Investigating the effect of an online enhanced care program on the emotional and physical wellbeing of patients discharged from hospital with acute decompensated heart failure: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial: Enhanced care program for heart failure.

Objective: Depression is highly prevalent and associated with increased hospitalisations and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). This study will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online wellbeing program for patients discharged from hospital with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in (i) improving emotional and physical wellbeing, and (ii) decreasing healthcare utilisation. Methods: Two-arm randomised controlled trial. Eligible patients with ADHF will be recruited pre-discharge from two hospitals. Five hundred and seventy participants will be randomised to receive the intervention (online enhanced care program for HF: 'Enhanced HF Care') or usual care. Enhanced HF Care includes health education (11 micro-learning modules) and monitoring of depression and clinical outcomes via fortnightly/monthly surveys for 6 months, with participants offered tailored advice via video email and SMS. Cardiac nurses track real-time patient data from a dashboard and receive automated email alerts when patients report medium- or high-risk levels of depression or clinical symptoms, to action where needed. General practitioners also receive automated alerts if patients report medium- or high-risk survey responses and are encouraged to schedule a patient consultation. Results: Sixty-five participants enrolled to-date. Co-primary outcomes ('Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire' Emotional and Physical subscales) and healthcare utilisation (secondary outcome) at 1- and 6-month post-recruitment will be compared between treatment arms using linear mixed effects regression models. Conclusions: This study has the potential to reduce the burden of depression for patients with HF by prioritising urgent mental health needs and clinical symptoms while simultaneously empowering patients with self-care knowledge. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered via the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622001289707. Issue date: 4 October 2022.

Integrating Cardio-Oncology Across the Research Pipeline, Policy, and Practice in Australia-An Australian Cardiovascular Alliance Perspective.

Over 18 million people worldwide were diagnosed with cancer in 2020, including over 150,000 people in Australia. Although improved early detection and treatment have increased the survival rates, cardiotoxic treatment and inadequate management of cardiovascular risk factors have resulted in cardiovascular disease (CVD) being one of the leading causes of non-cancer-related death and disability among cancer survivors. International guidelines outline the standards of care for CVD risk surveillance and management. However, Australian cardio-oncology policies and clinical guidelines are limited. There is increasing growth of cardio-oncology research in Australia and support from leading Australian professional bodies and advocacy and research networks, including the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, the National Heart Foundation of Australia, and the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance (ACvA). Thus, opportunities to drive multidisciplinary cardio-oncology initiatives are growing, including grant funding, position statements, and novel research to inform new policies. The ACvA has a unique flagship structure that spans the translational research pipeline from drug discovery to implementation science. This article aims to highlight how multidisciplinary cardio-oncology innovations could intersect with the seven ACvA flagships, and to showcase Australian achievements in cardio-oncology thus far. We summarise eight key priority areas for future cardio-oncology research that emerged. These strategies will strengthen cardio-oncology research and care in Australia, and drive new guidelines, policies, and government initiatives to ensure equity in health outcomes for all cardio-oncology patients.

Unchanged cellular inflammatory response following recurrent ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) are associated with poorer prognosis. A diminished haematopoietic response has been proposed as the mechanism responsible for this, but has yet to be validated in human studies. We therefore aim to map out the leukocyte response, and its subtypes, following the first and second STEMI to identify if the inflammatory response is dampened after recurrent myocardial infarctions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with recurrent STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Full blood counts were taken within 24 h of each admission, and daily thereafter. The primary outcome was whether there were any qualitative or quantitative difference in leukocyte cell response (and its subtypes) between first and second STEMI. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (mean age 59 years [SD 14.9], 26 males [83.9%]) with an average of 3.1 years between infarcts were included in the study. Overall, between first and second STEMI, similar mean leukocyte response (and its subtypes) was observed from admission to day three post PCI. Similarly, the peak leukocyte response (and its subtypes) was similar between the two STEMIs, even after adjusting for infarct size. CONCLUSIONS: In recurrent STEMIs, there is no long-term memory effect on the cellular inflammatory response leading to diminished peripherally circulating leucocytes, and its subtypes.

