001). Women taking two or more medications were most prescribed a beta blocker (94.9 %) followed by a calcium channel blocker (88.6 %). Women with a history of chronic hypertension had the highest risk of requiring two or more medications for blood pressure control (adjusted RR 11.19, 95 % CI 2.63-47.60). Chronic kidney disease also significantly increased the risk of requiring two or more medications (adjusted RR 3.09, 95 % CI 1.24-7.69). CONCLUSION: Women with chronic hypertension and chronic kidney disease are at increased risk for requiring multiple anti-hypertensive medications in the postpartum setting. We recommend frequent postpartum visits, either in person or implementing telemedicine platforms to optimize blood pressure control for this high-risk cohort.

Innovating Evaluation and Treatment of Intrapartum Fevers: Where Do We Go from Here?

As intrapartum fevers are not always infectious in origin, determining whether antibiotics are indicated is challenging. We previously sought to create a point-of-care calculator using clinical data available at the time of an intrapartum fever to identify the subset of women who require antibiotic treatment to avoid maternal and neonatal morbidity. Despite the use of a comprehensive dataset from our institutions, we were unable to propose a valid and highly predictive model. In this commentary, we discuss why our model failed, as well as future research directions to identify and treat true intraamniotic infection. Developing a risk-stratification model is paramount to minimizing maternal and neonatal exposure to unnecessary antibiotics while allowing for early identification of women and babies at risk for infectious morbidity. KEY POINTS: · Determining whether antibiotics are indicated in intrapartum fever is challenging.. · Developing a risk-stratification model for febrile laboring women is critical to decreasing harm.. · A point-of-care calculator based on clinical and biomarker data is the necessary approach..

Screening test characteristics and comparison of diabetes outcomes among pregnant patients with prediabetes.

This study sought to compare test characteristics of hemoglobin A1c, oral glucose tolerance test and fasting plasma glucose for the development of gestational diabetes among women with prediabetes. Diabetes outcomes were compared by screening test used for prediabetes diagnosis among a retrospective cohort of pregnant patients between 2017-2021. During the study, 8132 patients received diabetes screening and 14.0% met criteria for prediabetes. By screening test, 75.1% were screened with hemoglobin A1c, 10.0% with fasting plasma glucose and 14.9% with a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Hemoglobin A1c had the highest positive predictive value (67.2%). Use of hemoglobin A1c was significantly more likely to identify women with GDM than oral glucose tolerance test (aOR 3.94, 95% CI 2.30-6.73). In this study cohort, hemoglobin A1c was able to identify patients that were more likely to develop GDM in an at-risk population.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Prediabetes is becoming more common in the general population; however little is known about prediabetes in pregnancy. Women with prediabetes in pregnancy appear to be at increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus, however there is minimal information about various screening tests performance in pregnancy for detection of prediabetes and subsequent gestational diabetes.What do the results of this study add? The results of this study compare three commonly used screening tests for screening for diabetes. When identifying women with prediabetes, they are at increased risk for developing gestational diabetes mellitus if identified by hemoglobin A1c.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The clinical implication of this study is that women can be screened with hemoglobin A1c in early pregnancy for both overt diabetes, but also may be identified as high risk with prediabetes. Among women with prediabetes by hemoglobin A1c, they remain at high risk for developing gestational diabetes mellitus.

The Association Between Acculturation and Diet and Physical Activity Among Pregnant Hispanic Women with Abnormal Glucose Tolerance.

Background: Hispanic women are disproportionately affected by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), yet few studies have assessed the impact of acculturation on health behaviors that may reduce GDM risk. Materials and Methods: We assessed relationships between acculturation and meeting American Diabetes Association guidelines for macronutrient intake and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for physical activity (PA) using baseline data from Estudio Project Aiming to Reduce Type twO diabetes, a randomized trial conducted in Massachusetts (2013-2017) among 255 Hispanic pregnant women with hyperglycemia. Acculturation was assessed via the Psychological Acculturation Scale, duration of time and generation in the continental United States, and language preference; diet with 24-hours dietary recalls; and PA with the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ). Results: The majority of participants who reported low psychological acculturation (74.9%), preferred English (78.4%), were continental U.S. born (58.0%), and lived in the continental United States ≥5 years (91.4%). A total of 44.8%, 81.8%, 22.9%, and 4.6% of women met guidelines for carbohydrate, protein, fat, and fiber intakes, respectively; 31.9% met guidelines for PA. Women with higher acculturation were less likely to meet carbohydrate guidelines (English preference: adjusted risk ratios [aRR] 0.45, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.23-0.75; U.S. born: aRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.91; duration of time in United States: aRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99). Women with higher acculturation were more likely to meet PA guidelines (U.S. born: aRR 1.95, 95% CI 1.11-3.44). Conclusions: In summary, higher acculturation was associated with lower likelihood of meeting dietary guidelines but greater likelihood of meeting PA guidelines during pregnancy. Interventions aimed at reducing GDM in Hispanics should be culturally informed and incorporate acculturation. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01679210.