Preparation for cardiac procedures: a cross-sectional study identifying gaps between outpatients' views and experiences of patient-centred care.

BACKGROUND: To examine and identify gaps in care perceived as essential by patients; this study examined outpatients': 1) views on what characterises essential care and 2) experiences of care received, in relation to cardiac catheterisation and subsequent cardiovascular procedures. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Surveys were posted to outpatients who had undergone elective cardiac catheterisation in the prior six months at an Australian hospital. Participants completed a 65-item survey to determine: a) aspects of care they perceive as essential to patients receiving care for a cardiac condition (Important Care Survey); or b) their actual care received (Actual Care Survey). Numbers and percentages were used to calculate the most frequently identified essential care items; and the experiences of care received. Items rated as either 'Essential'/'Very important' by at least 80% of participants were determined. A gap in patient-centred care was identified as being any item that was endorsed as essential/very important by 80% or more of participants but reported as received by less than 80% of participants. RESULTS: Of 582 eligible patients, 264 (45%) returned a completed survey. 43/65 items were endorsed by > 80% of participants as essential. Of those, for 22 items, <80% reported the care as received. Gaps were identified in relation to GP consultation (1 item), preparation (1 item) subsequent decision making for treatment (1 item), prognosis (6 items) and post-treatment follow-up (1 item). CONCLUSIONS: Areas were identified where actual care fell short of patients' perceptions of essential care.

Cardiovascular outcomes of cancer patients in rural Australia.

Background: Cancer and heart disease are the two most common health conditions in the world, associated with high morbidity and mortality, with even worse outcomes in regional areas. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in cancer survivors. We aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of patients receiving cancer treatment (CT) in a regional hospital. Methods: This was an observational retrospective cohort study in a single rural hospital over a ten-year period (17th February 2010 to 19th March 2019). Outcomes of all patients receiving CT during this period were compared to those who were admitted to the hospital without a cancer diagnosis. Results: 268 patients received CT during the study period. High rates of cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension (52.2%), smoking (54.9%), and dyslipidaemia (38.4%) were observed in the CT group. Patients who had CT were more likely to be readmitted with ACS (5.9% vs. 2.8% p = 0.005) and AF (8.2% vs. 4.5% p = 0.006) when compared to the general admission cohort. There was a statistically significant difference observed for all cause cardiac readmission, with a higher rate observed in the CT group (17.1% vs. 13.2% p = 0.042). Patients undergoing CT had a higher rate of mortality (49.5% vs. 10.2%, p ≤ 0.001) and shorter time (days) from first admission to death (401.06 vs. 994.91, p ≤ 0.001) when compared to the general admission cohort, acknowledging this reduction in survival may be driven at least in part by the cancer itself. Conclusion: There is an increased incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including higher readmission rate, higher mortality rate and shorter survival in people undergoing cancer treatment in rural environments. Rural cancer patients demonstrated a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors.

Established and Emerging Cancer Therapies and Cardiovascular System: Focus on Hypertension-Mechanisms and Mitigation.

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are 2 of the leading causes of death worldwide. Although improvements in outcomes have been noted for both disease entities, the success of cancer therapies has come at the cost of at times very impactful adverse events such as cardiovascular events. Hypertension has been noted as both, a side effect as well as a risk factor for the cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. Some of these dynamics are in keeping with the role of hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor not only for heart failure, but also for the development of coronary and cerebrovascular disease, and kidney disease and its association with a higher morbidity and mortality overall. Other aspects such as the molecular mechanisms underlying the amplification of acute and long-term cardiotoxicity risk of anthracyclines and increase in blood pressure with various cancer therapeutics remain to be elucidated. In this review, we cover the latest clinical data regarding the risk of hypertension across a spectrum of novel anticancer therapies as well as the underlying known or postulated pathophysiological mechanisms. Furthermore, we review the acute and long-term implications for the amplification of the development of cardiotoxicity with drugs not commonly associated with hypertension such as anthracyclines. An outline of management strategies, including pharmacological and lifestyle interventions as well as models of care aimed to facilitate early detection and more timely management of hypertension in patients with cancer and survivors concludes this review, which overall aims to improve both cardiovascular and cancer-specific outcomes.

Early access to a cardio-oncology clinic in an Australian context: a qualitative exploration of patient experiences.

BACKGROUND: Dedicated cardio-oncology services are emerging rapidly around the world in order to provide cardiovascular care (CV) for cancer patients. The perspectives of patients regarding their experience of cardiac surveillance during their cancer journey has not been qualitatively evaluated. METHODS: An interpretative qualitative study. Fifteen, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a diverse range of community dwelling patients who attended a newly established cardio-oncology clinic in a large regional city in Australia. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Key themes were identified: (1) Access to a cardio-oncology clinic promotes information and understanding, (2) The experience of early CV intervention, (3) Factors promoting integrated care, (4) Balancing cancer treatment and CV symptoms and (5) Managing past and emerging CV risk factors. CONCLUSION: As cardio oncology clinics continue to emerge, this study confirms the benefit of early access to a cardiologist for management of existing or emerging CV risk factors and diseases in the context of cancer treatment. Participants valued the opportunity for regular monitoring and management of CV issues that enabled them to continue cancer treatment. However, we identified gaps in education and support towards making positive lifestyle changes that reduce the risk of CV diseases in cancer patients.

Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients in Rural Australia: The MORACS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in rural settings involves thrombolysis followed by transfer to a percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospital. The first step is accurate diagnosis via electrocardiography (ECG), but one-third of all STEMI incidents go unrecognized and hence untreated. Objective: To reduce missed diagnoses of STEMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial included 29 hospital emergency departments (EDs) in rural Australia with no emergency medicine specialists, which were randomized to usual care vs automatically triggered diagnostic support from the tertiary referral hospital (management of rural acute coronary syndromes [MORACS] intervention). Patients presenting with symptoms compatible with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) were eligible for inclusion. The study was conducted from December 2018 to April 2020. Data were analyzed in August 2021. Intervention: Triage of a patient with symptoms compatible with ACS triggered an automated notification to the tertiary hospital coronary care unit. The ECG and point-of-care troponin results were reviewed remotely and a phone call was made to the treating physician in the rural hospital to assist with diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients with missed STEMI diagnoses. Results: A total of 6249 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [12.2] years; 48% female). Of 7474 ED presentations with suspected ACS, STEMI accounted for 77 (2.0%) in usual care hospitals and 46 (1.3%) in MORACS hospitals. Missed diagnosis of STEMI occurred in 27 of 77 presentations (35%) in usual care hospitals and 0 of 46 (0%) in MORACS hospitals (P < .001). Of eligible patients, 48 of 75 (64%) in the usual care group and 36 of 36 (100%) in the MORACS group received primary reperfusion (P < .001). In the usual care group, 12-month mortality was 10.3% (n = 8) vs 6.5% (n = 3) in the MORACS group (relative risk, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.18-2.23). Patients with missed STEMI diagnoses had a mortality of 25.9% (n = 7) compared with 2.0% (n = 1) for those with accurately diagnosed STEMI (relative risk, 13.2; 95% CI, 1.71-102.00; P = .001). Overall, there were 6 patients who did not have STEMI as a final diagnosis; 5 had takotsubo cardiomyopathy and 1 had pericarditis. There was no difference between groups in the rate of alternative final diagnosis. Conclusion and Relevance: The findings indicate that MORACS diagnostic support service reduced the proportion of missed STEMI and improved the rates of primary reperfusion therapy. Accurate diagnosis of STEMI was associated with lower mortality. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12619000533190.