Identifying barriers, facilitators, and interventions to support healthy eating in pregnant women with or at risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Background: Heart-healthy diets are important in the prevention and treatment of hypertension (HTN), including among pregnant women. Yet, the barriers, facilitators, and beliefs/preferences regarding healthy eating are not well described in this population. Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators to healthy diet, examine the prevalence of food insecurity, and determine interest in specific healthy diet interventions. Methods: Pregnant women, aged 18-50 years (N = 38), diagnosed with HTN, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP), or risk factors for HDP, were recruited from a large academic medical center in central Massachusetts between June 2020 and June 2022. Participants completed an electronic survey using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Results: The mean age of participants was 31.6 years (SD 5.5) and 35.1% identified as Hispanic. Finances and time were major barriers to a healthy diet, reported by 42.1% and 28.9% of participants, respectively. Participants reported that their partners and families were supportive of healthy eating and preparing meals at home, though 30.0% of those with children considered their children's diet a barrier to preparing healthy meals. Additionally, 40.5% of the sample were considered food insecure. Everyone agreed that healthy diet was important for maternal and fetal health, and the most popular interventions were healthy ingredient grocery deliveries (89.4%) and meal deliveries (84.2%). Conclusion: Time and cost emerged as major challenges to healthy eating in these pregnant women. Such barriers, facilitators, and preferences can aid in intervention development and policy-level changes to mitigate obstacles to healthy eating in this vulnerable patient population.

Cardiac and Obstetric Outcomes Associated With Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common valvular heart disease in women of reproductive age. Whether MVP increases the likelihood of adverse outcomes in pregnancy is unknown. The study objective was to examine the cardiac and obstetric outcomes associated with MVP in pregnant women. This retrospective cohort study, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Readmission Sample database between 2010 and 2017, identified all pregnant women with MVP using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth and Tenth Revisions codes. The maternal cardiac and obstetric outcomes in pregnant women diagnosed with MVP were compared with women without MVP using multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for baseline demographic characteristics. There were 23,000 pregnancy admissions with MVP with an overall incidence of 16.9 cases per 10,000 pregnancy admissions. Pregnant women with MVP were more likely to die during pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 5.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 24.16), develop cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.44, 95% CI 1.04 to 18.89), arrhythmia (aOR 10.96, 95% CI 9.17 to 13.12), stroke (aOR 6.90, 95% CI 1.26 to 37.58), heart failure (aOR 5.81, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.79), or suffer a coronary artery dissection (aOR 25.22, 95% CI 3.42 to 186.07) compared with women without MVP. Pregnancies with MVP were also associated with increased risks of preterm delivery (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.44) and preeclampsia/hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.41). In conclusion, MVP in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal cardiac outcomes and higher obstetric risks.

Comparison of intrapartum glycemic management strategies in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Achieving intrapartum maternal euglycemia in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is critical to reducing the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes among women with T1DM by different intrapartum glycemic control strategies of continuation of subcutaneous insulin pumps versus intravenous insulin infusion. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify all women with type 1 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy between 1 October 2017 and 1 August 2020 at our tertiary medical center. Medical records were reviewed for sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and perinatal outcomes. A composite neonatal outcome was created to include one or more of the following outcomes: 5-minute APGAR less than 7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, or respiratory distress. RESULTS: We identified 75 women with T1DM that met inclusion criteria, 27(36%) who remained on their subcutaneous insulin pump and 48(64%) who were transitioned to intravenous insulin infusion intrapartum. Women that continued subcutaneous insulin were more likely to be older (30.5 vs. 28.1, p = .04), multiparous (74% vs. 50%, p = .042), and have a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) (93% vs. 43%, p < .001). There was no difference in maternal hypoglycemic events (14.8% vs. 18.8%, p = .76) or severe hyperglycemia (greater than 250 mg/dL)/development of diabetic ketoacidosis (3.7% vs. 4.2%, p = .99) in labor between both groups. There was no difference in neonatal composite outcome when adjusted for gestational age at delivery, maternal age, parity, and CGM use for both groups (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.12-4.43, p = .728). CONCLUSION: Continuation of subcutaneous insulin in the intrapartum period appears to be a reasonable option in women with T1DM, however future, larger studies are needed to confirm this. Both patient and provider must be comfortable with this intrapartum strategy for effective glycemic control.

Early Diagnosis of Prediabetes among Pregnant Women that Develop Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Influence on Perinatal Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Purpose of this study was to determine whether early identification of impaired glucose tolerance consistent with prediabetes among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the first trimester impacts maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were screened for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy at a large academic tertiary care center from October 1, 2017, to January 31, 2021, and who subsequently developed GDM. Demographic and perinatal outcomes were compared among women with GDM with a positive early diabetes screen consistent with prediabetes to women who screened negative in the first trimester. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for baseline demographic differences. RESULTS: During the study period, 260 women screened had negative first trimester diabetes screening and subsequently developed GDM, while 696 screened positive for prediabetes and developed GDM. Women with prediabetes were more likely to require insulin treatment for their GDM compared with those that screened negative (79.5 vs. 45.4%, p < 0.001), while those who screened negative were more likely to take an oral medication of metformin or glyburide for GDM management than those with prediabetes (41.5 vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001). Infants born to mothers who screened positive for prediabetes were more likely to require neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission compared with those who screened negative even when adjusted for type of GDM treatment used (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 8.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-49.9). CONCLUSION: Women identified as having early impaired glucose tolerance consistent with prediabetes that subsequently develop GDM are more likely to be prescribed insulin treatment and may be at increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes leading to NICU admission than women with negative first trimester diabetes screening. Future studies should focus on whether different methods of early treatment and/or intervention improve perinatal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Prediabetes in early pregnancy is associated with higher rates of insulin treatment for GDM.. · Prediabetes in pregnancy increases the risk of developing GDM.. · Prediabetes in early pregnancy is associated with higher rates of NICU admission..