Reperfusion After Fibrinolytic Therapy (RAFT): An open-label, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of bivalirudin versus heparin in rescue percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy profile of bivalirudin has not been examined in a randomised controlled trial of patients undergoing rescue PCI. OBJECTIVES: We conducted an open-label, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial to compare bivalirudin with heparin ± glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in patients undergoing rescue PCI. METHODS: Between 2010-2015, we randomly assigned 83 patients undergoing rescue PCI to bivalirudin (n = 42) or heparin ± GPIs (n = 41). The primary safety endpoint was any ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) bleeding at 90 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was infarct size measured by peak troponin levels as a multiple of the local upper reference limit (Tn/URL). Secondary endpoints included periprocedural change in haemoglobin adjusted for red cells transfused, TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) bleeding, ST-segment recovery and infarct size determined by the Selvester QRS score. RESULTS: The trial was terminated due to slow recruitment and futility after an interim analysis of 83 patients. The primary safety endpoint occurred in 6 (14%) patients in the bivalirudin group (4.8% GPIs) and 3 (7.3%) in the heparin ± GPIs group (54% GPIs) (risk ratio, 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-7.3, P = 0.48). Infarct size was similar between the two groups (mean Tn/URL, 730 [±675] for bivalirudin, versus 984 [±1585] for heparin ± GPIs, difference, 254, 95% CI, -283-794, P = 0.86). There was a smaller decrease in the periprocedural haemoglobin level with bivalirudin than heparin ± GPIs (-7.5% [±15] versus -14% [±17], difference, -6.5%, 95% CI, -0.83-14, P = 0.0067). The rate of complete (≥70%) ST-segment recovery post-PCI was higher in patients randomised to heparin ± GPIs compared with bivalirudin. CONCLUSIONS: Whether bivalirudin compared with heparin ± GPI reduces bleeding in rescue PCI could not be determined. Slow recruitment and futility in the context of lower-than-expected bleeding event rates led to the termination of this trial (ANZCTR.org.au, ACTRN12610000152022).

Ischaemic Heart Disease Mortality Increased With Weekend Admission: Results From a Large, Comprehensive Admission Cohort in Australia.

BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of the "weekend effect", whereby patient outcomes are significantly worse for those admitted to hospital on the weekend as compared to weekdays, is well-documented in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the literature. We sought to assess the effect of the time of a patient's admission on outcomes across an entire cardiology admissions cohort and explore other factors that have been previously identified or proposed to influence these outcomes, including admissions out-of-hours, and patient transfers from other facilities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving cardiology admissions at a large tertiary referral centre across a 6-year period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017. Outcomes were in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality rates as well as length-of-stay, and readmission rate. 14,078 patients admitted under a cardiologist across the 6-year period were identified, with 3,029 elective patients excluded. Patients were stratified into weekday (n=8,951) or weekend (n=2,098) categories. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality for weekend admissions was noted to be significantly higher compared to weekday admissions (adj OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.40-2.28; p<0.001). Mortality for weekend admissions was also higher at 30-days (adj OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.39-2.17; p<0.001) and at 1-year (adj OR 1.33 95% CI 1.14-1.55; p<0.001). Adjusted for diagnosis, there was a significant increase in in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality seen only for weekend admissions with the final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: We have identified an association between weekend admissions and higher in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality for the final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in our cardiology admissions data over an extended period of time, although confounders cannot be completely discounted. Any steps to reduce the weekend effect need to move to a system where weekend practices are not substantially different to a usual business day. The question of whether changes in organisation practice and the increased costs incurred would reduce mortality in this high-risk group needs to be addressed by further directed research.

Impact of Delay in Surgery on Outcome in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Revascularisation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of critical coronary artery disease, including after acute coronary syndrome presentation (ACS), represents an important indication for early coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The study aims to investigate the influence of time from diagnosis to CABG on outcomes and document barriers to early revascularisation. METHODS: All patients 18 years and older with an acute presentation due to ACS or critical coronary artery disease who were considered to require urgent inpatient cardiac surgery between January 2016-February 2019 were included in the study. The primary endpoints were 30-day all-cause mortality or readmission, 1-year all-cause mortality, all-cause readmission. The secondary endpoint was the rate of complications while waiting for surgery. The time duration between diagnostic coronary angiography and surgery was considered as the time interval. RESULTS: Of 266 eligible patients, 251 underwent surgical revascularisation with 15 (6%) not undergoing surgery due to preoperative complications (n=12) or due to perceived prohibitively high surgical risk (n=3). The majority (85%) were male (mean age 67 years), 37% of patients had diabetes and 71% had hypertension. Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction was documented in 51% of the patients. The median time between diagnosis and inpatient CABG was 7 days (IQR 5-11). Thirty-five per cent (35%) of patients experienced complications while awaiting surgery. Of the 266 patients, 140 patients (53% - cohort 1) underwent surgery within 7 days. The cohort 1 rate of complications was lower than in cohort 2 (surgery after 7 days) (24 vs 47%, p<0.001). Moreover, 1-year mortality was less in cohort 1 (2 vs 8%, p=0.029). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring urgent inpatient CABG, delay for more than 7 days is associated with a higher rate of in-hospital complications and worse 30 day and 12-month outcomes.

Factors Associated with Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Cancer Patients Treated with Bevacizumab.

Background: Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody commonly used for the treatment of various cancers, is often associated with adverse cardiovascular effects such as hypertension, cardiac and cerebral ischemia, thrombosis, and bleeding events. Factors associated with increased risks of adverse cardiovascular effects with bevacizumab have not been intensively studied. In this study, we determined factors associated with hospital admissions due to cardiovascular complications in patients who received bevacizumab for cancer treatment. Methods and Results: We retrospectively collected data for all patients treated with bevacizumab between the 1st January 2016 and the 31st December 2017 at the Hunter New England Local Health District. Patients' characteristics and their medical history were obtained from hospital electronic medical records. Outcome data were sourced from the Institutional Cardiac and Stroke Outcomes Unit database. A total of n = 230 patients (mean age 65, males n = 124 (53.9%)) were treated with bevacizumab during the study period. N = 28 patients were admitted to hospital for a major cardiovascular-related event. Higher total treatment dose (p < 0.05), concomitant hypertension (p = 0.005), diabetes (p = 0.04), atrial fibrillation (p = 0.03), and lack of use of statin therapy (p = 0.03) were key contributors to hospital admission. Conclusions: Results of our study highlight the fact that patients with concomitant baseline cardiovascular disease/risk factors are at an increased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization related to bevacizumab treatment. Careful baseline cardiovascular assessment may be an essential step to minimize cardiovascular complications.

Nursing-led ultrasound to aid in trans-radial access in cardiac catheterisation: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Trans-radial access is increasingly common for cardiac catheterisation. Benefits include reduced bleeding complications, length of hospital stay and costs. AIMS: To determine the feasibility of implementing a nurse-led ultrasound programme to measure radial artery diameter before and after cardiac catheterisation; to determine radial artery occlusion (RAO) rates, risk factors for RAO and predictors of radial artery (RA) diameter. METHOD: A prospective observational cohort study design for 100 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation, using RA access. Pre- and post-procedural RA diameter were measured using ultrasound, by specialist nurses trained to do so. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for RAO and predictors of RA diameter with results reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were no adverse events, supporting the feasibility of nurse led ultrasound programmes. A 4% (n = 4) rate of occlusion was observed. Haemostasis device application time of greater than 190 min was a predictor of RAO (OR 3.12, 95% CI 0.31-31). Male gender and height were predictors for a RA diameter of >2.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses can lead the assessment of RA occlusion using ultrasound to enhance planning and care, including monitoring compression times to reduce RAO.

Pre-hospital thrombolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in regional Australia: long-term follow up.

BACKGROUND: Delivering reperfusion therapy to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in regional areas without access to tertiary cardiology care remains challenging. The systems of care in Hunter New England Health, New South Wales, Australia (area covered = 130 000 km2 ) to provide reperfusion to patients with STEMI involve a 12-lead electrocardiogram in the ambulance, discussion between cardiologist and paramedic, followed by pre-hospital thrombolysis (PHT) delivered in ambulance to appropriate patients >60 min from the cardiac catheterisation laboratories. Patients who can access the cardiac catheterisation laboratories within 60 min are treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: We have previously reported excellent 12-month outcomes for patients receiving PHT and the aim of the current analysis is to look at the long term outcomes. METHODS: We assessed long-term all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events of STEMI patients undergoing PHT in our health district from August 2008 to August 2013 and compared with the primary PCI group. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty (mean age: 62 ± 13 years, males: 76%, n = 114) patients were administered PHT and 334 patients (mean age: 65 ± 13 years, males: 75%, n = 251) underwent primary PCI during the study period. During a median follow up of 6.2 years (interquartile range: 4.8-7.4 years) all-cause mortality was 16% and 19% in the PHT and primary PCI groups respectively (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Our real-world experience shows that PHT followed by early transfer to a primary PCI-capable centre is an effective reperfusion strategy, with comparable results to primary PCI, and mortality benefits are sustained to more than 6 years.

Contemporary trends in stroke complicating cardiac catheterisation.

BACKGROUND: Stroke remains an important complication of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with high rates of in-hospital mortality. AIMS: To evaluate the incidence of stroke over a 10-year period and assess the long-term influence of stroke following cardiac catheterisation and PCI on functional outcomes, based on modified Rankin score and mortality. METHODS: The study was performed using a case-control design in a single tertiary referral centre. Patients were identified by correlating those patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation between October 2006 and December 2016 with patients who underwent neuroimaging within 7 days to identify possible cases of suspected stroke or transient ischaemic attack. RESULTS: A total of 21 510 patients underwent cardiac catheterisation during the study period. Sixty (0.28%) patients experienced stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Compared to control patients, those who did experience cerebral ischaemic events were older (70.5 vs 64 years; P < 0.001), with higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Stroke complicating cardiac catheterisation was associated with an increased risk of readmission, with a significantly higher hazard of readmission for stroke noted. Despite minimal functional impairment based on modified Rankin score, stroke was associated with a significant risk of early and cumulative mortality. Stroke incidence remained stable over the study period despite changes in procedural practice. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and functional severity of stroke remains low despite evolving procedural practice with a stable incidence over time despite changes in procedural practice; however, post-procedural stroke confirms an increased mortality hazard.

Sedation and Analgesia for Cardiac Catheterisation and Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: While cardiac catheterisation is typically well tolerated, discomfort and anxiety are commonplace. Sedation using anxiolytic and analgesic medications has the potential to ameliorate such symptoms, however, is variably employed, with lack of standardised regimens and limited evidence. METHODS: We performed a review of the role of sedation for cardiac catheterisation, including current practices and summarising available evidence relevant to diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. RESULTS: Use of sedation and the medication regimens employed are highly variable. Available relevant studies are limited in number and mostly small. Sedation appears to modestly reduce anxiety and pain in most studies. The incidence of radial spasm and the consequent need to alter access site is reduced with procedural sedation. The majority of existing evidence applies to benzodiazepines and opioid use, which appear acceptably efficacious and safe when used with appropriate training and staffing; noting opioid medications reduce the absorption of loading doses of oral anti-platelet drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, benzodiazepines and opioids result a modest reduction in pain, improved patient tolerability and reduced risk of radial artery spasm. The decision on whether to use sedation, and which agent(s) and dose, should be individualised based on patient factors, including need for oral antiplatelet therapy administration. Appropriate staffing and monitoring is essential.

Missed Acute Myocardial Infarction (MAMI) in a rural and regional setting.

BACKGROUND: Delay in treatment and/or failure to provide reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) impacts on morbidity and mortality. This occurs more often outside metropolitan areas yet the reasons for this are unclear. This study aimed to describe factors associated with missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MAMI) in a rural and regional setting. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, patients who presented with STEMI and failed to receive reperfusion therapy within four hours were identified as MAMI. Univariate analyses were undertaken to identify differences in clinical characteristics between the treated STEMI group and the MAMI group. Mortality, 30-day readmission rates and length of hospital stay are reported. RESULTS: Of 100 patients identified as MAMI (70 male, 30 female), 24 died in hospital. Demographics and time from symptom onset were similar in the treated STEMI and MAMI groups. Of the MAMI patients who died, rural hospitals recorded the highest inpatient mortality (69.6% p = 0.008). MAMI patients compared to treated STEMI patients had higher 30 day readmission (31.6% vs 3.3%, p = 0.001) and longer length of stay (5.5 vs 4.3 days p = 0.029). Inaccurate identification of STEMI on electrocardiogram (72%) and diagnostic uncertainty (65%) were associated with MAMI. The Glasgow algorithm to identify STEMI was utilised on 57% of occasions, with 93% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Mortality following MAMI is high particularly in smaller rural hospitals. MAMI results in increased length of stay and readmission rate. Electrocardiogram interpretation and diagnostic accuracy require improvement to determine if this improves patient outcomes.

Keys to Achieving Target First Medical Contact to Balloon Times and Bypassing Emergency Department More Important Than Distance.

BACKGROUND: Australian guidelines advocate primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) as the reperfusion strategy of choice for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients in whom it can be performed within 90 minutes of first medical contact; otherwise, fibrinolytic therapy is preferred. In a large health district, the reperfusion strategy is often chosen in the prehospital setting. We sought to identify a distance from a PCI centre, which made it unlikely first medical contact to balloon time (FMCTB) of less than 90 minutes could be achieved in the Hunter New England health district and to identify causes of delay in patients who were triaged to a PPCI strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 116 patients presenting via the ambulance service with STEMI from January 2016 to December 2016. In patients who were taken directly to the cardiac catheterisation lab, a maximum distance of 50 km from hospital resulted in 75% of patients receiving PCI within 90 minutes and approximately 95% of patients receiving PCI within 120 minutes. Patients who bypassed the emergency department (ED) were significantly more likely to have FMCTB of less than 90 minutes (p < 0.001) despite having a longer travel distance (28.5 km versus 17.4 km, p < 0.001). Patients transiting via the ED were significantly more likely to present out of hours (60 versus 24.2% p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who do not bypass the ED have a longer FMCTB across all spectrum of distances from the PCI centre; therefore, bypassing the ED is key to achieving target FMCTB times. Using a cutoff distance of 50 km may reduce human error in estimating travel time to our PCI centre and thereby identifying patients who should receive prehospital thrombolysis.

Common themes in patients requiring urgent cardiothoracic surgery after percutaneous coronary interventions: Case series and review of the literature.

Urgent cardiothoracic surgical intervention for the management of complications of percutaneous coronary intervention is uncommon in the stent era. Nonetheless, given increasing procedural complexity, in part reflecting an aging population, an ongoing hazard for urgent surgery remains. We sought to review the incidence and outcome of urgent cardiothoracic surgery in patients undergoing PCI in a contemporary cohort at a tertiary referral centre. The incidence of cardiothoracic intervention for PCI related complications was low at 0.1% over a ten-year period, with iatrogenic coronary artery and aortic root dissection unable to successfully managed percutaneously recurrent precipitants for surgical involvement. Procedural features associated with the need for urgent surgery are noted and methods to overcome such complications discussed.